Pet attacks are rising, and councils are drawing the line—here’s what they want done about it

Australians love their pets—but when rules aren’t followed, the consequences can be serious.

Some councils say they’ve had enough, and they’re now pushing for major changes to how pet ownership is regulated.

Their proposals could have far-reaching implications for owners across the state.


Major councils in New South Wales have sounded the alarm over a worrying rise in dog attacks and irresponsible pet ownership, calling on the state government to crack down with tougher penalties and greater enforcement powers.

Over the past two decades, NSW recorded a significant surge in dog attacks—jumping from 900 in 2004 to a staggering 5,000 in just the past year. But physical attacks weren’t the only issue flagged by local authorities.

Randwick City Council, based in Sydney’s eastern suburbs, reported an increase in problematic behaviour from pet owners, including a decline in basic responsibilities like cleaning up after their dogs and properly supervising them in off-leash areas—especially when children and wildlife were nearby.


image1.png
NSW councils demand crackdown on dog attacks. Image source: Pexels/Alexas Fotos


As part of the ongoing review of the Companion Animals Act 1998, Randwick formally urged the NSW government to consider stricter fines, harsher penalties, and expanded powers for councils to take action against dangerous or nuisance animals. The call was put forward during a council meeting held in late May.

‘Randwick City Council is calling for tougher pet laws, stronger enforcement powers and better education,’ the council stated.

Neighbouring Waverley Council, which includes Bondi, also backed the push. It reportedly recommended that rule-breaking pet owners be required to attend training courses.

‘We encourage responsible pet ownership to ensure safety and that everyone, including our four-legged companions, can enjoy our parks and community,’ Waverley Council stated.

The proposal extended beyond dogs. Randwick’s submission also suggested that mandatory cat containment laws be introduced—something many conservationists have long supported due to the damage cats inflict on local wildlife. Even well-fed domestic cats can be prolific hunters, killing birds, reptiles and small mammals.

Despite councils being responsible for enforcing pet-related fines, they don’t have the authority to set them. Those amounts are established by state legislation. Currently, dog owners can be fined $330 for walking their pet off-leash in prohibited areas, and $275 for failing to pick up after them.


But Randwick’s Mayor Dylan Parker said the penalties in place didn’t reflect the severity of some incidents.

‘The law currently states that a dog that attacks another dog attracts the same fine as when it attacks a child. Clearly, that’s not right,’ he said.

‘Everyone loves their dog until something goes wrong, and that’s why we want to make sure we get the rules right for the 21st century.’

The campaign for tighter controls comes at a time when the pet population has exploded. Following the Covid-19 pandemic and a surge in remote work, the number of households with pets jumped from 61 per cent to 69 per cent. In NSW alone, there are now an estimated 4.7 million cats and dogs—making responsible pet ownership a critical issue for public spaces, ecosystems and community safety.

Randwick and Waverley councils have been contacted for further comment.


Related stories that highlight growing tensions over pet behaviour include one resident’s five-year legal battle with a local council over their dogs, new laws surrounding pets in graveyards, and troubling reports of roaming dogs terrorising inner-city neighbourhoods.

The push from councils now places pressure on the NSW government to act—or risk letting an increasingly widespread issue continue unchecked.

It’s one thing to read about the risks…it’s another to see how dangerous it’s become for everyday workers.

Watch what some Aussies are up against just doing their jobs.


Source: Youtube/9 News Australia​


Key Takeaways
  • NSW councils called for stricter pet laws following a sharp rise in dog attacks.
  • Randwick and Waverley councils urged stronger penalties, enforcement powers, and public education.
  • Proposals included mandatory cat containment and rule-breaker training courses.
  • The growing pet population post-pandemic raised concerns about safety and environmental impact.

With pet numbers on the rise and public spaces under pressure, do you think today’s owners are as responsible as they used to be? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kinchar

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Cats should be kept indoors which mine does. No excuses. In Qld, dogs who are violent have to wear a special red and yellow reflective striped collar, so people can recognise a savage dog and avoid it. Of course the savage dog's owners don't like their little darling dogs wearing them.
 
