Former NBA star ignites controversy with bold remarks on weather predictions
- Replies 24
In the wake of natural disasters, it's not uncommon for emotions to run high and for the conversation to become heated, especially on social media.
This was certainly the case when former NBA star and Australian sports icon took to his platform to express scepticism over the Bureau of Meteorology's (BOM) predictions regarding Cyclone Alfred.
Andrew Bogut, who has become known for his occasional forays into political commentary, didn't hold back in his critique.
He posted a series of messages questioning the accuracy of the BOM's forecasting, implying that their predictions could not be trusted.
He even mockingly suggested that people should 'take their predictions for 2030 and beyond seriously.'
The backlash was swift and pointed. Social media users directly affected by the cyclone called out Bogut for his remarks.
'Hey, big fella, 20+ hours without power in my suburb and now flooding. Looks like BOM got it right. Stay in your lane,' one commenter wrote.
'Just checking to see if Andrew Bogut’s got any more updates on the BOM today? Or has he retired from being a weather reporter?' another echoed.
'Yes storms change, if it wasn’t for the BOM you wouldn’t know it was there in the first place.'
Cyclone Alfred, which made landfall over southeast Queensland and weakened into a trough extending into New South Wales, caused significant disruption.
At the peak of the storm, 400,000 homes and businesses were left without power, which has since decreased but still stands at a staggering 118,000.
Since the cyclone's onset, the NSW State Emergency Service (SES) has received over 7,000 calls for assistance.
In defence of their work, the BOM responded to the criticism by emphasising the complexity of predicting tropical cyclones.
A spokesperson explained that these weather systems can follow erratic paths and that scientific understanding continually evolves.
They pointed out that Cyclone Alfred's unusual behaviour, including a full loop before making landfall, was tracked and reported in consistently updated forecasts.
The BOM also highlighted advancements in technology and science that have improved their ability to predict cyclone movements.
With faster computers and increased satellite observations, meteorologists have a better grasp of the environmental wind flows that influence the direction and speed of cyclones.
Andrew Bogut's comments serve as a reminder of the delicate balance between public opinion and scientific expertise, especially in times of crisis.
While it's essential to maintain a critical eye, it's equally crucial to recognise the expertise and dedication of professionals like those at the BOM, who work tirelessly to provide accurate information to the public.
For our readers at the Seniors Discount Club, many of whom have lived through their fair share of weather events, the importance of reliable weather forecasting cannot be overstated.
It's a critical tool for preparing and protecting communities, particularly those who may be more vulnerable during such emergencies.
Have you found the BOM's information to be reliable? How do you prepare for severe weather events? Your insights are valuable, and your stories could help others better understand the importance of weather services like the BOM. Join the conversation in the comments below.
This was certainly the case when former NBA star and Australian sports icon took to his platform to express scepticism over the Bureau of Meteorology's (BOM) predictions regarding Cyclone Alfred.
Andrew Bogut, who has become known for his occasional forays into political commentary, didn't hold back in his critique.
He posted a series of messages questioning the accuracy of the BOM's forecasting, implying that their predictions could not be trusted.
He even mockingly suggested that people should 'take their predictions for 2030 and beyond seriously.'
Andrew Bogut was criticised for comments on BOM's Cyclone Alfred predictions. Credit: Facebook
The backlash was swift and pointed. Social media users directly affected by the cyclone called out Bogut for his remarks.
'Hey, big fella, 20+ hours without power in my suburb and now flooding. Looks like BOM got it right. Stay in your lane,' one commenter wrote.
'Just checking to see if Andrew Bogut’s got any more updates on the BOM today? Or has he retired from being a weather reporter?' another echoed.
'Yes storms change, if it wasn’t for the BOM you wouldn’t know it was there in the first place.'
Cyclone Alfred, which made landfall over southeast Queensland and weakened into a trough extending into New South Wales, caused significant disruption.
At the peak of the storm, 400,000 homes and businesses were left without power, which has since decreased but still stands at a staggering 118,000.
Since the cyclone's onset, the NSW State Emergency Service (SES) has received over 7,000 calls for assistance.
In defence of their work, the BOM responded to the criticism by emphasising the complexity of predicting tropical cyclones.
A spokesperson explained that these weather systems can follow erratic paths and that scientific understanding continually evolves.
They pointed out that Cyclone Alfred's unusual behaviour, including a full loop before making landfall, was tracked and reported in consistently updated forecasts.
The BOM also highlighted advancements in technology and science that have improved their ability to predict cyclone movements.
With faster computers and increased satellite observations, meteorologists have a better grasp of the environmental wind flows that influence the direction and speed of cyclones.
Andrew Bogut's comments serve as a reminder of the delicate balance between public opinion and scientific expertise, especially in times of crisis.
While it's essential to maintain a critical eye, it's equally crucial to recognise the expertise and dedication of professionals like those at the BOM, who work tirelessly to provide accurate information to the public.
For our readers at the Seniors Discount Club, many of whom have lived through their fair share of weather events, the importance of reliable weather forecasting cannot be overstated.
It's a critical tool for preparing and protecting communities, particularly those who may be more vulnerable during such emergencies.
.png){kind=icon}
