Bank claims elderly man is responsible for losing $70,000 to scam
- Replies 13
In an age where technology has become intertwined with our daily lives, the threat of cybercrime looms large, particularly for those who may not be as familiar with modern technology.
This story reminds us of many Australians' vulnerability in the digital world, especially our seniors who have worked hard to save for retirement only to find their nest eggs at risk.
Danny McIver, a Victorian grandfather and Vietnam War veteran, has faced more than his fair share of heartache.
The recent loss of his son to suicide and his daughter to motor neurone disease were devastating blows.
Danny's world was rocked yet again when he became the victim of a ruthless scam that drained $70,000 from his Bendigo Bank account—money that was part of a life insurance payout meant to support him after his family's tragedies.
The scam began with a deceptive pop-up message on his computer, masquerading as a warning from Microsoft about a hack.
Urged to call a provided number, Danny unwittingly fell into the scammers' trap.
With his hearing impaired from his wartime service, he enlisted his granddaughter's help to download what they believed was antivirus software.
Instead, it granted the scammers remote access to his computer.
The scammers were methodical, transferring $9,900 in three separate transactions and making a $40,000 payment via BPAY.
Although Bendigo Bank managed to stop one transaction worth $18,000, the remaining funds remain unrecovered.
To Danny's dismay, the bank has placed the blame squarely on his shoulders, citing 'extreme carelessness' and refusing to reimburse the stolen funds.
This situation has left Danny in a state of despair, feeling betrayed by the institution he trusted to safeguard his money.
'I just can't believe that Bendigo took nearly two hours to discover that funds were being taken out of my bank four times. I thought the flags would have been raised very, very early,' he lamented.
The bank's response has emphasised the importance of customers protecting themselves and not sharing passwords or allowing remote access to their computers.
While this is sound advice, it does little to console those who have fallen victim to sophisticated cybercriminals.
Danny's case has sparked a broader conversation about the responsibility of banks to protect their customers and the need for legislative change.
In the UK, for example, legislation introduced in October last year mandates compensation for scam victims within five business days unless gross negligence is involved.
Danny is supporting a campaign calling for similar measures in Australia, advocating for banks to prioritise people over profit.
IT expert Jeremy Thomas, who assisted Danny in clearing his computer of the malicious software, has criticised the bank's reliance on one-time passcodes sent to mobile phones as inadequate security.
He argued that the ease with which scammers can intercept these messages and bypass other security measures is a glaring issue that needs to be addressed.
The push for online banking has left customers at the mercy of their banks' security systems, which, as Thomas points out, may not always be up to the task.
Positive change, he insists, must come from the federal government to protect the national economy and the financial well-being of its citizens.
As Danny continues to hope for the return of his funds and battles health issues, his story is a sobering reminder of the need for vigilance in the digital age.
It's a call to action for banks and the government to step up their cybersecurity game and educate individuals on staying safe online.
At the Seniors Discount Club, we urge our members to be cautious and to seek assistance when dealing with technology that may seem unfamiliar.
It's also important to remember that if something seems too good to be true or raises even the slightest suspicion, it's better to err on caution.
Have you or someone you know been affected by a similar scam? Please share your experiences and thoughts on how banks and the government can better protect us from these digital predators.
This story reminds us of many Australians' vulnerability in the digital world, especially our seniors who have worked hard to save for retirement only to find their nest eggs at risk.
Danny McIver, a Victorian grandfather and Vietnam War veteran, has faced more than his fair share of heartache.
The recent loss of his son to suicide and his daughter to motor neurone disease were devastating blows.
$70,000 was lost by Vietnam War veteran Danny McIver to scammers who used a fake Microsoft hacking alert. Credit: Facebook
Danny's world was rocked yet again when he became the victim of a ruthless scam that drained $70,000 from his Bendigo Bank account—money that was part of a life insurance payout meant to support him after his family's tragedies.
The scam began with a deceptive pop-up message on his computer, masquerading as a warning from Microsoft about a hack.
Urged to call a provided number, Danny unwittingly fell into the scammers' trap.
With his hearing impaired from his wartime service, he enlisted his granddaughter's help to download what they believed was antivirus software.
Instead, it granted the scammers remote access to his computer.
The scammers were methodical, transferring $9,900 in three separate transactions and making a $40,000 payment via BPAY.
Although Bendigo Bank managed to stop one transaction worth $18,000, the remaining funds remain unrecovered.
To Danny's dismay, the bank has placed the blame squarely on his shoulders, citing 'extreme carelessness' and refusing to reimburse the stolen funds.
This situation has left Danny in a state of despair, feeling betrayed by the institution he trusted to safeguard his money.
'I just can't believe that Bendigo took nearly two hours to discover that funds were being taken out of my bank four times. I thought the flags would have been raised very, very early,' he lamented.
The bank's response has emphasised the importance of customers protecting themselves and not sharing passwords or allowing remote access to their computers.
While this is sound advice, it does little to console those who have fallen victim to sophisticated cybercriminals.
Danny's case has sparked a broader conversation about the responsibility of banks to protect their customers and the need for legislative change.
In the UK, for example, legislation introduced in October last year mandates compensation for scam victims within five business days unless gross negligence is involved.
Danny is supporting a campaign calling for similar measures in Australia, advocating for banks to prioritise people over profit.
IT expert Jeremy Thomas, who assisted Danny in clearing his computer of the malicious software, has criticised the bank's reliance on one-time passcodes sent to mobile phones as inadequate security.
He argued that the ease with which scammers can intercept these messages and bypass other security measures is a glaring issue that needs to be addressed.
The push for online banking has left customers at the mercy of their banks' security systems, which, as Thomas points out, may not always be up to the task.
Positive change, he insists, must come from the federal government to protect the national economy and the financial well-being of its citizens.
As Danny continues to hope for the return of his funds and battles health issues, his story is a sobering reminder of the need for vigilance in the digital age.
It's a call to action for banks and the government to step up their cybersecurity game and educate individuals on staying safe online.
At the Seniors Discount Club, we urge our members to be cautious and to seek assistance when dealing with technology that may seem unfamiliar.
It's also important to remember that if something seems too good to be true or raises even the slightest suspicion, it's better to err on caution.
.png){kind=icon}
