New search reignites hope for missing Beaumont children! Will this finally be the breakthrough?

For nearly six decades, one of Australia’s most haunting mysteries has remained unsolved, leaving behind questions that may never be answered.

The case gripped the nation, changed the way parents viewed child safety, and led to countless theories—but no definitive answers.

Now, a fresh effort is underway, with renewed hope that long-buried secrets might finally come to light.


Excavators were set to dig beneath an Adelaide factory site in a final attempt to locate the remains of the Beaumont children.

The search needed to be completed before the government-owned land was handed over to developers.

If successful, the search could further link their presumed murders to businessman Harry Phipps, a key suspect in the decades-old case.


image2.png
Final search for Beaumont children begins. Image source: Instagram/beaumont.children


Jane, 9, Arnna, 7, and Grant, 4, vanished from Glenelg Beach on 26 January 1966, in what became one of Australia's most enduring crime mysteries.

Their parents, Jim and Nancy Beaumont, had allowed Jane to take her younger siblings on a short bus trip from their Somerton Park home, expecting them to return that afternoon.

Around midday, the children purchased pasties and a meat pie from Wenzel’s Bakery with a £1 note their mother insisted she had not given them.

Witnesses reported seeing the three playing at Colley Reserve in the company of a tall, thin-faced man with short blond hair, believed to be in his 30s.

The children's disappearance marked a turning point for Australian families, shifting public attitudes towards child safety.


The Castalloy foundry, where excavators were set to dig, was owned by Phipps at the time the siblings went missing.

Despite two previous searches yielding no evidence, this excavation aimed to dig deeper into areas of interest and explore a new location identified on the site.

Phipps emerged as a primary suspect following the 2013 release of The Satin Man: Uncovering the Mystery of the Missing Beaumont Children, written by Alan Whiticker and Stuart Mullins.

Although the book did not name him explicitly, his estranged son, Hayden Phipps, had implicated his father in 2007.

He claimed he had seen Jane, Arnna, and Grant in the family’s backyard on the day they disappeared.

Hayden also alleged his father had subjected him to physical and sexual abuse during his childhood.


At the time of the disappearance, Phipps lived just 300 metres from Glenelg Beach, at the corner of Augusta and Sussex Streets.

Two brothers separately stated they had been paid by Phipps to dig a hole—two metres long and one metre wide—at the factory over the Australia Day weekend in 1966.

The business had been closed for the holiday, leaving Phipps as the only person with access to the property.


image1.png
Did Phipps hide the truth in 1966? Image source: Instagram/beaumont.children


A 2013 search of the site followed the detection of an anomaly by ground-penetrating radar, though excavation efforts uncovered nothing of significance.

Police returned in 2018, after a private investigation backed by social media, but the dig—reaching 1.5 metres deep—only revealed rubbish and animal bones.

Detective Superintendent Des Bray stated at the time: ‘I can confirm that we have searched the areas of interest and reached the bottom of those areas and gone well below so that we can be 100 per cent certain.’

He added: ‘Sadly this means for the Beaumont family that we still have no answers. But we will always do anything humanly possible to locate the Beaumont children and take them home to their family.’

Before the 2018 search, police had confirmed Phipps was one of several persons of interest in the case.

‘It's probably had more people nominated as a potential offender than any other case that I'm aware of,’ Det Supt Bray said.


After that investigation, Phipps’s younger son, Wayne, dismissed the allegations, maintaining his father’s innocence and claiming his late brother had been mentally ill.

‘This is wrong,’ Wayne Phipps told the media.

‘It's hurting those who I care about and the memory of those who I cared about. We loved Harry and believe in his innocence.’

The renewed dig was led by independent South Australian MP Frank Pangallo, who had covered the case extensively as a journalist.

Pangallo secured government approval for the operation after receiving what he described as ‘compelling new evidence’.


Local businessman Flavio Anfiteatro donated the services of his family’s earthmoving company, Flavio and Sons Civil, to conduct the excavation.

‘The new evidence indicates previous digs on the former Castalloy factory site didn't go deep enough—so that is the intention of the new search,’ Pangallo said.

‘Another possible site has also been identified which will also be part of the new search.’

‘While we are hopeful the new search will help solve the mystery, it's also important to discount the site as the children's burial ground if we can.’

Here is a report from 7News:



Comparisons between old photographs and the present-day site suggested that at least 1.5 metres of soil had been added since 1966.

This view was supported by Professor Kenneth Olson, a soil science expert from the University of Illinois.

Joining the excavation team were university students, an archaeological scientist, and anthropologist and anatomist Maciej Henneberg.

Police stated they were aware of the excavation plans but were not directly involved.

A spokesperson confirmed: ‘The individuals conducting the fresh excavation at the site are following a theory that SAPOL believes is not supported by evidence and available information.’

‘SAPOL will monitor the excavation as it proceeds.’


Other suspects in the Beaumont case included convicted killers Bevan Spencer von Einem, Derek Edward Percy, Arthur Stanley Brown, and James Ryan O’Neill.

Von Einem, a sex offender, was serving life for the 1984 torture and murder of 15-year-old Richard Kelvin.

He allegedly confessed to an informant that he had abducted the Beaumonts for ‘experiments’.

Percy, one of Victoria’s most notorious child killers, had been in Glenelg on a family trip the day the children disappeared but denied any involvement.

Brown bore a resemblance to the police sketch of the suspect.

He was charged in 1998 with the 1970 murders of Judith and Susan Mackay in Townsville but was deemed unfit to stand trial due to dementia.


O’Neill, a convicted child murderer, allegedly told acquaintances he was responsible for abducting the Beaumont siblings.

