Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

 

[Thecheesequeen]

So is the proposal to cut speed limits for only high-emission cars? What’s that going to do to the traffic flow?

 

[NotNats]

Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

View attachment 20766

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

View attachment 20765

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

I drive a Mazda 2017 BT-50 (diesel) and I can tell you for a fact that I have lower emissions than a lot of so-called sedan cars.
Why just blame the dual-cab utes, large SUVs? I do understand about some of the older cars.
Just like putting the dangerous dog label on only some dog breeds.
It's not the DOG or VEHICILE that is the problem.
The problem is the human that owns the Dog (incorrect training) or Vehicle (poor maintenance). And why should I have to drive slower while another vehicle is spewing black smoke in front of me.

 

[Big John M]

Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

View attachment 20766

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

View attachment 20765

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

 

[Jaleah]

Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

View attachment 20766

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

View attachment 20765

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

So those people who have large families will be punished because they have to buy a car that fits their large family in, no sorry I dont agree. It’s great that we are working toward being environmental friendly but a lot more needs to be done Re electric vehicles. I just bought a little suv petrol engine I chose to go this way as I feel we have not moved quick enough with electric vehicles and the ones that are available are sooo expensive and also charging stations are very hard To find .

 

[Klaus A]

Has something to do with the Tax regime. High emission vehicles should be restricted for business use. I worked for a european company in 2010 and, because of emission, could not buy a Commodore for business use anymore. I instead bought a diesel VW caddy with much better emission values. Today also not acceptable anymore

 

[Big John M]

This article only articulates the view of a select few who have the belief that their view is ‘the be and end all‘, the ONLY TRUTH.
These very same people make all sorts of claims without presentation of accurate and proven facts.
A REAL debate needs to be had, not the one sided discussions held over the past years. And by real CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.
However these so-called CLIMATE CHANGE experts are not willing to face the real CLIMATE EXPERTS. On many occasions they have refused to debate and back up claims with facts and evidence.
As an example of misrepresentation, Al Gore who headed the major push at the turn of the century, ‘GLOBAL WARMING’ used information and data ‘cherry picked’ from lectures given by a professor with whom had contact.
This professor has refuted Gore’s misleading claims and statements showing where the out of context data is causing misguided and unnecessary HYSTERIA.
For those who are not aware, the GLOBAL WARMING has now changed to CLIMATE CHANGE, mainly due to two facts…….
1. Earth’s temperature rise did not jump as predicted and is now fluctuating as it has done so in the past.
Earth’s temperature and weather patterns are and have been monitored in a number of identifiable Cycles which have been recorded over hundreds of years.
2. Farcical temperature changes were loosing support so the wide ranging CLIMATE CHANGE headline was employed to hype the HYSTERIA. Like wild weather!!
NO not working, as an example, no cyclones on East Coast this year, one last year. And records show the number on the decrease.
As for floods, flood patterns since the mid 1800’s have not significantly changed.

And yes we all remember, sea levels to rise by 2 meters by 2007, no 2011, no 2013, no2018. And now temperatures to rise by 5 or 6 degrees.

Yes the WORLD has to protect the environment, but not be ridiculous and stupid about it.

Remember the earth once thrived with 3.81% CO2, we are now at 0.041%

WAKE UP AUSTRALIA and WORLD

 

[marnih09]

This article only articulates the view of a select few who have the belief that their view is ‘the be and end all‘, the ONLY TRUTH.
These very same people make all sorts of claims without presentation of accurate and proven facts.
A REAL debate needs to be had, not the one sided discussions held over the past years. And by real CLIMATE SCIENTISTS.
However these so-called CLIMATE CHANGE experts are not willing to face the real CLIMATE EXPERTS. On many occasions they have refused to debate and back up claims with facts and evidence.
As an example of misrepresentation, Al Gore who headed the major push at the turn of the century, ‘GLOBAL WARMING’ used information and data ‘cherry picked’ from lectures given by a professor with whom had contact.
This professor has refuted Gore’s misleading claims and statements showing where the out of context data is causing misguided and unnecessary HYSTERIA.
For those who are not aware, the GLOBAL WARMING has now changed to CLIMATE CHANGE, mainly due to two facts…….
1. Earth’s temperature rise did not jump as predicted and is now fluctuating as it has done so in the past.
Earth’s temperature and weather patterns are and have been monitored in a number of identifiable Cycles which have been recorded over hundreds of years.
2. Farcical temperature changes were loosing support so the wide ranging CLIMATE CHANGE headline was employed to hype the HYSTERIA. Like wild weather!!
NO not working, as an example, no cyclones on East Coast this year, one last year. And records show the number on the decrease.
As for floods, flood patterns since the mid 1800’s have not significantly changed.

