Is your beef contributing to deforestation? Woolies promises greener future with its bold pledge!

As people become more conscious of their environmental footprint, many are looking for ways to make more sustainable choices, especially when it comes to what they put on their dinner plates.

For our members who are passionate about preserving the beautiful Australian landscapes and ecosystems, there's some promising news on the horizon from one of the country's leading supermarkets.


Woolworths, a household name for many Aussies, has recently announced a significant update to its sustainability goals, committing to sell ‘deforestation-free’ beef by the end of next year.

On Wednesday, August 28, the retailer revealed its financial results and revised its sustainability target, moving from a net-zero deforestation goal to aiming for a ‘deforestation-free’ status by December 2025.

The policy will cover fresh beef, paper, pulp, timber, palm oil, cocoa, and soy sold in its stores.

However, it is still uncertain how ‘deforestation-free’ will be defined for cattle producers supplying beef to the supermarket, which represents around 7 per cent of all beef processed in Australia.


image (103).png
Woolworths has pledged to offer ‘deforestation-free’ beef by December 2025. Credit: Cattle Australia


‘We are committed to sourcing beef sustainably in partnership with our farmers and suppliers,’ a Woolworths spokesperson stated.

‘We believe our no-deforestation goal will help promote the already strong sustainability credentials of Australian red meat, and expect all our suppliers to adhere to all federal and state land management laws.’

‘We support the development of a localised definition which recognises Australia's unique landscape and vegetation while ensuring responsible land management,’ they added.

In its sustainability statement, Woolworths mentioned that its strategy for achieving the target would be ‘grounded in principles of a just transition’ and that it would keep collaborating with beef producers ‘in pursuit of a geographically appropriate definition of deforestation that meets global regulatory requirements and corporate deforestation targets’.


Cattle Australia, which represents farmers raising pasture-fed cattle, applauded Woolworths' pledge to collaborate with producers in defining its sustainability criteria for the Australian context.

According to its spokesman, Chris Parker, Australian farmers ‘already operate under some of the toughest and most extensive vegetation management laws in the developed world (and) this move was a win for producers and the environment’.

Conservation groups have also praised Woolworths' decision to shift from a net-zero deforestation goal to a deforestation-free target.

‘No one sells more beef to Australians than Woolworths, so this commitment has enormous implications for nature and for people who want to make sustainable food choices,’ Australian Conservation Foundation Spokesman Nathaniel Pelle said.

‘While most graziers are not engaged in broadscale bulldozing of bushland, Australians can't choose deforestation-free beef because supermarkets don't differentiate.’

‘With this commitment, which follows a similar commitment from ALDI, that is changing,’ he added.


Meanwhile, Coles supermarket has adopted a ‘net-zero’ deforestation target rather than a deforestation-free policy.

This approach permits deforestation as long as it is ‘offset’ by tree planting in other areas.

A Coles spokesperson stated that the company is working with environmental groups on various nature-related matters.

‘We recognise the complexity of addressing the nature challenge and are committed to working with our farmers, suppliers and industry partners to reduce our impact on the environment and help our customers to make more responsible choices,’ the spokesperson said.


As Woolworths moves towards a deforestation-free policy for its beef supply, aiming to address environmental concerns with a more sustainable approach, other retailers are also making strides in reducing their environmental impact.

For example, ALDI has recently introduced a new packaging strategy designed to cut down on plastic waste.

This initiative is part of a broader trend among supermarkets to adopt more eco-friendly practices and address the pressing issue of plastic pollution, highlighting a growing commitment across the industry to sustainability.
Key Takeaways

  • Woolworths has committed to selling ‘deforestation-free’ beef by December 2025.
  • The retailer has updated its sustainability target, moving from a net-zero deforestation goal to a deforestation-free goal, which will include a range of products.
  • Woolworths will work with farmers and suppliers to develop a definition of deforestation-free that is appropriate for the Australian context and ensures responsible land management.
  • Conservation groups have welcomed the move, noting the significance of Woolworths' market influence on sustainable food choices and contrasting the commitment with Coles' less stringent net-zero deforestation target.
What are your thoughts on Woolworths' deforestation-free beef pledge? Do you consider environmental factors when choosing where to shop and what to buy?

Share your views in the comments below, and let's discuss how we can all make a difference with our everyday choices.
 
Sponsored
Major concern with deforestation is Chinese Windmills
Not only those, but all this so called alternative energies. Look around Australia and see how much has been done already to accomodate those stupid wind turbines and solar panels. Why aren't they taking advantage of all the real eastate on top of all city building etc. or the desert areas. Too costly, then stop throwing money at Ukraine and stupid stuff like a Rugby Team for New Guinea.
 
The policy will cover fresh beef, paper, pulp, timber, palm oil, cocoa, and soy sold in its stores. So fresh beef is an issue. I see the rest as an issue. Cattle can graze on land not suitable to grow anything and keep the undergrowth down so there is less fires or less serious fires. All plants are grown on land stripped of everything including small animals and insects. The sprayed with chemicals to stop them being eaten and chemical fertilisers into the soil. And don't get me started on the wind and solar. They damage the environment, solar panels in the volume they put on the land can start wild fires and the wind turbines are not only not recyclable they are prone to bursting into flames, need fossil oil to run them and cost millions to transport and set up and the transport is done by fossil fuel driven trucks. We are being conned big time for money for the already rich
 
Phrases emanating from a bovine colon: "Cage-Free", "Free-Range", "Deforestation-Free", "Healthy", "Your data is safe with us", and "I promise not to ***e in your mouth."
 
  • Love
Reactions: bluetang
Not only those, but all this so called alternative energies. Look around Australia and see how much has been done already to accomodate those stupid wind turbines and solar panels. Why aren't they taking advantage of all the real eastate on top of all city building etc. or the desert areas. Too costly, then stop throwing money at Ukraine and stupid stuff like a Rugby Team for New Guinea.
Saw a pic the other day how in Korea they utilised the space between the up and down freeway lanes to install elevated solar panels and the space under them was the bike lanes, it went for kilometres, we just don't have the ingenuity here for much of anything, Ukraine has been demolished, helping them to resist a communist dictator and keeping the faith with our nearest and dearest neighbour is not stupid imo.
 
It's all a load of BS..... CONTROL is the name of the game with exorbitant price increases.... I changed to AMBER..... the worst thing I ever did.... they have 1 month to shape up or I ship out....
 
The policy will cover fresh beef, paper, pulp, timber, palm oil, cocoa, and soy sold in its stores. So fresh beef is an issue. I see the rest as an issue. Cattle can graze on land not suitable to grow anything and keep the undergrowth down so there is less fires or less serious fires. All plants are grown on land stripped of everything including small animals and insects. The sprayed with chemicals to stop them being eaten and chemical fertilisers into the soil. And don't get me started on the wind and solar. They damage the environment, solar panels in the volume they put on the land can start wild fires and the wind turbines are not only not recyclable they are prone to bursting into flames, need fossil oil to run them and cost millions to transport and set up and the transport is done by fossil fuel driven trucks. We are being conned big time for money for the already rich
Well said. More people who are awake like this are sorely needed.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×