One million retirees could be missing out on huge savings—are you one of them?

Many retirees may be missing out on valuable financial support without even realising it.

Changes to government policies have opened up new opportunities for savings, yet a surprising number of eligible Australians remain unaware.

A little-known benefit could mean thousands of dollars in extra savings each year—but are you overlooking it?


More than a million Australians had been missing out on thousands of dollars in savings through Centrelink’s Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC) simply because they didn’t realise they were eligible.

The card allowed retirees to access discounted healthcare and provided state-based concessions on essential services such as electricity, council rates, public transport, and other household bills.

It was available to Australians aged 67 and over who were not receiving Centrelink payments like the Age Pension.


image1.png
Retirees missing out on major savings. Image source: Pexel/- landsmann -


While there was no asset test, eligibility depended on an income test that had been significantly revised in recent years.

Retirement Essentials estimated that a single cardholder could save up to $3,000 annually, potentially accumulating $60,000 in benefits over two decades.

SuperEd’s chief customer officer, James Coyle, believed as many as 1.5 million self-funded retirees had been eligible but were not claiming the CSHC, while approximately 500,000 people already had the card.

‘Some of these will have high incomes from rental properties, shares, etc so may not be eligible but a conservative calculation would be in the order of one million self-funded retirees that could be eligible that are not receiving it,’ Coyle shared.


Many retirees had remained unaware of their eligibility due to changes in the income threshold, which had increased significantly over the past few years.

The government had passed legislation to raise these limits, with annual reviews tied to the Consumer Price Index.

From 20 September 2024, singles earning up to $99,025 and couples with a combined income of $158,440 could qualify for the card.

Services Australia assessed eligibility by considering adjusted taxable income along with deemed earnings from account-based pensions rather than actual income.

This deemed income was typically lower, making it easier for retirees to qualify.


Coyle explained that a retiree with $1.9 million in an account-based pension would be deemed to earn about $41,500—well below the new $99,025 threshold.

Those who qualified could check the eligibility criteria and submit an application through Centrelink’s website.

Age Pension recipients did not receive the CSHC but were instead issued a Pensioner Concession Card.

CSHC holders could access prescriptions under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for just $7.70 per script, with a yearly cap of $277.20, after which medications became free.

Bulk-billed doctor visits were also available, though participation depended on individual medical providers.


Additional state-based discounts are applied to healthcare services, ambulance cover, dental and optical care, utility bills, property and water rates, and public transport.

According to Challenger, Western Australian retirees could receive up to $32,440 in extra state-based benefits over their lifetime.

South Australians could gain $11,540, while New South Wales residents could receive an additional $5,000.

Those in Victoria, Queensland, and Tasmania, however, did not receive extra state-based concessions.


More benefits and updates—see what’s new with Centrelink.

Key Takeaways
  • Many retirees were unaware they qualified for Centrelink’s Commonwealth Seniors Health Card (CSHC), which offered discounts on healthcare, utilities, and transport.
  • Higher income thresholds made it easier to qualify, with deemed income from pensions lowering assessed earnings.
  • Up to one million retirees may have missed out on savings of up to $3,000 per year.
  • WA retirees could get $32,440 in extra state benefits, SA $11,540, and NSW $5,000, while VIC, QLD, and TAS offered none.

With thousands of retirees potentially missing out on valuable savings, do you think more should be done to raise awareness about the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Definitely more should be done to raise awareness about the pensioner concessions available to us. It's probably not advertised because it's money that the politicians will miss out on.
 
I'd love to know what the break-up of the $5,000 for NSW is - I'm the holder of the CSHC, but Canterbury-Bankstown Council apparently doesn't give me any discount for Council Rates, sadly....
 
I'd love to know what the break-up of the $5,000 for NSW is - I'm the holder of the CSHC, but Canterbury-Bankstown Council apparently doesn't give me any discount for Council Rates, sadly....
Take a look at the makeup of the councillors of the City Of Canterbury Bankstown.

The mayor is Bilal El-Hayek and his deputy is Khodr Saleh. Great true blue Aussies right there! Muslim scum in a predominantly Muslim area.

There lies the answer to your question.
 
Whilst the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card does assist with transport (train/bus) Council rates are not reduced, electricity rates are not reduced and water rates are not reduced.Certain tests are not reduced such as Xrays CTs etc. The card helps but not to the degree you state. I am a self funded retiree and I have no super and my income is less than the pension. Not all self funded retirees are wealthy. The system is unfair.
 
Take a look at the makeup of the councillors of the City Of Canterbury Bankstown.

The mayor is Bilal El-Hayek and his deputy is Khodr Saleh. Great true blue Aussies right there! Muslim scum in a predominantly Muslim area.

There lies the answer to your question.

Could you please help me here Bridgette?
I do not fully understand self funding retirement. You state you are a 'self funded retiree but have no super'. I am trying to understand how you can be self funded without super.

