Major bank threatens account closure over unexplained home cash

Australians have long prided themselves on their right to privacy, especially when it comes to their hard-earned money.

But a recent incident involving one of the country’s biggest banks has left many customers feeling rattled, with some even questioning whether our financial institutions have gone too far in their quest to comply with government regulations.


A high-profile property researcher, Louis Christopher, recently took to social media to share his shock and outrage after receiving an unexpected email from the Commonwealth Bank (CBA).

The message demanded that he provide detailed information about his finances—including whether he keeps cash at home—or risk having his accounts restricted or even closed.


1747267959753.png
The customer was threatened with account closure over home cash and source of wealth. Credit: katharina13 / iStock


The email, which Christopher described as 'disgusting' and 'Orwellian', was part of the bank’s efforts to comply with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, overseen by the government’s financial intelligence agency, Austrac.

These rules are designed to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing, but for many everyday Aussies, the experience can feel intrusive and unsettling.

Christopher, who has been a loyal CBA customer since 1978, said the email came without warning.


At first, he thought it might be a scam. But after calling the bank directly, he was stunned to learn the request was genuine.

The bank’s representative asked him a series of highly personal questions:

How did he build up his wealth? Why had he made certain cash withdrawals? Did he keep cash at home, and if so, why? And what was the purpose of certain transactions to third parties?

'I was shocked they would ask me if I’m holding cash at home and why—I regard sharing that info as a security risk,' Christopher told reporters.

'How have I generated my wealth? That’s my business unless they’ve got more than a slight suspicion I’m doing something illegal, in which case it should require a court order.'

He reluctantly answered the questions but made it clear he was unhappy.


'The ironic thing was at the end of all this. They wanted to share the information from the phone call with regulatory authorities as well as with other third-party credit providers. I had to say yes under duress.'

Christopher’s experience isn’t unique. After sharing his story online, he was inundated with similar tales from other Australians who had their accounts frozen or faced probing questions from their banks.

Many are left feeling powerless, especially when the threat of losing access to their own money is on the table.

So why are banks suddenly so interested in your personal finances? The answer lies in Australia’s strict anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing laws.

Under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, banks are required to collect, verify, and maintain up-to-date information about their customers.


This includes not just when you open an account but on an ongoing basis.

A CBA spokesperson explained: 'We are required to manage our customers’ accounts in line with the law. Ensuring we have a customer’s most up-to-date and correct details also helps us to keep them safe and protect them from fraud.'

While most Australians support efforts to crack down on crime, many feel that the pendulum has swung too far.

The idea that a bank can freeze your account or demand to know why you keep cash at home—without any evidence of wrongdoing—has left some customers feeling like they’re being treated as suspects rather than valued clients.

Christopher summed up the sentiment: 'Banks should not be allowed to freeze people’s accounts unless it’s via a court order. It is a human right and it should not be done on a whim of some manager.'


He also pointed out the practical risks: 'I said [the cash] is for a rainy day. I’m a bit concerned because other people have given ambiguous answers and have had their accounts frozen.'

If you receive an unexpected email or call from your bank requesting personal financial information, stay calm and take careful steps to protect yourself.

Verify the request by contacting your bank through a trusted source rather than responding directly; understand your rights, including the right to know why the information is needed and how it will be used; be cautious with your responses, ask for clarification if needed, and keep a record of the conversation; and if you believe your account has been unfairly restricted or closed, consider lodging a complaint with the bank’s ombudsman or seeking legal advice.

This incident also raises broader questions about the future of cash in Australia.

With banks and governments pushing for a 'cashless society', some Aussies worry that their ability to keep and use cash is being eroded.


For many over-60s, cash is not just a convenience—it’s a way to budget, maintain privacy, and feel secure in uncertain times.

But as banks ramp up their scrutiny of cash transactions, it’s clear that the days of 'no questions asked' banking are over.

