‘This is a joke’: Grandmother slams $1,209 fine for road rule breach, cuts back Christmas spending

In the hustle and bustle of modern life, it's easy to make a mistake. But when it comes to road rules, even a small slip can lead to a hefty price, as a 70-year-old grandmother discovered to her dismay.

The incident has drawn attention to the strict laws in place to prevent distractions on the road, with authorities stressing the importance of safe driving practices.

As the conversation around road safety continues, many are questioning whether the current laws are too harsh or necessary for reducing accidents and promoting responsible driving.


A grandmother has reduced her Christmas spending after using more than two weeks' worth of her pension to pay off a fine for violating a driving rule.

Maree Bauer, 70, like many, was simply going about her day, driving along the Capricorn Highway in Emerald, west of Rockhampton in Queensland, when she was caught in a situation that many drivers might find themselves in: her thumb was resting on her mobile phone, which was lying on top of her handbag.

The phone was not in her hand, per se, but according to Queensland's stringent driving laws, this counted as ‘using her phone while driving’. The result? A staggering $1,209 fine and four demerit points were deducted from her license.


image - 2024-12-09T102950.258.jpg
Maree Bauer, 70, was fined $1,209 for resting her thumb on her phone while driving. Credit: Yahoo News Australia


For Maree, whose weekly pension is approximately $557, this fine was more than a fortnight's income.

It's a financial blow that would be tough for anyone to absorb, but it's especially challenging for seniors on a fixed income.

The size of the fine is particularly noteworthy when compared to other Australian states: it's nearly triple the $410 fine in New South Wales and more than double what drivers in Victoria ($593) and South Australia ($540) would pay for the same offence.


The image captured by a mobile phone and seatbelt detection camera showed Maree's thumb in contact with her phone.

However, Maree insists she was merely ensuring the phone didn't move while she used Google Maps for directions.

‘I don't consider that as being on my body. It's just ridiculous,’ she argued.

She also pointed out that another photo attached to the fine showed her eyes were on the road, indicating minimal attention to her phone.


Despite feeling that the rule is ‘ridiculous’ and the fine excessive, Maree admitted she's ‘not innocent’.

She typically used her phone through her car's Bluetooth system and was shocked by the penalty. ‘This is a joke,’ she thought, as the reality of the situation set in.

With Christmas approaching, Maree had to tighten her belt and cut back on holiday spending to manage the unexpected expense.

She even resorted to ‘counting up my change tin’, a humble savings method many seniors might relate to, to see if she could scrape through the festive season.

‘I just have to cop it. I don't have money to fight it…and besides, you can't beat it, you can't win,’ Maree resignedly stated.


Queensland's laws are clear: it's illegal for drivers to have a phone resting on any part of their body, even if it's in their lap or just touching a thumb.

A Queensland Revenue Office (QRO) spokesman explained that all offenses caught by detection cameras are reviewed by officers before a fine is issued, ensuring that the process is thorough.

‘Camera images are initially filtered by Artificial Intelligence software which detects if there was possible illegal use of a mobile phone by the driver,’ the spokesman said.

‘If a possible offence is detected, the images are reviewed by two authorised officers within QRO to determine whether to issue an infringement.’


Maree Bauer's experience highlights the financial strain that can come with driving fines, especially for seniors living on a fixed income.

However, she's not the only one feeling the weight of hefty penalties. Another senior driver is now challenging a significant fine in court after facing a $544 charge for a driving violation.

As more older Australians navigate the challenges of driving regulations, the impact of fines is prompting some to seek legal recourse, aiming to ease the financial burden.
Key Takeaways
  • Maree Bauer, a 70-year-old grandmother, was fined $1,209 for having her thumb on her phone while driving.
  • The fine issued to Maree was significantly more than her weekly pension, causing her to curb her Christmas spending.
  • Queensland's penalties for using a phone while driving are among the highest in Australia, with the fine being more than double that of New South Wales.
  • The Queensland Revenue Office states that all offences caught by detection cameras are reviewed by officers before issuing a fine, and the law prohibits having a phone resting on any part of the driver's body.
Members, we'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Have you or someone you know been caught out by what seemed like an overzealous application of driving laws? How do you manage the balance between staying connected and staying on the right side of the law while on the road? Share your experiences and tips in the comments below—your insights could be invaluable to fellow drivers!
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
She should’ve written asking for a warning rather than the fine if she had no other offenses in the past 3 years.
 
Two hands on the wheel at all times. I got my licence in 1975 in one country and then back in Victoria now Queensland and it's always been the rule.. Pull off the road to check your pH or do it before you leave home 🚗🚙
 
Two hands on the wheel at all times. I got my licence in 1975 in one country and then back in Victoria now Queensland and it's always been the rule.. Pull off the road to check your pH or do it before you leave home 🚗🚙
Ha ha ha! Read my previous post. No such rule.