I have always said that it is not the dog that is registered it should be the people who want a dog. People should have to apply for a licence for a dog and a Ranger should come and make sure the property is fit for having a dog, eg fences, kennel, safe area when gates are open so dogs can't get out. Same with cats, my cats have always been indoor cats, they have a big run at the side of the house and they have a cubby house where they sleep they are safe and it saves on vet bills as well you don't need yearly shots because they are not out in the paddocks, also I have never wormed my cats they don't need to be, once again because they aren't out in the paddocks.
 
I have always said that it is not the dog that is registered it should be the people who want a dog. People should have to apply for a licence for a dog and a Ranger should come and make sure the property is fit for having a dog, eg fences, kennel, safe area when gates are open so dogs can't get out. Same with cats, my cats have always been indoor cats, they have a big run at the side of the house and they have a cubby house where they sleep they are safe and it saves on vet bills as well you don't need yearly shots because they are not out in the paddocks, also I have never wormed my cats they don't need to be, once again because they aren't out in the paddocks.
Ditto. We have a cat enclosure attached to the house too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and PattiB
I have always said that it is not the dog that is registered it should be the people who want a dog. People should have to apply for a licence for a dog and a Ranger should come and make sure the property is fit for having a dog, eg fences, kennel, safe area when gates are open so dogs can't get out. Same with cats, my cats have always been indoor cats, they have a big run at the side of the house and they have a cubby house where they sleep they are safe and it saves on vet bills as well you don't need yearly shots because they are not out in the paddocks, also I have never wormed my cats they don't need to be, once again because they aren't out in the paddocks.
I also have a massive enclosure attached to house, with retaining wall of rocks that create shelves, some soil which reduces litter costs, canopies of shrubs protects agains weather. And they can come and go as they please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM and PattiB
I had a cat that went out in the garden with me sometimes. Each time she curled up in the sun and slept until I woke her up and took her back inside with me. In her case it was the opposite. I had to watch that the birds didn't attack her. A person I know has a cat that permanently wears a harness. He puts a long stretchy lead on his collar which he anchors to 2 different places in his yard.
 
1. Fines or penalties that can't be enforced are futile at best - and makes a mockery of the law. And if one law is mocked, why not all?
2. Training the owners of dangerous dogs sounds like a very good idea: the owner has a choice - responsible dog ownership or no dog. I was a vet, I've stitched up enough dog-on-dog fight injuries (and euthanased far too many - i.e. more than 0) to have any patience with people who own vicious dogs. Some of them are proud that their dog(s) attack other dogs. I also knew an old man having chemotherapy who was attacked by a Dobermann or the like. I say attacked - Gus kicked the dog in the chest before the dog latched on, and the dog collapsed: so the owner berated Gus for "killing her dog". I don't know if the dog was actually killed or just winded, but as far as I was concerned - good on Gus for keeping his head.
3. For those whose pet is grabbed by an aggressive/vicious dog - don't try and open the attacking dog's mouth, you'll only get bitten. Use your thumbs to push hard down on the attacking dog's eyes. You might kill the dog (so what? that dog was going to kill your pet - or child!) but you're more likely to render the dog unconscious. Either way, you can get your pet (or child) out of the attacker's mouth.
Hitting an attacking dog? doesn't work (unless you can hit it hard enough on the head to knock it out, or get the right spot on the chest to have the same effect). Throw water over fighting dogs? Might work. Might just cool the dogs down while they keep fighting. Yelling, screaming - dog is as likely to see it as encouragement. Try to pull off the dog? You'll be bitten as well. Shoving a running hose in the dog's mouth - down its gullet - will work if you can get near enough to do so.

So you might call me a dog-hater. Doesn't worry me. What/who I hate is people who condone violence in any form against another human or an animal. Owners of aggressive dogs are condoning violence - probably take vicarious pleasure when their dog attacks.
 
