Neighbourhood feud over cats starts heated debate online: Should cats be allowed to roam outside unsupervised?
By
- Replies 14
We've all had a neighbour we don't get along with. Maybe they're too noisy, or they have an unruly dog that bark s all night, or perhaps they're just really messy and their yard is always cluttered.
But most of us (hopefully) would never stoop so low as to threaten our neighbours – especially when it comes to their pets.
Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened to one Brisbane woman recently, who received a threatening note from a neighbour after her cat got into a fight with their cat.
The whole ordeal started when the Brisbane woman's neighbour approached her over the weekend and told her that her cat was going into their property to 'pick a fight' .
To prevent her misbehaving cat from escaping, the 'mortified and apologetic' cat owner immediately covered the cat flap on the backdoor. She did this because she believed it was the right thing to do.
The owner of the cat, however, claimed to have received an 'abusive' remark from a neighbour, who scribbled the warning on the reverse of a council document on managing cat behaviour, the following day.
A photo of the note that one concerned cat owner received from her neighbour. Credit: Reddit.
The note warned: 'Control your animals or they will disappear!'
The concerned cat owner posted a picture of the note on Reddit in the hopes of getting some advice on what to do.
The post quickly captured the attention of many users, receiving more than 800 comments. However, not all of them sided with the letter recipient, sparking a heated online argument between Brisbane dog and cat owners.
Residents who were adamantly opposed to allowing cats to wander free were 'implored' to borrow cat traps from their council so they could catch the animals and transport them to the pound.
One user commented: 'I don‘t mind the inconvenience of taking the cats I catch into the council. My neighbourhood benefits from every cat that is off the streets.'
Some people pointed out the reports about the typical number of wildlife killings caused by cats, before labelling felines as 'killers'.
The feud stirred a heated debate online. Credit. iStock.
One comment read: 'Cats are killers, it‘s not the flavour of the month. There’s undisputed evidence that wildlife is suffering because of cat owners. You’re being willingly ignorant on an important topic.'
'"On average, cats kill 2.92 million mammals, 1.67 million reptiles, 1.09 million birds, 0.26 million frogs and 2.97 million invertebrates every 24 hours." This includes roaming pet cats,' another added, citing data from the Invasive Species Council.
Even though a tradesman mistakenly left the garage door open, some other commentators shamelessly blamed the owner for letting the cat escape.
One person said: 'Best bet is to keep your cat inside or enclosed outside. Doing the right thing from the start would have avoided the issues in the first place.'
'You own the cat and it is your responsibility to keep that cat on your own property … If I found a cat had done something to my bird I would see red. I can tell you that much,' one parrot owner argued.
Others expressed sympathy for the cat owner.
One supportive comment read: 'I think you’re doing the right thing. Sorry you had to deal with this, I would be mortified if I got that letter.'
'You’re doing really well and your neighbour should be keeping their cat indoors too? Accidents happen, what matters is the work you are doing.'
Others said that responsible cat ownership works both ways and that if a neighbour doesn't want their cat to be harmed by another cat, they should likewise keep their animal indoors.
Owners of cats must microchip, register, and provide a suitable enclosure, according to Brisbane City Council.
While it is unclear which local government district the resident belongs to, the cat's owner has said that she abides by these regulations.
The cat owner explained: 'She’s a rescue street cat and I’m doing everything in my power to keep her in, wanting suggestions on how to keep her in or if those digital barriers work.'
'My animals are f****** registered and fully insured and fed premium quality food so get off telling me I’m irresponsible when I’m literally trying to act as responsibly as possible here.'
According to the website, cats can be outside as long as they are in an enclosed environment and don't bother their neighbours.
The council also suggests that if an annoyance is made, the person who is bothered goes and chats with the cat owner before taking any further action.
'There are numerous ways a cat owner can safely contain a cat to their property and there are plenty of options that could be considered including but not limited to: Provide further stimulation, keeping the cat indoors, modifying existing fencing or (by) providing prefabricated cat runs,' a statement on the council website read.
Despite the argument, it appeared that the letter's recipient had the last word when she stated that she had purchased a digital fence as a 'backup solution' and had totally taken out the cat flap.
She shared: 'Obviously this was gonna bring out the cat haters and I should have expected as much. Thanks to everyone who gave constructive advice.'
We love our pets, and we want to make sure that they are always safe. That's why we're committed to keeping them safe, whether it's from hazards in the home or outside dangers.
While the other cat owner's concerns are valid, threatening another cat owner of causing harm to their pet is not a pleasant way to ensure your furry friend's safety. After all, it will be ironic that you're willing to hurt other animals if you are a pet lover yourself.
