After decades of mystery, one detail might finally shift the Falconio case

Content warning: This article contains distressing content, including violence and murder.

For 24 years, the mystery of Peter Falconio’s final resting place haunted Australia.

Now, the man convicted of his murder is dead—taking the secret with him.

But it’s the convicted killer’s family’s public tribute that’s left many reeling.


Bradley John Murdoch, who was sentenced to life in prison for the 2001 murder of British backpacker Peter Falconio, died at Alice Springs Hospital after a battle with throat cancer.

The 67-year-old was released from the Alice Springs Correctional Centre last month and placed in palliative care, just weeks before his death.

He passed away on 15 July—one day after the 24th anniversary of the brutal outback killing.


image1.png
Falconio killer dies after cancer battle. Image source: Falconio Family


Murdoch was found guilty in December 2005 and handed a life sentence with a non-parole period of 28 years.

He maintained his innocence until the end, and never disclosed the location of Falconio’s body—denying the victim’s family the closure they’ve long sought.

NT Police confirmed his death on Wednesday, calling it ‘deeply regrettable’ that Murdoch had died without revealing what happened to Falconio’s remains.

‘His silence has denied the Falconio family the closure they have so long deserved,’ police said.

‘Our thoughts are with the Falconio family in the United Kingdom, whose grief continues.’

On 14 July 2001, Peter Falconio and his girlfriend Joanne Lees were travelling along the Stuart Highway near Barrow Creek, more than 200 kilometres north of Alice Springs, when they were flagged down by Murdoch.

Pretending their van was sparking, Murdoch lured the couple out before shooting Falconio in the head and abducting Ms Lees.


She managed to escape, hiding in the bush for hours before flagging down a truck driver.

During the trial, it was revealed that Murdoch loaded Falconio’s body into his vehicle before disposing of it somewhere between Alice Springs and Broome—a distance of nearly 2,000 kilometres.

‘The case isn’t closed until they find Peter,’ former NT Police assistant commissioner John Daulby once said.

Murdoch appealed his conviction twice and was denied special leave by the High Court in 2007.

Under the Northern Territory’s ‘no body, no parole’ laws, introduced in 2016, Murdoch would have been ineligible for parole unless he disclosed the location of Falconio’s remains.

Following his 2019 cancer diagnosis, Murdoch reportedly refused treatment and left his prison job as a pastry chef.


In the final days before his death, Murdoch’s family released a shock statement that painted a starkly different picture of the convicted killer.

‘To many, Bradley Murdoch is known only for the events that led to his conviction in 2005 for the murder of British backpacker Peter Falconio… But to those who truly knew him, he was much more than the headlines,’ they wrote.

They described him as a ‘devoted father’, ‘proud Poppy’, and a man ‘deeply loved’ by those close to him.

‘He was a gentle giant with a heart of gold…known for his quick wit…and incredible skills in the kitchen,’ the statement continued.


They also claimed he had been betrayed by a former lawyer who falsely claimed to be working with top barristers on a last-ditch Petition for Mercy.

‘It was later revealed that all three KCs had not been involved in Brad’s matter for years… This revelation was a crushing blow,’ the family said.

‘Our intention is simply to share the man we knew… the version of him that was rarely, if ever, seen beyond our family and close friends.’

Luciano Falconio, Peter’s 83-year-old father, marked the anniversary of his son’s death by renewing his desperate plea for answers.

‘I wish I could find him and make an end to it, bury him…find where he is buried and what happened to him,’ he said.

‘I still hope, yeah I still hope, but I don’t know, if we (will) live long enough.’


NT Police recently launched a renewed appeal for information, offering a $500,000 reward for credible leads that lead to the discovery of Falconio’s body.

‘We’re asking for anyone that may believe they have information…to please come forward,’ Acting Commissioner Mark Grieve said at a press conference.

He confirmed police had tried multiple times to speak to Murdoch again but were repeatedly met with silence.

‘On all occasions, he has chosen not to positively engage with police.’

Authorities said they remained committed to resolving the case.

‘We have been unwavering in that regard in the 24 years up to this point,’ Acting Commissioner Grieve said.

Disappearance cases often leave more questions than answers—and for loved ones, the search rarely ends when headlines fade.


Just like in the case of Peter Falconio, one family is pleading for help as they try to make sense of a loved one’s sudden vanishing.

