Are you at risk of a $400 fine? Aussie driver's shocking story sparks outrage at new police crackdown

It’s a scenario that could happen to any of us: you’re driving along, minding your own business, when suddenly you’re hit with a hefty fine for something as simple as not wearing your seatbelt correctly.

That’s exactly what happened to one Melbourne driver, and her story has reignited a fiery debate about road safety cameras, government revenue, and whether the punishment always fits the crime.



The incident unfolded in full view of TV cameras, capturing the moment a frustrated driver pulled over and vented her anger at police.

Her crime? Wearing her seatbelt incorrectly—she claimed it was to accommodate a shoulder injury.


Screenshot 2025-08-26 at 13.05.24.png
Victorian driver criticised police after receiving a $400 fine for incorrectly wearing her seatbelt, claiming her shoulder injury was not considered and labelling the penalty as government revenue-raising. Image source: 7NEWS Australia / Youtube.



The penalty? A whopping $400 fine and three demerit points. Ouch!

‘It’s just ridiculous,’ she told 7News, pointing at the mobile and seatbelt detection camera that caught her out. ‘Revenue for the government, that’s what it is. Get it off the street!’



If you’re a Victorian driver, you’ll know the rules are strict: $407 for not wearing your seatbelt properly, and the cameras are always watching.

But is it fair?

Authorities were quick to defend the system. Police Minister Anthony Carbines and the Traffic Accident Commission’s Sam Cockfield both insisted that these cameras are about saving lives, not just raising revenue.


Source: 7NEWS Australia / Youtube.​


‘These cameras save lives, they change driver behaviour,’ Carbines said. Cockfield went even further: ‘There was absolutely no excuse. There was no reason for anybody not to wear their seatbelt correctly… People after 55 years are choosing sometimes not to wear their seatbelt; it is almost incomprehensible.’



And the numbers seem to back them up.

In Victoria, there’s been a 36% drop in seatbelt offences between January and March this year compared to the same period last year—down from nearly 30,000 fines to just over 19,000. That’s a lot of people getting the message, but it’s still a staggering number of infringements.

While Victoria is seeing a drop in fines, other states are heading in the opposite direction.

Queensland’s cameras have raked in over $500 million from 461,000 infringements since late 2021. Tasmania’s cameras issued $9.5 million in fines in just one year. It’s clear that, across the country, authorities are cracking down harder than ever.



Why? Because Australia’s road toll is at a 15-year high.

In the 12 months to May 31, 1,337 people lost their lives on our roads—a 4.8% increase from the previous year. With numbers like these, it’s no wonder governments are pulling out all the stops to try and make our roads safer.

Here’s where things get tricky. Many of us remember a time when police would use their discretion—maybe a warning for a first offence, or a bit of understanding if you had a genuine reason for not wearing your seatbelt the ‘right’ way.

But with automated cameras, there’s no room for explanation or context. If you’re caught, you’re fined. End of story.

For those with medical conditions or injuries, this can feel especially unfair. Should there be a process for appealing fines in these cases? Should the rules be more flexible for people with genuine needs? Or is the risk simply too great to allow any exceptions?

Read more: How Aussie driver avoided $1,200 fine with surprising seatbelt claim

Key Takeaways
  • A Victorian driver criticised police after receiving a $400 fine for incorrectly wearing her seatbelt, claiming her shoulder injury was not considered and labelling the penalty as government revenue-raising.
  • Authorities defended the use of road safety cameras, stating they save lives by catching unsafe behaviours like improper seatbelt use and mobile phone offences, with the Police Minister insisting there are 'no excuses' for failing to wear a seatbelt correctly.
  • The number of seatbelt-related fines in Victoria dropped by 36 per cent between January and March this year compared to last year, indicating more drivers are obeying road safety rules, though authorities warned continued vigilance is necessary.
  • Despite Victoria’s improvement, Australia’s national road toll has risen to a 15-year high, and other states like Queensland and Tasmania have seen increases in dangerous driving fines and substantial revenue from road camera infringements.

