Bullsbrook residents' row with Defence Department continues over PFAS 'forever' chemicals


Screenshot 2025-08-13 at 10.52.05.png
Bullsbrook is home to one of several sites across the country which were contaminated with chemicals from firefighting foam used at military bases. (ABC News: Che Chorley)



The Department of Defence is refusing to replace residential pipes and water systems in a Perth town it contaminated with "forever chemicals".

Bullsbrook, north of Perth, is home to one of several sites across the country which were contaminated with chemicals from firefighting foam used at military bases.



PFAS — or per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances — is an umbrella term for a group of chemicals that do not break down, and can accumulate in soil, water, and human bodies.

The federal government settled a class action in 2023 over PFAS contamination at seven sites, including Bullsbrook, and paid $132.7 million to about 30,000 claimants.

Bullsbrook PFAS contamination​


Screenshot 2025-08-13 at 10.53.04.png
Image source: ABC News (Australia).



Defence has been working to connect more than 200 properties in Bullsbrook to scheme water by March 2026, including installing devices to prevent water from properties flowing back into the mains system.

The project is part of the "management and remediation" of PFAS contamination around the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Pearce air base.

However, progress has reached a standstill for some residents who believe the internal pipework and hot water systems in their properties also need to be replaced, which the ABC understands the department has refused to do.


'Our lives are still on hold'​

In letters sent to residents in 2022, seen by the ABC, the Department of Defence outlined the funding arrangement for scheme water connections in West Bullsbrook.

"Defence will fund any infrastructure required to connect the property to the mains pipeline, as well as any necessary plumbing works on your property and dwelling," the letter said.

Bullsbrook resident Reannan Haswell said the "necessary plumbing works" should include pipes and water systems inside homes.

"I still can't believe we're having this conversation ... you've got a contaminated source, it sent water through pipes, it's contaminated your whole household," Ms Haswell said.

"We've been on bottled water since 2016 — our lives are still on hold 10 plus years later."

The department has agreed to fund the scheme water connection and the installation of back-flow prevention devices.

Ms Haswell was the lead applicant in the class action lawsuit against the Commonwealth.

Last month, she raised concerns with Defence that residents would ultimately still be using potentially contaminated water if internal piping was not replaced.


Screenshot 2025-08-13 at 10.54.33.png
Reannan Haswell says her family's lives are on hold as they wait for Defence Department remediation works. (ABC News: Nicolas Perpitch)



In an email response to Ms Haswell, the department said it had no record of any commitment to replace pipework or hot water systems in homes.

"At the time of water connection, Defence will provide instructions for the flushing of internal pipes in the residences where PFAS-impacted groundwater was previously used," the email read.

"Defence will offer to collect water samples from your taps for analysis to ensure the water meets the Australian standards for safe drinking with respect to PFAS concentrations."


Contamination 'not fixed'​

Ms Haswell said she wasn't convinced they could flush the pipes clean of PFAS.

"You can't flush it ... hence why the original plan of a portable filtration device on everyone's premise back in 2016 was not an option," she said.

"It is a forever man-made chemical — it cannot be eradicated."

The Department of Defence had not responded to the ABC's enquiries by the time of publication.


Screenshot 2025-08-13 at 10.55.03.png
Bullsbrook residents have been forced to drink and wash with bottled water for years because of the PFAS contamination. (ABC News: Rebecca Turner)



Ms Haswell said she felt compelled to speak out for impacted residents and taxpayers.

"I thought a class action would have had that nailed on the head ... it's still not fixed, it's still not resolved," she said.

"They're just woefully wasting money to give people scheme water that's not safe."

Written by: Cason Ho, ABC News.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54 and 7777

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Gosh if there was a government minister living in the area this would have been fixed years ago. Come on Defence this is just not good enough. Pull a finger and just get on with it and do what needs doing. You are an absolute disgrace.
 
Gosh if there was a government minister living in the area this would have been fixed years ago. Come on Defence this is just not good enough. Pull a finger and just get on with it and do what needs doing. You are an absolute disgrace.
Yer right about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54
"Forever chemicals"? BWWWAAAHHHH!!!!!

A total of 13 articles were included in the review, with 5 studies conducted in exposed general populations and 8 studies conducted in exposed workers; the estimated mean half-life ranged from 1.48 to 5.1 years for PFOA, from 3.4 to 5.7 years for total PFOS, and from 2.84 to 8.5 years for PFHxS.

These are studies undertaken using blood serum levels on the half life of these "menacing" chemicals. It means if you have 1 mg per litre of PFOA in your blood at day zero, you will have 0.5mg per litre after 1.5 years. After three years, it drops to 0.25 mg per litre and so on. After 15 years, you have 0.001 mg per litre in your blood or 10 parts per billion.

From the studies on the toxicity of PFOA, an average of 500 mg per kg of body weight per day is the LD50 figure. The value of LD50 for a substance is the dose required to kill half the subjects of a tested population after a specified test duration.

A 70 kg human would have to consume 35 grams of PFOA every day to reach the LD50 threshold. How many hundreds of food containers would you have to eat daily before you approached that level? In excess of 175 kgs EVERY DAY!

There is scant evidence with the health concerns with PFOAs, etc. They are accused of being a POSSIBLE carcinogen, a POSSIBLE liver toxicant, a POSSIBLE developmental toxicant, and a POSSIBLE immune system toxicant.

Trust science written by scientists, not lie filled pseudoscience published by backyard alchemists and stoners, along with their business focused monocellular brained drones.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Wombat2u2004

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×