Whether this makes us safer or simply more anxious is a question that’s yet to be answered.
Key Takeaways

  • CommBank (Commonwealth Bank) threatened to close a customer’s account unless he explained why he was holding cash at home and provided details about his source of wealth.
  • The high-profile property researcher Louis Christopher criticised the bank’s actions as 'Orwellian' and 'disgusting', saying he felt the request was a security risk and an invasion of privacy.
  • The bank’s questions were part of Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, which Austrac oversees under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act.
  • CommBank stated they are legally required to verify and update customers’ information to comply with regulations and help protect against fraud and criminal activity.
Have you ever been asked by your bank to explain your transactions or why you keep cash at home? Do you think these new rules go too far, or are they a necessary part of keeping our financial system safe? Share your experiences and thoughts in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
So @Greg350, are you going to tell us that a bank is legally permitted to demand details with regard to money kept on private property?

Do banks have the legal power of conducting a search of said property?

The answer to both questions is NO!

I can say that I have 10 cents in my property when, in reality, I have $253915 (wishful thinking)!

And the bank can't do diddly squat about it! And I am referring SOLELY about the bank, not law enforcement agencies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54
Just as I said, you have been well and truly indoctrinated into bank Policy and Proceedures and to say the least dubious ethics, so who is into conspiracy theories. So anyone who happens to deposit $10,000 or less can be asked very personal questions about the origins of this money. If the banks have concerns they should refer the matter to the Police and mind their own business.
Money laundering is everyone's problem. You seem to be naive about money laundering and the impacts on our economy and the fact that people who could look like any old scrub turkey depositing or withdrawing at financial institutions or pushing buttons on the poke machine, or be a professional anything and are being paid to do the dirty work. It really is a serious problem and quite difficult to identify due to the many nefarious actions by everyday looking people. You don’t know what ‘watch lists’ they might have.
“The Australian Institute of Criminology estimates that serious and organised crime, including money laundering, costs Australia between $30.4 billion and $68.7 billion annually. This encompasses direct financial losses and the broader economic effects of criminal activities.”
It is affecting everything including real estate prices. Many players in this criminal game. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) also reported that a Sydney criminal gang was laundering $1 million every hour for three to five hours on some days in 2022. You might not care about that but many Australians are happy to have them being tracked and caught.
 
Just as I said, you have been well and truly indoctrinated into bank Policy and Proceedures and to say the least dubious ethics, so who is into conspiracy theories. So anyone who happens to deposit $10,000 or less can be asked very personal questions about the origins of this money. If the banks have concerns they should refer the matter to the Police and mind their own business.
Have you never heard of Austrac? This has been around since 1989, and Australia was behind other countries.

It's for CASH transactions of $10,000 or MORE, not less, lol.

The Banks are mandated to report these transactions, if it's a once only transaction nothing will happen, if it's regular that's when questions maybe asked. Also if transactions are under $10,000 and regular they maybe reported, also ANY transaction that is felt by the Bank to be suspicious can be reported. That's all the bank does originally, report, it's up to Austrac to decide whether it needs further investigation and if so the Bank follows it up as it's their customer.

You seem dead set against this, is that because YOU are into money laundering , drug trafficking? Maybe you want to encourage this behaviour, I don't, if you are an innocent citizen you have nothing to worry about. Unfortunately in this world the good people have to be inconvenienced sometimes, just like RBT, or security checks at airports or a million other places where security checks people to keep out the bad ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knell
I`d like to know how the bank knew the customer was keeping cash at home?? Sounds like a fishy story. Any wonder customers think they should start hiding money. Sound`s very Orwellian to me.
Where did it say the Bank knew, the article states, "Did he keep cash at home, and if so, why?" That's a question not an assumption. Maybe you should learn to read properly.
 
Have you never heard of Austrac? This has been around since 1989, and Australia was behind other countries.

It's for CASH transactions of $10,000 or MORE, not less, lol.

The Banks are mandated to report these transactions, if it's a once only transaction nothing will happen, if it's regular that's when questions maybe asked. Also if transactions are under $10,000 and regular they maybe reported, also ANY transaction that is felt by the Bank to be suspicious can be reported. That's all the bank does originally, report, it's up to Austrac to decide whether it needs further investigation and if so the Bank follows it up as it's their customer.