Have you or someone you know been caught out by these new cameras? Do you think the fines are fair, or do you agree with the Melbourne driver that it’s all about revenue? Have you ever had to wear your seatbelt differently due to injury or medical reasons?

Share your thoughts and stories in the comments below—let’s get the conversation started! And remember, stay safe out there, and always buckle up (the right way!).
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Sadly I am with the police on this, if her shoulder is injured should she be on the road, did she need the doctor to sign off for her to be able to drive. If she didn't couldn't there have been some other way to get to where she needed to be so she didn't have to risk a fine for not wearing her seat belt correctly or indeed making her injury worse?.
 
I have had 2 shoulder replacement, and it is a nightmare trying to wear a seatbelt. Get a letter from your GP, preferably a specialist, stating that in their opinion, you were wearing your seatbelt correctly. As long as you are wearing it, and it’s over your right shoulder, you have done nothing wrong. Be strong, and go to court and fight for your rights, on principle. You are dead right about revenue raising! And dealing with cops, many of whom are pigs, you need to get tough, and fight. Good luck, Gezzabel.
 
Sadly I am with the police on this, if her shoulder is injured should she be on the road, did she need the doctor to sign off for her to be able to drive. If she didn't couldn't there have been some other way to get to where she needed to be so she didn't have to risk a fine for not wearing her seat belt correctly or indeed making her injury worse?.
There are fines for passengers not wearing belts correctly too. So is someone with an injury not allowed to go anywhere - even if they need to be transported to a hospital or doctor? And there are certainly injuries that make wearing a seat belt in exactly the right manner harmful but that do not impact driving capacity. There needs to be some common sense applied here.
 
The statement "There was no reason for anybody not to wear their seatbelt correctly" is just ill-informed rubbish.

Long time ago now, and seat belt laws were not particularly strong at the time, but after the birth of my babies, I had infections in the breast and there was no way I could wear a seat belt the way we are required to now. It wouldn't have been just uncomfortable. It would have been pure agony, and harmful.

I greatly appreciate the benefit of seat belts, because one saved my husband's life just before our wedding. They were not compulsory back then, but a policeman at the scene of the accident exclaimed, "Thank goodness you chose to have seatbelts fitted. That saved you." I also know of someone who suffered serious injury that disabled her for life because of not wearing one. But there needs to be some scope for adjusting it in certain situations - with a medical certificate to verity the requirement, otherwise leniency is often abused.
 
Why are you driving with a shoulder injury? Surely that in itself would make you a more dangerous driver due to less flexibility.
 
Why are you driving with a shoulder injury? Surely that in itself would make you a more dangerous driver due to less flexibility.
Not all injuries that make wearing a seat belt hazardous impact driving ability. But, in any case, passengers have to wear belts also. There are fines if passengers are wearing incorrectly. So are you suggesting an injured party can't ride in a car - even if they need to go to a doctor or hospital?
 
Not all injuries that make wearing a seat belt hazardous impact driving ability. But, in any case, passengers have to wear belts also. There are fines if passengers are wearing incorrectly. So are you suggesting an injured party can't ride in a car - even if they need to go to a doctor or hospital?
Just stating that if you are so injured you can't wear a seat belt, you probably shouldn't be driving.
 
Just stating that if you are so injured you can't wear a seat belt, you probably shouldn't be driving.
I can't agree. it's not necessary 'can't wear a seat belt'. It may be, as in my case many years ago, 'can't wear a seat belt the way regulations require'. I wore a seatbelt, but I had to have fairly generous padding between the breast and the belt and the belt had to be a bit looser than usual. It also depends on the vehicle and the way the belt is fitted. Some seat belts are far more aggravating than others if you have an injury. Anyway, the law applies to passengers equally, so not driving isn't a solution to the problem. In the real world, one rule fits all doesn't work and there needs to be some consideration of specific problems that arise.
 
