New Design
  1. Enable New Design

After years of public scrutiny, one Royal’s troubles may soon reach a turning point

Offtopic / Everything else

After years of public scrutiny, one Royal’s troubles may soon reach a turning point

Screenshot 2025-10-30 at 11.04.09 am.png After years of public scrutiny, one Royal’s troubles may soon reach a turning point
Prince Andrew has been under fire for years over several allegations. Image Credit: People Magazine

When we think of the British Royal Family, we think of regal figures and icons that lead a nation. However, bombshell allegations have marred the family's image over the years.



For the first time in over two decades, a senior member of the British Royal Family could face criminal charges, and may face prison bars instead of palace gates.




Legal experts and campaigners now warn that Prince Andrew could face genuine criminal liability and potentially even prison.



United States-based lawyers believed that he may be drawn into a criminal probe over claims he illegally shared Virginia Giuffre's social security details.



The bombshell assessment comes from leading royal biographer Andrew Lownie, who shared in an interview that there's 'a very good chance that both he and Sarah Ferguson may well go to prison'.



It's a stunning fall from grace for the Duke and Duchess of York, whose scandals have finally caught up with them in the most serious way imaginable.



Police probe puts Andrew in unprecedented territory

Prince Andrew could become the first member of the Royal Family to be investigated by police for more than 20 years after he was accused of trying to use his protection officer to smear his accuser.



The Metropolitan Police is 'actively looking into' allegations that he asked his taxpayer-funded bodyguard to investigate Virginia Giuffre.



The investigation centres on explosive leaked emails from 2011 showing Andrew allegedly handed over Giuffre's confidential social security number and date of birth to his Met Police protection officer.



Legal experts warn the penalties for this crime are 'very severe and can be up to 15 years in prison,' with one lawyer stating Andrew 'may have violated both of these acts'.



The last senior royal to face criminal charges was Princess Anne in 2002, who pleaded guilty to a charge under the Dangerous Dogs Act after her pet Dotty bit two children in Windsor Great Park.



The American threat looms large

Across the Atlantic, the legal jeopardy is even more severe.



Lawyers believe Andrew may be drawn into a criminal probe over the social security violation—a felony that could carry up to 20 years in prison.



US Representative Nancy Mace has been particularly vocal, posting on social media about the consequences of Prince Andrew's alleged actions. 'A cold, dark cell. Prince Andrew in handcuffs. Sends the right message,' she wrote.




Potential criminal charges against Prince Andrew


Charges in the United Kingdom: Misuse of personal information, conspiracy to pervert justice


Charges in the United States: Identity theft (up to 15 years), conspiracy (up to 20 years), RICO violations (up to 25 years)


Status: No formal charges filed, but investigations underway




The legal landscape has shifted dramatically since Virginia Giuffre's posthumous memoir, Nobody's Girl, was published, containing fresh allegations about Andrew's conduct.



The book has exposed new allegations, and a newly reported email from 2011 has called into question Andrew's claim that he severed ties with Epstein in 2010, with Andrew appearing to reach out to Epstein, saying 'keep in close touch' and that they were 'in this together.'



Sarah Ferguson's financial web

The Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, also faces her own legal perils.



Fresh revelations suggest Jeffrey Epstein secretly bankrolled Ferguson for 15 years, far beyond the £15,000 (about $30,000) she previously admitted to receiving from him.




Screenshot 2025-10-30 at 11.03.46 am.png
Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson were married in 1986. Image Credit: YouTube/Sky News Australia


However, newly unearthed emails show Epstein complained to associates about Ferguson's 'scrounging ways' and claimed she was so eager to maintain ties that 'she was the first to celebrate' his release from jail 'with her two daughters in tow'.



[/p]These financial entanglements could expose Ferguson to charges of money laundering or tax evasion, particularly if investigators determine that she failed to properly declare Epstein's substantial payments to authorities.[/p]

Royal family under siege

For King Charles II and heir Prince William, this scandal is not simply one individual's problem.



The credibility of the monarchy depends on public trust and the perception of accountability, with analysts warning that Andrew's continued presence poses a systemic risk.



The pressure on King Charles II has been immense, as commentators say this situation could surpass the 1936 abdication crisis.



Whereas Edward VIII voluntarily stepped aside for love, Andrew's case is driven by allegations of criminal behaviour that could destabilise the institution's moral authority.


