Authorities introduce scan zones in bustling areas—how will you adjust to drastic knife law changes?
- Replies 0
As of this Friday, Western Australians will find themselves navigating the 'toughest' knife laws in the nation, a significant shift in legislation that aims to bolster community safety by granting police unprecedented powers to search for knives and other weapons.
But what does this mean for the average citizen, and how will these changes impact daily life in WA?
With harsher penalties for carrying prohibited items and increased police discretion in public areas, these laws are set to reshape how individuals approach personal safety and everyday activities.
The new laws empower police officers to use metal detectors to scan individuals of any age for knives and other weapons at any time and place without the need for suspicion of a crime.
This sweeping authority is part of the government's strategy to deter knife-related crimes and increase security in public spaces.
In Perth's five 'Protected Entertainment Precincts'—Perth/Northbridge, Scarborough, Fremantle, Hillarys, and Mandurah—officers can pull aside anyone for scanning.
Additionally, police ranked Inspector and above can designate scan zones for up to 12 hours in publicly accessible areas such as shopping centres, train stations, and during community or sporting events.
The searches will be conducted using hand-held wands or traditional walk-through metal detectors.
The penalties for non-compliance are severe: selling an edged weapon to someone under 18 could result in up to three years in jail and a $36,000 fine.
If a scan indicates the presence of metal, police will request to see the item.
Refusal to comply or to reveal the metal object can lead to arrest, a search, and potentially a $12,000 fine or a year in prison.
Being found with an 'edged weapon' carries a penalty of up to three years in jail or a $36,000 fine.
However, there are exceptions for items needed for employment, lawful sport, recreation, entertainment, or for lawful collection purposes.
Notably, self-defence is not considered a legal reason to carry a knife.
These stringent laws were introduced amid heightened concerns over knife crime, highlighted by tragic incidents such as the Bondi Junction shopping centre stabbing and the murder of Petr Levkovskiy in WA.
While such events have captured public attention, the data on knife assaults leading to hospital admissions in WA has been declining over the last decade.
However, ambulance call-outs for stabbings have increased, encompassing a range of scenarios, including self-harm and accidental injuries.
Police Minister Paul Papalia cited these high-profile crimes as a driving force behind the new legislation, which draws parallels to Queensland's 'Jack's Law', enacted in 2021 after the fatal stabbing of teenager Jack Beasley.
Queensland's experience with these laws has seen 641 weapons confiscated from over 66,000 scans in 14 months, equating to a weapon found in approximately one in every 100 scans.
Dr Margo van Felius, a former detective and now a criminology lecturer at Griffith University, suggested that removing knives from the streets is a positive outcome and that community safety perceptions have improved.
Introducing these laws has sparked a debate over the balance between community safety and individual rights.
Dr van Felius acknowledges the 'inherent tension' in such legislation, which involves searching people without reasonable suspicion, potentially infringing on human rights.
The Griffith University review also raised concerns about 'net widening', where incidental findings during a weapons search, such as possession of small amounts of cannabis, could lead to additional charges.
Knowing your rights and the scope of these new laws is crucial as Western Australians adjust to these changes.
Whether heading out for a night on the town or simply commuting to work, understanding the potential for scans and searches is now part of the reality in WA.
The government and law enforcement agencies argue that these measures are necessary for public safety.
Still, citizens must stay informed and engaged in the conversation about how these laws are implemented and their impact on civil liberties.
Have you encountered a scan zone yet? Do you feel safer with these measures, or are you concerned about privacy and rights? Let us know in the comments below.
But what does this mean for the average citizen, and how will these changes impact daily life in WA?
With harsher penalties for carrying prohibited items and increased police discretion in public areas, these laws are set to reshape how individuals approach personal safety and everyday activities.
The new laws empower police officers to use metal detectors to scan individuals of any age for knives and other weapons at any time and place without the need for suspicion of a crime.
This sweeping authority is part of the government's strategy to deter knife-related crimes and increase security in public spaces.
In Perth's five 'Protected Entertainment Precincts'—Perth/Northbridge, Scarborough, Fremantle, Hillarys, and Mandurah—officers can pull aside anyone for scanning.
Western Australia's 'toughest' knife laws to be implemented, with police granted extra search powers. Credit: sturti / iStock
Additionally, police ranked Inspector and above can designate scan zones for up to 12 hours in publicly accessible areas such as shopping centres, train stations, and during community or sporting events.
The searches will be conducted using hand-held wands or traditional walk-through metal detectors.
The penalties for non-compliance are severe: selling an edged weapon to someone under 18 could result in up to three years in jail and a $36,000 fine.
If a scan indicates the presence of metal, police will request to see the item.
Refusal to comply or to reveal the metal object can lead to arrest, a search, and potentially a $12,000 fine or a year in prison.
Being found with an 'edged weapon' carries a penalty of up to three years in jail or a $36,000 fine.
However, there are exceptions for items needed for employment, lawful sport, recreation, entertainment, or for lawful collection purposes.
Notably, self-defence is not considered a legal reason to carry a knife.
These stringent laws were introduced amid heightened concerns over knife crime, highlighted by tragic incidents such as the Bondi Junction shopping centre stabbing and the murder of Petr Levkovskiy in WA.
While such events have captured public attention, the data on knife assaults leading to hospital admissions in WA has been declining over the last decade.
However, ambulance call-outs for stabbings have increased, encompassing a range of scenarios, including self-harm and accidental injuries.
Police Minister Paul Papalia cited these high-profile crimes as a driving force behind the new legislation, which draws parallels to Queensland's 'Jack's Law', enacted in 2021 after the fatal stabbing of teenager Jack Beasley.
Queensland's experience with these laws has seen 641 weapons confiscated from over 66,000 scans in 14 months, equating to a weapon found in approximately one in every 100 scans.
Dr Margo van Felius, a former detective and now a criminology lecturer at Griffith University, suggested that removing knives from the streets is a positive outcome and that community safety perceptions have improved.
Introducing these laws has sparked a debate over the balance between community safety and individual rights.
Dr van Felius acknowledges the 'inherent tension' in such legislation, which involves searching people without reasonable suspicion, potentially infringing on human rights.
The Griffith University review also raised concerns about 'net widening', where incidental findings during a weapons search, such as possession of small amounts of cannabis, could lead to additional charges.
Knowing your rights and the scope of these new laws is crucial as Western Australians adjust to these changes.
Whether heading out for a night on the town or simply commuting to work, understanding the potential for scans and searches is now part of the reality in WA.
The government and law enforcement agencies argue that these measures are necessary for public safety.
Still, citizens must stay informed and engaged in the conversation about how these laws are implemented and their impact on civil liberties.