1) I am positive that there is always an option to appeal these cases in court.
2) Why are the police being lambasted if the fine was initiated from a safety camera. I am frankly sick of people increasingly blaming the police for enforcing the rules but blaming them for a safety camera issued fine is stretching the line.
3) As other posters have noted, if this person was so inconvenienced why did she not seek a medical exemption.
4) As for the poster who noted that some police are “ just pigs” I hasten to point out that so are a great number of the general public ( especially when they get caught offending).
 
You need a Dr to give you a letter re the reason you are unable to use a seatbelt, Mine did that for me when I had my mastectomy and I had no problem.
 
Why are you driving with a shoulder injury? Surely that in itself would make you a more dangerous driver due to less flexibility.
Dear member Kerrikennel, thankyou for your post. Our member states that they had a shoulder injury not hands and arms injury. People can still use their arms and hands normally even with a shoulder injury. The seat belt was aggravating the shoulder, not the arms and hands. Wishing you a pleasant day. 🙏🦋
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricci and Leenie
"Because Australia’s road toll is at a 15-year high.

In the 12 months to May 31, 1,337 people lost their lives on our roads—a 4.8% increase from the previous year"


One needs to ask WHY Australia's road toll is at a 15 year high.
It's not because people are not wearing seatbelts. Maybe look at the number of vehicles now on the road.. look at the conditions of those roads
.

"In Victoria, there’s been a 36% drop in seatbelt offences between January and March this year compared to the same period last year"

Where is the data that shows this decrease in fines has resulted in a corresponding decrease in deaths
Whilst I believe that seat belts should be worn, I am also of the belief that the revenue raising function of these cameras is also a strong motivator for their installation.
 
It's getting to the stage that we may have to buy a Dash Cam facing the driver and passenger to have record of you wearing the Seatbelt and Correctly....If wearing black or dark clothes & the seatbelts are black it's very hard see if you are wearing or not.. Most Dash Cams now record date and time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sass and Ricci
I had a Triple A repair done back in 2019 I have a 38 cm scar down my chest and when my son picked me up from the hospital he brought a pillow so I could still wear the seatbelt correctly the scar runs from My sternum to My pelvic bone there are ways even with injuries to still wear it correctly it is common sense
 
Tough for this person! Regardless of a shoulder injury! Seatbelts are COMPULSORY! maybe they need to read up on that? Also if they couldn't wear a seatbelt then they SHOULD NOT be in a car!!
 
I can't agree. it's not necessary 'can't wear a seat belt'. It may be, as in my case many years ago, 'can't wear a seat belt the way regulations require'. I wore a seatbelt, but I had to have fairly generous padding between the breast and the belt and the belt had to be a bit looser than usual. It also depends on the vehicle and the way the belt is fitted. Some seat belts are far more aggravating than others if you have an injury. Anyway, the law applies to passengers equally, so not driving isn't a solution to the problem. In the real world, one rule fits all doesn't work and there needs to be some consideration of specific problems that arise.
The person driving is supposed to be in control of the vehicle and is responsible for the safety of anyone else in the car, if you're driving with an injury and an emergency situation arises, how do you expect to react? You would be held responsible for any consequences. Nobody thinks it will happen to them, but it does. You're just pissed off 'cos you got caught.
 
Last edited:
tge main reaso all these cameras are is for revenu raising, all Governments and council dont really give a damn about road safety, I dont dissagree with these cameras but lets have the truth as to why they are really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carolann0709
Modern vehicles are fitted with an inertia lock and a belt tightening device that deploys when the computer parameters are met to save horrific injuries so if the design parameters are negated a fine is appropriate. At least you live to pay it.
 
Commission’s Sam Cockfield both insisted that these cameras are about saving lives, not just raising revenue.

Sorry COCKfield, that statement implies that revenue raising IS a part of the infringement process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×