For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

 

[Ringdragon]

If the monarch is not to be on the $5 note any more why does the space have to be another person? Why can't it be a thing, or a place? Something that says Australia?

I would be sad to loose the Monarch, but I like your idea of something Australian, if the Monarch was replaced, and a non-human image was chosen.

 

[brendanvp]

For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

View attachment 12767

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

View attachment 12768

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

I believe King Charles should be on front of all notes and coins. Indigenous symbols can be on back

 

[Suzanne rose]

Personally, I would like to see something representing and saluting both our first peoples and our commonwealth associations. Divorced or not, I have no problem seeing King Charles appear on our $5 note, and alongside an image of suitable first peoples' person. As King, Charles is doing a pretty good job to date, meeting the change and challenges of a 21st century world.

He has just started !!! and the Queen left it in good condition for him

 

[Suzanne rose]

What I don't understand is that everyone knew the Queen couldn't last forever and all manner of things were put into place before her demise, hell, even her funeral was planned down to the last minute years before it was needed. How come our people in power didn't have similar plans for a smooth transition? It's not like they didn't know who would take over from her. So the excuse for it taking years is....?

I think she was hoping it would be William

 

[RTS]

Caroline Chisholm should go back on the $5 note.

 

[ROZ5]

No he should not be on any of our notes or coins, he is not an Australian and he is not even King material.
He is nothing but a cold hearted, nasty, horrible & hypocritical 2 faced little man.

 

[MHM]

No he should not be on any of our notes or coins, he is not an Australian and he is not even King material.
He is nothing but a cold hearted, nasty, horrible & hypocritical 2 faced little man.

Know him well then ROZ? By the way he is Australian, in fact Australia's number 1 citizen.

 

[Luckyus]

What I don't understand is that everyone knew the Queen couldn't last forever and all manner of things were put into place before her demise, hell, even her funeral was planned down to the last minute years before it was needed. How come our people in power didn't have similar plans for a smooth transition? It's not like they didn't know who would take over from her. So the excuse for it taking years is....?

I'm only surprised that they haven't blamed all this on Climate Change, Putin, and the invasion of Ukraine, amongst other problems in the world. I'm reminded of the Rolling Stones lyric. "Hey you get off of my cloud" Instead in the case of government it should be

" Hey You Get Off Of Your ARSE"

 

[Eveanngra37@gmail]

For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

View attachment 12767

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

View attachment 12768

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

Until, if ever, we become a replubic, i think we should stay with our heritage and have the ruling monarch on our $5.00 note. So much of history is being dumped, and it is history that made us what we are.

 

[Lesleymorris58]

For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

View attachment 12767

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

View attachment 12768

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

I don’t think K. Charles should be on our $5 note, he won’t be round long enough for one, but I also don’t think we should have a design/drawing from our first Australians either, why can’t we have our beautiful coast line or city at night, our war heroes/memorials there is so much more to choose from, in a few years when the $5 note is ready to come out, you never know Prince William could be King

 

[Lesleymorris58]

Until, if ever, we become a replubic, i think we should stay with our heritage and have the ruling monarch on our $5.00 note. So much of history is being dumped, and it is history that made us what we are.

Exactly

 

[Hieme]

If we are not having Chuck on the 5ver, then why not the Australian Governor General? Otherwise a depiction of Ernie Dingo's Welcome to Country Ceremony that he invented in the 1980's, in response to the Kiwi Rugby 'All Blacks' Haka.

 

[Jest]

For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

View attachment 12767

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

View attachment 12768

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

typical. crawl up any crevice to be liked.

 

[Jay Jay]

For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

View attachment 12767

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

View attachment 12768

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

Two points: Your 'lead-in' is incorrect. There is no announcement regarding a person of any background to go on the new $5 note. We know that it will not be King Charles, and that the new design will be related to our indigenous peoples.

Second point: Only the $5 note is currently being discussed, therefore to say that this change 'would' make Queen Eluzabeth the last royal on our banknotes is also incorrect. We have five denominations. Only one is mentioned in the current RBA proposal.

 

[PepeLePew]

I for one am glad it ain't Charles, can't stand the pr*^k or his pompous ass partner. Plus the length of time that it will take the Government to pull their finger out and design this note will probably, hopefully see the demise of Charles and then William will step into the role of King anyway, so that would just be a complete waste of time, effort and taxpayers money to put Charles on a $5 note when it would have to be changed yet again. For me personally I think an Indigenous theme is a good choice and no I do not identify but I have grandchildren that do.

 

[benallacath]

For decades, the face of the reigning British monarch has constantly featured on Australia’s currency notes in what could be seen as a nod to the country’s roots and status as a Commonwealth nation.

However, in a significant and sudden shift, it has been revealed that the tradition will be brought to an end, with a design honouring First Australians taking the place of King Charles III.

‘The Reserve Bank has decided to update the $5 banknote to feature a new design that honours the culture and history of the First Australians,’ the Reserve Bank said in a statement.

‘This new design will replace the portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The other side of the $5 banknote will continue to feature the Australian Parliament.’

The RBA stressed that the move was done in consultation with the government.

‘I think this is a good opportunity to strike a good balance between the monarch on the coins and the First Nations design on the fiver,’ Treasurer Jim Chalmers said.

‘But the $5 note will say more about our history and our heritage, our country and I see that as a good thing.’

View attachment 12767

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Opposition to the change

The move has earned criticism, most notably stemming from the Opposition.