You seem dead set against this, is that because YOU are into money laundering , drug trafficking? Maybe you want to encourage this behaviour, I don't, if you are an innocent citizen you have nothing to worry about. Unfortunately in this world the good people have to be inconvenienced sometimes, just like RBT, or security checks at airports or a million other places where security checks people to keep out the bad ones.
…and thankfully the Proceeds of Crime Act (2002) a scheme to confiscate proceeds of crime and allows for confiscated funds to be used to benefit the community.
 
Where did it say the Bank knew, the article states, "Did he keep cash at home, and if so, why?" That's a question not an assumption. Maybe you should learn to read properly.
The question is an accusatory one. Where is the mandatory requirement for banks to investigate a person's wealth which is NOT held by the bank in the person's account? None of their business!

The question can be construed as a accusation of a crime being committed which is way out of the bank's "powers".

Banks should stick to banking and keep their noses out of issues that do not concern them.
 
The question is an accusatory one. Where is the mandatory requirement for banks to investigate a person's wealth which is NOT held by the bank in the person's account? None of their business!

The question can be construed as a accusation of a crime being committed which is way out of the bank's "powers".

Banks should stick to banking and keep their noses out of issues that do not concern them.
AGAIN, the Banks are mandated to do this, they have no choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knell
AGAIN, the Banks are mandated to do this, they have no choice.
Are you telling me the banks can demand that I disclose what liquid assets I have in my private home?

Say if I have a mint 1930 Australian penny in my possession. It could be worth $100000 There is no way the bank can demand evidence of its possession even though it is still legal tender.

Read carefully.

Some coins which are no longer in circulation, such as Australia’s pre-decimal coins and the 1 and 2 cent coin are still ‘legal tender.’
So, if I roll up to Woolworths with a handful of pennies, shillings and florins to buy an item, legally they cannot refuse the sale.

 
Are you telling me the banks can demand that I disclose what liquid assets I have in my private home?

Say if I have a mint 1930 Australian penny in my possession. It could be worth $100000 There is no way the bank can demand evidence of its possession even though it is still legal tender.

Read carefully.

Some coins which are no longer in circulation, such as Australia’s pre-decimal coins and the 1 and 2 cent coin are still ‘legal tender.’
So, if I roll up to Woolworths with a handful of pennies, shillings and florins to buy an item, legally they cannot refuse the sale.

FFS, you are an idiot. What the hell are you on about.

This is simple, the Bank asks you if you have cash on hand, if you tell them no, that's it. You cannot be this dumb, it is not the Bank wanting to know it's the cash reporting agency who in turn sends the information to the Federal Police. The Federal Police may come knocking on your door if they had suspicions you were dealing in criminal activity.

Clearly you had no idea about this going on, suddenly you read a story and it's the end of the world, yet it's been happening for decades AND around the world. The naivety of you is astounding, although I'm not really surprised, you don't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed.

And what does all this have to do with you using coins in shops, lol, no idea what that's about. There is no law about having cash, it's purely seen as MAYBE you are up to criminal activity.
 
Money laundering is everyone's problem. You seem to be naive about money laundering and the impacts on our economy and the fact that people who could look like any old scrub turkey depositing or withdrawing at financial institutions or pushing buttons on the poke machine, or be a professional anything and are being paid to do the dirty work. It really is a serious problem and quite difficult to identify due to the many nefarious actions by everyday looking people. You don’t know what ‘watch lists’ they might have.
“The Australian Institute of Criminology estimates that serious and organised crime, including money laundering, costs Australia between $30.4 billion and $68.7 billion annually. This encompasses direct financial losses and the broader economic effects of criminal activities.”
It is affecting everything including real estate prices. Many players in this criminal game. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) also reported that a Sydney criminal gang was laundering $1 million every hour for three to five hours on some days in 2022. You might not care about that but many Australians are happy to have them being tracked and caught.
I`m glad you agree with Greg, but I don`t believe the banks have the right to investigate a customer regarding their bank deposits, it should be handled by the appropriate authority. I didn`t once say I was in favour of money laundering. What I did say was that I do not think bank employees have the delegation or legal right to pry into customer transactions.
Have you never heard of Austrac? This has been around since 1989, and Australia was behind other countries.

