Driver disputes hefty $1,000 fine with roadside camera image
By
VanessaC
- Replies 27
Navigating the roads these days is tricky enough dealing with hour-long traffic and costly fuel prices.
But there’s one bit of road safety advice that we should all take seriously: wearing your seatbelt properly.
Gavin Storkey, a business owner based on the Gold Coast, recently discovered just how serious a seatbelt violation can be.
He copped a $1000 fine from Queensland Transport after a roadside camera caught a passenger apparently having their seatbelt tucked under their arm while travelling on the Pacific Motorway at Upper Coomera.
According to the Queensland Revenue Office, images are taken of each vehicle travelling in the lane of traffic that the camera is monitoring. Artificial Intelligence is then used to detect if a seatbelt offence has occurred.
But Storkey claims when he received the fine and corresponding legal forms from the Queensland Treasury, he was not offered the option to submit an online enquiry. He was allegedly offered only two choices–pay the fine or go to court. However, the Queensland Treasury has confirmed there is an option to submit a fine enquiry through the state government website.
In a letter to Storkey, the Department of Transport and Main Roads explained that ‘infringement notices will be issued if a camera detects the driver or passenger of a vehicle not wearing a seatbelt that is both properly adjusted and fastened’.
‘The image shows the seatbelt was placed under the arm,’ it said.
‘If you wish to withdraw your court election and pay [the] infringement notice, please advise this office by return email and the infringement will be released.’
Storkey claims the right side is unclear and it’s impossible to see whether the passenger is wearing the seatbelt under his arm. Image source: Nine News.
He believed the image showed the passenger’s seatbelt didn’t appear to be under the arm–despite the low-quality photo that was provided as evidence. So Storkey decided to fight the fine.
‘I have been a good citizen, (I've) never been in trouble with the law, I'm struggling to pay (my) mortgage and keep my small business afloat, and now I am being sent to trial over a seatbelt photo for a $1000 fine,’ he said.
‘I had a closer look and analysed the image further, I realised the image was taken in the late afternoon sun and was overexposed.’
‘I could see the seatbelt disappear in the image, (it's) clear on the left side of the image, but on the right side it's impossible to see,’ he added.
Queensland drivers face a maximum penalty of $2875 for improper wearing of seatbelts.
Storkey appeared in Southport’s Magistrates Court earlier this month, and his case has been adjourned until January 2024.
Dear members, it goes without saying–wearing your seatbelt is essential for your safety, so take the time to adjust it properly. And if you do end up being issued a ticket, make sure you’re aware of all your options.
So, what's your verdict dear members? Do you think the passenger was wearing the seatbelt right? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
But there’s one bit of road safety advice that we should all take seriously: wearing your seatbelt properly.
Gavin Storkey, a business owner based on the Gold Coast, recently discovered just how serious a seatbelt violation can be.
He copped a $1000 fine from Queensland Transport after a roadside camera caught a passenger apparently having their seatbelt tucked under their arm while travelling on the Pacific Motorway at Upper Coomera.
According to the Queensland Revenue Office, images are taken of each vehicle travelling in the lane of traffic that the camera is monitoring. Artificial Intelligence is then used to detect if a seatbelt offence has occurred.
But Storkey claims when he received the fine and corresponding legal forms from the Queensland Treasury, he was not offered the option to submit an online enquiry. He was allegedly offered only two choices–pay the fine or go to court. However, the Queensland Treasury has confirmed there is an option to submit a fine enquiry through the state government website.
In a letter to Storkey, the Department of Transport and Main Roads explained that ‘infringement notices will be issued if a camera detects the driver or passenger of a vehicle not wearing a seatbelt that is both properly adjusted and fastened’.
‘The image shows the seatbelt was placed under the arm,’ it said.
‘If you wish to withdraw your court election and pay [the] infringement notice, please advise this office by return email and the infringement will be released.’
Storkey claims the right side is unclear and it’s impossible to see whether the passenger is wearing the seatbelt under his arm. Image source: Nine News.
He believed the image showed the passenger’s seatbelt didn’t appear to be under the arm–despite the low-quality photo that was provided as evidence. So Storkey decided to fight the fine.
‘I have been a good citizen, (I've) never been in trouble with the law, I'm struggling to pay (my) mortgage and keep my small business afloat, and now I am being sent to trial over a seatbelt photo for a $1000 fine,’ he said.
‘I had a closer look and analysed the image further, I realised the image was taken in the late afternoon sun and was overexposed.’
‘I could see the seatbelt disappear in the image, (it's) clear on the left side of the image, but on the right side it's impossible to see,’ he added.
Queensland drivers face a maximum penalty of $2875 for improper wearing of seatbelts.
Storkey appeared in Southport’s Magistrates Court earlier this month, and his case has been adjourned until January 2024.
Key Takeaways
- A Queensland business owner, Gavin Storkey, received a $1,000 fine for a seatbelt offence, according to a photo taken by a road camera.
- Storkey refutes the fine, claiming the passenger’s seatbelt was not under the arm as stated in the infringement notice but over it.
- He alleges he was not given the option to submit a fine enquiry online by the Queensland Treasury, and was only offered the alternatives of going to court or paying the fine.
- Storkey has pleaded not guilty in court, and the case has been adjourned until January 2024.
So, what's your verdict dear members? Do you think the passenger was wearing the seatbelt right? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!