(Please excuse my ignorance in this subject).
Ezzy: A lot of people have very large amounts of super from which they draw an amount to live on and keep it below the limit so that they can get the CSHC and other benefits. Their investment usually attracts high interest so that the capital base usually does not diminish as they can live off and draw down the interest. If it does go down, it usually is able to be recouped when the share market bounces back. I have no super at all and no savings. My income is from rental. After paying for my home and all the other associated expenses , rates, taxes, insurances, etc. I then pay out again for the same expenses plus maintenance, management fees and all the other myriad of associated taxes. It is a passive income stream which comes with risks. If the rental return is low then the income for living expenses etc. is usually at least 30% lower than the pension. If the property is untenanted, there is no income. Most people who are self-funded retirees in this circumstance do so because being tied to a Govt. body telling you how you live your life is unpalatable. Robodebt, restricting you how much you can earn to supplement the pension, deeming (which is a joke), how long you can go overseas for without losing your pension, reporting on your bank account if you got a gift of money, waiting on line for hours to speak with someone, etc. etc. . - all the bureaucracy is just not worth the grief to some even if it means a very frugal lifestyle. We all make choices in life and accept the consequences. Regarding your question, I hope this clarifies matters for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Take a look at the makeup of the councillors of the City Of Canterbury Bankstown.

The mayor is Bilal El-Hayek and his deputy is Khodr Saleh. Great true blue Aussies right there! Muslim scum in a predominantly Muslim area.

There lies the answer to your question.

Why "name" brands over generic brands? Unfounded information is spread around regarding this.

The active ingredient in a preparation do not change with brands when considering the pharmacokinetics or bioequivalence, within statistical confidence levels.
It is not the active ingredient which changes. The problem is with the fillers and, speaking from experience, I have suffered on two occasions a considerable adverse reaction to the generic product. Not everyone is affected but some people are intolerant or allergic to the ingredients used for the fillers. It is for this reason that I will not purchase generic brands even though they are cheaper.
 
To live on $50000 on year, you would need about $1.5 million as a term deposit at the current interest rates of about 3.5%.

Not many people have that sort of cash laying around while $1000 a week rental return would give the same amount. A decent property for that amount of rent!

Forget about shares. It is just another form of gambling.
Veggie patch: Not every rental attracts $1,000 per week even though the property may be very attractive Also, you are incorrect in the maths because you have not factored in all the expense, particularly land tax payable every year as well as insurances, rates, maintenance, gardening, repairs, management fees, income tax PLUS pay for your own living expenses. A lot of paperwork and time is also involved together with having to submit records etc. to accountants and (where necessary) lawyers fees. Also, not everyone would need to draw down $50,000 per annum to live. Term deposits are not a very good mode of investment and the portfolios managed by Super Funds generally average between 5-8% per annum on the capital which is far greater than term deposits have offered for a number of years now. When mortgage rates were low, term deposits were not worth having because the interest was almost neglible and the money was tied up for a period of time which could be a problem in times of an emergency for cash reserves. Your understanding of financial matters appears to be a somewhat limited and, in that light, I took the liberty of clarifying a few matters for you. I hope you will accept it in that vein.
 
I'm getting 4.8% on my fixed term
investment currently.
That is fine. What were you getting a few years back - it was more like 1.5 to 2%. The economic landscape is never static and when investing one has to be abreast of all that is happening at a particular time and act accordingly. Investment strategies are not a "one size fits all" and each has its place and purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
That is fine. What were you getting a few years back - it was more like 1.5 to 2%. The economic landscape is never static and when investing one has to be abreast of all that is happening at a particular time and act accordingly. Investment strategies are not a "one size fits all" and each has its place and purpose.
At 78 years of age I'm happy to have 4.8% on my investment. I don't worry anymore of being a breast of what is happening . What for?
My years of property investment have given me a comfortable retirement, but those days are behind me. I just want as little stress as possible and putting up with crappy tenants is not on my agenda.
Fixed term suits me fine. I keep more than enough aside for emergenhcies.
Fixed term is safe and secure. Obviously it fluctuates and there have been bad years but there were years when I got 18%in the past, it all balances out.
I'm not dreaming of being the richest person in the graveyard. My children and grandies have already been well taken of and that is all I am concerned about.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Veggiepatch
It is not the active ingredient which changes. The problem is with the fillers and, speaking from experience, I have suffered on two occasions a considerable adverse reaction to the generic product. Not everyone is affected but some people are intolerant or allergic to the ingredients used for the fillers. It is for this reason that I will not purchase generic brands even though they are cheaper.
Fillers, also termed excipients, may, in rare cases, cause adverse reactions.

Just to compare the excipients, of the probably most used medication Australia wide, paracetamol. I will compare the "generic" Panamax and the "brand name" Panadol. The bolded are common to both brands.

Panamax - maize starch, purified talc, pregelatinised maize starch, povidone, stearic acid and potassium sorbate.

Panadol - hypromellose, pregelatinised maize starch, povidone, croscarmellose sodium, magnesium stearate, stearic acid, glycerol triacetate, carnauba wax.

I am not aware to any common allergic reaction to the excipients mentioned above.

Excipient information courtesy of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

The price difference? A mere 2.5 cents per tablet for Panamax and 18.7 cents per tablet for Panadol.

Pricing information courtesy of Chemist Warehouse.
 
