Grieving Daughter's Home Invasion Nightmare - Squatters Take Over & Ruin Her Father's Legacy!

In a tale that reads like a script from a dramatic thriller, a grieving daughter in Victoria, Australia, was left reeling from a shocking discovery that would add to her sorrow. Carol, a resident of Westmeadows in Melbourne's northwest, found herself at the centre of a home ownership debate that has since sparked a national conversation, including commentary from the outspoken writer Clementine Ford.

Carol's ordeal began when she approached her late father's home, which had been mostly vacant for the last 12 to 15 years due to her caring responsibilities for her mother and prior renovations. To her astonishment, her key no longer worked. Upon further investigation, she realised that squatters had broken in, changed all the locks, and cleared out the house of all its contents – from furniture and clothing to personal and sentimental items that held memories of her late father.


The emotional toll of such a violation is hard to quantify. For Carol, it wasn't just about the loss of physical items but the erasure of her family's presence from a place that once held so much history and love. The police were called, and with the help of neighbours who confirmed Carol's ownership, they gained entry to the property. The squatters were not present, but evidence of their stay was clear – they had moved in their own furniture, including a fridge and a washing machine.


1726809560396.png
A Victorian woman finds squatters have changed the locks and cleared her late father's long-vacant home. Credit: Clementine Ford / Instagram


Legal advice given to Carol suggested hiring a security guard to ward off the squatters and arranging for them to collect their belongings under supervision before changing the locks. However, the situation is not as straightforward as it seems. The incident has highlighted the complexities surrounding property rights, homelessness, and the rental market in Australia.


Clementine Ford, known for her left-wing commentary, weighed in on the debate, sympathising with Carol's loss but also pointing out the failures of the rental market in Australia. Ford defended the squatters' actions, arguing that the dire situation of the rental market and the lack of renters' rights justify the occupation of a house that has been mostly empty for years. She criticised the concept of property as an investment and called for a reevaluation of property ownership as a basic right to help reduce or eliminate homelessness, particularly among older women.

The government's Specialist Homelessness Services Annual Report 2022–23 supports Ford's concerns, revealing a 40% increase in older women seeking help for homelessness in the last decade. The report attributes this rise to a shortage of affordable housing, lower lifetime earnings, and savings for women, and the aging population.

Ford's personal reflections on her own housing insecurity and the broader implications for Australia's property market add depth to the discussion. She calls for stricter regulations on property investors to ensure homes are not left vacant while many struggle to find stable housing.


This incident has opened up a Pandora's box of issues related to property ownership, homelessness, and social justice. It raises questions about the balance between the rights of property owners and the needs of the community, especially in a country where the gap between the haves and have-nots seems to be widening.

As members of the Seniors Discount Club, many of you may have experienced or know someone who has faced similar challenges with property and housing. We invite you to share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. How do you think Australia should address the issue of vacant properties and homelessness? What rights should homeowners have when their properties are invaded, and what support should be available to those in need of housing?
Key Takeaways
  • A Victorian woman discovered squatters had changed the locks and cleared out her late father's home, which had been mostly vacant for the last 12 to 15 years.
  • Lawyer David Whiting advised the woman to hire security and confront the squatters to reclaim her property.
  • Writer Clementine Ford highlighted issues with Australia's rental market, expressing sympathy for the women's situation but also defending the squatters' rights due to housing shortages.
  • Ford calls for a change in Australia's attitude towards property ownership, advocating for fixed-term and long-term rental leases to combat homelessness and make housing more accessible, especially for older women facing a crisis in homelessness.
This story is not just about a house; it's about the fabric of our society and how we care for the most vulnerable among us. It's a conversation that needs to be had, and we're here to facilitate that discussion.
 
Sponsored
Owned but not visited for 12-15 Years!
I know family duties are long, tough, arduous, but to not even bother to go there to check up, to see if the house had burned down or fallen down defies belief. Unless a manager was employed, or a ‘responsible person’ was appointed to regularly check on, and check out, the property for you and send a regular report, no one would be surprised that others took it to be abandoned!
I have little sympathy for anyone so entitled as to just walk away for such
a monumental length of time!!

Who was mowing lawn, and naturestrip?
Did she think the property did not require any form of RESPONSIBLE upkeep?
I do not support squatters, but neither do I support her absolute and complete failure to be a responsible owner.
No wonder others desperate for a home thought it abandoned!
She is very lucky they did not get to keep the entire property through ADVERSE POSSESSION!
Absolutely - no consideration given to the state the property would have been in, the vermin etc it would have attracted. I cannot quite fathom how anyone could just ignore a property for so long. Not condoning squatters, but really ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dynamo and IAN3005
I have a client who's family home has been vandalised and when a person known to the owners reported theft taking place, the police did nothing about it. It's a sad indictment of our modern world.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: Dynamo and Ezzy
Mmostly I just feel for the poor lady who has devoted her life to caring for aging relatives and then finds herself in a situation where the belongings of said relatives have been removed and destroyed by squatting vandals. I'm sure she could have been found if the illegal tenants had so much as asked the neighbours (who identified her). Then they could have come to some arrangement. I wonder how the convinced utility companies to connect them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dynamo
I have to say that I'm 100% on the squatter's side with this one. As far as they were concerned, it was an abandoned property, and reading between the lines, it sounds like they were the only ones who maintained it since moving in, possibly over a decade ago, as well as keeping all the utilities and services in good order. Only yesterday I wrote an article on another site about the debate over Negative Gearing. In that article I suggested that Negative Gearing should not be abolished altogether but should only apply to investment properties that are occupied on a full-time basis, NOT on properties left empty. Property owners would be required to provide ongoing proof of occupancy in the form of lease agreements, maintenance, AND outgoing utility bills to claim a negative gearing tax concession. This should bring a lot more homes on to the rental market, or to be on sold to help ease the housing crisis, as well as cost savings for the government by reducing unfair tax concessions.

