Is Australia expecting an enemy soon? Insider reveals details about possible attacks Down Under!
- Replies 11
Geopolitical tensions often simmer below the surface, as these usually lead to complex discussions.
Yet, a recent development sent ripples of concern across Australia, and here's what we know about it so far.
Reports have emerged that Chinese warships, lurking ominously on Aussie shores, could be rehearsing for land strikes.
This startling revelation prompted a serious re-evaluation of Australia's security posture and defence capabilities.
The alarm was first sounded by Australia's top defence bureaucrat, Greg Moriarty.
During a Senate Estimates hearing, Moriarty described the Chinese military's activities as 'practising, rehearsing, and they are collecting.'
This was no vague insinuation as it indicated that the threat level might escalate.
Former Home Affairs secretary Mike Pezzulo also voiced his concern about the sighting.
Pezzulo warned that the Chinese military was preparing for 'land strike missions against Australian infrastructure and bases'.
Strategic defence expert Michael Shoebridge spoke to the media about the gravity of the situation.
He pointed out that China's live-fire exercises, conducted 600 km off Australia's east coast, demonstrated that the nation's geographical isolation was no longer a protective barrier.
Shoebridge noted that Chinese warships were showcasing their ability to project power far beyond their borders.
The Chinese flotilla, last spotted 170 nautical miles southeast of Perth, now included two more warships and a potential nuclear-powered submarine.
This task force is expected to complete a full circumnavigation of Australia.
In response, American and Australian submarines, along with an air warfare destroyer, were dispatched from a Perth naval base to monitor the Chinese fleet.
The HMAS Stuart, an ANZAC-class frigate, has been shadowing the flotilla for real-time updates on their actions.
However, the Chinese navy, now the largest in the world, has exposed the vulnerabilities in Australia's maritime defence.
Shoebridge described the Australian Navy as 'small and ageing', with the current fleet of ANZAC frigates being outgunned and outclassed by the Chinese task force.
Even with planned upgrades scheduled for the early 2030s, Australia's naval capabilities lagged behind China's warships.
The cost disparity is also stark, with China's cruisers coming in at a fraction of the price compared to Australia's Hunter class frigates.
The People's Liberation Army Navy task force's live-fire drill, which took place off the South Coast of New South Wales, led to the diversion of 49 commercial flights.
This incident was not reported to Australian Defence by China but rather by a Virgin Airlines pilot, which raised more questions about communication protocols and early warning systems in place.
Amidst these developments, Defence Minister Richard Marles urged Australians not to overestimate the threat and emphasised adherence to international law.
However, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong faced criticism from the Opposition for allegedly underestimating the strategic significance of the drills.
The Opposition also accused the Labor government of failing to appreciate the strategic implications.
Coalition Senator James Paterson highlighted the inadequacy of Prime Minister Albanese's 'stabilisation agenda'.
Shadow Defence Minister Andrew Hastie also criticised the Prime Minister's response as 'very weak leadership'.
In the wake of these events, it's clear that Australia is at a crossroads.
The nation must confront the reality of a changing security landscape and the potential threats looming on the horizon.
Is Australia prepared to defend its sovereignty in the face of China's increasing military posturing? How do you feel about the government's response to these potential threats? We encourage you to share your thoughts and concerns about this news in the comments section below.
Yet, a recent development sent ripples of concern across Australia, and here's what we know about it so far.
Reports have emerged that Chinese warships, lurking ominously on Aussie shores, could be rehearsing for land strikes.
This startling revelation prompted a serious re-evaluation of Australia's security posture and defence capabilities.
The alarm was first sounded by Australia's top defence bureaucrat, Greg Moriarty.
During a Senate Estimates hearing, Moriarty described the Chinese military's activities as 'practising, rehearsing, and they are collecting.'
This was no vague insinuation as it indicated that the threat level might escalate.
Former Home Affairs secretary Mike Pezzulo also voiced his concern about the sighting.
Pezzulo warned that the Chinese military was preparing for 'land strike missions against Australian infrastructure and bases'.
Strategic defence expert Michael Shoebridge spoke to the media about the gravity of the situation.
He pointed out that China's live-fire exercises, conducted 600 km off Australia's east coast, demonstrated that the nation's geographical isolation was no longer a protective barrier.
Shoebridge noted that Chinese warships were showcasing their ability to project power far beyond their borders.
The Chinese flotilla, last spotted 170 nautical miles southeast of Perth, now included two more warships and a potential nuclear-powered submarine.
This task force is expected to complete a full circumnavigation of Australia.
In response, American and Australian submarines, along with an air warfare destroyer, were dispatched from a Perth naval base to monitor the Chinese fleet.
The HMAS Stuart, an ANZAC-class frigate, has been shadowing the flotilla for real-time updates on their actions.
However, the Chinese navy, now the largest in the world, has exposed the vulnerabilities in Australia's maritime defence.
Shoebridge described the Australian Navy as 'small and ageing', with the current fleet of ANZAC frigates being outgunned and outclassed by the Chinese task force.
Even with planned upgrades scheduled for the early 2030s, Australia's naval capabilities lagged behind China's warships.
The cost disparity is also stark, with China's cruisers coming in at a fraction of the price compared to Australia's Hunter class frigates.
The People's Liberation Army Navy task force's live-fire drill, which took place off the South Coast of New South Wales, led to the diversion of 49 commercial flights.
This incident was not reported to Australian Defence by China but rather by a Virgin Airlines pilot, which raised more questions about communication protocols and early warning systems in place.
Amidst these developments, Defence Minister Richard Marles urged Australians not to overestimate the threat and emphasised adherence to international law.
However, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong faced criticism from the Opposition for allegedly underestimating the strategic significance of the drills.
The Opposition also accused the Labor government of failing to appreciate the strategic implications.
Coalition Senator James Paterson highlighted the inadequacy of Prime Minister Albanese's 'stabilisation agenda'.
Shadow Defence Minister Andrew Hastie also criticised the Prime Minister's response as 'very weak leadership'.
In the wake of these events, it's clear that Australia is at a crossroads.
The nation must confront the reality of a changing security landscape and the potential threats looming on the horizon.
.png){kind=icon}