And I checked my pH last night and it is normal - 7.41 to be exact. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isis
Oh dear ! How many times are we told not to have your mobile phone anywhere near you. I leave mine in my handbag on passenger seat If I'm on a long journey I may pull over into a layby if I'm expecting contact ,if not wait until I reach my destination people will always call again,or leave a message,if not it probably wasn't important
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isis
Can you recommend a phone cradle that won't be stuck on windscreen (which hinders your driving vision and attracts a fine), and actually lets you see maps quite well, without the need to touch it all the time.
There are numerous cradles that are windscreen mounted AND do not block vision or can be mounted on air vents or other sections of the dash.
 
So she had the phone there to look at regularly no doubt, that IS a distraction.

And having driven those roads where she is the number of times I've seen cars veering across the centerline because the river is looking down is unbelievable. One of the reasons I left my last job, too many near misses.

Yes it's a tough fine in QLD, but she really should not be using her phone like that. Have it mounted correctly, it's than in a better sight line and doesn't have to worry about the phone sliding around.
 
This country has reverted to the Great Depression days where debt collecting thugs stole everything from struggling Families. The difference from those years to now is the debt collecting thugs are State Federal and Local Government Politicians.
These fines are okay with me, sick to death of the drivers, head down looking at their phones while going over 100 on single carriageway roads. Head-ons because of this are highly likely and well under reported because when the cop asks the driver if they were using their phone they say, "No", simple and the cops can't prove it, so it goes into the stats without phone use as a reason for the crash.
 
I think the point of the article isn't whether she deserved a fine, it's whether the size of the fine is appropriate. Why are Queenslanders paying 3 times more than NSW and twice VIC and why are those on benefits paying the same as those with far more income. The former sounds like a cash grab. The latter? Well, you might argue everyone is equal before the law, but they're clearly not if different states pay such wildly varying amounts. Perhaps a sliding scale based on assets and/or income (or even driving record) would be more equitable? A $1200 fine is just a mozzie bite to a big CEO, but to someone on benefits, it's a copperhead bite.
 
A fine is just that ‘a fine’ and fines are for the same offence. How is the camera expected to determine that the offender is a CEO or a pensioner? Don’t be ridiculous - an offence is an offence. What I don’t understand is this: we live in one country but each state has their own road rules, other differing rules in everything else, their own level of fines for the same offence. W-H-Y.??

Then we have some companies refusing to sell Australia Day merchandise and yet again others states now saying they won’t be displaying two flags at national observance days. ARE WE NOT ONE COUNTRY and what is the name of this country? Isn’t it AUSTRALIA?

I migrated here in 1965 and all these differences in our country (which, by the way, I consider to be MY COUNTRY) are ridiculous. People cannot live as one any more - religions are abused in different ways, National days are being abused or are leading to services and companies changing things to suit the ridiculous attitudes of people. WE ARE ONE COUNTRY - behave like you believe that. Adapt if you are a migrant or go back to where you came from and do what you want to do THERE, don’t bring your irrational, bad and violent behaviour here; we should be living in harmony and respecting one another - stay away if you can’t adapt. THIS IS AUSTRALIA - each has the right to follow their own religion without intimidation and must not impose their views on others with violence, vengeance and revenge. Do your own thing in a peaceful way, don’t dump your violence and rage on others. Black is black, white is white, so are all shades of skin in between - no one asked to be born with a particular skin colour.

I am so angry that my husband, my children, my grandchildren and I have to put up with all this rubbish in Australia - MY COUNTRY!
 
So she had the phone there to look at regularly no doubt, that IS a distraction.

And having driven those roads where she is the number of times I've seen cars veering across the centerline because the river is looking down is unbelievable. One of the reasons I left my last job, too many near misses.

Yes it's a tough fine in QLD, but she really should not be using her phone like that. Have it mounted correctly, it's than in a better sight line and doesn't have to worry about the phone sliding around.
My response to every and ALL drivers - do as much ‘homework’ at home as you can before getting behind the wheel when using unfamiliar routes. Map out your route IN YOUR HEAD as best you can before leaving home. Even a mounted mobile phone holder is a distraction as it means taking your eyes off the road for just that split second. If you think you are on the wrong road or have taken a wrong turn pull over to the side, check a GPS, a refidex or a map (turning off your engine and pulling out the key as is legal). You will only lose a few minutes of time but won’t get fined or collide with another car because of the distraction of looking at something else while driving. And for goodness sake give that mobile phone A REST. It is not a matter of life and death - OR IT COULD VERY WELL BE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIFE AND DEATH.
 
A fine is just that ‘a fine’ and fines are for the same offence. How is the camera expected to determine that the offender is a CEO or a pensioner? Don’t be ridiculous - an offence is an offence. What I don’t understand is this: we live in one country but each state has their own road rules, other differing rules in everything else, their own level of fines for the same offence. W-H-Y.??

Then we have some companies refusing to sell Australia Day merchandise and yet again others states now saying they won’t be displaying two flags at national observance days. ARE WE NOT ONE COUNTRY and what is the name of this country? Isn’t it AUSTRALIA?