The Royal Lodge standoff and the public's thoughts

Adding to the royal family's woes, Andrew has been living rent-free at the 30-room Royal Lodge for two decades, paying only 'peppercorn rent' of around £250 per week for a property worth millions.



The arrangement has become a symbol of royal privilege that increasingly sits poorly with the British public.



Reports suggest Charles wants the disgraced couple out, but they're demanding two alternative homes in exchange for leaving.




Public outrage has increased as more details emerge.



Campaign group Republic noted that stripping Andrew of titles was no longer sufficient, stating, 'Public anger is what's going to push this forward ... Andrew being stripped of the use of his titles is no punishment at all.'



For Australians who've watched this saga unfold, there's a particular sense of betrayal.



Commonwealth nations have long supported the royal family based on notions of duty, service, and moral leadership. Andrew's alleged conduct represents the antithesis of these values.


What happens next

Pressure is mounting for Parliament to intervene where the royal prerogative ends.



Though criminal charges remain speculative, the new allegations, leaked communications, and intensifying political scrutiny have left Andrew in a perilous position, with legal experts saying any renewed investigation could carry consequences for the Duke and the monarchy.



The coming months will likely determine whether Andrew becomes the first senior royal in living memory to face serious criminal charges. If the biographer's prediction proves correct, we could witness the extraordinary spectacle of a Queen's son in the dock—or even behind bars.



The royal family has weathered many storms, but none quite like this.



As investigations proceed on both sides of the Atlantic, the coming months will test whether the monarchy can survive its most serious criminal scandal in living memory.



What do you think about this Royal news? Should Prince Andrew face the full force of the law, regardless of his royal status? Share your thoughts on this unprecedented crisis in the comments below.





  • Primary source


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...woes-Prince-Andrew-Sarah-Ferguson-PRISON.html





  • Prince Andrew Faces Mounting Legal Pressure Amid Epstein Scandal — Experts Warn Jail Time Possible

    Cited text: 'Legal experts and campaigners now warn that the embattled royal could face genuine criminal liability and potentially even prison, marking one of the ...'


    Excerpt: Legal experts and campaigners now warn that Prince Andrew could face genuine criminal liability and potentially even prison.







  • Prince Andrew could face first royal police probe in 20 years over smear claims

    Cited text: 'Leaked emails suggest that Prince Andrew asked his taxpayer-funded police bodyguard to investigate Virginia Giuffre.’


    Excerpt: Prince Andrew could become the first member of the Royal Family to be investigated by police for more than 20 years after he was accused of trying to use his protection officer to smear his accuser.







  • Will Prince Andrew Go to Jail For Jeffrey Epstein Accusations?

    Cited text: 'Later, she posted on X, “Now seems like a good time to discuss prosecuting Prince Andrew for any and all potential crimes on US soil,” But that wasn’t...'


    Excerpt: US Representative Nancy Mace has been particularly vocal, posting on social media about the consequences of Prince Andrew's alleged actions. 'A cold, dark cell. Prince Andrew in handcuffs. Sends the right message,' she wrote.







  • The unanswered questions hanging over the Prince Andrew scandal | CNN

    Cited text: 'There has been an avalanche of headlines in recent days, in the run up to the publication of a posthumous memoir, “Nobody’s Girl,” by his accuser Virg...'


    Excerpt: The legal landscape has shifted dramatically since Virginia Giuffre's posthumous memoir, Nobody's Girl, was published, containing fresh allegations about Andrew's conduct.





Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
She had no choice 🙏🦋
I disagree. Of course she had a choice. She chose to commit suicide. But she made sure she got her book finished first. She couldn’t be questioned about it once she was dead.
 
Instant karma's gonna get you
Going to knock you on the head!!!
 
I think King Charles is a bit spiteful. For years, he played the quite prince, waiting his turn, but Elizabeth kept on going.

Charles should never have taken the crown. He was too old. Diana must be rolling in her grave to see Camilla as queen consort or whatever she is. The reality of going from Prince to King is it turned Charles into a Billionaire, when he should have passed, to let William and Kate take the crown.

Prince Andrew - I feel a bit sorry for him.

Sure, Prince Andrew was an idiot getting involved with an inappropriate aged young woman. That said, the moral culture of the USA exploits young women, left, right and centre. For many lesser educated women, from poorer families, the job prospects of her era were working for a bare subsistence wage in a menial job, with little hope of escaping the poverty trap.

