Masked vandal shocks Aussies with severed heads of politician statues, causing $140,000 in damages

In a brazen act of vandalism that has sent shockwaves through the community, a masked figure has been photographed issuing a stark and chilling warning while clutching the severed head of a statue of former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating.

The unsettling image, which also shows the vandal kneeling on the bust of another former Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, has sparked outrage and concern among Australians, particularly those in the Ballarat region where the incident took place.


The vandal, shrouded in black and wielding a sledgehammer, was captured with a foot disrespectfully placed upon the Australian flag.

Accompanying the disturbing photo was a caption: 'Victoria Police say return the heads? We say return the land to its rightful owners! The colony is falling.'


1738719292098.png
The heads of statues representing former Australian prime ministers Paul Keating and Kevin Rudd were stolen by a masked vandal from the Ballarat Botanical Gardens. Credit: YouTube


This message is a provocative political statement that has deeply troubled authorities and citizens alike.

The statues of Keating and Rudd were part of a collection of 20 bronze busts representing former Australian prime ministers, all of which were damaged in the early morning hours of 23 January at the Ballarat Botanical Gardens.

The vandals did not stop at decapitation; they also covered the nameplates of the remaining 18 statues with paint, leaving behind a damage bill estimated at a staggering $140,000, as reported by the Courier.


The heads of the Keating and Rudd statues are valued at approximately $50,000 each.

Police investigations revealed that an angle grinder was likely used to remove the busts.

They are seeking to speak with four individuals seen in a silver ute captured on CCTV footage at the scene.

Ballarat Police Acting Inspector Brad Hall expressed his disappointment at the blatant disregard for the community's well-being, emphasising the emotional impact such actions have on the public.

'Knowing full well the emotions that their actions have created, to have a complete disregard for that is quite disappointing,' he expressed.


Sculptor Peter Nicholson, who crafted several of the busts, including those of Keating and Rudd, was particularly distraught.

'It is very upsetting … especially for the people of Ballarat,' he said.

'(Prime Ministers Avenue is) very popular. It's got every prime minister since federation, and it's the only one of its kind in Australia. '

'It's just a disgraceful thing that it's been vandalised in this way.'
The vandalism has been condemned by Ballarat mayor Tracey Hargreaves as 'completely unacceptable,' highlighting the financial burden it places on ratepayers and its negative impact on Ballarat's image as a city.


The police treat the incident as a political statement and believe the photo is legitimate.

This is not the first time the statues have been targeted; in 2020, the busts of former Liberal prime ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott were sprayed with red paint.

Inspector Hall warned that it was only a matter of time before the perpetrators were arrested and urged them to return the stolen heads.

The brazen attack raises questions about the security of public art and the motivations behind such acts of vandalism.

It also serves as a reminder of the deep-seated political tensions within Australian society.

As the community grapples with the aftermath of this crime, many are left wondering what message the vandals truly intended to convey and what the implications are for the broader discourse on Australia's political and cultural heritage.


Credit: YouTube

Key Takeaways
  • A masked vandal has stolen the heads of statues representing former Australian prime ministers Paul Keating and Kevin Rudd from the Ballarat Botanical Gardens, issuing a chilling political statement.
  • The criminal damage included defacing 20 bronze busts with paint, resulting in an estimated damage bill of $140,000, with the stolen heads valued at around $50,000 each.
  • Police are seeking four individuals seen in a silver ute on CCTV concerning the vandalism and are treating the incident as a political statement.
  • The Ballarat community and the sculptor of some statues, Peter Nicholson, have expressed distress and disappointment over the disrespectful act.
Have you visited the Prime Minister's Avenue in Ballarat? How do you feel about using vandalism as a form of political protest? Share your opinions in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Dirty rotten filthy, the great unwashed who wouldn't have a drop of black blood in them..
Even the indigenous don't like the filthy bludgers!!
My own thoughts on this will probably be shot down, but I don think to prove the your ethnicity would require more than one ancestor. I myself are of mixed blood although which only goes back three generations, any more than that I care nothing. My friend and life partner is of mixed blood but goes back that many generations that it no longer counts in her ethnicity, by her own she is classed as a person of full blood. Although I most say that when she throws things I'm glad the bastards are not sharp!!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bridgit and Leenie
I think both Bleating and Dudd would be horrified to learn their heads are worth so little, prima donnas would expect no less than seven figures each. Pffttt!
The knicknames you use cracked me up, sorry for grinning a bit more than I should've
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie and DLHM
Dirty rotten filthy, the great unwashed who wouldn't have a drop of black blood in them..
Even the indigenous don't like the filthy bludgers!!
I wonder whether you're talking about the Extinction Rebellion mob? The bright individuals who superglue themselves to the road surfaces? If I happened to be a cop who was told to get them off the road, I think I'd say, "What? You're stuck to the road? Aw, gee, that's bad luck. How long has it been? Oh, you want to go to the toilet ... don't think we have any Quilton around here, mate, you'll have to wait a week or so until we can organise a delivery. What's that -- you're hungry? Macca's or Hungry Jack's? Maybe a Pizza Hut special? How do you reckon a beer would go? Gets pretty hot out here on the bitumen in the summer. Hang on, your arms are stuck to the surface. Would you like me to spoonfeed you? Oh, look. Here comes a 10-tonner. You'd just be a soft speed bump when he went over you. Anyway, my shift has ended and I won't be back until next Monday. See ya!"
 