If you found this story confronting, here’s another real-life mystery that continues to unfold.

Read more: 'Please help us': Mysterious disappearance rocks family, calls for support online

Key Takeaways
  • Bradley John Murdoch died aged 67 after being released to palliative care.
  • He was convicted of murdering Peter Falconio in 2005 and maintained his innocence until death.
  • Murdoch never revealed where Falconio’s body was hidden, despite police pleas and ‘no body, no parole’ laws.
  • NT Police have renewed a $500,000 reward for information that leads to Falconio’s remains.

How do you say goodbye when there’s no grave to visit and no truth to hold onto?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: deni67

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Murdoch is innocent of this crime i'm sure of.
He was miles away and was witnessed being somewhere else in the time frame of Peter's death!
Joanne Lees lied through her teeth, in fact we don't even know if Peter is dead.
He was seen by a truck driver being bundled into a small red car in the spot he was allegedly killed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veggiepatch
Murdoch is innocent of this crime i'm sure of.
He was miles away and was witnessed being somewhere else in the time frame of Peter's death!
Joanne Lees lied through her teeth, in fact we don't even know if Peter is dead.
He was seen by a truck driver being bundled into a small red car in the spot he was allegedly killed.
It's hard to say being on the sidelines, unless you were on the Jury to hear every bit of what happened/evidence. I've been on a few, and it's nothing like I thought it would be.
 
Murdoch is innocent of this crime i'm sure of.
He was miles away and was witnessed being somewhere else in the time frame of Peter's death!
Joanne Lees lied through her teeth, in fact we don't even know if Peter is dead.
He was seen by a truck driver being bundled into a small red car in the spot he was allegedly killed.
If you ever saw Lees' initial television interview, you would have seen a scheming deceitful bitch. Guilt written all over her face with eyes continuously darting around nervously.

Did you know she was paid about $100000 for a television interview with Martin Bashir in 2005(?). Then, in 2006, she went on a media frenzy, releasing a book called No Turning Back, and having numerous interviews with Andrew Denton, BBC Radio 4 and BBC News 24.

In 2007, Channel 10 made a documentary called Joanne Lees: Murder in the Outback. It was shown in Australia, New Zealand, Germany and the UK.

In 2011, she was again interviewed by Woman's Day magazine and in 2017, Channel 9 had a extended episode with her being interviewed AGAIN!

Just think of all the kickbacks this slimy little Pommy witch received over the years. A self made millionaire concocted in her own delusion mind. Her and Falconio are possibly living the high life on some Caribbean island. Who knows?

She deserves to be dead, not Murdoch!
 
  • Love
Reactions: deni67
It's hard to say being on the sidelines, unless you were on the Jury to hear every bit of what happened/evidence. I've been on a few, and it's nothing like I thought it would be.
From Dean Mildren, a former judge of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory from 1991 to 2013.

The trial had a number of complications which counsel had to deal with:

• There was no body found. Therefore, how could the Crown prove that he had been killed?
• Even if the Crown could prove that Falconio was missing, and almost certainly no longer alive, how did he die?
• No murder weapon was found.
• The Crown theory was that Falconio had been shot in the head by a .22 pistol but no bullet, spent cartridge, brain matter or powder from the propellant was found at the scene or on the back of the VW Kombi Van.
• There was no eye-witness who saw what happened to Falconio after he went to the rear of the Van, and Miss Lees had not seen his body.
• Could the jury be satisfied that he had been killed at the scene in the light of the evidence of witnesses from the Burke Roadhouse who claimed that he had filled his vehicle there a week later?
• Was Lees’ identification evidence admissible, or should it be excluded in the exercise of the Court’s discretion given that Miss Lees had seen the photo on the BBC website?
• Even if the Court admitted Lees’ evidence, would the jury accept her identification of him in all the circumstances given that Murdoch was a total stranger to her and the abduction had taken place at night-time?
• Hepi was un unreliable witness who had a motive to lie because he claimed that he and Murdoch had been involved in the transportation of cannabis from Sedan to Broome, the preferred route being via the Tanami Track.
• If Murdoch was involved in transporting cannabis from Sedan to Broome, why would he not take the turn-off to the Tanami Track rather than travel almost 300 kilometres north past Barrow Creek before turning west?
• Was the person and the vehicle shown in the Truck Stop video that of the accused and his vehicle?
• Given that the Crown could prove that Murdoch arrived in Broome at about 4 am on the following morning, was it possible that he could have travelled from Barrow Creek back to Alice Springs and then across the Tanami Track and arrived in Broome in that time, given the distances he would have had to travel, and the conditions of the unsealed road for much of the way?
• When the police obtained access to his vehicle, it had a canopy closed in with mesh for security purposes. If that canopy had been on the vehicle at the time, Lees could not have escaped from it by sliding out the back of the vehicle as she asserted. Could the Crown prove that the closed in section of the canopy had been added after the murder?
• There were also differences in the bull-bar on the vehicle than that shown in the Truck Stop video. Could these differences be explained?


