New Design
  1. Enable New Design

The super trap that could cost your family thousands: Why your best intentions might backfire

News & Politics

The super trap that could cost your family thousands: Why your best intentions might backfire

Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 12.57.07.png The super trap that could cost your family thousands: Why your best intentions might backfire
Image source: Seniors Discount Club.

Disclaimer: The information in this article is general in nature and doesn’t consider your personal circumstances. Always seek professional financial and legal advice before making decisions about superannuation and estate planning. Rules may change; this is current as of August 2025.



In this Article



When “Margaret” from Brisbane carefully filled out her superannuation beneficiary form, she thought she was doing the right thing for her family.


She nominated her elderly parents and her brother as beneficiaries, believing her $450,000 super balance would provide them with much-needed financial security after her passing. What she didn’t realise was that she’d just triggered a little-known rule that could see her family slugged with a tax bill of up to $140,000.





This example illustrates a frustrating reality facing millions of Australians: nearly half of Australian super members haven’t nominated a beneficiary, but even those who have might be in for a nasty surprise. The superannuation system’s beneficiary rules are riddled with restrictions that catch even well-meaning families off guard, potentially costing them tens of thousands of dollars in unnecessary tax.



The Rule That Stumps Most Australians


Australia’s superannuation laws are clear about who you can and cannot directly nominate to receive your retirement savings. While you might assume you can leave your super to anyone you choose—just like other assets in your will—the reality is far more restrictive.


You can only directly nominate three groups as superannuation beneficiaries:


  • Your spouse or de facto partner
  • Your children (of any age)
  • Someone with whom you have an interdependency relationship

This means siblings, parents, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and friends are all off-limits for direct nominations—unless they meet the strict criteria for an interdependency relationship.




‘In many cases, if an invalid nomination is made, the super fund will simply accept it as a non-binding nomination without providing any warning or follow-up.’

— Hannah Elliott, Stellar Wealth (Yahoo Finance interview)


This creates a dangerous situation where your carefully planned nomination might be worthless, leaving trustees to decide where your money goes—and potentially creating delays and disputes among family members.




Who Can’t Receive Your Super Directly


• Parents (unless interdependency relationship exists)


• Siblings (unless interdependency relationship exists)


• Grandchildren


• Nieces and nephews


• Friends


• Charities


• Anyone not classified as a ‘dependant’ under super law





The Interdependency Relationship: Not What You Think


The concept of an “interdependency relationship” sounds like it might provide a loophole for those wanting to leave super to parents or siblings. However, recent private ATO rulings since 2024 have mostly failed to demonstrate that interdependency relationships exist between parents and adult children, making this avenue increasingly difficult to navigate. Each case depends on specific facts and circumstances.





To establish an interdependency relationship, all four of these criteria must be met:


• You have a close personal relationship


• You live together


• One or both of you provides financial support to the other


• One or both of you provides domestic support and personal care



These requirements must exist at the date of death, and all four elements must be satisfied (with limited exceptions involving disability or special circumstances).



Did you know?


Living with your parents doesn’t automatically create an interdependency relationship. ATO rulings show that typical family arrangements—even when adult children live at home—often don’t meet the strict tests for mutual support and care beyond ordinary family relationships.





The Tax Penalty That Hits Hard


When your super ends up going to non-dependants—whether through invalid nominations or trustee decisions—the tax consequences can be severe. The taxable component of a death benefit paid to a non-dependent is subject to tax at 15% plus the 2% Medicare levy on the taxed element, and 30% plus the 2% Medicare levy on any untaxed element. The tax-free component is always received tax-free.



Example Scenario


    Sarah, 58, has $600,000 in superannuation when she passes away unexpectedly. Her super consists of 70% taxable component ($420,000) and 30% tax-free component ($180,000). She nominates her brother James.


    • Because James is not a dependant under tax law:


    • Tax-free component: $180,000 (received tax-free)


    • Taxable component: $420,000 × 17% = $71,400 tax


    • James receives $528,600 instead of $600,000


    • If Sarah had nominated her spouse, the entire $600,000 would have been received tax-free.






Screenshot 2025-08-19 at 15.53.12.png
Image source: Seniors Discount Club.