It's for CASH transactions of $10,000 or MORE, not less, lol.

The Banks are mandated to report these transactions, if it's a once only transaction nothing will happen, if it's regular that's when questions maybe asked. Also if transactions are under $10,000 and regular they maybe reported, also ANY transaction that is felt by the Bank to be suspicious can be reported. That's all the bank does originally, report, it's up to Austrac to decide whether it needs further investigation and if so the Bank follows it up as it's their customer.

You seem dead set against this, is that because YOU are into money laundering , drug trafficking? Maybe you want to encourage this behaviour, I don't, if you are an innocent citizen you have nothing to worry about. Unfortunately in this world the good people have to be inconvenienced sometimes, just like RBT, or security checks at airports or a million other places where security checks people to keep out the bad ones.
How dare you imply that I maybe involved in money laundering or drug trafficking and maybe want to encourage this behaviour. What I do not like is that some lame brain in a bank having the hide to investigate or ask questions of a customer regarding their transaction. It is a breach of privacy and confidentiality to the nth degree.
Another paranoid fool. This has been happening since 1989 and happens around the world, so how has it controlled you so far?
(n)
 
Last edited:
FFS, you are an idiot. What the hell are you on about.

This is simple, the Bank asks you if you have cash on hand, if you tell them no, that's it. You cannot be this dumb, it is not the Bank wanting to know it's the cash reporting agency who in turn sends the information to the Federal Police. The Federal Police may come knocking on your door if they had suspicions you were dealing in criminal activity.

Clearly you had no idea about this going on, suddenly you read a story and it's the end of the world, yet it's been happening for decades AND around the world. The naivety of you is astounding, although I'm not really surprised, you don't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed.

And what does all this have to do with you using coins in shops, lol, no idea what that's about. There is no law about having cash, it's purely seen as MAYBE you are up to criminal activity.
Who the hell do you think you are?, actually people that throw stones are the ones with the most to hide!!
 
Where did it say the Bank knew, the article states, "Did he keep cash at home, and if so, why?" That's a question not an assumption. Maybe you should learn to read properly.
Quote:
The message demanded that he provide detailed information about his finances—including whether he keeps cash at home—or risk having his accounts restricted or even closed.

That`s where, if you are so bright and well informed why don`t you learn to read!!
 
FFS, you are an idiot. What the hell are you on about.

This is simple, the Bank asks you if you have cash on hand, if you tell them no, that's it. You cannot be this dumb, it is not the Bank wanting to know it's the cash reporting agency who in turn sends the information to the Federal Police. The Federal Police may come knocking on your door if they had suspicions you were dealing in criminal activity.

Clearly you had no idea about this going on, suddenly you read a story and it's the end of the world, yet it's been happening for decades AND around the world. The naivety of you is astounding, although I'm not really surprised, you don't seem to be the sharpest tool in the shed.

And what does all this have to do with you using coins in shops, lol, no idea what that's about. There is no law about having cash, it's purely seen as MAYBE you are up to criminal activity.
Your god is AUSTRAC. Their powers are limited too.

Don't worry! I've read this over an hour ago.

 
I`m glad you agree with Greg, but I don`t believe the banks have the right to investigate a customer regarding their bank deposits, it should be handled by the appropriate authority. I didn`t once say I was in favour of money laundering. What I did say was that I do not think bank employees have the delegation or legal right to pry into customer transactions.

How dare you imply that I maybe involved in money laundering or drug trafficking and maybe want to encourage this behaviour. What I do not like is that some lame brain in a bank having the hide to investigate or ask questions of a customer regarding their transaction. It is a breach of privacy and confidentiality to the nth degree.

(n)
It is compliance. If you have ever gone through a compliance audit you would realise the banking/financial industry take it very seriously and comply. They are absolutely obliged to comply with Austrac, ASIC and other regulators. The regulators make the rules. They are a Federal Government Agency dealing with major crime investigations…they can ask questions as per guidelines in circumstances.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×