Insider reveals Princess of Wales' ‘worst nightmare’ in biography

The life of royalty often appears as a fairytale from the outside, with its grandeur and pageantry capturing people's imaginations worldwide.

However, behind the gilded gates and the regal titles, members of the royal family are not immune to personal trials and tribulations that can be as harrowing as any experienced by the public.

For the Princess of Wales, formerly known as Kate Middleton, one such ordeal stood out as a reminder of the invasive and distressing aspects of life in the public eye.



In a recent biography by Robert Jobson titled Catherine, The Princess of Wales, readers were given a glimpse into what the Princess described as her 'worst nightmare’.

Many may only vaguely recall this incident, which occurred in 2012, but the emotional scars it left on both the Princess and her husband, Prince William, were indelibly etched into their personal histories.


shutterstock_2374497723.jpg
Robert Jobson revealed in Princess of Wales’ biography about the Princess’ ‘worst nightmare’. Credit: Shutterstock


The couple, seeking respite from their royal duties and the dreary British weather, ventured to the Château d’Autet estate in Provence, owned by Prince William's second cousin, Viscount Linley (now Earl of Snowdon).

It was meant to be a private getaway, a chance to unwind under the Provençal sun and enjoy the simple pleasures of life away from the public gaze.

However, their privacy was shattered when a local photographer, Valerie Suau, captured images of the Princess sunbathing topless.

These photographs were later published by the French tabloid magazine Closer, with the headline ‘Seulement dans Closer: Kate et William, Leurs Vacances Très Hot en Provence’ (‘Only in Closer: Kate and William, Their Very Hot Holidays in Provence’).

The princess ‘remained composed’, but ‘once they were alone, a maelstrom of emotions must have swirled within them’, according to Jobson.

In private, they were ‘livid’ and feeling ‘violated’, a royal spokesman later disclosed. William also described the moment as ‘shocking’ in a later court statement.



The timing of the publication was particularly cruel, coinciding with the 15th anniversary of the death of Prince William's mother, Diana, Princess of Wales, whose own battles with the paparazzi are well-documented and tragically linked to her untimely death.

The invasion of privacy was not just a personal affront but a painful echo of the past for Prince William.

Prince William was ‘overcome with anger and frustration’, Jobson wrote.

The royal couple's response was swift and decisive. They launched a legal battle that spanned six years and multiple countries, a testament to their determination to protect their privacy and set a precedent for the future.

‘Their sadness has turned to anger and disbelief as we learn more about the photographs,’ a royal source said.

‘This is a clear and unjustifiable, grotesque breach of privacy. If we don’t take a stand against this, then when would we make a stand?’

‘They feel very strongly about what’s happened in France today,’ the source added.

The legal proceedings were arduous, and while the French court eventually ruled in their favour, awarding the Princess $193,000 in damages, the photographs had already circulated across various European publications.



This incident was not an isolated one within the Royal Family.

In 1999, Sophie Rhys-Jones, now the Duchess of Edinburgh, faced a similar invasion of privacy before her wedding to Prince Edward when topless photos of her were published by The Sun.

‘I remember Sophie ringing me in the early hours of the morning, in floods of tears, when she discovered that The Sun had bought the picture and was planning to publish it,’ her former business partner Murray Harkin said.

‘She was so upset.’
Key Takeaways

  • An insider revealed the emotional toll experienced by the Prince and Princess of Wales during a crisis earlier in their royal careers.
  • The crisis involved private, near-nude photographs of the Princess being published in a French magazine, leading to a lengthy legal battle.
  • The situation was especially painful for the Prince, reminding him of the paparazzi harassment that contributed to his mother's death.
  • Despite the royal couple's efforts, the ruling against the magazine had limited effect, with the images being published elsewhere in Europe.
How do you feel about the balance between public interest and the privacy of public figures? Have you ever experienced a breach of privacy that left a lasting impact? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below!
 
Sponsored
Simple if you are in the public eye don’t sunbathe topless ! The paps are as bad as scammers no one is safe from them.
Bollocks! She wasn’t in a public place. The photographer should be in jail for invasion of privacy and the French magazine publishers held to account for immoral earnings … and preferably guillotined.
 
Why does the paparazzi, think they have the right to take pictures of anyone famous at any time and particularly when on a private holiday. No one needs to see anyone topless, they should be allowed privacy. The damage this causes would be just dreadful. No matter who you are we are all intituled to privacy.
Sad to say there is always someone who will be happy to hand over a huge amount of money for the photos.
Leave people to live their lives as they wish.
Kind regards to all Vicki
 
Bollocks! She wasn’t in a public place. The photographer should be in jail for invasion of privacy and the French magazine publishers held to account for immoral earnings … and preferably guillotined.
I'd photoshop a photo of them, the photographer shagging a dog, or being shagged by one and put it on the internet
 
Wow! Who wants to see photos of some inconsequential woman baring her pancakes at some French hovel?

"News" approaching the nadirs of journalism along with the story of a roof blowing off a 3 metre by 3 metre shed during high winds in Mount Isa. Definitely front page material! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: NotNats and DLHM
Why does the paparazzi, think they have the right to take pictures of anyone famous at any time and particularly when on a private holiday. No one needs to see anyone topless, they should be allowed privacy. The damage this causes would be just dreadful. No matter who you are we are all intituled to privacy.
Sad to say there is always someone who will be happy to hand over a huge amount of money for the photos.
Leave people to live their lives as they wish.
Kind regards to all Vicki
Poor Catherine just like living in a fishbowl and Sophie l like her too nice person
 
  • Like
Reactions: BellaB18
Did you ring these guys?

View attachment 57756

London police in 1891. Things have progressed since the Victorian Era of stuffy, pompous and pretentious fakery.

I hope you don't watch television. Your eyelashes and ear hairs would be severely singed!
Did you ring these guys?

View attachment 57756

London police in 1891. Things have progressed since the Victorian Era of stuffy, pompous and pretentious fakery.

I hope you don't watch television. Your eyelashes and ear hairs would be severely singed!
No cause for vulgarity all the same
 
  • Like
Reactions: marni
Many SDC articles have quotes from people who say "F**KED" and "A***HOLE". I, for one, do not condone censorship.

In certain occupations, reports are deemed legal documents. By using censorship like the two examples above, renders those documents as inadmissible evidence in a court of law when a critical incident has occurred.
 
Many SDC articles have quotes from people who say "F**KED" and "A***HOLE". I, for one, do not condone censorship.

In certain occupations, reports are deemed legal documents. By using censorship like the two examples above, renders those documents as inadmissible evidence in a court of law when a critical incident has occurred.
Then l belong in the old days when people had manners were respectful and filthy language was looked down on,Now nearly everybody thinks it clever to be as repulsive as they can.Very sad!
 
Got news for you it was never out of the fucker, I've been around to long and seen to much shit to really give a God damn what you think or feel.
Thats not good news but sad news to think you have to be so obnoxious to express yourself
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×