Are you at risk of a $400 fine? Aussie driver's shocking story sparks outrage at new police crackdown

It’s a scenario that could happen to any of us: you’re driving along, minding your own business, when suddenly you’re hit with a hefty fine for something as simple as not wearing your seatbelt correctly.

That’s exactly what happened to one Melbourne driver, and her story has reignited a fiery debate about road safety cameras, government revenue, and whether the punishment always fits the crime.



The incident unfolded in full view of TV cameras, capturing the moment a frustrated driver pulled over and vented her anger at police.

Her crime? Wearing her seatbelt incorrectly—she claimed it was to accommodate a shoulder injury.


Screenshot 2025-08-26 at 13.05.24.png
Victorian driver criticised police after receiving a $400 fine for incorrectly wearing her seatbelt, claiming her shoulder injury was not considered and labelling the penalty as government revenue-raising. Image source: 7NEWS Australia / Youtube.



The penalty? A whopping $400 fine and three demerit points. Ouch!

‘It’s just ridiculous,’ she told 7News, pointing at the mobile and seatbelt detection camera that caught her out. ‘Revenue for the government, that’s what it is. Get it off the street!’



If you’re a Victorian driver, you’ll know the rules are strict: $407 for not wearing your seatbelt properly, and the cameras are always watching.

But is it fair?

Authorities were quick to defend the system. Police Minister Anthony Carbines and the Traffic Accident Commission’s Sam Cockfield both insisted that these cameras are about saving lives, not just raising revenue.


Source: 7NEWS Australia / Youtube.​


‘These cameras save lives, they change driver behaviour,’ Carbines said. Cockfield went even further: ‘There was absolutely no excuse. There was no reason for anybody not to wear their seatbelt correctly… People after 55 years are choosing sometimes not to wear their seatbelt; it is almost incomprehensible.’



And the numbers seem to back them up.

In Victoria, there’s been a 36% drop in seatbelt offences between January and March this year compared to the same period last year—down from nearly 30,000 fines to just over 19,000. That’s a lot of people getting the message, but it’s still a staggering number of infringements.

While Victoria is seeing a drop in fines, other states are heading in the opposite direction.

Queensland’s cameras have raked in over $500 million from 461,000 infringements since late 2021. Tasmania’s cameras issued $9.5 million in fines in just one year. It’s clear that, across the country, authorities are cracking down harder than ever.



Why? Because Australia’s road toll is at a 15-year high.

In the 12 months to May 31, 1,337 people lost their lives on our roads—a 4.8% increase from the previous year. With numbers like these, it’s no wonder governments are pulling out all the stops to try and make our roads safer.

Here’s where things get tricky. Many of us remember a time when police would use their discretion—maybe a warning for a first offence, or a bit of understanding if you had a genuine reason for not wearing your seatbelt the ‘right’ way.

But with automated cameras, there’s no room for explanation or context. If you’re caught, you’re fined. End of story.

For those with medical conditions or injuries, this can feel especially unfair. Should there be a process for appealing fines in these cases? Should the rules be more flexible for people with genuine needs? Or is the risk simply too great to allow any exceptions?

Read more: How Aussie driver avoided $1,200 fine with surprising seatbelt claim

Key Takeaways
  • A Victorian driver criticised police after receiving a $400 fine for incorrectly wearing her seatbelt, claiming her shoulder injury was not considered and labelling the penalty as government revenue-raising.
  • Authorities defended the use of road safety cameras, stating they save lives by catching unsafe behaviours like improper seatbelt use and mobile phone offences, with the Police Minister insisting there are 'no excuses' for failing to wear a seatbelt correctly.
  • The number of seatbelt-related fines in Victoria dropped by 36 per cent between January and March this year compared to last year, indicating more drivers are obeying road safety rules, though authorities warned continued vigilance is necessary.
  • Despite Victoria’s improvement, Australia’s national road toll has risen to a 15-year high, and other states like Queensland and Tasmania have seen increases in dangerous driving fines and substantial revenue from road camera infringements.

