Aussie Government rolls out massive road change in a few weeks. Is it time to say goodbye to your car?

As the clock ticks down to a significant shift in road rules, drivers are bracing for a massive overhaul happening soon.

This change could axe several beloved car models from showrooms.


The Australian Design Rule (ADR) has been the cornerstone of vehicle regulation in the country.

It sets the bar for vehicle safety, efficiency, and environmental impact.

These non-negotiable rules ensure that every car, truck, or motorcycle sold or driven in Australia meets stringent standards.


compressed-pexels-vehicles.jpeg
Starting 1 March, vehicles should be compliant to the ADR 98/100 rule. Image Credit: Pexels/Nimit N


An impending change called the ADR 98/100 should take effect starting 1 March to make way for better vehicle safety.

Part of ADR 98/100's mandate stated that all new vehicles, regardless of launch date and time, must be equipped with autonomous emergency braking (AEB).

AEB technology detects potential collisions and automatically applies brakes, potentially preventing crashes or reducing severity.

This move towards enhanced safety has been in the pipeline since 2021, which gave the automotive industry ample time to adapt.


James Williams, Head of Policy at the Royal Automotive Club of Victoria (RACV), spoke about the benefits of AEB.

Mr Williams cited data from the Monash University Accident Research Centre and Europe's New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) that demonstrated AEB's effectiveness in reducing collision severity.

The RACV firmly stood by the legislation, as it prioritised vehicle safety and the potential to reduce road trauma over dealership profits.

In light of the looming change, some vehicle models will make the ADR98/100's cut.

Hussein Dia, a specialist from Swinburne University, spoke about the implications of the new rule.

'Car dealers would need to invest in bringing their existing models up to the required standard for Australia,' Dia stated.

'If they can't update the vehicles, or they choose not to update them because it is costly, then these models would need to be retired altogether.'


Several vehicle companies in Australia have already prepared for the looming change.

For example, Suzuki retired its Ignis light SUV and introduced the Suzuki Fronx, a new vehicle complete with AEB.

This shift should align Australia with international safety standards similar to European countries.

The ADR 98/100 may seem beneficial to the public, but it could have several drawbacks.

The introduction of AEB across all vehicles could drive car prices up, as manufacturers need to recoup the costs of integrating this new technology.

Vehicles from various carmakers could also discontinue extensive models.


According to the Australasian Fleet Management Association (AfMA), models such as the Fiat 500 and Abarth models, select LDV G10 and V80 vans, and Mahindra Pik-Up variants will be phased out soon due to non-compliance.

Mainstream models are not immune to the phase-out either.

The Mitsubishi ASX, Eclipse Cross, Pajero Sport, and older Renault Kangoo and Trafic models will also be affected.

Other than the Ignis, Suzuki will also pull out the Baleno and S-Cross units from sale.


Luxury cars are not spared from the culling.

Models like the Aston Martin DB11 and DBS, Lamborghini Aventador and Huracan, and some Porsche 718 versions should be phased out from the Australian market as well.

As Australia moves forward with this legislation, it has made it clear that it is prioritising saving lives and creating safer roads for everyone.

It's essential to stay informed about how the ADR 98/100 might affect you and your vehicle.

Consult with your manufacturer if your vehicle is good to go or if it's on the chopping block/

Make sure that your vehicle meets the new standards and can offer you and your loved ones safety on the road.
Key Takeaways

  • Starting 1 March, the Australian Government should be pushing out the changes requiring new vehicles to have autonomous emergency braking (AEB).
  • The Australian Design Rule (ADR) 98/100 could affect several popular vehicle models, which will be retired from catalogues due to non-compliance.
  • The new rule aimed to improve road safety by reducing the number of rear-end collisions and should align Australian vehicle standards with Europe.
  • While this change could lead to the discontinuation of some vehicle models, it may also result in higher prices due to building costs.
What do you think about the changes ADR 98/100 could bring? Share your thoughts about this new road change in the comments section below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
takr a leaf out of nz. have a road worthy certificate every 6 months. then one lighted vehicles, spewing out stinking fuel, and making sure they are roadworthy. pure heaven.
 
When I think about it. It is in all honesty what would have alerted me when I was distracted. After rear ending a car in Brisbane, a distraction that has cost me over $5000.
Didn't you have insurance, if not you should have NEVER been on the road
 
These safety inclusions have been in cars over in Europe for many years, Australia is always the last country to bring out anything years after everyone else. I worked in the car industry 20 years ago and we were making this stuff and sending over to Europe then.
 
Yes it used to be that, I believe, but even now one or less than one car’s length seems to be good enough for so many to push in. I guess I should have clarified my comment of ‘at least one car’s length’ but we personally drive at a minimum of that distance at the signed speed limit on suburban roads and a hell of a lot more distance on highways due to the speed. And still there are idiots who push in because they seem to think we are driving too slowly and need to get ahead of us regardless.
 
You really are an obnoxious person ! .Everyone makes mistakes now and again when they make comments even you have. Don't be so judgemental and try to have something nice to say for once.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
Oh like you blaming our road accidents from all the migrants being allowed into the country !That's nice, you are the judgemental racist here not me and others blaming veils for not allowing proper vision in cars.REALLY!!!!!NO WONDER THIS COUNTRY CANT MOOVE FORWARD.SEEMS THAT IF YOUR ANCESTORS DIDN'T' COME HERE IN "CHAINS"YOU ARE THE PROBLEM OF ALL THIS COUNTRIES WOES.
What an embarrassment this site is becoming 😩
 
Oh like you blaming our road accidents from all the migrants being allowed into the country !That's nice, you are the judgemental racist here not me and others blaming veils for not allowing proper vision in cars.REALLY!!!!!NO WONDER THIS COUNTRY CANT MOOVE FORWARD.SEEMS THAT IF YOUR ANCESTORS DIDN'T' COME HERE IN "CHAINS"YOU ARE THE PROBLEM OF ALL THIS COUNTRIES WOES.
What an embarrassment this site is becoming 😩
Oh like you blaming our road accidents from all the migrants being allowed into the country !That's nice, you are the judgemental racist here not me and others blaming veils for not allowing proper vision in cars.REALLY!!!!!NO WONDER THIS COUNTRY CANT MOOVE FORWARD.SEEMS THAT IF YOUR ANCESTORS DIDN'T' COME HERE IN "CHAINS"YOU ARE THE PROBLEM OF ALL THIS COUNTRIES WOES.
What an embarrassment this site is becoming 😩
You have got the wrong person.l said l had heard Albanese was getting more Chinese in the country and that is all l said.So what! how is that being raciest?
You have got me mixed up with what Canham said and l was defending him after all the nasty remarks you said.He has got a good point a lot of foreign people come here that don't know our road rules or even speak our language .Those people DO need to pass a test. l will dismiss the last part about ancestors as ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catherines and DLHM
You have got the wrong person.l said l had heard Albanese was getting more Chinese in the country and that is all l said.So what! how is that being raciest?
You have got me mixed up with what Canham said and l was defending him after all the nasty remarks you said.He has got a good point a lot of foreign people come here that don't know our road rules or even speak our language .Those people DO need to pass a test. l will dismiss the last part about ancestors as ignorance.
This was a reply to the last post I saw,I don't look at the names I just reply underneath,if you did not make any of the comments I have said above them this is not meant for you is it?The person who wrote all the comments that I am referring to knows who they are,andy last comment is far from ignorant.Tje people claiming road accidents on the people allowed into our country and the comment about VEILS being the problem because of limited vision.,
..now that's the ignorant comment and rascist wouldn't you agree? Whoever wrote it should be owning the comment and you should not have to be having a go at me if you did not make the comment,or a you quietly also in agreeance.
.
 
This was a reply to the last post I saw,I don't look at the names I just reply underneath,if you did not make any of the comments I have said above them this is not meant for you is it?The person who wrote all the comments that I am referring to knows who they are,andy last comment is far from ignorant.Tje people claiming road accidents on the people allowed into our country and the comment about VEILS being the problem because of limited vision.,
..now that's the ignorant comment and rascist wouldn't you agree? Whoever wrote it should be owning the comment and you should not have to be having a go at me if you did not make the comment,or a you quietly also in agreeance.
.
l intervened because l didn't like your reference to Canhams lack of command of the English language as we are not on here to take an essay test but to just make comments. l am surprised Canham didn't reply to you or others as your remark was offensive. Thats all l have to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catherines and DLHM
This was a reply to the last post I saw,I don't look at the names I just reply underneath,if you did not make any of the comments I have said above them this is not meant for you is it?The person who wrote all the comments that I am referring to knows who they are,andy last comment is far from ignorant.Tje people claiming road accidents on the people allowed into our country and the comment about VEILS being the problem because of limited vision.,
..now that's the ignorant comment and rascist wouldn't you agree? Whoever wrote it should be owning the comment and you should not have to be having a go at me if you did not make the comment,or a you quietly also in agreeance.
.
You owe @Still Ebby an apology. Your accusations to her are unfounded and insulting.

Your only “defence” is “I don't look at the names I just reply underneath…”. That is not an apology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Still Ebby
We're in Australia why not use an Australian photo.... just wondering:unsure:
 
The ADR are a bunch of morons and a waste of tax payers money. They pass rules like speedos can be out by as much as 15kpm. Why install them if they don't bloody work. No wonder there are so many accidents. All these morons sitting around in an office thinking what can we do so people think we are worth while. I suggest they all get sacked. Cheaper to pay them the dole, save thousands.
 
Yes, there's no set distance or time in the road rules as every driver and vehicle is different.
I believe the queensland advisory (not a rule) states we should endeavour to keep a minimum of 2 seconds distance when following another car. That means locating anything, a post or object at the side of the road, noting when the car in front passes it and counting a 2-second interval before your car passes that same object. And then adjusting your own speed accordingly. And that is advice not a rule with obviously more distance when on the highway and driving at higher speed.
 
You obviously have no command of punctuation,spelling or english language.We all have to.pass the same driving test, irrespective of where we COME FROM,OUR AGE RELIGION AND EXPERIENCE.How is the government lining their pockets in this case.You may not be a commie,as you phrase it,but certainly a rascist.....ALL NEWCOMERS TO THIS COUNTRY.....YOU MAKE ME FEEL ASHAMED ,how racist can you get😩
[/QUOTE
Wow - no command and I quote: “You obviously have no command of punctuation,spelling or english language.We all have to.pass the same driving test, irrespective of where we COME FROM,OUR AGE RELIGION AND EXPERIENCE.How is the government lining their pockets in this case.You may not be a commie,as you phrase it,but certainly a rascist.....ALL NEWCOMERS TO THIS COUNTRY.....YOU MAKE ME FEEL ASHAMED ,how racist can you get😩”.

Everyone, regardless of age, gender, nationality etcetera, should be able to read, write and speak the language or at least be able to converse well enough in the language of the country they migrate to whichever country that may be. That can be a huge factor in getting by whether it is for driving or anything else.

I might be wrong, but in your comment quoted above your English and punctuation fails the very point you are trying to get across.
 
Didn't you have insurance, if not you should have NEVER been on the road
Mate, having just come out from a broken marriage. I was in between visits to a private hospital and private mental health retreat. I know how these things work. The distraction was an incoming call on my hands free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
Mate, having just come out from a broken marriage. I was in between visits to a private hospital and private mental health retreat. I know how these things work. The distraction was an incoming call on my hands free.
I'm sorry about your situation BUT if you had insurance you would not be $5000 poorer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skippytbk
Didn't you have insurance, if not you should have NEVER been on the road
You have no right to be saying something like that. You don't know me. I only had that car a week and was waiting for my pay fortnight to pay for the insurance. I guess you're just a perfect example of an imperfect human being.
 
Last edited:
Mate, having just come out from a broken marriage. I was in between visits to a private hospital and private mental health retreat. I know how these things work. The distraction was an incoming call on my hands free.
You don’t owe anyone an explanation. It’s perfectly understandable that personal problems can be distracting. Some of us have more disturbing situations than others. Hopefully you’ll feel your life is getting more on track. 👍🏻
 
You really are an obnoxious person ! .Everyone makes mistakes now and again when they make comments even you have. Don't be so judgemental and try to have something nice to say for once.:rolleyes::rolleyes:


The following is from the Queensland Government website under Safe Following Distance and it also states "during ideal conditions":

"What is a safe following distance?​

In most cases, a safe following distance is much longer than a car length.

You should drive at least 2 seconds behind the vehicle in front during ideal conditions.

Add 1 second extra for each 3m of trailer length—when driving a vehicle towing a trailer or caravan.

Remember to also:
  • double your following distance in poor conditions
  • increase following distances if you're driving a heavy vehicle.

Time-lapse method​

One car passes a landmark, with another car following behind at a safe distance

Cars using the time-lapse method
You can use the time-lapse method to keep a safe distance behind the vehicle in front.
  1. Pick a mark on the road or an object close to the left-hand side of the road, such as a power or light pole.
  2. When the rear of the vehicle ahead passes the object, count ‘1 thousand 1, 1 thousand 2’ (this takes about 2 seconds).
  3. If the front of your vehicle passes the object before you finish counting, you are too close, so drop back."
The above quote was taken directly from the Queensland Government website on Safe Driving Distance.
My comments above on safe driving distances has somehow become mixed up in another person's comments.
 
My comment to "havingadoggyday" also got tied up in someone else's comment. My comment to "havingadoggyday" was the following:

I might be wrong, but in your comment quoted above your English and punctuation fails the very point you are trying to get across.

To add: There is little correct punctuation and separation of words after commas, question marks, sentences etc. Think again about commenting on another person's English if you yourself cannot write properly constructed English sentences. Even the word English does not have a capital 'E'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: skippytbk

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×