Understanding Your Nomination Options


The type of nomination you make significantly impacts how your super is distributed and taxed:



Binding nominations


• Must nominate only valid dependants or your legal personal representative


• Requires two independent adult witnesses


• Usually expires every three years (some funds now allow non-lapsing nominations)


• Trustees must follow if valid



Non-binding nominations


• Easier to complete—no witnesses needed


• Can nominate anyone (including non-dependants)


• Trustees use discretion and may not follow your wishes



Reversionary nominations


• Apply only to pension accounts


• Available for spouses or certain dependent children


• Allow payments to continue until balance reaches zero




Nomination Strategy Checklist


Review your current nominations annually, especially after major life events


Ensure binding nominations are witnessed correctly and renewed before expiry


Consider nominating your legal personal representative if you want non-dependants to benefit


Understand the tax implications for your chosen beneficiaries


Seek professional advice for complex family situations





The Workarounds That Actually Work


1. Legal Personal Representative Route


Nominate your legal personal representative (executor). This lets your will decide who receives your super, but non-dependants may still face 17-32% tax.



2. Withdrawal and Re-contribution


If you’re over 60 and can access your super, you can withdraw and re-contribute funds as after-tax contributions. This converts taxable components into tax-free. With the transfer balance cap now at $2 million (2025-26), this is powerful for larger balances.



3. Strategic Spending and Investment


Use super first in retirement and preserve other assets (which transfer tax-free) for your
intended beneficiaries. This way, you enjoy the tax advantages of super during your lifetime, while leaving assets outside super (like property or shares held personally) to flow through your estate without super’s restrictive rules.




Important Legal Considerations


Ensure your will is current and properly executed


Consider the impact on your age pension eligibility


Understand contribution caps and eligibility rules before re-contributing


Factor in life expectancy, retirement spending, and healthcare needs


Always seek professional legal and financial advice




Common Mistakes That Cost Families


Mistake 1: Set-and-Forget Mentality


Many people make a beneficiary nomination once and never review it. But marriages, divorces, births, or changing relationships mean a 20-year-old nomination could no longer match your wishes.


Mistake 2: Assuming Living Together Equals Dependence


Just because you live with your parents or children doesn’t automatically meet the ATO’s strict definition of an interdependency relationship. More than “sharing a roof” is required.



Mistake 3: Ignoring Tax Implications


Even valid nominations can sting. A spouse may receive super tax-free, but adult children—if financially independent—will face tax rates of up to 32% on the taxable portion.


Mistake 4: Overlooking Fund-Specific Rules


Not all funds offer binding nominations, and some impose unique rules about lapsing or witnessing. Always confirm the requirements with your specific super fund.




Source: @planyourpennies / Tiktok.



Taking Action: Your Next Steps


Immediate Actions (This Week)


1. Check your most recent super statement and confirm who your nominated beneficiaries are

2. Call your super fund to check if your nomination is binding, non-binding, or expired


Consider whether your current nominees are still valid and appropriate



Short-term Actions (Next Month)


1. Update any invalid or outdated nominations


2. Decide whether binding or non-binding nominations suit your situation


3. Ensure your will is current and considers superannuation


4. Estimate potential tax impacts for each beneficiary





Long-term Planning (Next Three Months)


1. Develop a full estate plan integrating super and non-super assets


2. Consider withdrawal/re-contribution strategies if over 60


3. Review your nominations after every major life event


4.Document your intentions clearly for family clarity



The Bottom Line for Australian Seniors


The superannuation beneficiary rules exist to ensure retirement savings support dependants—but in practice, they often create traps for families who don’t know the system. Nearly half of Australians still have no nominated beneficiaries, and many others unknowingly have invalid or lapsed nominations.



Unlike other assets, super doesn’t automatically pass under your will. If you want to make sure your retirement savings end up with the right people, you need to: review your nominations regularly, understand the tax rules, and seek professional advice. With proper planning, you can reduce tax leakage and ensure your loved ones benefit as you intended.



Don't let good intentions create bad outcomes for your family. Take the time to understand these rules, review your nominations regularly, and seek professional advice when needed. Your loved ones will thank you for it.