For Jim and Nancy Beaumont, years of uncertainty and dashed hopes took a devastating toll, leading to their separation in the early 1970s.

Nancy passed away in September 2019, aged 92, while Jim died in April 2023 at 97.

A $1million reward remained on offer for information that could finally bring closure to one of Australia's most baffling cold cases.


For decades, theories have swirled about what really happened to the Beaumont children, but the full truth remains elusive.

Watch the video below to explore the case further and share your thoughts in the comments.



Key Takeaways

  • Excavators searched an Adelaide factory site for the Beaumont children's remains before redevelopment, aiming to link their case to businessman Harry Phipps.
  • Phipps was implicated by his son and former workers, but past searches found nothing, and police did not support the latest dig.
  • Convicted killers Bevan von Einem, Derek Percy, Arthur Brown, and James O’Neill were also suspected, with some allegedly confessing.
  • The 1966 disappearance deeply impacted Australia, with the Beaumonts never found, their parents passing away, and a $1million reward still offered.

With decades of speculation and unanswered questions, do you think this latest search will finally uncover the truth about the Beaumont children’s fate?

Share your thoughts in the comments.
 
Last edited:

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
It is bad enough to lose 1 child, but to lose all 3 is the most heartbreaking event that could happen to anyone. It is so sad that the parent's went to their graves without ever knowing where their babies were. Sadly I feel it is one of those mysteries that will never be solved.
 
I remember my parents talking about this when I was a child (I was 7, my brother was 9, my sisters were 5 & 3) and have followed this story throughout the yrs. When I became a mum myself the disappearance of these children was always at the back of my mind, so my children got to go nowhere without me until they turned 16.
Now as a grandparent and have watched the world go to hell, my grandchildren when in my care are not allowed out of my sight when we go out. I trust nobody.
I so hope that they find these children's remains, then at least they can be reunited with their parents in death even if the killer is never identified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: novezar and PattiB
I lived directly across the road from Wenzels in the Alexandra Terrace flats back in those days, I would go to the beach by myself at 7 years old in the mornings for a play.
I would have been there that day with my family celebrating Australia day, even though it wasn't a public holiday my mum and stepdad took the day off from work so we could have a picnic down on the beach and go to the sideshows after.
Alexandra terrace flats.jpg
 
Times were very different back then.
If you mean people were more naive back then, I agree.
But in terms of danger, I disagree.
Kiddie Fiddlers, I would suggest were more active back then and not getting caught.
Children at the beach without supervision - nope, kids cannot comprehend the danger of water, then or now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: novezar
I, as with every one would love for the remains of the children be found.
I really think that this is going to remain an unsolved mystery & an unresolved Cold Case filing.
I certainly hope that I'm wrong in my assertion.
I'm of the notion that the killer is already on the investigators radar, but, the final piece of evidence hasn't been located for charges to be directly laid & conviction given.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
Times were very different back then.
Yes, to a certain degree.
I still recall of danger warnings from my mum from when I was older enough to go to the shops etc.
One warning was to never accept any money from a stranger or get into any cars.
As it was, when I was about 10/11 yrs old, down at the shops of the main street, a car pulled up & one of the blokes in the car offered me 2 shillings to get in for a ride. I remembered what mum said, & I said no & walked away.
Another time at Circular Quay in the railway precinct, I was about 14, a bloke offered me 5 pounds to go into the toilets with him. I had my fishing gear & rod with me as I was fishing around the wharves etc. He showed me the 5 pound note, but I had too much stuff with me to grab it & run.
So, twice I had adhered to my mum's warnings.

I have passed these type of warnings on to my wife's grand sons. Also, I've warned the eldest one, he's just turned 14, about not getting into any cars driven by one of kids he knows, knowing that they don't have a drivers licence or own a car.
As I explained to him, that if the car crashes & he's hurt, or even killed, there is no insurance to cover injuries or otherwise.
You just hope that the message sinks in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
My mother in law dropped my husband off at the beach one hot day in Hobart when he was 7 in his bathers ,no clothes, not even a towel at 10 am in the morning and did not go back to get him until 3 p m in the afternoon . He had red hair and no freckles at that stage , he was that sunburnt apparently unbelievable he survived . He is 90 years old now. I can never believe how parents leave their children like this, back in those days and even now and are so upset when something happens to them.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: DLHM
Times were very different back then.
I was an nipper in crounalla surf life saving club then, black and blues, and it was nothing for us kids to go up to the main Street to get a pie, you didn't think then what was right and what was wrong ,didn't think about mum and dad, but they did, still feel the walloping I got, more than once. If I could run faster I'd be on the ferry to bundena.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
If you mean people were more naive back then, I agree.
But in terms of danger, I disagree.
Kiddie Fiddlers, I would suggest were more active back then and not getting caught.
Children at the beach without supervision - nope, kids cannot comprehend the danger of water, then or now.
Compare the population of early 1966 to what it is now. Of course there are going to be more criminals, predators, deranged people now than what there used to be.

It’s not a matter of naivety. It’s the way life was at the time. We live and learn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67
I think in those days, geography may have made a difference to some extent.
In smaller towns, most people knew each other...a village looking out for the vulnerable.
Where we lived, the buses went from our door right to the beach. 4 of us went on our own because mum worked and dad was an abusive alcoholic... to be avoided. School holidays meant we caught the bus in every day. There was no need for us to wander away from the main promenade and we tended to stick together where other people were at the pool. The lifeguards seemed to be always nearby.
Then, you look at bigger metro areas where it was much more difficult to be in a warm, friendly nest. Too many people very busy living their busy lives.
Today, I would not let any child venture anywhere without proper supervision. Sad but true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×