Ezzy: A lot of people have very large amounts of super from which they draw an amount to live on and keep it below the limit so that they can get the CSHC and other benefits. Their investment usually attracts high interest so that the capital base usually does not diminish as they can live off and draw down the interest. If it does go down, it usually is able to be recouped when the share market bounces back. I have no super at all and no savings. My income is from rental. After paying for my home and all the other associated expenses , rates, taxes, insurances, etc. I then pay out again for the same expenses plus maintenance, management fees and all the other myriad of associated taxes. It is a passive income stream which comes with risks. If the rental return is low then the income for living expenses etc. is usually at least 30% lower than the pension. If the property is untenanted, there is no income. Most people who are self-funded retirees in this circumstance do so because being tied to a Govt. body telling you how you live your life is unpalatable. Robodebt, restricting you how much you can earn to supplement the pension, deeming (which is a joke), how long you can go overseas for without losing your pension, reporting on your bank account if you got a gift of money, waiting on line for hours to speak with someone, etc. etc. . - all the bureaucracy is just not worth the grief to some even if it means a very frugal lifestyle. We all make choices in life and accept the consequences. Regarding your question, I hope this clarifies matters for you.
Bridgette Pace: Thankyou for your time to explain these facts. I can see you have had to plan well for what you are doing & taking risks is a principle part of this. You must always be alert to the fluctuations (highs & lows), that come with rentals. There is clearly much expenditure in what you do, not only in the $ sense but also in your time. I have known self funded retirees who have been unable to receive a Pension due to the way they have set themselves up or because they had too many $'s. The Government want people to be self funded & are pushing for this to happen more in the future but they still want total control of them.

Can l just congratulate you on the choices you have made & the time & effort expended to make a self sufficient lifestyle for yourself. I guess there are times when you may feel like a Princess but other times less so.

Thankyou again for taking time to explain what you meant by your previous statement.
 
At 78 years of age I'm happy to have 4.8% on my investment. I don't worry anymore of being a breast of what is happening . What for?
My years of property investment have given me a comfortable retirement, but those days are behind me. I just want as little stress as possible and putting up with crappy tenants is not on my agenda.
Fixed term suits me fine. I keep more than enough aside for emergenhcies.
Fixed term is safe and secure. Obviously it fluctuates and there have been bad years but there were years when I got 18%in the past, it all balances out.
I'm not dreaming of being the richest person in the graveyard. My children and grandies have already been well taken of and that is all I am concerned about.
Good for you. Am pleased that you have achieved your goals.
 
Bridgette Pace: Thankyou for your time to explain these facts. I can see you have had to plan well for what you are doing & taking risks is a principle part of this. You must always be alert to the fluctuations (highs & lows), that come with rentals. There is clearly much expenditure in what you do, not only in the $ sense but also in your time. I have known self funded retirees who have been unable to receive a Pension due to the way they have set themselves up or because they had too many $'s. The Government want people to be self funded & are pushing for this to happen more in the future but they still want total control of them.

Can l just congratulate you on the choices you have made & the time & effort expended to make a self sufficient lifestyle for yourself. I guess there are times when you may feel like a Princess but other times less so.

Thankyou again for taking time to explain what you meant by your previous statement.

Ezzy. Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, there has never been a time that I felt like a Princess but I most certainly have always felt free and independent but it comes at a very high cost in many respects. It was easier when I was working but not so when retired. The Govt. panders to the rich and protects the poor to a reasonable extent but the ones in the middle are slugged left right and centre. So, in reality, they do not want people to be self-funded because we are taxed at every juncture, vilified for what we do, blamed for every ill that affects the populace and forces us to be almost living on the breadline. We will be charged triple for aged care and denied bulk billing for medical needs. Independence to me has always been paramount but the govt. particularly the Labour Govt, the Greens and every leftist politician has made sure that self-funded retirees like myself will pay the price, in every way, for not becoming another sheep for the shepherd. I thank you for your respectful reply and wish you good luck in your endeavours.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Fillers, also termed excipients, may, in rare cases, cause adverse reactions.

Just to compare the excipients, of the probably most used medication Australia wide, paracetamol. I will compare the "generic" Panamax and the "brand name" Panadol. The bolded are common to both brands.

Panamax - maize starch, purified talc, pregelatinised maize starch, povidone, stearic acid and potassium sorbate.

Panadol - hypromellose, pregelatinised maize starch, povidone, croscarmellose sodium, magnesium stearate, stearic acid, glycerol triacetate, carnauba wax.

I am not aware to any common allergic reaction to the excipients mentioned above.

Excipient information courtesy of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

The price difference? A mere 2.5 cents per tablet for Panamax and 18.7 cents per tablet for Panadol.

Pricing information courtesy of Chemist Warehouse.
Thank you for the above response. My reactions were to generic prescription medicine which was for a particular medical condition and not for the two examples given above for tablets which are commonplace. I can only go by my experience and that of a friend of mine who had a severe reaction to the blue dye which was used in the generic tablets given in substitution of her brand name tablets. I don't think reactions to generics are rare but I do consider they may be uncommon and that needs to be fairly considered. In health matters, it is not always one size fits all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×