Final Checklist for Protecting Your Super


Don’t assume your will covers your super—check your fund rules


Review your beneficiaries every 1-3 years and after major life events


Understand that non-dependants may face up to 32% tax


Use strategies like LPR nominations or recontribution to reduce tax


Professional financial and legal advice is essential






What strategies have you used to ensure your super goes where you want? Have you discovered any surprises in your own beneficiary nominations? Share your experiences and questions in the comments below!

Last edited:

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
What crap this one is!!! You pay taxes all your life especially your Superannuation & now you can't bind it to the person you want!!!
Thank God I listed Spouse instead of Interdependent which had confused me at the time. Just the wrong flick of the pen could of cost your savings going into the Government coffers again.
 
I think your information is gold.
In ‘Workarounds that actually work’ Item 2: the importance of closing your super account then recontributing into a new super (even with the same Super fund) so that the money becomes totally your contribution and not made up of your working life contributions + employer contributions is so important.
Your children would be paying 15% + 2% Medicare Levy on the employer contribution. Just this quick exercise can save $10000’s in tax.
 
Nothing like making life easier when you're edging up to the final drop-off, is there? Or should I say making life a lot easier for the government to grab more of your hard-earned?
 
How many people would be aware of this?? Not many I would guess.
Super is your money. You should be able to leave it to whomever you choose.
Is there anything the government can't get their greedy hands on??
Tax has already been paid on super and then here they come again.
 
Another cash grab by greedy governments. I have already paid tax on my money & now they want to take another chunk. Surely I should be able to pass MY money on to whomever I wish without being penalised, yet again
 
How many people would be aware of this?? Not many I would guess.
Super is your money. You should be able to leave it to whomever you choose.
Is there anything the government can't get their greedy hands on??
Tax has already been paid on super and then here they come again.
Input ax that has been paid is at a reduced rate ie 15%. If you take funds out, not as a pension, then 15% is payable on the taxable portion. Don't forget there is an increase in available funds earn't by the super fund on your behalf. Why should adult children gain a tax advantage just because they are related? Super in Australia is quite generous in creating wealth for retirement. Unfortunately there are many abusing the system eg those with $100 to $500 million in their funds postponing taxation and allowing those funds to grow/
 
I have been stung by a similar technicality with an early withdrawal.

Super withdrawal is known as taxable income when it comes to the Child Support Agency (CSA). So when I withdrew $85000 in October 2014, five years later I was slugged with a $13500 arrears bill from the CSA.

If I had undertaken this withdrawal TWO MONTHS later, I wouldn't have been lumbered with this bullshit "tax" charge as my youngest child had turned 18. No avenue for appeal and money being withdrawn from Centrelink benefit WITHOUT warning or consultation.

There is a reason why the CSA does not have any walk-in offices and you don't have to be Einstein to figure out why.
 
Input ax that has been paid is at a reduced rate ie 15%. If you take funds out, not as a pension, then 15% is payable on the taxable portion. Don't forget there is an increase in available funds earn't by the super fund on your behalf. Why should adult children gain a tax advantage just because they are related? Super in Australia is quite generous in creating wealth for retirement. Unfortunately there are many abusing the system eg those with $100 to $500 million in their funds postponing taxation and allowing those funds to grow/
They don't tax the amount for spouse or children, just other relatives and friends.
It should be the same no matter who you leave it to. What gives the government the right to virtually dictate who you can and can't leave your own money to, without being penalised.
I have been stung by a similar technicality with an early withdrawal.

Super withdrawal is known as taxable income when it comes to the Child Support Agency (CSA). So when I withdrew $85000 in October 2014, five years later I was slugged with a $13500 arrears bill from the CSA.

If I had undertaken this withdrawal TWO MONTHS later, I wouldn't have been lumbered with this bullshit "tax" charge as my youngest child had turned 18. No avenue for appeal and money being withdrawn from Centrelink benefit WITHOUT warning or consultation.

