Feeling the pinch? Here's why some might miss out on a potential $932 support increase

In a place often seen as thriving, it's easy to overlook the quiet challenges many continue to face.

For some, making ends meet remains a constant struggle, especially those depending on support systems to get by.

Ongoing discussions about financial assistance have left many feeling left out and unheard.


The current state of Centrelink payments is a pressing issue for many, especially older Australians who have spent their lives contributing to the nation's economy.

Marge, a retiree who voiced her concerns on the ABC program Q&A, encapsulates the sentiment of many when she questions how older Aussies are expected to get by on the current Age Pension.

'How can the government expect us to believe that they know everyone is doing it tough when the latest pension increase for a couple equates to 25 cents per day each?' she said.


1744675264255.png
Calls to raise Centrelink payments were rejected despite rising costs and community appeals. Credit: Facebook


'Every bill we pay has risen significantly... actions definitely speak louder than words in this situation.'

The disparity between their financial resources and the cost of living is growing wider for those on a fixed income.

Many people share Marge's frustration. They feel that after a lifetime of working and paying taxes, they should not have to pinch pennies in their twilight years.


JobSeeker, another critical Centrelink payment, has also been under scrutiny.

The recent increase of $3.10 per fortnight has been met with dismay, as it does little to alleviate recipients' financial strain.

Economist Nicki Hutley points out that investing in JobSeeker not only benefits the recipients but also the community at large.

According to recent modelling, every additional dollar invested in JobSeeker generates a $1.25 return through healthier individuals, reduced government payments, and improved productivity.

The government's Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee has recommended increasing JobSeeker to 90 per cent of the Age Pension, raising the fortnightly payment from $781.10 to $942.39.

This suggestion, however, has been met with resistance from both major political parties.


Despite the clear benefits, politicians have reaffirmed their stance against increasing the payment, citing budget constraints and the challenge of raising taxes to fund social benefits.

The debate has brought to light the broader issue of prioritising government spending.

Richard Denniss from The Australia Institute offers a provocative perspective, highlighting the billions of dollars in fossil fuel subsidies and the colossal investment in the AUKUS submarine deal as areas where funds could be reallocated to support the country's most vulnerable.

As we navigate these challenging times, we must remember that behind the statistics and political debates are real people struggling to afford necessities.

The question remains: How can one of the wealthiest nations in the world justify not providing adequate support to those in need?

We at the Seniors Discount Club believe a society is judged by how it treats its most vulnerable members.

It's time for a serious conversation about our national priorities and how we can ensure that every Australian has the means to live with dignity.


In other news, millions across the country received a boost to certain support payments from 20 March, affecting various forms of assistance.

These adjustments were part of a regular review tied to shifts in living costs and broader economic factors. You can read more about it here.
Key Takeaways

  • Labour and the Coalition have rejected calls to increase Centrelink payments, despite rising cost of living pressures and community group pleas.
  • Retirees and JobSeeker recipients have expressed frustration at the modest increases, which they claim are insufficient for meeting basic needs.
  • Economist Nicki Hutley suggested that increasing JobSeeker could lead to positive community outcomes, with a good return on investment.
  • Political debate continues regarding social security payment levels, with suggestions of reallocating funds from areas such as fossil fuel subsidies to support vulnerable Australians.
Have you or someone you know been affected by the lack of increase in Centrelink benefits? How has this impacted your daily life? Your stories are powerful and can help bring about change. Let's start the conversation in the comments below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
As a renting pensioner I am doing it tough iknow that I am not the only one, I know this government has looked after us in the past but, now is when we need help, rent and bills and food take a huge chunk out of the pension, so Mr Prime Minister stand up to what you keep telling us nobody will be left behind
Nobody is left behind - only us old struggling pensioners who can't keep up. They don't look behind them
 
The major parties appose increases to centrelink payments because they need that extra money for their next $19k payrise... instead they focus on... we gave you a tax cut and a $2.75 centrelink fortnightly increase... and down play the fact the tax cut doesn't take effect for 10 months... the day it was announced supermarkets and power companys increased their prices... there will be at least 3 more price rises (upto $50 a week overall) before the $5 tax cut comes into effect... but all people see is we are getting a tax cut... yahoo 🤦‍♂️... cost of living increases by between $50-$100 per fortnight overall... the PM announces a generous cost of living assistance income increase of, wait for it, $5 on average per fortnight. Yep our government are gods, we should worship the ground they walk on...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Milica
it states "it's time for a serious conversation" that is what has been happening for years, no-one is really listening as it does not directly affect them - change with action and granting pple a higher
age pension amount to be able to live and not get sick! and for the ones that can still do some part time work - do not penalise them for this, as they still pay taxes from their wages! The first criteria for being eligible for an age pension is your age - that in itself should be enough needed, regardless of how much some one is still able to work, or what they have bought from a lifetime of working hard to put a roof over their heads & food on the table - their pension is granted for their lifetime of service to society in many different ways, each and every senior. It amazes me that a politician only has to do 3 yrs and then receives a lifetime pension of (not sure of amount)
marginally more that the layperson, and do they have to meet an assetts and income test, if they did they wouldn't qualify for the laypersons pension - Greed - think about the seniors who need not have the added daily worry of financial stress in how to make ends meet!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Ivory
Having worked with people who are long term unemployed I say they should be put to work in some manner, particularly when there is no motivation to study either. If the work was compulsory national service these people would be working in the national interest, and have army barracks style accommodation, mess etc. There would be no need for increased benefits as a lot of costs would be accounted further.
 
I knew an NDIS worker in my regional city who told me that a single mum rents a house and has 4 children, which she says all have a disability. This NDIS worker used to visit them a lot to see how they were going etc etc, which was his job as she was one of his clients. He told me that there was nothing wrong with the mum or the children, and that she gets $140,000 a year from the government. And no, she is not aboriginal, she's as white as me.
I became eligible for the Disability Support Pension several years ago, and it was a long and arduous process to have that payment granted. From my experience I would suggest if children were found eligible for the disability then they definitely are.

For a NDIS worker to be speaking in the manner he did regarding the woman and 4 children I find it morally reprehensible and totally unprofessional
 
As it often said politicians are completely out of touch to the real cost of living on a low income be it wages or pensions. They don't have to worry if they will have enough money for mortgage payments or rent, food medicine, petrol or fares etc. They only look at the total cost of an increase in the Federal budget and not at the tiny amount each pensioner actually receives. If I was an employer and offered my staff a wage rise of $3.50 They would laugh me out of the building!
 
We were totally disgusted at the recent increase in our pension $3.50 pf per person. I would love to see the Prime minister live on this demeaning amount. Like many pensioners we subsidise our pension with our superannuation which is not a great amount. Although we have really good health cover, you still have to find the gap.
It's time we got a break financially and the Government needs to increase the pension to an amount where we can live without drawing on our meagre saving. We are not asking for much just to be considered with a bit more dignity. I am sure many pensioners have tried to work longer. i know I have but been told I am too old.
 
Evert extra dollar spent jobseeker is just further incentive for lazy bastards to stay sitting on their arse playing sodding video games or smoking dope? either that wasting time in pubs or hanging around bloody train stations? at least the lazy bastards do that I can see?
 
Maybe if the government jacked up GST to 15% and used that revenue to ensure pensioners get a fair deal.
If they jack up GST to 15%, us pensioners will need a rise of at least 18% just to break even. Pensioners who have worked all their lives paying taxes, should be on at least the minimum wage. Our last rise of $3.80 is an insult. My gas bill just to heat water has gone up more than that this year. I cook all my meals on the BBQ outside as it is cheaper than using the gas stove in my unit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004
It's as always does not matter if Labor or libs get in pensoners and the needy are the furtherest from their minds but when it comes to raising their wages cost is the last thing on their mind we need a new party that puts people first
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chicky
If they jack up GST to 15%, us pensioners will need a rise of at least 18% just to break even. Pensioners who have worked all their lives paying taxes, should be on at least the minimum wage. Our last rise of $3.80 is an insult. My gas bill just to heat water has gone up more than that this year. I cook all my meals on the BBQ outside as it is cheaper than using the gas stove in my unit.
Then why not give the pensioners a 50% rise at least? They bloody well deserve it.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×