And yes we all remember, sea levels to rise by 2 meters by 2007, no 2011, no 2013, no2018. And now temperatures to rise by 5 or 6 degrees.

Yes the WORLD has to protect the environment, but not be ridiculous and stupid about it.

Remember the earth once thrived with 3.81% CO2, we are now at 0.041%

WAKE UP AUSTRALIA and WORLD

Totally agree with you. The world's A-Lites are conning everyone, including governments, on the so-called global warming. In Australia, if the state governments actually maintained our road systems, as they should instead of wasting money on renewables and wokeness, then our choice of motor vehicles would not be an issue. It is because of the terrible state of our roads that cause vehicles to slow down and/or be stuck in 'carparks' of traffic which actually causes slow and stationary traffic to build up emissions. Then all the activists and politicians are happy to to believe the emissions are the problem! Hahaha, what a joke

 

[Pat T]

We have a caravan. Can’t really see a Kio Rio pulling it (I have one actually). Pulling the van at 80 kph on major highways , in heavy traffic? There are enough impatient drivers now. Imagine the increase in accidents and deaths. Some of these educated w…s haven’t a practical thinking cell in their body.

 

[fourwb]

Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

View attachment 20766

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

View attachment 20765

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

 

[fourwb]

There is no climate crisis! Only morons talk about carbon emissions, carbon footprint. Do these morons think they are leaving lumps of coal behind? Another contribution to the great climate change scam.
John

 

[Mr Chips]

Why is it that when talk becomes heated about vehicle emissions Australia becomes a target? The answer is blatantly simple and because of its simplicity, it appears that all the clever people cannot cope with it. WE TRAVEL FURTHER! What the hell is so complicated about that? Australia is a touch bigger than England and a distance of 10 to 15 kms to the average motorist in the UK almost means they have to take a packed lunch with them. They are not used to driving distances (including other Europen countries) on a regular basis. Here in Aus, we can often travel 10 times that to just visit the next-door neighbour. So for the dummies, if we travel 10 times further then you can expect a significant increase in exhaust fumes. I will leave you to the maths, 10 times? = ?.

 

[Vinylted]

Has something to do with the Tax regime. High emission vehicles should be restricted for business use. I worked for a european company in 2010 and, because of emission, could not buy a Commodore for business use anymore. I instead bought a diesel VW caddy with much better emission values. Today also not acceptable anymore

VW were caught out not so long ago fudging emissions!

 

[Bill MacL]

We have the LEAST POPULATION of the 7 continents in the world how can he say we use the most fuel, what a load of crap. Put a map of Australia over the other continents and compare the populations of each. There are 8 BILLION people in the world, we have 25 MILLION, that's approximately "point 3 of one percent", every other continent out numbers us by many times. DO THE SAME COMPARISON FOR POLLUTION, it's all a big lie.

 

[Vinylted]

Why is it that when talk becomes heated about vehicle emissions Australia becomes a target? The answer is blatantly simple and because of its simplicity, it appears that all the clever people cannot cope with it. WE TRAVEL FURTHER! What the hell is so complicated about that? Australia is a touch bigger than England and a distance of 10 to 15 kms to the average motorist in the UK almost means they have to take a packed lunch with them. They are not used to driving distances (including other Europen countries) on a regular basis. Here in Aus, we can often travel 10 times that to just visit the next-door neighbour. So for the dummies, if we travel 10 times further then you can expect a significant increase in exhaust fumes. I will leave you to the maths, 10 times? = ?.

Hahaha a touch bigger than England? Sir you are a comedian. The whole of Great Britain can fit into the area of Victoria alone! Apart from that you are spot on.

 

[Vinylted]

The article was written by a New Zealander.. enough said!

 

[Klaus A]

There will be restrictions very soon, not by speed more by pollution, like in other major cities around the world. Cars and trucks with high pollution will get banned to go into the major cities.

 

[Lynjw]

Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

View attachment 20766

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

View attachment 20765

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

Reducing emissions is good but not every can afford a modern fuel efficient vehicle. How the hell are they going to reduce limits for specific vehicles. Do they use different lanes or just hold up all the other cars on the road. Not feasible. Are we going to be dictated to as to what we can can’t buy. It’s dictatorship. Maybe addressing traffic jam issues would help too.

 

[Danny M]

Dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles – they certainly have their appeal! Many people, regardless of age, appreciate these vehicles for various reasons.

Over the years, Australians have seen generations of families enjoy cruising in their Ford Ranger, Toyota Hilux or another similar vehicle, loading them up for family outings with the grandkids, hauling bulky purchases, or simply enjoying a smooth and comfortable ride.

However, the cost of owning and operating these vehicles goes beyond the significant fuel consumption and subsequent visits to the petrol station.