Liberal Party leader Peter Dutton dismissed the development as nothing but a progressive whim in an interview.

‘I think it is another attack on our systems, our society, and institutions.’

Opposition senator and monarchist Dean Smith, meanwhile, said the move was a missed opportunity.

‘A design incorporating both our new King and an appreciation for Australia's Indigenous heritage and culture would be a better and more unifying approach,’ he said.

‘This decision misses a unique opportunity for both the RBA and Anthony Albanese to merge these two important aspects of Australia's story.’

‘Although not totally unexpected, breaking with this long tradition will come as a disappointment to many Australians, who have never known anything different.’

The Sydney Morning Herald notes that the change passed through the current RBA board before it reached the government.

New $5 note out in ‘a number of years’

Despite the development, Aussies shouldn’t expect to see the new design anytime soon.

‘The Bank will consult with First Australians in designing the $5 banknote. The new banknote will take a number of years to be designed and printed,’ the RBA said.

‘In the meantime, the current $5 banknote will continue to be issued. It will be able to be used even after the new banknote is issued.’

This development, if final, would make the late Queen Elizabeth the last royal to be featured on Australian banknotes.

The tradition of featuring the reigning monarch first started in 1923, with King George V’s portrait appearing on all Australian bank notes up to 1953.


A sign of the times?

It wouldn’t be too far-fetched to say that this change in the $5 note is a sign of Australia’s widening break away from the British throne.

After the Queen’s passing last year conversations sprung up on whether or not it was time for the country to become a republic.

The Albanese government was earlier reported to have its eyes on a referendum for the matter — but only after it’s finished with another referendum on an the indigenous voice to parliament.

Many supporters have decried the nation’s long-standing ties with the British throne, seeing it as an impediment to a truly independent Australia.

However, others see no reason for such a shift in something they see has worked for the country so far.

View attachment 12768

The late Queen Elizabeth’s passing and King Charles’ ascension have sparked calls in Australia to shift to a republic. Image Credit: Shutterstock

Still, future moves towards a republican Australia aren’t guaranteed victory despite a sitting government that seems more open to the idea.

In 1999, a referendum was held on the same issue which resulted in a crushing defeat for the republican movement.

Another thing to take note of is public sentiment — does the average Aussie even want a republic?

Well, various polls reveal a mixed picture.

A poll conducted by The Guardian (right around the Queen’s passing, it must be noted) revealed that 43 per cent of Australians supported a republican form of government, with 20 per cent saying they were unsure and the remaining 37 per cent saying they opposed it.

However, in another poll conducted by market research company Roy Morgan around the same time, 60 per cent of Aussies wanted the monarchy to stay, while the remaining 40 per cent opposed the idea.

And of course, here in the SDC, an overwhelming majority — 72 per cent — said they didn’t think Australia should become a republic.

Something to think about, eh?

Key Takeaways

• The Reserve Bank has announced that a design honouring the culture and history of the First Australians will replace Queen Elizabeth’s image on the $5 note, ending a century-long tradition of the monarchy appearing on Australia’s cash.
• Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government supported the Reserve Bank’s decision, while Opposition leader Peter Dutton accused the government of leading the change and labelled it as an 'attack on our systems'.
• The RBA said it consulted the federal government before making its decision and will now consult with First Australians in the design of the new note, which will take a number of years to manufacture.

On that note, perhaps as something of a consolation, Aussie currency isn’t entirely saying goodbye to the monarchy as King Charles III will still be featured on our coins.

If you’re excited to see King Charles’ visage on your change, however, you might also have to do some waiting.

In the meantime, you might want to stay updated on plans for his upcoming coronation on May 6.

So, what are your thoughts on this announced change to our $5 notes? Is it something you agree with, or do you share sentiments with Dutton?

If you’re in favour — who or what do you think should replace the royals on the note? Popular suggestions in the past have included Steve Irwin, Paul Hogan and Shane Warne.

Members, please take note that some of you will have differing opinions on this decision and we want to remind everyone that it is okay to have opposing opinions, but it is not okay to attack someone for having an opposing opinion to you.

Remember, to be kind first and foremost. We will never endorse bullying behaviour.

Tell us your opinion below!

Source: YouTube/9 News Australia​

Have you researched when the Queen was put on the $5 note? I would prefer Australian flora and fauna on the notes. Otherwise we could end up with Australian people on our notes who are later proven to be corrupt. I really do not want to see the British monarchy on our new notes, nor on our coins when they are replaced.

 

[Bullwinkle]

Until such time that Australia becomes a Republic….the reigning monarch should be on the $5.00 note….show respect!!

 

[SiouxheeQ]

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

The above statement says it all - not in the hands of the people or the Government, instead the less than 3% of our population gets to decide. Welcome to wokeness.

 

[Luckyus]

A design to be determined through consultations with Indigenous Australians will soon be seen on $5 notes. Image Credit: Shutterstock

The above statement says it all - not in the hands of the people or the Government, instead the less than 3% of our population gets to decide. Welcome to wokeness.

A couple of muddy hand prints, wavy lines, and a carton of VB with a wine casket?

 

[Alan W]

Indigenous people are already represented on our currency, take a look at the fifty dollar note or a one dollar coin. The same with the referendum to give indigenous people a voice in our government; what about the indigenous representatives already in Canberra?

The government no longer listens to the people, it listens to the noisy minorities. It will be a sad day when this country becomes a republic and losses those checks and balances of the Govenor-General. History is there to teach us, not to be ignored!