Can this new proposal slash thousands off your vehicle? Here's what you need to know

For many Australians, the prospect of buying a new vehicle can be both exciting and daunting.

It's a significant investment, and Aussies are looking for ways to save without compromising on quality or safety.

That's why the latest promises coming out of Canberra have caught many motorists' attention.


Opposition Leader Peter Dutton made a bold pledge that could see West Australians—and potentially all Australians—save thousands on new vehicles.

Mr Dutton promised to scrap an 'unfair' tax on family cars and utes.

This announcement was part of his broader appeal to make Western Australia boom.

The proposal was also meant to address the cost-of-living pressures faced by many.


compressed-pexels-tibor-janas-512731642-16483659 (1).jpeg
Many Australian motorists need to follow the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard. Image Credit: Pexels/Tibor Janas


The 'unfair' tax in question was the Labor government's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard.

The goal of this standard was to encourage the uptake of cleaner, more fuel-efficient cars.

It should also align with Australia's commitment to net zero emissions by 2050.

'This is a tax on families who need a reliable car and small businesses trying to grow. Instead of making life easier, Labor is making it harder and more expensive,' Mr Dutton said.

'A Coalition Government will scrap this tax, so Australians can keep more of their hard-earned money when purchasing a new car.'


According to Mr Dutton, the Labor proposal should see price hikes for popular vehicles such as the Toyota RAV4 and Ford Ranger.

The price hikes could go up to $9,700 and $14,400, respectively.

These figures sparked debate, with some even disputing the accuracy of the projected costs.

Mr Dutton's stance is that cleaner, cheaper cars are desirable, but not at the expense of imposing 'unfair penalties' on car makers and consumers.

The Coalition's alternative approach would involve working with the industry to bring to market the cleanest, most fuel-efficient models of the cars Australians need and want to drive without the additional costs.

This policy followed the Coalition's proposal to cut the fuel excise by 25 cents a litre for 12 months.


Meanwhile, Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen defended the Government's approach.

Minister Bowen highlighted their efforts to end what he describes as 'a decade of delay and denial'.

Minister Bowen asserted that the Government's policies would provide a wider variety of more efficient vehicles that are cheaper and cleaner to run, benefiting Australian motorists for decades to come.

The debate over vehicle standards and related taxes has been about finding sustainable solutions that work for all Australians.

That includes Australians who may not be in the market for an electric vehicle yet.

If you're considering purchasing a new vehicle, it's essential to stay informed about the potential changes and incentives that could impact the price you pay at the dealership.
Key Takeaways

  • Opposition Leader Peter Dutton pledged to scrap Labor's New Vehicle Efficiency Standard and claimed that it would result in savings.
  • The policy proposal aimed to make family vehicles and utes more affordable by removing an 'unfair' tax.
  • The policy was part of a broader Coalition plan, including cutting fuel excise for a year to reduce cost-of-living pressures.
  • The Coalition's plans contradicted Labor's approach, which emphasises the uptake of cleaner, more fuel-efficient vehicles as part of a strategy to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
Have you considered purchasing a new family vehicle lately? Does the prospect of a tax cut or excise reduction influence your decision? Share your experiences and opinions about this proposal in the comments section below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
just another cheap vote catching trick, /con by Dutton
If it was al election many years ago, he would be against, seat belts(Freedoms and rights) ABS brakes ( drivers should know how to apply brakes) cat converters ,( makes new cars smell like rotten egg gas) and now this one
the fact is Australia is the dumping ground of American crap and they don't care if we get 5 miles to the gallon
The ALP is in the forefront in requiring the latest improvements in imported cars for safety, economy and quality but as usual Dutton wants to keeps us in smog filled cities breathing LNP methane gas
ANY BODY WHO STILL BELIEVES THAT DUTTON AND THE LNP HAVE ANY REAL IDEAS, IS LIVING IN VIRTUAL REALITY LA LA LAND.
 
just another cheap vote catching trick, /con by Dutton
If it was al election many years ago, he would be against, seat belts(Freedoms and rights) ABS brakes ( drivers should know how to apply brakes) cat converters ,( makes new cars smell like rotten egg gas) and now this one
the fact is Australia is the dumping ground of American crap and they don't care if we get 5 miles to the gallon
The ALP is in the forefront in requiring the latest improvements in imported cars for safety, economy and quality but as usual Dutton wants to keeps us in smog filled cities breathing LNP methane gas
ANY BODY WHO STILL BELIEVES THAT DUTTON AND THE LNP HAVE ANY REAL IDEAS, IS LIVING IN VIRTUAL REALITY LA LA LAND.
Of course he will never get your vote but you missed the point. It was a twisting of the meaning of the what he proposed whether you believe him or not. It is also very far fetched to imply that he was against seat belts etc. That is typical of ALP/Green supporters. Twists and lies are natural to them. Economy my foot. It is control, control and more control. Good bye.
 
Of course he will never get your vote but you missed the point. It was a twisting of the meaning of the what he proposed whether you believe him or not. It is also very far fetched to imply that he was against seat belts etc. That is typical of ALP/Green supporters. Twists and lies are natural to them. Economy my foot. It is control, control and more control. Good bye.
I fail to come up with anything worthwhile the LNP have done, or suggested recently, apart from rorts. This Labor government are sitting on their hands doing very little. They could start with better fuel standards and taxing oversized vehicles with exceptions for where they are needed for work. Given the actions of the US should we be allowing their oversized vehicles in?
 
Toyota RAV4 There have been a Hybrid version for 3 + years. (petrol + battery) and is not a big car. Its battery self recharges. It is smaller than a same age Nissan X-trail. Some cars are going to go up in price. Only some will go down. I know somebody who bought a new car last year. Between when he signed the contract with price on it and when he received it the price had gone up $8000.00. People are naturally going to keep their older cars for longer. It was recently stated that the steel sections of late model cars are thinner and the paint is thinner with higher more risk of rust.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivory and Bridgit
My car is 25 yrs old. Still goes well. I only drive about 4000km each year but still need it. My flat has no garage, so the car boot acts as that extra storage.
A new car is too expensive, and I need boot space. Looks like I will stick w what I have now. Reduction in petrol prices gratefully appreciated.
the reduction on fuel price is just a vote catching promise and doesn't lower the price of petrol at all ( petrol companies will us the USA recession to keep the price the same as) but it is making an $8 billion hole in the excise revenue that should be earned for vital infrastructure and general expenditure
If you think that Dutton will keep that promise, you believe in fairies in the bottom garden and remember this in 12 months time ( if he does keep the promise , that excise will come back as 50 cents a liter to make up for the lost revenue
You keep what you have as it is quality but don't fall for the Dutton con
 
I fail to come up with anything worthwhile the LNP have done, or suggested recently, apart from rorts. This Labor government are sitting on their hands doing very little. They could start with better fuel standards and taxing oversized vehicles with exceptions for where they are needed for work. Given the actions of the US should we be allowing their oversized vehicles in?
Maybe the ALP should reply to trump tariffs , and stop the imports of any American vehicle bigger than a land cruiser
we don't need $125,000.00 dodge rams on our roads and in our car parks.
 
Of course he will never get your vote but you missed the point. It was a twisting of the meaning of the what he proposed whether you believe him or not. It is also very far fetched to imply that he was against seat belts etc. That is typical of ALP/Green supporters. Twists and lies are natural to them. Economy my foot. It is control, control and more control. Good bye.
What’s with the ALP/Greens crap. They are not a coalition unlike your party/parties. You lot only joined together because you couldn’t win individually. And so what if they did become a coalition (highly unlikely), what difference is it than your mob. Take the blinkers off mate.
 
just another cheap vote catching trick, /con by Dutton
If it was al election many years ago, he would be against, seat belts(Freedoms and rights) ABS brakes ( drivers should know how to apply brakes) cat converters ,( makes new cars smell like rotten egg gas) and now this one
the fact is Australia is the dumping ground of American crap and they don't care if we get 5 miles to the gallon
The ALP is in the forefront in requiring the latest improvements in imported cars for safety, economy and quality but as usual Dutton wants to keeps us in smog filled cities breathing LNP methane gas
ANY BODY WHO STILL BELIEVES THAT DUTTON AND THE LNP HAVE ANY REAL IDEAS, IS LIVING IN VIRTUAL REALITY LA LA LAND.
Well I will not be buying one of their you beaut cars - safety? - car built for pissant European roads - not for Australia. And if you don't like smog etc then move to the country - much healthier all round!
 
the reduction on fuel price is just a vote catching promise and doesn't lower the price of petrol at all ( petrol companies will us the USA recession to keep the price the same as) but it is making an $8 billion hole in the excise revenue that should be earned for vital infrastructure and general expenditure
If you think that Dutton will keep that promise, you believe in fairies in the bottom garden and remember this in 12 months time ( if he does keep the promise , that excise will come back as 50 cents a liter to make up for the lost revenue
You keep what you have as it is quality but don't fall for the Dutton con
why do you not just say I AM A LABOUR SUPPORTER. Maybe you would like to tell us all about the $275.00 promised by labour.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×