Aged care reforms face further delays due to 'surprise' provisions
By
Danielle F.
- Replies 10
Aged care in Australia has been at a crossroads, as sweeping reforms on the horizon promise to reshape the way senior Australians receive care.
However, due to recent developments, the path to change is fraught with unexpected hurdles.
The much-anticipated aged care reforms, which could see some seniors paying more for their care, have been delayed due to 'surprise' provisions that caught many off guard.
The reforms, which should introduce a means-tested, user-pays model for non-medical services in nursing homes and in-home care, have been put on hold once again.
Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor emphasised the importance of due diligence, given the significant impact these changes will have on senior Australians and their families.
'We only received a 500-page Bill from the government a week ago. I think it's fair and reasonable for us to work through the legislation, given how much is at stake here,' Mr Taylor said.
'There are very, very sensitive and important issues in the Bill. There are major new provisions that we were not expecting, so we'll work our way through those.'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called for swift action on these 'sensible reforms' and highlighted the need for confidence in the sector.
He also reassured the public that the changes would only affect new entrants into the system through a process called 'grandfathering'.
News of the delay met mixed reactions.
Despite the reassurance from the Albanese Government, the Greens accused the Labor government of succumbing to the Coalition's influence.
'They're so desperate to avoid Peter Dutton's attacks that they're letting him set the policy agenda,' Greens spokesperson for older people Penny Allman-Payne argued.
'From the census questions debacle to pulling the plug on promised religious discrimination reforms, and now keeping millions of older Australians waiting for a new Aged Care Act.'
According to statistics, Australians over the age of 85 could triple by 2050, placing immense pressure on the federal budget and the sustainability of aged care services.
The proposed reforms also included a controversial waiving of criminal penalties for operators found guilty of misconduct.
Despite the rush for implementation, Retirement Living Council (RLC) Executive Director Daniel Gannon argued that it's crucial to take the time planning these reforms for future-proofing.
'There is no point rushing towards a bad outcome. It's frankly too important to get this piece of legislation wrong,' Mr Gannon said.
Navigating the complexities of aged care could be daunting for seniors and their families.
The prospect of paying more for care is a sensitive issue, and the uncertainty surrounding these reforms could add to the anxiety many feel about the future.
What are your thoughts on the aged care reforms? Are you concerned about the potential cost increases or the delay in implementing these changes? Share your thoughts and opinions with us in the comments below.
However, due to recent developments, the path to change is fraught with unexpected hurdles.
The much-anticipated aged care reforms, which could see some seniors paying more for their care, have been delayed due to 'surprise' provisions that caught many off guard.
The reforms, which should introduce a means-tested, user-pays model for non-medical services in nursing homes and in-home care, have been put on hold once again.
Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor emphasised the importance of due diligence, given the significant impact these changes will have on senior Australians and their families.
'We only received a 500-page Bill from the government a week ago. I think it's fair and reasonable for us to work through the legislation, given how much is at stake here,' Mr Taylor said.
'There are very, very sensitive and important issues in the Bill. There are major new provisions that we were not expecting, so we'll work our way through those.'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called for swift action on these 'sensible reforms' and highlighted the need for confidence in the sector.
He also reassured the public that the changes would only affect new entrants into the system through a process called 'grandfathering'.
News of the delay met mixed reactions.
Despite the reassurance from the Albanese Government, the Greens accused the Labor government of succumbing to the Coalition's influence.
'They're so desperate to avoid Peter Dutton's attacks that they're letting him set the policy agenda,' Greens spokesperson for older people Penny Allman-Payne argued.
'From the census questions debacle to pulling the plug on promised religious discrimination reforms, and now keeping millions of older Australians waiting for a new Aged Care Act.'
According to statistics, Australians over the age of 85 could triple by 2050, placing immense pressure on the federal budget and the sustainability of aged care services.
The proposed reforms also included a controversial waiving of criminal penalties for operators found guilty of misconduct.
Despite the rush for implementation, Retirement Living Council (RLC) Executive Director Daniel Gannon argued that it's crucial to take the time planning these reforms for future-proofing.
'There is no point rushing towards a bad outcome. It's frankly too important to get this piece of legislation wrong,' Mr Gannon said.
Navigating the complexities of aged care could be daunting for seniors and their families.
The prospect of paying more for care is a sensitive issue, and the uncertainty surrounding these reforms could add to the anxiety many feel about the future.
Key Takeaways
- The highly-anticipated aged care reforms in Australia could face delays due to surprise provisions in the new legislation.
- Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor stated that they need more time to work through the 500-page Bill because of its content.
- The proposed reforms included a means-tested, user-pays model for non-health related services in aged care.
- The government encouraged quick action on these reforms, but several experts argued that major reforms need more time for future-proofing purposes.