It may also contribute to environmental concerns and, as a result, lead to changes in how these beloved vehicles can be driven on Australian roads.

A recent report by The Australia Institute suggests that Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs and older vehicles has made the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.

Consequently, this sparked the proposal to introduce lower speed limits for high-emission vehicles in an attempt to cut down on pollution and support climate change initiatives.

Professor Lennard Gillman from Auckland University of Technology summarised this idea best when he said: 'Lowering the speed limit for high emission vehicles has the double effect of cutting emissions but also incentivises people to buy low-emission cars.'

View attachment 20766

Renowned Professor Lennard Gillman urges Australia to impose lower speed limits on high-emission cars for massive carbon reduction and fuel savings. Credit: Shutterstock.

The professor also expressed his belief that the environmental benefit that comes from reducing speed limits will outweigh the extra time spent on the road.

Fuel consumption aside, what makes this proposal stand out is its intent to create a meaningful impact on the environment, particularly when it comes to carbon emissions.

'Lowering the speed limit for people with high-emission vehicles will be a much better incentive to buy a more efficient vehicle,' said Professor Gillman.

Additionally, he suggested that this new measure could be more effective and fair to low-income earners than increasing fuel taxes.

A 2017 New Zealand Transport Agency study revealed that reducing speeds from 100 km/h to 80 km/h can result in a 15% decrease in fuel consumption.

While this speed limit change may not sit well with everyone, it could mark a shift in society's approach to road behaviour and lend support to the urgent need to address climate change.

Professor Gillman pointed out: 'If it makes a huge difference in carbon emissions, which is destroying the planet we live on, surely we can make that sacrifice.'

According to an analysis conducted by The Australia Institute, a notable portion of transport emissions in Australia can be attributed to ‘poorly targeted tax incentives that encourage Australians to drive large, inefficient, dual-cab utes’.

The study revealed that Australia's transport emissions have increased by 17% since 2000, in stark contrast to countries such as the US, UK, and Japan, which have successfully reduced their emissions.

Matt Grudnoff, Senior Economist at the Australia Institute, emphasised that Australia has the potential to achieve significant emissions reductions and save billions of dollars in fuel costs simply by adopting more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The report highlighted that among Australia’s top 10 best-selling vehicles, five were dual-cab utes, three were SUVs, and only two were small passenger cars.

Furthermore, the report recommended several measures to address the issue.

Firstly, it suggested revising vehicle emissions tests to align with international standards.

Secondly, it proposed a commitment to transition all government fleets to electric vehicles by 2030.

Lastly, the report advocated for implementing a fuel efficiency standard to promote greater fuel efficiency in vehicles nationwide.

Professor Gillman warned about the potentially dire consequences of neglecting to take small steps towards reducing emissions.

He emphasised: ‘We're facing a climate crisis. We're on track to be 2C warmer, and many scientists believe that once it surpasses 2C, it will escalate to 5C or 6C.’

He further elaborated, stating that such a scenario would render much of the Earth uninhabitable and result in the loss of millions of lives.

Professor Gillman highlighted the resistance to emission reduction efforts: ‘Most of the pushback is from people who own these high-emission vehicles and believe it's their entitlement to do as they please.’

He underscored the urgency of the situation by pointing out that the impacts of climate change are already claiming lives, citing the occurrence of catastrophic storms worldwide.

Key Takeaways

• A top professor has called for Australia to lower motorway speed limits for SUVs and other high-emission vehicles to combat climate change.
• Australia's love for dual-cab utes, large SUVs, and older vehicles makes the country one of the biggest petrol consumers in the world.
• Professor Lennard Gillman suggests introducing differential speed limits for high-emission and low-emission vehicles to reduce their environmental impact.
• A study by the New Zealand Transport Agency found that reducing speed from 100 km/h to 80km/h results in a 15% reduction in fuel consumption.

Implementing such a bold measure carries immense potential to combat climate change, a pressing issue that demands urgent action.

However, it is crucial to bear in mind that driving in a fuel-efficient manner is also a valuable approach to reducing emissions.

View attachment 20765

Driving tips for minimising your fuel consumption. Credit: Seniors Discount Club.

Do you have tips for reducing your fuel consumption? Join the conversation in the comments and let us know your steps to reduce your carbon footprint!

We also recommend checking out this article to stay on top of some major road changes in the country.

When are we going to debunk all this climate change cr*p. The climate always changes, we have summer autumn winter and spring. The Co2 level in the world is .04%, and plants etc cannot survive with less than.02% level of Co2. So wake up and vote these doomsday sayers out.

 

[Danny M]

VW diesel better emissions??? Surely an oxymoron. You must have missed the court case and the massive fine.