Digest this and you will swayed towards Murdoch's innocence.
 
From Dean Mildren, a former judge of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory from 1991 to 2013.

The trial had a number of complications which counsel had to deal with:

• There was no body found. Therefore, how could the Crown prove that he had been killed?
• Even if the Crown could prove that Falconio was missing, and almost certainly no longer alive, how did he die?
• No murder weapon was found.
• The Crown theory was that Falconio had been shot in the head by a .22 pistol but no bullet, spent cartridge, brain matter or powder from the propellant was found at the scene or on the back of the VW Kombi Van.
• There was no eye-witness who saw what happened to Falconio after he went to the rear of the Van, and Miss Lees had not seen his body.
• Could the jury be satisfied that he had been killed at the scene in the light of the evidence of witnesses from the Burke Roadhouse who claimed that he had filled his vehicle there a week later?
• Was Lees’ identification evidence admissible, or should it be excluded in the exercise of the Court’s discretion given that Miss Lees had seen the photo on the BBC website?
• Even if the Court admitted Lees’ evidence, would the jury accept her identification of him in all the circumstances given that Murdoch was a total stranger to her and the abduction had taken place at night-time?
• Hepi was un unreliable witness who had a motive to lie because he claimed that he and Murdoch had been involved in the transportation of cannabis from Sedan to Broome, the preferred route being via the Tanami Track.
• If Murdoch was involved in transporting cannabis from Sedan to Broome, why would he not take the turn-off to the Tanami Track rather than travel almost 300 kilometres north past Barrow Creek before turning west?
• Was the person and the vehicle shown in the Truck Stop video that of the accused and his vehicle?
• Given that the Crown could prove that Murdoch arrived in Broome at about 4 am on the following morning, was it possible that he could have travelled from Barrow Creek back to Alice Springs and then across the Tanami Track and arrived in Broome in that time, given the distances he would have had to travel, and the conditions of the unsealed road for much of the way?
• When the police obtained access to his vehicle, it had a canopy closed in with mesh for security purposes. If that canopy had been on the vehicle at the time, Lees could not have escaped from it by sliding out the back of the vehicle as she asserted. Could the Crown prove that the closed in section of the canopy had been added after the murder?
• There were also differences in the bull-bar on the vehicle than that shown in the Truck Stop video. Could these differences be explained?


Digest this and you will swayed towards Murdoch's innocence.
Okay, so what you're saying is after 8 weeks of the trial, the jury of 12 people got it wrong. Perhaps, but I'm sitting on the fence because I don't really know, because I've read all those writings over the years too.
 
Okay, so what you're saying is after 8 weeks of the trial, the jury of 12 people got it wrong. Perhaps, but I'm sitting on the fence because I don't really know, because I've read all those writings over the years too.
Yes.

Were the jury there to witness the alleged murder of Falconio? No body, no weapon, conflicting and lack of evidence as detailed in Dean Mildren's statement, someone who knows insurmountably more about the legal process than you, me or the jury at the trial.

All based on circumstantial evidence which should be thrown out of court.

Juries are not immune to errors in judgement.
 
  • Love
Reactions: deni67
Yes.

Were the jury there to witness the alleged murder of Falconio? No body, no weapon, conflicting and lack of evidence as detailed in Dean Mildren's statement, someone who knows insurmountably more about the legal process than you, me or the jury at the trial.

All based on circumstantial evidence which should be thrown out of court.

Juries are not immune to errors in judgement.
Okay
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veggiepatch

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×