Committee formally recommends NT government adopt voluntary assisted dying

Judy Dent remembers the day her terminally ill husband Bob told her he had enough.

Bob Dent had been suffering from incurable prostate cancer for nearly five years, and by that stage Judy said Bob was only half living.

"It got to the stage where managing the pain meant that he couldn't see, he couldn't hear, he couldn't do anything," she said.


1760314834629.jpeg
Judy Dent's husband was the first person to die from a legal, voluntary lethal injection, and she has remained a VAD advocate since his death. (ABC News: Peter Garnish)


In September 1996, Bob Dent became the first person in the world to die through legally accessible voluntary assisted dying (VAD).

He was able to access the health service after the Northern Territory — under then-chief minister Marshall Perron — passed the Rights of the Terminally Ill Act in 1995.




1760314834652.jpeg
In 1995, then-chief minister Marshall Perron's successful private members bill made the Northern Territory the first jurisdiction in the world to allow access to voluntary assisted dying.


It was a piece of legislation that made the territory the first place in the world to allow terminally ill patients to have control over when and how they died.

So, after a Sunday lunch with doctor Philip Nitschke, in a bed set up on the verandah of Bob and Judy's Darwin home, Dr Nitschke asked Bob a series of three questions.

"Bob said 'yes … yes … yes' and then the fluid started going into his arm," Judy said.

"Almost instantly the pain signs disappeared from his face and he just looked peaceful."

Judy held Bob's hand all the while.




1760314834670.jpeg
Judy Dent believes there is community support for the introduction of VAD in the NT. (ABC News: Michael Franchi)


A year after Bob died, the federal government intervened and overturned the Perron government's law, stripping the Northern Territory of its power to allow voluntary assisted dying.

That remained the case for 25 years, until the federal government repealed the ban in 2022, giving the NT and ACT the ability to pass VAD legislation.

With all other Australian states and territories having now legalised VAD, the NT remains the only jurisdiction in the country that has not.

If you or anyone you know needs help:​


In May, the NT government tasked a parliamentary committee with consulting communities across the territory on the issue and, if recommended, providing drafting instructions for a new law.

The committee has now tabled its report, recommending "VAD legislation be adopted in the NT".

The drafting instructions, aimed at shaping an NT-specific framework, included not requiring there to be a timeframe on a person's prognosis — or no fixed "months to live" requirement.

The NT has the nation's highest proportion of Indigenous Australians, and many people live in remote areas.

Written by Matthew Qvortrup, ABC News.
 
  • Love
Reactions: BJM and Pam71

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
If he was deaf how could he have agreed and answered?
Blind so he couldn’t read either?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RealityCheck
We allow all other animals euthanasia, why not people. Also the needs to be of sound mind means those with
Alzheimer's disease Can’t get the same result WHY ?
 
If he was deaf how could he have agreed and answered?
Blind so he couldn’t read either?
The article says he was deaf and blind when using drugs to control pain. Have you considered that maybe the drugs were paused long enough for him to communicate effectively?
 
Even where VAD is technically legal, the restrictions are inhuman. Keeping people live when they are suffering and have n quality of life is cruel in the extreme. If someone wants to die because their illness or age means they have nothing left to live for, let them. The law should be amended to ensure that anyone of sound mind can specify under what terms they wish to be assisted to die, just as we can - with the help of a doctor and lawyer - specify under what conditions we want assistance to live discontinued.
 
The article says he was deaf and blind when using drugs to control pain. Have you considered that maybe the drugs were paused long enough for him to communicate effectively?
Drugs for pain relief don't render people blind or deaf unless taken to the extent of causing unconsciousness, in which case they would/should have stated that was the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxtyson
If he was deaf how could he have agreed and answered?
Blind so he couldn’t read either?
Because it was the pain management medication that would temporarily cause the deafness etc. therefore affecting overall quality of life. It would have been opioid type medication which dulls pain, but also affects the senses significantly. I know this because as a nurse I would give this type of medicine years ago which was usually in liquid form and before modern delivery systems for opioids. Reduces pain, but "knocks" the patient out with heavy sedating effect..
 
Hello Everyone,l really do not think it mattered that the man was deaf & blind.It is a human right to die with dignity through VAD. We treat our Pets better with this process.
Thank you Goatwhisperer, l think nurses are wonderful.Bye Everyone. Please be kind to yourself.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sherril54
what the hell has this got to do with anyone else? It is the sole judgement of the person involved.
Bloody butt out.
 
Everyone should have the right to choose how to die, and the time for doing it. VAD for me is a right of everyone if they are suffering and can't be helped.
Julie
 
I AM Gratefull... it should be an option consistently Australia wide
I AM a retired nurse with Palliative Care as one of my skills
I BElieve in Palliation as an option & Assisted Palliation especially WithIN Cancer care-
 
I agree with you jest & I hope if the time comes who ever it is takes notice of the papers I have signed about euthanasia.
 
It's my body my right. I believe it should be available to everyone not only the terminal. I will not go into aged care and so unfortunately Switzerland is the only alternative very expensive
 
I was involved in the VAD process with my neighbour who had pancreatic cancer. I watched that man suffer intolerable pain for 9 months before he’d finally had enough and enacted his VAD right. I was with him from the start of that to when he took hos last breath and it was a peaceful passing as soon as he took his final ‘medicine’. Just recently I also spent a week in hospital with my brother who was also EOL with kidney cancer, gangrene, and multiple ischemic breakdown. I stayed with him day and night until he passed and I couldn’t help but compare the end stages of both men - my brother was tortured with pain until a pain pump was finally fitted to him and he lingered on until his body finally shut down. I have multiple health issues including Parkinson’s and I know which option I’ll be taking when I feel I’ve had enough
 
I’m sorry but I really believe that everyone should have the option to end their own life, when they are in so much pain and suffering. Perhaps if some in the governments had loved ones in the same situation that they would want them to be out of all their misery of their own lives. But this is only my opinion. So yes I do agree with assisted dying as the only option. And god bless the people who stand by their loved ones in their passing 🙏🏼
 
VAD should be a right to anyone at that stage of life. I have a Not for Resuscitation in place which is valid if i am considered to be not of sound mind but you can’t obtain VAD permission with the same guidelines. Having a neurological disability and multiple health conditions i have very clear ideas about my end of life choices.
 
Who the hell are these people who think they have the right to dictate when you can and cannot die , they need to butt out, I will decide when and where when my time comes and not some government bureaucrat , my life my decision .
 
If he was deaf how could he have agreed and answered?
Blind so he couldn’t read either?
Deaf people can communicate quite well. My dad was completely deaf from age 3 ad then went to live in at a school which taught him to communicate by lip=reading and also the sign language, which has some different signs in different languages for certain things. We communicated very well with our dad and was proud of his achievements, so learn something more about deaf people. They are Deaf not Stupid as some people would have it!
 
If he was deaf how could he have agreed and answered?
Blind so he couldn’t read either?
It seemed that these symptoms' were a result of heavy pain medication
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×