I migrated here in 1965 and all these differences in our country (which, by the way, I consider to be MY COUNTRY) are ridiculous. People cannot live as one any more - religions are abused in different ways, National days are being abused or are leading to services and companies changing things to suit the ridiculous attitudes of people. WE ARE ONE COUNTRY - behave like you believe that. Adapt if you are a migrant or go back to where you came from and do what you want to do THERE, don’t bring your irrational, bad and violent behaviour here; we should be living in harmony and respecting one another - stay away if you can’t adapt. THIS IS AUSTRALIA - each has the right to follow their own religion without intimidation and must not impose their views on others with violence, vengeance and revenge. Do your own thing in a peaceful way, don’t dump your violence and rage on others. Black is black, white is white, so are all shades of skin in between - no one asked to be born with a particular skin colour.

I am so angry that my husband, my children, my grandchildren and I have to put up with all this rubbish in Australia - MY COUNTRY!
Best comments ever. Agree 100%
 
Best comments ever. Agree 100%
Thank you Isis. I get so fed up reading and seeing hundreds of negative and very few positive comments in the news, and on this site. I’m by no means a religious fanatic, I don’t put my beliefs on others (theirs is theirs to believe and follow or not). Live with your human beings in some sort of harmony. It pays off in the end in some way.
 
Yeah a tough one, but the law is clear. Perhaps as a pensioner she could insist in some kind of time payment procedure.
 
Can you recommend a phone cradle that won't be stuck on windscreen (which hinders your driving vision and attracts a fine), and actually lets you see maps quite well, without the need to touch it all the time.
This is my next one:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241210-192242.png
    Screenshot_20241210-192242.png
    93.4 KB · Views: 0
Yes, it is overzealous of the government. All they want is money and they crucify people with ever little constraint they can find. This is a huge amount for a person on a fixed income, with no disposable income left, to pay. It's criminal and inhumane. My suggestion to this lady though would be to purchase a phone holder that she can attach to her vent so it will be at the level of her wheel and then she won't have to ensure the mobile doesn't slip. These fines are cruel and they do not take into account various circumstances. Clearly her eyes were on the road and she wasn't distracted. She was obviously listening to the direction of the GPS. Give her a break please.

I get annoyed reading comments here by persons making excuses for the wrong-doings of others. Those ‘others’ have often whinged about the law doing them wrong, and how poor they are, when in actual fact they have done the wrong thing somewhere. And others constantly saying government and other council or police authorities are just ‘money grabbers’.

Offences must be paid for otherwise YOU whingers and, unfortunately us as well, will find ourselves paying higher taxes and then the whinge will start all over again. If you do wrong you pay - not us - and you bear the financial loss and consequences of your stupidity and errors. Red lights, speed cameras, phone detection cameras etc CANNOT determine a person’s financial status & offenders are treated the same for the same offence, regardless of their financial status.

This woman could have asked for some relief by paying off the fine but she appears to want some sympathy which she DOESN’T deserve. You do wrong, you pay!
 
Yes, it is overzealous of the government. All they want is money and they crucify people with ever little constraint they can find. This is a huge amount for a person on a fixed income, with no disposable income left, to pay. It's criminal and inhumane. My suggestion to this lady though would be to purchase a phone holder that she can attach to her vent so it will be at the level of her wheel and then she won't have to ensure the mobile doesn't slip. These fines are cruel and they do not take into account various circumstances. Clearly her eyes were on the road and she wasn't distracted. She was obviously listening to the direction of the GPS. Give her a break please.
No excuses for her behaviour and a red-light, speeding or phone-detection camera is an inanimate object. It does not know your income status!! She appears to have done wrong so she pays the fine.
 
This country has reverted to the Great Depression days where debt collecting thugs stole everything from struggling Families. The difference from those years to now is the debt collecting thugs are State Federal and Local Government Politicians.
“ The woman has done wrong - she must cop the fine. Don’t call government politicians “debt collecting thugs”. Do you not know the meaning of ‘debt’. It means something that is owed. She OWED the government that fine - hence is is her debt. She committed an offence and was fined, hence it is her debt & must be paid. If these misdemeanours are not paid for then your taxes and mine will rise and you’ll start your whingeing again..
 
I think the point of the article isn't whether she deserved a fine, it's whether the size of the fine is appropriate. Why are Queenslanders paying 3 times more than NSW and twice VIC and why are those on benefits paying the same as those with far more income. The former sounds like a cash grab. The latter? Well, you might argue everyone is equal before the law, but they're clearly not if different states pay such wildly varying amounts. Perhaps a sliding scale based on assets and/or income (or even driving record) would be more equitable? A $1200 fine is just a mozzie bite to a big CEO, but to someone on benefits, it's a copperhead bite.
One of the issues is definitely the variation in the size of ALL kinds of fines from state to state. This is one big country - rules and fines should be the same throughout. And when it comes to different road rules how is a person travelling from one state to another expected to know all the rules of that state. Are we expected to read, remember and observe the other state’s rules?? And benefits or not, if you disobey a rule then you pay up and smile. No excuses.
 
Can you recommend a phone cradle that won't be stuck on windscreen (which hinders your driving vision and attracts a fine), and actually lets you see maps quite well, without the need to touch it all the time.
Do some research.
I had a phone cradle on the windscreen (right hand bottom corner) that actually rested on the dash without obstructing any view for 10 years. I now have a new car and I don’t need a saddle I just tell Siri where I want to go and it pops up on the screen.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×