What are your thoughts on this, folks? Do you think the other cat owner went too far?
But most of us (hopefully) would never stoop so low as to threaten our neighbours – especially when it comes to their pets.
Unfortunately, that's exactly what happened to one Brisbane woman recently, who received a threatening note from a neighbour after her cat got into a fight with their cat.
The whole ordeal started when the Brisbane woman's neighbour approached her over the weekend and told her that her cat was going into their property to 'pick a fight' .
To prevent her misbehaving cat from escaping, the 'mortified and apologetic' cat owner immediately covered the cat flap on the backdoor. She did this because she believed it was the right thing to do.
The owner of the cat, however, claimed to have received an 'abusive' remark from a neighbour, who scribbled the warning on the reverse of a council document on managing cat behaviour, the following day.
A photo of the note that one concerned cat owner received from her neighbour. Credit: Reddit.
The note warned: 'Control your animals or they will disappear!'
The concerned cat owner posted a picture of the note on Reddit in the hopes of getting some advice on what to do.
The post quickly captured the attention of many users, receiving more than 800 comments. However, not all of them sided with the letter recipient, sparking a heated online argument between Brisbane dog and cat owners.
Residents who were adamantly opposed to allowing cats to wander free were 'implored' to borrow cat traps from their council so they could catch the animals and transport them to the pound.
One user commented: 'I don‘t mind the inconvenience of taking the cats I catch into the council. My neighbourhood benefits from every cat that is off the streets.'
Some people pointed out the reports about the typical number of wildlife killings caused by cats, before labelling felines as 'killers'.
The feud stirred a heated debate online. Credit. iStock.
One comment read: 'Cats are killers, it‘s not the flavour of the month. There’s undisputed evidence that wildlife is suffering because of cat owners. You’re being willingly ignorant on an important topic.'
'"On average, cats kill 2.92 million mammals, 1.67 million reptiles, 1.09 million birds, 0.26 million frogs and 2.97 million invertebrates every 24 hours." This includes roaming pet cats,' another added, citing data from the Invasive Species Council.
Even though a tradesman mistakenly left the garage door open, some other commentators shamelessly blamed the owner for letting the cat escape.
One person said: 'Best bet is to keep your cat inside or enclosed outside. Doing the right thing from the start would have avoided the issues in the first place.'
'You own the cat and it is your responsibility to keep that cat on your own property … If I found a cat had done something to my bird I would see red. I can tell you that much,' one parrot owner argued.
Others expressed sympathy for the cat owner.
One supportive comment read: 'I think you’re doing the right thing. Sorry you had to deal with this, I would be mortified if I got that letter.'
'You’re doing really well and your neighbour should be keeping their cat indoors too? Accidents happen, what matters is the work you are doing.'
Others said that responsible cat ownership works both ways and that if a neighbour doesn't want their cat to be harmed by another cat, they should likewise keep their animal indoors.
Owners of cats must microchip, register, and provide a suitable enclosure, according to Brisbane City Council.
While it is unclear which local government district the resident belongs to, the cat's owner has said that she abides by these regulations.
The cat owner explained: 'She’s a rescue street cat and I’m doing everything in my power to keep her in, wanting suggestions on how to keep her in or if those digital barriers work.'
'My animals are f****** registered and fully insured and fed premium quality food so get off telling me I’m irresponsible when I’m literally trying to act as responsibly as possible here.'
According to the website, cats can be outside as long as they are in an enclosed environment and don't bother their neighbours.
The council also suggests that if an annoyance is made, the person who is bothered goes and chats with the cat owner before taking any further action.
'There are numerous ways a cat owner can safely contain a cat to their property and there are plenty of options that could be considered including but not limited to: Provide further stimulation, keeping the cat indoors, modifying existing fencing or (by) providing prefabricated cat runs,' a statement on the council website read.
Despite the argument, it appeared that the letter's recipient had the last word when she stated that she had purchased a digital fence as a 'backup solution' and had totally taken out the cat flap.
She shared: 'Obviously this was gonna bring out the cat haters and I should have expected as much. Thanks to everyone who gave constructive advice.'
We love our pets, and we want to make sure that they are always safe. That's why we're committed to keeping them safe, whether it's from hazards in the home or outside dangers.
While the other cat owner's concerns are valid, threatening another cat owner of causing harm to their pet is not a pleasant way to ensure your furry friend's safety. After all, it will be ironic that you're willing to hurt other animals if you are a pet lover yourself.
What are your thoughts on this, folks? Do you think the other cat owner went too far?