Obviously, a lot of other members of SDC will be in total disagreement with such a suggestion simply because there are other members that would have one or more negatively geared investment properties both occupied full-time, used purely as holiday lets, or left empty. But in my opinion, there really needs to be some fairness towards people on lower incomes in need of somewhere to live in an impossible to afford housing market due to a drastic shortage of available properties. I'm very much a USE IT or LOSE IT kinda guy when it comes to people's rights! Cheers :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAN3005
Mmostly I just feel for the poor lady who has devoted her life to caring for aging relatives and then finds herself in a situation where the belongings of said relatives have been removed and destroyed by squatting vandals. I'm sure she could have been found if the illegal tenants had so much as asked the neighbours (who identified her). Then they could have come to some arrangement. I wonder how the convinced utility companies to connect them?
Nothing in the article suggested that any property had been destroyed or vandalised, simply removed and replaced. I'm pretty sure that if it was abandoned, and locked up for 15 years, whatever property left inside would have smelled very musty and mouldy, so there couldn't have been very much by way of 'treasured possessions' if they were neither claimed or checked on for 15 years. As far as the 'squatters' were concerned, it was an abandoned property that almost certainly looked like a complete mess with no upkeep or maintenance at all for 15 years when they moved in. The squatters were almost certainly the only ones that returned it to being liveable again.

As far as utilities are concerned, they simply needed to open or transfer accounts normally with no need to 'convince' anybody to connect them. There was obviously no service history for 15 years to refer to, so connecting the services would be straight forward. I'm hoping that the squatters challenge this one under the Adverse Possession laws if it's been close to 15 years, especially if they have maintained it in good order, which clearly the owner neglected to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nozmo
Sadly I can see both sides of this story, had the home been left unattended all those years both the home and the garden would have been in a terrible state, it would have been better to rent it or employ the services of a caretaker. So many people are homeless due to no fault of their own I feel houses should not be left empty for extreme periods of time there should be a law in place either rent or sell not just leave them unoccupied to fall into decay of use to no one then. Obviously Carol hadn’t been there in all those years nor commissioned any one else to check on it or maintain the property I’m sorry for her dilemma but also for the squatters who have looked after the property
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Nozmo
Owned but not visited for 12-15 Years!
I know family duties are long, tough, arduous, but to not even bother to go there to check up, to see if the house had burned down or fallen down defies belief. Unless a manager was employed, or a ‘responsible person’ was appointed to regularly check on, and check out, the property for you and send a regular report, no one would be surprised that others took it to be abandoned!
I have little sympathy for anyone so entitled as to just walk away for such
a monumental length of time!!

Who was mowing lawn, and naturestrip?
Did she think the property did not require any form of RESPONSIBLE upkeep?
I do not support squatters, but neither do I support her absolute and complete failure to be a responsible owner.
No wonder others desperate for a home thought it abandoned!
She is very lucky they did not get to keep the entire property through ADVERSE POSSESSION!
I totally agree with you. Everybody knows about the housing crisis and yet she left a perfectly good home to rot for about 15 years. Not right.
 
I have to say that I'm 100% on the squatter's side with this one. As far as they were concerned, it was an abandoned property, and reading between the lines, it sounds like they were the only ones who maintained it since moving in, possibly over a decade ago, as well as keeping all the utilities and services in good order. Only yesterday I wrote an article on another site about the debate over Negative Gearing. In that article I suggested that Negative Gearing should not be abolished altogether but should only apply to investment properties that are occupied on a full-time basis, NOT on properties left empty. Property owners would be required to provide ongoing proof of occupancy in the form of lease agreements, maintenance, AND outgoing utility bills to claim a negative gearing tax concession. This should bring a lot more homes on to the rental market, or to be on sold to help ease the housing crisis, as well as cost savings for the government by reducing unfair tax concessions.

Obviously, a lot of other members of SDC will be in total disagreement with such a suggestion simply because there are other members that would have one or more negatively geared investment properties both occupied full-time, used purely as holiday lets, or left empty. But in my opinion, there really needs to be some fairness towards people on lower incomes in need of somewhere to live in an impossible to afford housing market due to a drastic shortage of available properties. I'm very much a USE IT or LOSE IT kinda guy when it comes to people's rights! Cheers :)
Have to disagree....there is such a thing as privacy. I would drive them off the property.
 
Have to disagree....there is such a thing as privacy. I would drive them off the property.
That's ok, all good, but I just need to ask one thing: If the owner hasn't gone to the property nor done any maintenance at all for 12-15 years, it's going to be in a bit of a state of disrepair. So, then if somebody else moves in, cleans it up, reconnects the utilities, and returns it to being a liveable home again, shouldn't those people be entitled to some form of compensation for doing what the owner neglected to do? I think they most certainly should be. For all we know, the owner may well have been watching the property, having the maintenance and upkeep done for free for the past 15 years, then chose to 'reclaim' the property just before the 15 years adverse possession laws kicks in. In other words, we just don't know the full facts to judge in this case, but I for one would love to see it go to court and find out how it pans out. Cheers :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marni
Best to have someone in it. So many people want to keep the pension and therefore don’t want the bother of income or tenants. Overseas people call it land banking. Truly is a problem with the government making rules. I bet the house with so many
Memories will be sold when the estate is up for grabs
 
I wonder if it even had insurance on it --not that it would be valid when it had been "empty" for that long.
Some insurance companies unless the rules have been changed the property has to be slept in for one night "at least once a..." I can't remember the length of time. It also related to holiday houses.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×