Search results

Cheap and nasty.

If they are set up and left, a logical conclusion would be that they've been abandoned. Any of these PLACE SAVING ITEMS at a beach/park at say 9am that are simply set up on the site with no owners present can then be deemed abandoned. The right to confiscate should stem from the abandonment...

I've read a comment calling for NDIS scrapping and replacement. I believe that would cost millions. If you (or anyone else you know) is aware of defrauders of our tax money, report them and help clean the system up.

Trees. Developers, landscapers and property owners alike often plant future disaster trees without giving any thought to the potential invasiveness of the particular tree(s). Have seen the results on footpaths, properties, parks and even university campuses. 'Think before you.........' seems...

It seems that many of the wrong people are getting NDIS benefits while other truly needy individuals are being put through the ringer.

Phased out by March 2025!!! WHAT??? EVERY DOG LOVER READING THIS, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF ALL DOGS, TAKE TIME TO TELL EVERY DOG OWNER YOU KNOW TO NOT BUY THIS PROSCIUTTO DOG BONE.

This article contains contradicting comments. 1. Department tested and decontaminated BEFORE the tenant moved in. 2. Tenant moved in and tested and found contamination. 3. Department wants to retest but tenant wants INDEPENDENT tester. 4. Department states it follows official GUIDELINES AND...

Exactly. Sterilization. The article states that Munchausen syndrome by proxy had not been raised. This comment leads to the conclusion that the torture done to this child was to make her sick for the purpose of raising money. Any future child could be at risk.

I believe that being on a phonecall while driving does take your focus away from the crucial task of manoeuvring a vehicle.

There is likely a need for increased care in the examination of photographs. If drivers are disputing the fine because a phone can't be seen in the photograph, something is wrong.

I don't follow any influencers or even know the names of any. Not even sure why people choose to put faith in them since they're total strangers. Thank you, you've given me an insight into this odd influencer world. It sounds like an environment to steer clear of.

Hi, Why would she make a story like this up?

Commenters on this site please refrain from judgement. See attached:

I'm just so sorry to read about this woman's terrible experience.

Yes. Woolworths still observes the obligation to refund and provide the item free per the Scanning Code of Conduct. You need to ask though.

I think neighbours have the right to object to camera surveillance into their property from other neighbours.

Why is the onus on the individual going about his/her day? I see the issue being one concerned with an invasion of privacy. Surely people should be able to sunbath and change clothes in their bedrooms.

I agree with you regarding the death of privacy, but am disgusted at the drones noted in the article allegedly hovering: 1. Above a child sleeping in a backyard tent; 2. Above a sunbathing woman; and 3. Outside a window where a woman was changing. A licensing system would make users traceable...

Please see attached. What the hell?

Thank you for the information. In my first post, I noted that the firemen attending near my friend's house went off at her for as they said: 'covering the (embedded) hydrant up'. Granted, the situation was urgent with a fire burning in the property opposite. I'll tell my friend to make calls...