Aussie's $6000 ceiling disaster rejected - is your insurer's policy this brutal?

When we pay our insurance premiums, we do so with the belief that when disaster strikes, our insurer will have our backs. It's a safety net that gives us peace of mind, especially as we grow older and seek stability and protection for our homes and possessions. However, the recent experience of a West Australian man has left many questioning the reliability of this safety net.

Luke Britton, a resident of the Fremantle area, returned from a nearly month-long holiday in Bali to a shocking sight: his living room ceiling had completely collapsed, leaving a mess of debris and destruction. After 12 years of diligently paying his insurance premiums, totaling almost $20,000, and never having made a claim, Britton believed that his insurer, CommInsure – now owned by the South African-based Hollard Group – would step in to cover the damages. The cost to repair the ceiling was estimated at around $6000, a significant sum that insurance was meant to mitigate.


However, Britton's initial relief turned to frustration when CommInsure denied his claim. The insurer's reason? They alleged that the adhesive glue binding the ceiling's beams to the roof had not been properly maintained. This was despite no prior indication that the beams were faulty or loose. It was a response that many would consider harsh, especially given the lack of evidence that Britton had neglected his ceiling maintenance.


1721278870175.png
Luke Britton returned from holiday to find collapsed ceiling; insurer initially denied $6000 repair claim. Credit: @wombat_travels / TikTok


The situation took a turn when Britton, driven by his frustration, took to social media to share his plight. His TikTok video detailing the incident went viral, amassing tens of thousands of views. It was only then that Hollard reconsidered their stance, issuing an apology and agreeing to honor the claim, even waiving the excess fee. They admitted that the initial assessment was perhaps 'a bit unfair.'


Britton's story raises a critical question for all of us, particularly those in the over-60s community who often rely on insurance to safeguard against unforeseen home repairs and other emergencies. Are we truly protected by our insurance policies, or are we at the mercy of assessors who may too quickly dismiss legitimate claims?

It's essential to understand the fine print of our insurance policies. What are the maintenance requirements? How often are assessments required to ensure coverage remains valid? And what recourse do we have if a claim is denied?

Moreover, Britton's experience underscores the power of social media as a tool for consumers to seek justice and accountability from large corporations. Yet, it also highlights a worrying possibility: would Hollard have revised their decision if Britton's video hadn't gone viral? What about those who don't have the means or knowledge to leverage social media in their favor?


Hollard has since apologized to Britton, stating that they have measures in place for customers to request a review of claim outcomes. While this is a positive step, it's a reminder that sometimes, it takes more than just following the process to achieve a fair result.

As members of the Seniors Discount Club, it's crucial to share our experiences and knowledge with one another. Have you ever had to fight for an insurance claim? What advice would you give to others in a similar situation? Your insights could be invaluable to someone facing their battle with an insurer.

Key Takeaways
  • Luke Britton from Fremantle discovered his ceiling had collapsed after returning from holiday, but his insurer initially refused to cover the $6000 repair cost.
  • CommInsure, now owned by Hollard, claimed the ceiling issue was due to improper maintenance and thus not liable for the damage.
  • After Britton's social media video went viral, Hollard issued an apology and agreed to cover the repair costs, acknowledging their initial assessment was 'a bit harsh'.
  • Hollard has apologised for the inconvenience and encourages customers to request a review if they're dissatisfied with a claim outcome.

Remember, insurance is meant to serve as our financial shield in times of trouble. It's important that we hold these companies accountable and ensure they uphold their end of the bargain. After all, isn't that what we've been paying them for all these years?
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: seeana and Abby2

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
I have a similar problem where a insurance company is not happy of repairing a front colourbond fence which was damaged by a person with a medical condition they only want to repair the damaged part of the fence and as it will not match the balance part of the fence which seems to be damaged to.the fence was in good condition as it is about 22 years old its been over 3 months since the accident and nothing has been done
 
  • Sad
Reactions: DLHM and Dynamo
When I read my policies it points out that the dwelling must be occupied or supervised if you intend to be absent for more than 10 days. My friend was refused insurance because they went to America for six weeks and their driveway collapsed while they were away. Always read the policy carefully
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
I'd wait for a few months after the repair job was done & then go & chase up another very reputable insurance company & take out another policy. The particular insurance company he is with, now more than likely will have a Black mark notation against him for making a claim.
 
If the ceiling had been glued to the beams, how could any homeowner maintain the glue? Pull the ceiling down and replace the glue? That is one deeply stupid or very greedy insurance company.
 
Yes, I was confused about the glue?? No supporting beams I have ever seen rely on glue?
 
Yes, I was confused about the glue?? No supporting beams I have ever seen rely on glue?
I suggest the the glue had been used to glue the plasterboard to the ceiling beams. That is quite common and saves the time and effort of nailing or screwing the plasterboard to the beams.
 
had the same a few years ago, apparently in older homes they didn't use as many nails (?) as required and adhesive. therefore not covered now. Could not believe at the time.
 
I am having the same problem as Luke. After a very heavy downpur on the flat metal roof, the ceiling in one bedroom collapsed after cracking one day and falling the next. The next bedroom showed a crack at the same time.The insurer RAC sent their assessor. Their builder spent 10 mjn in the house and in her observatiion reported: DO NOT ACCEPT - NOT COVERED. The rubble was removed and the crack in the next bedroom was temporarily patched with 2 strips of metal to keep it from falling. The house has been rented to a family with 4 children and rent had to be forfeited as they had to put up with the dust, inability to use 2 of the 3 bedrooms, insecurity in using the second bedroom and suffered damage to 2 mattresses. RAC 10 days later has declined the claim. However as a very long term insured (we have been with them for decades) have graciously offered us an amount to cover the collapsed ceiling in one of the bedroom. As the insurance also covers public liability I believe this ex gratia full and final payment offer to be highly inadequate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob44
My experience with the Royal Automobile Club Insurance was equally bad. My house was broken into an vandalised just a few days after I had completed a major redecoration cum renovation. After two months and the police having to lodge their report three times and the insurance assessor having been somewhat dilatory, I was told that the RAC was extremely busy etc and they would get a round tuit in due course. After a polite argument on the telephone, some days later the RAC agent informed me that they considered that the vandalism was fair wear and tear. After I had offered politely to fair wear and tear the agent's house to demonstrate the type of fair wear and tear involved I was told that she hadn't viewed it like that and would reconsider her opinion. Next day she phoned to tell me that I had vandalised my own house. After a rather strained discussion, she said she would phone me next day, which she did telling me that a cheque for X dollars would be sent and did I consider that adequate. As I did, I accepted the payment and then found a different insurer.
 
If anyone in NSW has a prob., with an insurance co., I'd be sticking with NRMA, GIO or even, maybe Budget.


There again, maybe someone may have had a prob., with one of those. I'd be giving the "Pretenders" a "Big Joe Bliss". I've heard of a lot of Heartache with others.

Good Luck.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×