I wonder whether you're talking about the Extinction Rebellion mob? The bright individuals who superglue themselves to the road surfaces? If I happened to be a cop who was told to get them off the road, I think I'd say, "What? You're stuck to the road? Aw, gee, that's bad luck. How long has it been? Oh, you want to go to the toilet ... don't think we have any Quilton around here, mate, you'll have to wait a week or so until we can organise a delivery. What's that -- you're hungry? Macca's or Hungry Jack's? Maybe a Pizza Hut special? How do you reckon a beer would go? Gets pretty hot out here on the bitumen in the summer. Hang on, your arms are stuck to the surface. Would you like me to spoonfeed you? Oh, look. Here comes a 10-tonner. You'd just be a soft speed bump when he went over you. Anyway, my shift has ended and I won't be back until next Monday. See ya!"
I also was wondering who the ‘they’ being blamed here are. My thought is the National Socialist Network. It certainly smacks of ‘organised’. The uniform closely resembles that of the Neo-Nazi Group as per photos taken when they marched through Ballarat on Eureka Day shouting white supremacist slogans.
The group of about 30 people marched through Ballarat on Eureka Day 2023, wearing black and shouting white supremacist slogans.
Dressed in black and wearing balaclavas, members of the National Socialist Network walked the streets of Ballarat while chanting white supremacist slogans.
 
What land, the land they deprived the people of before them.
I think I heard one of the brothers claim on telebishion something like 250,000 years of their occupancy of the place. Any advance on that?
 
(Papuans/Melanesians )settled the continent.
Actually MungoMan his skeletal remains were discovered at Lake Mungo , comparison of mitochondrial DNA with that of ancient and modern Aboriginal people led to the conclusion that MUNGO MAN fell outside the range of genetic variation seen in Australian Aboriginal people. In other Words his gene is extinct. They were living in Australia 60,000 yrs ago. Mungo inhabitants no relation to Aborigines were the original Australians. The. Article poses the question,”(Had they b even wiped out in a prehistoric case of ethnic cleansing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67 and DLHM
Actually MungoMan his skeletal remains were discovered at Lake Mungo , comparison of mitochondrial DNA with that of ancient and modern Aboriginal people led to the conclusion that MUNGO MAN fell outside the range of genetic variation seen in Australian Aboriginal people. In other Words his gene is extinct. They were living in Australia 60,000 yrs ago. Mungo inhabitants no relation to Aborigines were the original Australians. The. Article poses the question,”(Had they b even wiped out in a prehistoric case of ethnic cleansing?
Interesting. 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: deni67
Actually MungoMan his skeletal remains were discovered at Lake Mungo , comparison of mitochondrial DNA with that of ancient and modern Aboriginal people led to the conclusion that MUNGO MAN fell outside the range of genetic variation seen in Australian Aboriginal people. In other Words his gene is extinct. They were living in Australia 60,000 yrs ago. Mungo inhabitants no relation to Aborigines were the original Australians. The. Article poses the question,”(Had they b even wiped out in a prehistoric case of ethnic cleansing?
Ah, people just believe what they want to believe as it suits their biases.
FACT CHECK:
Senator Leyonhjelm’s spokesman said 42,000 year-old skeletal remains found at Lake Mungo (“Mungo Man”), and an analysis of DNA from one of those skeletons, suggest another argument for a pre-Aboriginal population.