Virginia Guiffre - I remember reading her backstory a couple of years ago. Broken home. Ran away a couple of times, which started as a pre-teen. Supported herself on the streets as a prostitute.

Police 'found her living' with a bloke who was involved in human trafficking - passing young girls around a network for prostitution purposes. She was around 14 at the time the police found her. (?)

Then, Virginia ended up with her father. He got her a job at a sporting club somehow connected to Trump. She worked as a trainee masseuse. That is where Gishlaine Maxwell found her.

As Prince Andrew slept with her when she was 16 or 17, ergo she must have been around 15 when working as a trainee masseuse.

Maxwell recruited Virginia Guiffre and she went to work for Epstein - well that is the story. It is probably safe to guess a discussion about Virginia's past happened somewhere in the recruiting stage.

Personally, I'm under no illusions about Virginia Guiffre's life. Harsh as it is, by the time she got to Epstein, she was an experienced teenage prostitute, living in the USA. Realistically, $100 doesn't go far on the streets of the USA. Virginia Guiffre wasn't an 'occasional' or 'reluctant' prostitute - more like she worked consistently as a prostitute.

The media keep trying to make out Virginia Guiffre was naive, but she was not by any stretch of the imagination.

There are thousands of young women like Virginia Guiffre in the USA.

I notice two things about American culture. There are a lot of young women who appear to work in jobs that involve them wearing skimpy clothes. Even watching You Tube videos of life in the USA, and notice how many young woman appear to get around in skin tight gear with the goods just about hanging out.

They dress differently to Australian women and I think it a combination of low employment prospects, minimum wages, and over 345 million Americans.

Americans also appear to enjoy being in a position where they have humiliating control over another American, and have no qualms about exploiting others for a dollar. That seems some moral relic from slavery, and exploiting the next cheapest sources of labour.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Sherril54
  • Sad
Reactions: Sherril54
Don't be so bloody daft She was a pro no matter how old she was
As a matter of fact what is wrong with a Pro as you would call a prostitute,? It is a legal profession in Australia. The issue is that she was only 16 yrs old when she got caught up in this sex ring, where she was exploited, and sexually used by some very wealthy and well known men and one was Andrew, who denied it and has since been caught out in his lies. He knew it was very, very wrong and that`s why he lied. Why would you blame the victim?.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
I think King Charles is a bit spiteful. For years, he played the quite prince, waiting his turn, but Elizabeth kept on going.

Charles should never have taken the crown. He was too old. Diana must be rolling in her grave to see Camilla as queen consort or whatever she is. The reality of going from Prince to King is it turned Charles into a Billionaire, when he should have passed, to let William and Kate take the crown.

Prince Andrew - I feel a bit sorry for him.

Sure, Prince Andrew was an idiot getting involved with an inappropriate aged young woman. That said, the moral culture of the USA exploits young women, left, right and centre. For many lesser educated women, from poorer families, the job prospects of her era were working for a bare subsistence wage in a menial job, with little hope of escaping the poverty trap.

Virginia Guiffre - I remember reading her backstory a couple of years ago. Broken home. Ran away a couple of times, which started as a pre-teen. Supported herself on the streets as a prostitute.

Police 'found her living' with a bloke who was involved in human trafficking - passing young girls around a network for prostitution purposes. She was around 14 at the time the police found her. (?)

Then, Virginia ended up with her father. He got her a job at a sporting club somehow connected to Trump. She worked as a trainee masseuse. That is where Gishlaine Maxwell found her.

As Prince Andrew slept with her when she was 16 or 17, ergo she must have been around 15 when working as a trainee masseuse.

Maxwell recruited Virginia Guiffre and she went to work for Epstein - well that is the story. It is probably safe to guess a discussion about Virginia's past happened somewhere in the recruiting stage.

Personally, I'm under no illusions about Virginia Guiffre's life. Harsh as it is, by the time she got to Epstein, she was an experienced teenage prostitute, living in the USA. Realistically, $100 doesn't go far on the streets of the USA. Virginia Guiffre wasn't an 'occasional' or 'reluctant' prostitute - more like she worked consistently as a prostitute.

The media keep trying to make out Virginia Guiffre was naive, but she was not by any stretch of the imagination.