This was my daughters dog, a Labrador, that was attacked by a roaming pit bull, the people came and grabbed their feral animal and left her dog bleeding out, a passer by stopped and took the dog to a vet, thankyou to the good Samaritan, my daughter wasn't home at the time, the owners of the other mongrel should be in jail.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230908_163155_Messages.jpg
    Screenshot_20230908_163155_Messages.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 0
  • Sad
Reactions: DLHM and Penny4
1. Fines or penalties that can't be enforced are futile at best - and makes a mockery of the law. And if one law is mocked, why not all?
2. Training the owners of dangerous dogs sounds like a very good idea: the owner has a choice - responsible dog ownership or no dog. I was a vet, I've stitched up enough dog-on-dog fight injuries (and euthanased far too many - i.e. more than 0) to have any patience with people who own vicious dogs. Some of them are proud that their dog(s) attack other dogs. I also knew an old man having chemotherapy who was attacked by a Dobermann or the like. I say attacked - Gus kicked the dog in the chest before the dog latched on, and the dog collapsed: so the owner berated Gus for "killing her dog". I don't know if the dog was actually killed or just winded, but as far as I was concerned - good on Gus for keeping his head.
3. For those whose pet is grabbed by an aggressive/vicious dog - don't try and open the attacking dog's mouth, you'll only get bitten. Use your thumbs to push hard down on the attacking dog's eyes. You might kill the dog (so what? that dog was going to kill your pet - or child!) but you're more likely to render the dog unconscious. Either way, you can get your pet (or child) out of the attacker's mouth.
Hitting an attacking dog? doesn't work (unless you can hit it hard enough on the head to knock it out, or get the right spot on the chest to have the same effect). Throw water over fighting dogs? Might work. Might just cool the dogs down while they keep fighting. Yelling, screaming - dog is as likely to see it as encouragement. Try to pull off the dog? You'll be bitten as well. Shoving a running hose in the dog's mouth - down its gullet - will work if you can get near enough to do so.

So you might call me a dog-hater. Doesn't worry me. What/who I hate is people who condone violence in any form against another human or an animal. Owners of aggressive dogs are condoning violence - probably take vicarious pleasure when their dog attacks.
A full house brick worked well back in 1973 when I was slyly attacked by a beagle.

Doggone....
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
I had a cat that went out in the garden with me sometimes. Each time she curled up in the sun and slept until I woke her up and took her back inside with me. In her case it was the opposite. I had to watch that the birds didn't attack her. A person I know has a cat that permanently wears a harness. He puts a long stretchy lead on his collar which he anchors to 2 different places in his yard.
I have a rescue cat. I tried to keep him indoors but he just doesn’t handle it. It cost me well over $300 at the vets as he was so stressed at being kept in he just wouldn’t poo. I ended up opening the back door and saying “go for it!” He mainly uses the garden but also the cat litter. He sleeps on the outside furniture. I bring him inside, even if I’m going down the street for five minutes and he’s always inside before dusk, always supervised. At this time of year he doesn’t really go out much anyway. And as for killing wildlife, he’s too damn lazy lol. Birds land next to him in the garden and he doesn’t bat an eyelid. In fact one happened to hit the back window and knocked itself out and Charlie walked right by it and came in. (Meanwhile I was freaking out, bird phobia kicking in lol)
 
Cats should be kept indoors which mine does. No excuses. In Qld, dogs who are violent have to wear a special red and yellow reflective striped collar, so people can recognise a savage dog and avoid it. Of course the savage dog's owners don't like their little darling dogs wearing them.
Well, that is news to me. I don`t own a dog now, ours were always trained, via Puppy School, etc, But I take my Grandsons dog for a walk every morning, a Large Border Collie, who when GS, first got him, I told him, he needed to go to training, Puppy school etc Well, that never happened. Now, living here, feel sorry for the dog, so take him for a walk every day, that I am here. While able, I hop into my car and take off for a week or two+++ Luckily, I do meet up with a neighbor, so if we see the dog getting agitated, she will help me hold him. Okay, I could just go for my walk with out the dog, but other than when I take him out, he never leaves the yard. Which is just a normal subdivision size. He is not anti all dogs, and he certainly like Humans, but he can be a problem, and if I see someone with a dog, that I haven`t seen before, I do get a bit nervous. Probably translate to him. I would like to get one of those check collars, but not my dog. When house and Dog sitting for my Daughter, one of her dogs has a check collar. Doesn`t hurt him. Her other dog, a Collie, no problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Penny4
No problem with fines and training sessions for those that break the law. If we could only have the same stringent rules for irresponsible parents of children! We allow parents off the hook when their children break the law
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×