There is a reason why the CSA does not have any walk-in offices and you don't have to be Einstein to figure out why.
My youngest son had a very highly paid job and was slugged a fortune for child support for his two children from hus first marriage.
I have always been proud of him as he didn't shirk his responsibility to hus children.
However his ex-wife , instead of being grateful thst she had an ex who actually paid up, went out if her way to stop him from seeing them, despite him having an access order. He was constantly having to go back to court to enforce the order but it went on and on.
They couldn't come because they were sick, had a school camp, going to grand parents. The list was endless.
My son remarried and when his wife was pregnant, his ex told those two little girls that dad didn't want to see them anymore as he had a new family and he always wanted a boy, which he was now having. Who does that to their children??
Years later he discovered that his eldest daughter had been living with her boyfriend for almost two years, during which time he had still been paying maintenance for her to his ex. The Child Support Agency refused to recoup that money from her, but they sure would have been after him if he had ever got behind
The system is unfair in many cases to the father.
 
They don't tax the amount for spouse or children, just other relatives and friends.
It should be the same no matter who you leave it to. What gives the government the right to virtually dictate who you can and can't leave your own money to, without being penalised.

My youngest son had a very highly paid job and was slugged a fortune for child support for his two children from hus first marriage.
I have always been proud of him as he didn't shirk his responsibility to hus children.
However his ex-wife , instead of being grateful thst she had an ex who actually paid up, went out if her way to stop him from seeing them, despite him having an access order. He was constantly having to go back to court to enforce the order but it went on and on.
They couldn't come because they were sick, had a school camp, going to grand parents. The list was endless.
My son remarried and when his wife was pregnant, his ex told those two little girls that dad didn't want to see them anymore as he had a new family and he always wanted a boy, which he was now having. Who does that to their children??
Years later he discovered that his eldest daughter had been living with her boyfriend for almost two years, during which time he had still been paying maintenance for her to his ex. The Child Support Agency refused to recoup that money from her, but they sure would have been after him if he had ever got behind
The system is unfair in many cases to the father.
The CSA is renowned for taking but NEVER giving. When my ex-wife had major surgery when my son was 14, he lived with me for a few months. The hoops I jumped through, the fire pits I walked across and the arses I licked to get the care arrangement changed was ridiculous.

And I never ONCE did I speak to a CSA officer face to face!
 
The CSA is renowned for taking but NEVER giving. When my ex-wife had major surgery when my son was 14, he lived with me for a few months. The hoops I jumped through, the fire pits I walked across and the arses I licked to get the care arrangement changed was ridiculous.

And I never ONCE did I speak to a CSA officer face to face!
Sounds familiar. My son eventually gave up as it was affecting his marriage, all the constant hassles because of the ex.
Those two girls are in their early twenties now and the eldest one definitely has daddy abandonment issues because of the BS her mother put in her head when she was young.
She even told them that he never paid maintenance for them, he paid a fortune because he was in such a high paid job.
 
Sounds familiar. My son eventually gave up as it was affecting his marriage, all the constant hassles because of the ex.
Those two girls are in their early twenties now and the eldest one definitely has daddy abandonment issues because of the BS her mother put in her head when she was young.
She even told them that he never paid maintenance for them, he paid a fortune because he was in such a high paid job.
Hopefully Karma has some justice forthcoming to the nasty Ex.
I had close friends go through a nasty divorce, one turning their children against the other partner causing horror all round except to the conspiring partner happy in his own kingdom with children with Mother separation issues.
He is the nasty Ex who got child custody, I am on her side having known both before they got married and knowing how vindictive he can get and me hating that I felt I had to choose sides.
I don't know if Karma finally hit him because I have lost contact with them all many moons ago.
I do have faith in Karma both good and bad Karma.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: natalielocket
Well, I'm confused, I was of the belief both spouse and children were exempt.
 
I have been stung by a similar technicality with an early withdrawal.

Super withdrawal is known as taxable income when it comes to the Child Support Agency (CSA). So when I withdrew $85000 in October 2014, five years later I was slugged with a $13500 arrears bill from the CSA.

If I had undertaken this withdrawal TWO MONTHS later, I wouldn't have been lumbered with this bullshit "tax" charge as my youngest child had turned 18. No avenue for appeal and money being withdrawn from Centrelink benefit WITHOUT warning or consultation.

There is a reason why the CSA does not have any walk-in offices and you don't have to be Einstein to figure out why.
Ohhhhhhhhhh that’s like buying a new item at the shop ( or online) at full price and then finding out there’s a sale on the next day……What a knock down 😤😤😤😠
 
I wonder how the poor bloody millionaires get on trying to handle this little wrinkle in their lives?
 
Last edited:

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×