Have you or someone you know been caught out by these new cameras? Do you think the fines are fair, or do you agree with the Melbourne driver that it’s all about revenue? Have you ever had to wear your seatbelt differently due to injury or medical reasons?

Share your thoughts and stories in the comments below—let’s get the conversation started! And remember, stay safe out there, and always buckle up (the right way!).
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Seat belts save lives if worn correctly, not incorrectly.
This rule and information has been out there for years.

It is sad people complain and argue!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jest
My brother has simply gotten a letter from his doctor stating that he doesn't have to wear a seatbelt. Different case, his being cancer, with tubing running from behind his collar bone into his heart. He was pulled over by police, who took one look at his set-up and let him go, suggesting a letter from doctor in case of camera infringements. To say the person with injury shouldn't be driving is also an issue as the driver is also responsible for all passengers being in their seatbelts correctly.
 
this person is a real dingbat. if she had troubles get a doctors certificate and carry it. They are there to use and protect, and it is law, it is not something new.
I say serves her right. comply, it is free. you really are a stupid driver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrannyJA!
Commission’s Sam Cockfield both insisted that these cameras are about saving lives, not just raising revenue.

Sorry COCKfield, that statement implies that revenue raising IS a part of the infringement process.
it pisses me off when those who are in the wrong carry on about revenue raising. comply to the rules to save peoples lives and all will be hunky dory.
 
Funny, only those who get caught call it revenue raising. Don't break the rules, don't give your money to the Government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrannyJA!
Oh dear I am do torn. But I have to come down on the side of the police. If she had an injured shoulder best not drive and possibly reinjurecwith belt in wrong place or get a lift.
My eyes become bad and I actually stopped driving. At least she will be able to drive in due course.
 
I have had 2 shoulder replacement, and it is a nightmare trying to wear a seatbelt. Get a letter from your GP, preferably a specialist, stating that in their opinion, you were wearing your seatbelt correctly. As long as you are wearing it, and it’s over your right shoulder, you have done nothing wrong. Be strong, and go to court and fight for your rights, on principle. You are dead right about revenue raising! And dealing with cops, many of whom are pigs, you need to get tough, and fight. Good luck, Gezzabel.
My worry would be a chance of reinjury. A sudden stop not only do something else to it the pain might take you focus off the road. Not only thinking of you but others. Wouldn’t risk it.
 
1) I am positive that there is always an option to appeal these cases in court.
2) Why are the police being lambasted if the fine was initiated from a safety camera. I am frankly sick of people increasingly blaming the police for enforcing the rules but blaming them for a safety camera issued fine is stretching the line.
3) As other posters have noted, if this person was so inconvenienced why did she not seek a medical exemption.
4) As for the poster who noted that some police are “ just pigs” I hasten to point out that so are a great number of the general public ( especially when they get caught offending).
I agree with most of your comments - and especially the last. But I question the cost of appealing a case in court. It's often more costly than just copping the fine. And a medical exemption is of limited use fighting a camera, unless you are willing to take it to court. I think that is the point of the article - that cameras have removed the human element that had to capacity to look at an exemption (if one was presented) and say 'oh, okay then'.
And as for police - they are human, and like the rest of society, they come in all flavours. Some are unnecessarily nasty. Some are lazy. Some are far too aggressive, and will use any excuse to torment. Most are just ordinary people doing a tough job. I don't think it's fair to brand the entire force. I've known some policemen who were very nice people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catherines
Oh dear I am do torn. But I have to come down on the side of the police. If she had an injured shoulder best not drive and possibly reinjurecwith belt in wrong place or get a lift.
My eyes become bad and I actually stopped driving. At least she will be able to drive in due course.
But if she gets a lift, she still has to wear a seat belt and she or the driver is liable to a fine if the camera captures her without it correctly positioned, so she gains nothing - except to maybe jeopardise thee friend she asks to give her a lift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catherines
1) I am positive that there is always an option to appeal these cases in court.
2) Why are the police being lambasted if the fine was initiated from a safety camera. I am frankly sick of people increasingly blaming the police for enforcing the rules but blaming them for a safety camera issued fine is stretching the line.
3) As other posters have noted, if this person was so inconvenienced why did she not seek a medical exemption.
4) As for the poster who noted that some police are “ just pigs” I hasten to point out that so are a great number of the general public ( especially when they get caught offending).
My comments are not aimed at you Jerry5 so please don’t take any offence.

