SDC Rewards Member
Upgrade yours now
"Fun" Aunt takes 13 year old girl to get her bellybutton pierced without parental consent and is 'banned' from Easter
A Reddit user has sparked debate after revealing that her husband's sister took their 13-year-old daughter to get her bellybutton pierced without their consent.
The original poster (OP), who is 40 years old and from the US, said that her husband's sister is "not her favourite person".
"She's always involved in a different MLM (multi-level marketing scheme) every time we see her, she quits every other job she has after a month, asks us for money, and has a new boyfriend every time we see her," she wrote.
However, she said that their daughter has always been "crazy about her" and that she is the "fun" aunt.
The OP said that she found out about the piercing when she saw her daughter disinfecting it a few days later.
"Our daughter has expressed wanting this to her dad and I, and we firmly said no. My husband thinks they're trashy and I sort of agree. Maybe when she's a little older if that's really what she wants, but 13? No way," she wrote.
Mom asks online users if she and her husband are being unreasonable for banning her husband's sister
from their Easter celebrations after the sister took their 13-year-old daughter to get her bellybutton pierced without their consent.
Credits: Shutterstock
The OP said that she and her husband are now "banning" the sister from their Easter celebrations and that their daughter is "upset".
"At the end of the day, she took our daughter to do something that we firmly said no to, and potentially put her at harm. We also aren't going to allow our daughter to go with her aunt alone anywhere anytime soon," she wrote.
"Are we a**holes for this?"
Many Reddit users were quick to point out that the sister had disobeyed the parents' wishes and potentially put the child in danger.
"NTA ('not the a**hole) and it would be irresponsible to let her be alone with your daughter any time in the future. She had to have known she was doing it without your permission and what lengths will she go to be the cool aunt? Tattoos? Alcohol? Drugs?" wrote one user.
Another added: "NTA. But you should take your daughter to a tat shop that also specialises in piercings, they are often the best place to get them and they can look at what was done and tell you if it was done right, hopefully it was."
However, some users said that the OP was being "irresponsible" for calling the piercing "trashy" and that it was a phase that many people go through.
"If she had taken her to a reputable piercer, that would be a different story and I don’t think it would be an issue for a 13 year old (although legally they’re not old enough to do that without a parent I don’t think?) bodily autonomy is important and it’s not as if she can’t take it out if she changes her mind when she’s older, or hide it in professional situations, it’s not a nose ring or tongue ring," wrote one user.
Another added: "As someone who had a belly button Ruby, I can tell you it's not trashy. It was a phase of life that I enjoyed. With that said, 13 is too young in my opinion."
What are your thoughts on the matter, members? Leaving aside the question of whether or not the piercing is 'trashy', do you think the aunt was out of line? Should the parents have allowed their daughter to make her own decision, or was this a case of them rightfully exerting their authority? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
Last edited by a moderator: