Writers’ strike threat puts long-running soap in jeopardy

For more than three decades, one of Australia’s most recognisable TV shows has brought drama, romance, and unforgettable moments to living rooms across the country.

But now, uncertainty surrounds its future as behind-the-scenes tensions threaten to bring everything to a sudden stop.

Fans are left wondering if this could be the end of an era.


At the heart of the drama is a long-simmering row over superannuation—yes, that all-important retirement nest egg that every working Aussie is entitled to.

According to the Australian Writers’ Guild (AWG), the writers behind Home and Away (and other iconic shows like Neighbours) have been denied their rightful superannuation payments for years, possibly even decades.

The AWG is now pushing for Seven Productions, the company behind Home and Away, to comply with a recent Australian Tax Office (ATO) ruling that could see millions of dollars in back payments owed to writers.


1754879012086.png
Home and Away writers are threatening legal action and a strike over claims of decades of unpaid superannuation. Credit: Instagram


The ATO’s December ruling was a game-changer. It clarified that film and television writers, when engaged to produce scripts, are considered employees, not just freelancers selling a product.

This means they’re entitled to superannuation under the Superannuation Guarantee Act, just like any other worker.

The AWG says that, despite this, Seven has refused to pay up, claiming there’s no legal basis for the payments.


One Home and Away writer didn’t mince words: ‘We should all stop letting Seven treat us like s*** and threaten to go on strike.’

Another source close to the situation said the claim could end up in court, with the potential payout running into the millions.

It’s not just Home and Away in the firing line. Writers for Neighbours—another Aussie TV institution—have also allegedly missed out on superannuation, even after the show’s revival by Amazon.

Some production companies, like Matchbox Pictures (behind hits like The Heights and The Slap), do pay super to their writers, but it’s a bit of a lucky dip across the industry.

‘It can be pot luck with who pays it and who doesn’t,’ one insider said.

‘But none of those currently writing for Home and Away have ever received super, despite many attempts over the years.’


Many of these writers are technically freelancers, but some have worked on the show for more than a decade.

The fear of losing their jobs has kept many from speaking out, but the AWG is now taking a stand, spelling out that writers engaged to create scripts are employees for superannuation purposes.

The threat of a strike is very real. The AWG hasn’t ruled out industrial action or even a class action lawsuit, though they acknowledge that a strike could cause financial hardship for their members.

Still, the stakes are high: if the writers walk out, Home and Away could be forced off the air, at least temporarily.

This wouldn’t be the first time a writers’ strike has rocked the TV world. Just last year, the Writers Guild of America went on strike for 148 days, joined by the Screen Actors Guild, causing massive disruption to the US film and TV industry.

The result is a major concessions from production companies and new agreements that improved pay and conditions for writers and actors alike.


The situation is already heating up in the courts. Veteran Home and Away scriptwriter Fiona Bozic, who’s worked for Seven for over 20 years, has filed a statement with the Federal Court, alleging breaches of workplace protections.

Bozic’s responsibilities have included everything from creating storylines to recruiting new writers, and her case could set a precedent for others in the industry.

Seven, for its part, is keeping quiet, citing ongoing legal proceedings. Other industry bodies, like Screen Producers Australia, have offered mixed messages, suggesting that some writing services attract super while others don’t, depending on whether the writer is providing a service or simply selling a script.

Home and Away could face serious delays or even a temporary shutdown if the dispute isn't resolved.

For many over-60s who’ve followed the show since its early days, this would be a huge blow.

The show has been a constant companion through the ups and downs of life, and its absence would leave a big hole in the TV schedule.


But the issue goes beyond just one show. It’s about fairness and respect for the creative minds who bring our favourite stories to life.

Superannuation is a basic right for all workers, and it’s only fair that writers—who often work long hours under tight deadlines—get their due.
Key Takeaways
  • Home and Away writers are in a dispute with Channel Seven over claims of decades of unpaid superannuation, with the Australian Writers’ Guild backing potential legal action and a possible strike.
  • The Australian Tax Office has ruled that TV writers are considered employees entitled to super, but Home and Away and Neighbours writers have allegedly not received these entitlements for around 20 years.
  • Many writers on the show are freelancers and fear speaking out due to job security concerns, despite long-term employment with the program.
  • Veteran Home and Away scriptwriter Fiona Bozic is suing Seven over related issues, while the Australian Writers’ Guild and Screen Producers Australia are seeking further legal advice on writer superannuation entitlements.
Home and Away fans, and some of you may have worked in TV or creative industries yourselves. What do you think about the writers’ fight for superannuation? Should Channel Seven pay up? Would you support a strike if it meant fairer treatment for writers? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Read more: Has your superannuation suffered over the past month? Here's what finance experts have to say
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
We can only hope they do strike 🤞getting this show off tv is way long overdue.
 
What's wrong with Channel 7 they would be up in arms if anything happened to their super, why should writers be any different? Stinks of discrimination to me. It will end up costing them alot more. You do have to wonder where their brains are at times!
 