The so-called “pigs” are the first ones we will call on to save us in the event of a crisis, a break-in, an assault etc, etc, etc.!! Step into their shoes for even half a day on the beat or attending assaults or a break-in to your home and you will be a wreck, all of you who complain about the police as well as those that call it revenue raising. Please think before whingers post here; just walk even 100metres in their shoes to find out what their work entails. Yes, there are many cases some believe is revenue raising - where does funding come from for all that we avail ourselves of? It’s from taxes and not what many think are the bottomless pits of government but some money does come from the government ‘coffers’ as well.
 
I can't agree. it's not necessary 'can't wear a seat belt'. It may be, as in my case many years ago, 'can't wear a seat belt the way regulations require'. I wore a seatbelt, but I had to have fairly generous padding between the breast and the belt and the belt had to be a bit looser than usual. It also depends on the vehicle and the way the belt is fitted. Some seat belts are far more aggravating than others if you have an injury. Anyway, the law applies to passengers equally, so not driving isn't a solution to the problem. In the real world, one rule fits all doesn't work and there needs to be some consideration of specific problems that arise.
so not driving isn't a solution to the problem

You said it.
Lots here saying should not be in a car at all and yet not offering holistic suggestions. useless lot, just like sheep don't do this don't do that because the Government says so and waiting for them for solutions not forthcoming. Drs don't do house calls anymore.
If people can drive without legs then let a sore shoulder in the car.
 
Funny, only those who get caught call it revenue raising. Don't break the rules, don't give your money to the Government.
They get enough as it is why give em more
 
My comments are not aimed at you Jerry5 so please don’t take any offence.

The so-called “pigs” are the first ones we will call on to save us in the event of a crisis, a break-in, an assault etc, etc, etc.!! Step into their shoes for even half a day on the beat or attending assaults or a break-in to your home and you will be a wreck, all of you who complain about the police as well as those that call it revenue raising. Please think before whingers post here; just walk even 100metres in their shoes to find out what their work entails. Yes, there are many cases some believe is revenue raising - where does funding come from for all that we avail ourselves of? It’s from taxes and not what many think are the bottomless pits of government but some money does come from the government ‘coffers’ as well.
What you say is very valid, and it's true that a policeman's job is extremely challenging. But while I would never use the word 'pigs', I do understand why some people condemn police. I have been in situations where I genuinely needed their protection or assistance and they failed dismally, making weak and incorrect excuses for not acting, or, in one case, after an accident, actually favouring the friend who caused it and wrongfully blaming the innocent victim driver (who luckily was a hobby photographer and took photos to another station later to prove what had really happened). I have also had to appeal to a local MP to override police authority that was misused to torment a young person after a Dept Transport error resulted in him inadvertently towing an improperly registered trailer. On that occasion, the policeman concerned harassed with early morning threatening phone calls. He was sacked when recordings proved his conduct. We suffered shocking systemic abuse in a small town where police refused to protect us against their mates.

Policemen and women are people, and people come in all flavours. There are some, sadly, who do not do their job properly. And some folk tend to judge an entire profession by the few disreputable ones they encounter. (Ever heard used car salesmen slammed as all con men?)

Despite past experiences, I would still call police in the event of a break-in, assault, etc. etc. etc. I would just hope those who responded were diligent. I am in awe of those policemen and women who put their lives on the line in the course of their job, and who suffer endlessly in silence.

As for revenue raising - some police will be quick to condemn the activities they are compelled to engage in, despite disagreeing with policies dictated from above. So, yes, revenue raising is a thing, but the police who participate are not necessarily to blame. So cut them some slack on that one!
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×