There are thousands of young women like Virginia Guiffre in the USA.

I notice two things about American culture. There are a lot of young women who appear to work in jobs that involve them wearing skimpy clothes. Even watching You Tube videos of life in the USA, and notice how many young woman appear to get around in skin tight gear with the goods just about hanging out.

They dress differently to Australian women and I think it a combination of low employment prospects, minimum wages, and over 345 million Americans.

Americans also appear to enjoy being in a position where they have humiliating control over another American, and have no qualms about exploiting others for a dollar. That seems some moral relic from slavery, and exploiting the next cheapest sources of labour.
Yes, like the others she was exploited by the men and Maxwell!. Sad state of affairs for America the Great !! I don`t think so!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
I would just like to know why him, specifically…..I mean he couldn’t have been the only person she was forced to have sex with at seventeen years of age. Epstein would have forced her on high profile men before Andrew and after him, so why specifically him ?….the crowds are practically baying for his total demise while others who took advantage of this girl seem to be getting off scot free…
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
I would just like to know why him, specifically…..I mean he couldn’t have been the only person she was forced to have sex with at seventeen years of age. Epstein would have forced her on high profile men before Andrew and after him, so why specifically him ?….the crowds are practically baying for his total demise while others who took advantage of this girl seem to be getting off scot free…
Prince Andrew was the silly bugger who got photographed with his arm around her. My impression is he may have humped her more than once. I recall reading something about seeing her on an island near the USA, and then her being at a party where he was in the UK.

His nickname in the media years ago used to be Randy Andy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miss Chris
Prince Andrew was the silly bugger who got photographed with his arm around her. My impression is he may have humped her more than once. I recall reading something about seeing her on an island near the USA, and then her being at a party where he was in the UK.

His nickname in the media years ago used to be Randy Andy.
Oh undoubtedly he had her more than once……. I think also that she would be accompanying Epstein to the best of places…..he was rich and so were his cronies so I expect that he must have demanded a high price for one of his girls…….I remember when Andrew was Randy Andy 😆
 
I would just like to know why him, specifically…..I mean he couldn’t have been the only person she was forced to have sex with at seventeen years of age. Epstein would have forced her on high profile men before Andrew and after him, so why specifically him ?….the crowds are practically baying for his total demise while others who took advantage of this girl seem to be getting off scot free…
She was handed around to a lot of different men. I cannot answer that question, there is evidence sealed and in the hands of the Dept of Justice and the FBI., so far this has not been released. It is thought that it will eventually be released and the names of these men will become known.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
Not a fan of the royal family period, but am wondering what ever happened to the saying, 'Innocent until proven guilty'. From all I've heard on the radio, he has not been arrested and/or charged with any wrong doings, so I don't understand why he is being punished for something that nobody has yet proved he did. Knowing somebody who is charged with a crime doesn't automatically make you the same person as them. My sympathies are with Fergie as she now doesn't have a home to live in and is an innocent by standing to her ex husbands association with a criminal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7777
Not a fan of the royal family period, but am wondering what ever happened to the saying, 'Innocent until proven guilty'. From all I've heard on the radio, he has not been arrested and/or charged with any wrong doings, so I don't understand why he is being punished for something that nobody has yet proved he did. Knowing somebody who is charged with a crime doesn't automatically make you the same person as them. My sympathies are with Fergie as she now doesn't have a home to live in and is an innocent by standing to her ex husbands association with a criminal.
Dear member PepeLePew goodmorning. Your post is interesting. It appears that Andrew has not been arrested, yet. It is not easy for one to come out, and speak about the wrong that a Royal has done to them. Watch 60 minutes to find out the latest news on this story. Also, may I say what a wonderful husband and father and Royal, has Andrew proven himself to be, being sexually active with women that are younger than his daughters. And his wife Fergie, must adore him so much knowing that he has not provided for her financially, leaving her in a position without a home to live in. This is not the kind of behaviour that a Royal should ever take part in. He has taken advantage of everyone, with his no boundaries life style. No respect for his daughters, his wife, no respect to the people who cherished everything about the Royal family and no respect for human life. He does not have a conscience and lacks so many human qualities. A person in such a high profile position, with devious self-centred motives, as he has, can become very dangerous, to all those who come into contact with him. Have a good morning. 🙏🦋
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×