There used to be a rule (probably still is) that anyone with a ‘sole trader’ ABN still had to be paid super if they were only working for one ‘employer’. The ‘sole trader’ was responsible for paying their tax to the ATO though. A person working for the same employer who had an ACN was a different matter and super was not paid to that person as they ‘were a company’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maggiej
I had a close mate who worked at Channel 7 for many years, Skase took over the Channel and did the same thing ie: holding back super payments the whole time he was there. When it all came to light, Skase emptied the Bank Accounts, sold off assets and he and his ' mattress testing wife', fled the country and got away with everything. My mate was lucky as he worked in the Atlab unit of Seven, where the developing of movies was done. Many people lost their jobs overnight and the Gov. along with other Departments were slow to react so Skase was able to flee to Spain with all the cash. They never got him back and failed to recover any of the cash. When my mate finally retired he was only able to receive a miniscule amount of his entitlements. He was broken both physically and mentally with the loss after many years of service and saving. Now, we hear it happening again and with the same organisation...hasn't anyone learnt a lesson. It would appear that the same 'loophole' has been left open. We rely on the employer, the Gov. who make the rules however, who is doing the checking, it sounds like no-one. Superannuation is the reward for long service to your employer to help their business prosper and put money into the owners' pockets, it looks like the employer is allowed to empty the workers' pockets into their own as well.
Have a great day everyone and have a laugh... cheers.
 
We can only hope they do strike 🤞getting this show off tv is way long overdue.
I don’t, and never have, watched this show but for some strange reason lots of people do, so for them it would probably be devastating. I actually watch very little on tv, but one of my neighbours loves Home and Away, so it’s very much a case of each to their own. The show has way too much catastrophic drama for me, a bit like Days of Our whatever it was called.
 
Super has proved to be a variably unreliable scheme on many fronts, but there's no doubt these writers are entitled to it. Arts workers are generally shut out of any such schemes so it's good to see it possibly being applied, and retrospectively, to tv writers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PattiB
Remove Channel Seven's broadcasting licence.

Then the gargoyle Natalie Barr will disappear from our airwaves for good.

But I will miss Jane's Bunns! She's got some....
 
It's a little funny that nothing is mentioned what the writers of these shows actually get paid for their services in the 1st place.

Is their payments on an agreed contract or otherwise ?
 
I would have thought these writers would have negotiated a payment for what they are selling to the TV stations. They would be self employed and responsible for their own super same as any other contractor. Just imagine if it was a lawnmower operator doing the lawns around the stations. It is the same thing . Surely these writers are not working at the TV stations
 
We can only hope they do strike 🤞getting this show off tv is way long overdue.
Well it's longevity obviously puts you people in the minority I guess.
A show doesn't last that long without an audience.
To each his own I say. I can't stand reality shows like MAFS, etc. but they keep making it so I guess I'm in the minority there.
It really doesn't matter, change the channel, read a good book, ring a friend.
Nobody forces you to watch anything.
 
Remove Channel Seven's broadcasting licence.

Then the gargoyle Natalie Barr will disappear from our airwaves for good.

But I will miss Jane's Bunns! She's got some....
😳🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
Well it's longevity obviously puts you people in the minority I guess.
A show doesn't last that long without an audience.
To each his own I say. I can't stand reality shows like MAFS, etc. but they keep making it so I guess I'm in the minority there.
It really doesn't matter, change the channel, read a good book, ring a friend.
Nobody forces you to watch anything.
Completely agree with you about all that fake reality rubbish. That's why from 7pm it's all streaming for me. Only watch local TV for their fake news & weather updates 🤔
 
i have never ever watched an episode yet of either programes, i hope my intelligence keeps working.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mOiOz and Casper
Remove Channel Seven's broadcasting licence.

Then the gargoyle Natalie Barr will disappear from our airwaves for good.

But I will miss Jane's Bunns! She's got some....
take 9 with it. a leftist outfit. Time for Natalie to expire, she is getting on my nerves. i will never watch that idiot carl.
did you notice the logies consisted of 9 and abc? rivoting.
 
I had a close mate who worked at Channel 7 for many years, Skase took over the Channel and did the same thing ie: holding back super payments the whole time he was there. When it all came to light, Skase emptied the Bank Accounts, sold off assets and he and his ' mattress testing wife', fled the country and got away with everything. My mate was lucky as he worked in the Atlab unit of Seven, where the developing of movies was done. Many people lost their jobs overnight and the Gov. along with other Departments were slow to react so Skase was able to flee to Spain with all the cash. They never got him back and failed to recover any of the cash. When my mate finally retired he was only able to receive a miniscule amount of his entitlements. He was broken both physically and mentally with the loss after many years of service and saving. Now, we hear it happening again and with the same organisation...hasn't anyone learnt a lesson. It would appear that the same 'loophole' has been left open. We rely on the employer, the Gov. who make the rules however, who is doing the checking, it sounds like no-one. Superannuation is the reward for long service to your employer to help their business prosper and put money into the owners' pockets, it looks like the employer is allowed to empty the workers' pockets into their own as well.
Have a great day everyone and have a laugh... cheers.
and i had his shares> bastard.
 
It's a little funny that nothing is mentioned what the writers of these shows actually get paid for their services in the 1st place.

Is their payments on an agreed contract or otherwise ?
That is irrelevant to super
 
I am very glad the company I worked for 40 years never had an issue with super
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×