These claims, from a 2001 study, are not widely accepted in the anthropological community, and not even really debated any more. The 2001 DNA study was a very early attempt to extract DNA from an ancient skeleton in conditions that could be expected to be very bad for the survival of ancient DNA. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the DNA signature was most likely contamination from the scientists that handled the fossil remains.
It is true that there has been, historically, a small number of claims that there were people in Australia before Australian Aborigines, but these claims have all been refuted and are no longer widely debated. The overwhelming weight of evidence supports the idea that Aboriginal people were the first Australians.
 
Ah, people just believe what they want to believe as it suits their biases.
FACT CHECK:
Senator Leyonhjelm’s spokesman said 42,000 year-old skeletal remains found at Lake Mungo (“Mungo Man”), and an analysis of DNA from one of those skeletons, suggest another argument for a pre-Aboriginal population.

These claims, from a 2001 study, are not widely accepted in the anthropological community, and not even really debated any more. The 2001 DNA study was a very early attempt to extract DNA from an ancient skeleton in conditions that could be expected to be very bad for the survival of ancient DNA. Subsequent studies demonstrated that the DNA signature was most likely contamination from the scientists that handled the fossil remains.
It is true that there has been, historically, a small number of claims that there were people in Australia before Australian Aborigines, but these claims have all been refuted and are no longer widely debated. The overwhelming weight of evidence supports the idea that Aboriginal people were the first Australians.
Initially Aborigines occupation was given as 8,000 years in 1961, then blew out to 40,000years ,but in recent times its been inflated to 65,000, The modern claim that Australian aborigines were resident as far back as 65,000 years ago must be questioned because according to the ABC article The current mainstream thinking,the recent African origin of modern humans outside Africa alive today descended from a small group which left Africa at a specific time ,currently generally estimated at about 60,000years ago. If the article is correct then there’s no waour Aboriginals could be in Australia before African man left Africa. They certainly cannot have been here 80,000 years or even 60,000 years ago.
 
Initially Aborigines occupation was given as 8,000 years in 1961, then blew out to 40,000years ,but in recent times its been inflated to 65,000, The modern claim that Australian aborigines were resident as far back as 65,000 years ago must be questioned because according to the ABC article The current mainstream thinking,the recent African origin of modern humans outside Africa alive today descended from a small group which left Africa at a specific time ,currently generally estimated at about 60,000years ago. If the article is correct then there’s no waour Aboriginals could be in Australia before African man left Africa. They certainly cannot have been here 80,000 years or even 60,000 years ago.
Fact is no one can be certain as I said the Papuans /Melanesians settled the continent .In 1898 Professor Haddin led the Cambridge An
Initially Aborigines occupation was given as 8,000 years in 1961, then blew out to 40,000years ,but in recent times its been inflated to 65,000, The modern claim that Australian aborigines were resident as far back as 65,000 years ago must be questioned because according to the ABC article The current mainstream thinking,the recent African origin of modern humans outside Africa alive today descended from a small group which left Africa at a specific time ,currently generally estimated at about 60,000years ago. If the article is correct then there’s no waour Aboriginals could be in Australia before African man left Africa. They certainly cannot have been here 80,000 years or even 60,000 years ago.
In 1898 Professor Haddin led the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Straight and carried out research in Australia. In 1909 Haddon published The Races of. Man, and exposed the invasion of Australia by the Dravidians . Note Dravidians are described as people from Central India ,Ceylon,Malaya. Australia was originally inhabited by Papuans .As I posted it was the Papuans andMelanisians, who settled the continent
 
Initially Aborigines occupation was given as 8,000 years in 1961, then blew out to 40,000years ,but in recent times its been inflated to 65,000, The modern claim that Australian aborigines were resident as far back as 65,000 years ago must be questioned because according to the ABC article The current mainstream thinking,the recent African origin of modern humans outside Africa alive today descended from a small group which left Africa at a specific time ,currently generally estimated at about 60,000years ago. If the article is correct then there’s no waour Aboriginals could be in Australia before African man left Africa. They certainly cannot have been here 80,000 years or even 60,000 years ago.
Ohhh-kayyy - so most anthropologists are wrong? I don’t even know what your point is. I thought the point was that they were most likely here first, whether that be 80,000 of 50,000. WTF? A long friggin time, yeah? There is no evidence of ‘others’ at this time. But I guess you are saying that science suggests we are all descendants of Africans i.e. black skin - yep, seems to be the general consensus. I think you are just trying to be petty. Wanna talk about cannibalism too? … cos it was common everywhere at some point in time…ohhhh!
 
I did not say what you are insinuating, Aborigines are descendents of. Africans , get your facts right , I am not going to continue with this topic . Believe what you like ,I’m through with this topic.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×