$97K light show sparks outrage among residents over spending priorities

As the city of Sydney prepares to roll out the red carpet for King Charles and Queen Camilla's arrival, a lavish welcome gesture has ignited a fiery debate among Australians.

The royal couple, set to embark on a nine-day tour down under, will be greeted with a grand spectacle that has left some citizens questioning the use of public funds.


In a display of pomp and pageantry, the iconic sails of the Sydney Opera House will be illuminated with a curated photo montage for four minutes from 8 pm, showcasing images from previous royal visits.

This grand gesture, intended to celebrate King Charles's first visit to New South Wales as Sovereign, costs $97,030.


1729208273656.png
A celebratory welcome is to be received by King Charles and Queen Camilla, with the Sydney Opera House sails illuminated by images of previous royal visits. Credit: Shutterstock


Premier Chris Minns has expressed that the light show is a 'fitting tribute' to welcome Their Majesties and to commemorate this historic moment.

The public is invited to witness the projection and even catch a glimpse of the King and Queen as they engage with the crowd on the Sydney Opera House Forecourt.

The royal visit will also feature a Fleet Review on Sydney Harbour, complete with an Australian Defence Force flypast and an on-water review of His Majesty’s Australian ships.


These events offer additional opportunities for the public to partake in the celebrations from various vantage points around the city.

However, the decision to spend nearly $100,000 on the light show has sparked outrage among many Australians, who have taken to social media to voice their concerns.

Critics argue that the funds could have been better allocated to address pressing issues such as the housing crisis, overcrowded hospitals, and the rising cost of living.

One Facebook user lamented the waste of taxpayer money on a visit by millionaires, while another questioned the excitement of 'battling Aussies' over such an extravagant expenditure.

Many echoed the sentiment of channelling funds to the needy, highlighting the disconnect between royal fanfare and the everyday struggles of the Australian people.


On the flip side, royal enthusiasts have expressed their excitement and support for the visit, with some planning to bring their families to the festivities.

Monarchists, in particular, look forward to warmly welcoming the King and Queen, showcasing the divide in public opinion.

As we delve into this contentious issue, it's essential to consider the broader implications of such expenditures.

While royal visits can boost tourism and international relations, they also raise questions about government spending priorities, especially in economic hardship for many citizens.
Key Takeaways
  • King Charles and Queen Camilla are set to receive a celebratory welcome with the Sydney Opera House sails to be illuminated with images of previous royal visits.
  • The NSW Government curated the photo montage to commemorate the King's first visit as Sovereign for $97,030.
  • Public members have expressed mixed reactions to the cost, with some criticising the expense during economic hardship.
  • Despite the controversy, some Australians are enthusiastic about the royal visit, planning to welcome the King and Queen in person.
Do you think the $97K light show is an excellent tribute to the royal visit, or is it a waste of money? How else could that money benefit Australians? Let us know in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
I know that 🙂 but it's only signing a piece of paper, once your living together it's like your married.

Defacto relationships have the same rights as being married only difference is a piece of signed paper.

Marriage is a commitment to each other .

Hope there wasn't any typo's
😳No it’s not I’ve been in de factos or as mum used to call it living in sin and never considered myself married at all, why would I what a dumb thing to say🤣
Now I look back and wish I’d never got married what was I thinking dumb blonde bubblehead 🤣
 
Last edited:
Do you really believe that? If so, you should get to grips with the facts.

As I enter my 80th year, it appalls me to see the bitterness and judgement being thrown around by women. Rarely men. Two things: why does Charles not deserve to be happy? Had the queen not forbidden their marriage in the first place, Diana would have married some aristocratic socialite and we'd never have heard of her.

Secondly, is your friend and family circle so lily-white that you know nobody who's been divorced or had a bit of a dalliance on the side? If so, you're one in a million! And I'm sitting next to my husband of 56 years, so I have no personal experience of divorce, but I know many who have, and I don't judge them.
Maybe you should judge them for the disloyalty, betrayal and hurt they have caused due to their own selfishness and lack of compassion for those who loved and supported them only to be left behind to suffer. Good on you for your life long marriage but I bet you wouldn't be so understanding if you were cheated on or left heartbroken.
 
Don't call US the poms ! Such a laugh ! Get off your high horse and stop being so nasty.
Some of us just get stuck here through no fault of their own You need to stop judging people.
I don't judge , some of us see that most Royalist are English. It's an Aussie thing saying Pommy

So I guess you are English !!!

Not sure how people are stuck here.

I actually take offence to anyone saying they are stuck here in our beautiful country 🇦🇺
 
Sick, sick person! If the world has people like you in it, decent humans wouldn't want to grow old.

Obviously your intelligence and reasoning skills only extend to the point of attempting to insult others with foul language. So sad for you to be mired in such negativity, bitterness and hatred.
🤬🤬🤬
 
😳No it’s not I’ve been in de factos or as mum used to call it living in sin and never considered myself married at all, why would I what a dumb thing to say🤣
Now I look back and wish I’d never got married what was I thinking dumb blonde bubblehead 🤣
You do know that if you live with someone for 2 years you have exactly the same rights as if you were married , including property, superannuation absolutely everything
 
Maybe you should judge them for the disloyalty, betrayal and hurt they have caused due to their own selfishness and lack of compassion for those who loved and supported them only to be left behind to suffer. Good on you for your life long marriage but I bet you wouldn't be so understanding if you were cheated on or left heartbroken.
Well said 😍
 
You do know that if you live with someone for 2 years you have exactly the same rights as if you were married , including property, superannuation absolutely everything
🙄
Went through that shit years ago not worth talking about now it’s in the past
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×