‘$3.10 isn't even a litre of milk’: Centrelink recipients slam latest payment increase

Rising living costs continue to put immense pressure on Australians relying on welfare support.

While government payments are adjusted in line with inflation, many recipients argue these increases fail to keep pace with real-world expenses.

For those on JobSeeker, the Age Pension, and Commonwealth Rent Assistance, the latest payment adjustment has sparked frustration rather than relief.


Welfare recipients have slammed the latest Centrelink increase, saying the adjustment fails to ease the financial strain they are facing.

From today, payments such as JobSeeker, the Age Pension, and Commonwealth Rent Assistance have risen in line with inflation.

However, many on welfare said the increase was too small to keep up with the soaring cost of essentials.


image1.png
Centrelink rise slammed as ‘pointless’ by recipients. Image source: Getty/Scott Barbour


Damien, 62, said the change was ‘paltry’ and did nothing to help him afford food or medication.

‘I just scoffed at it. I just feel like not accepting it. It's not going to do us any benefit at all,’ he shared.

‘$3.10 isn't even a litre of milk. We're supposed to be the lucky country.’

He had been on JobSeeker since 2019 and briefly took on a part-time job last year to break free from the welfare cycle.

Despite earning $400 a week, the increased income meant his Centrelink payments were cut, and his social housing rent—calculated as a portion of his income—rose.

He quit after a few months, saying it ‘wasn’t worth the trouble’.

With rent set to increase again in May, the JobSeeker indexation would leave him $4.50 worse off.

Social housing tenants have long criticised the system, where any increase in Centrelink payments triggers a rent hike.


Trudi, a disability pensioner, said she had grown frustrated with the cycle.

‘We get absolutely nothing, it's b*******,’ she said.

‘The government is slapping itself on the back, beating its chest... it's not enough, it will never be enough.’

Emily, 25, said she was forced to choose between basic needs, often skipping meals to afford essentials.

‘I am living on one meal per day,’ she said.

‘If I run out of both my medications at around the same time, I must choose between medicine for my chronic pain or medication for my PCOS.’

She said her rent accounted for 55 per cent of her income, leaving her unable to afford internet and sometimes struggling to recharge her phone.

‘This is my reality, and the reality of countless others,’ she said.


The rising cost of living had made it harder for JobSeeker recipients to get by, with many now relying on charity organisations for essentials.

Even dual-income households had turned to outreach services as food prices surged.

Since March 2020, grocery prices had risen by 17 per cent, while rental costs had increased by 37.6 per cent, according to CoreLogic data.

Petrol had jumped 42 per cent since 2022, while insurance costs had risen by 20 per cent.

JobSeeker had increased from $565.70 per fortnight in 2020 to $781.10 today—an adjustment of 27.5 per cent.

Despite these increases, many argued the payment was still not enough to cover necessities.


The Economic Inclusion Advisory Committee reported that JobSeeker payments remained below all benchmarks, causing severe hardship for many Australians.

It recommended raising JobSeeker to 90 per cent of the Age Pension, which would bring the payment to $942.39 per fortnight.

The Australian Council of Social Services had called for an even higher increase to at least $82 per day.

Damien said even an extra $100 per week would not be enough for a comfortable life.

Mission Australia’s Marion Bennett warned that failing to raise JobSeeker would have wider consequences.

‘If people are able to receive an adequate income, then they actually will be less frequently needing to use other government services,’ she said.

‘So there's actually a return on that investment of $1.24 for every dollar invested in JobSeeker.’


Social Services Minister Amanda Rishworth said today’s increase would ‘help ease some pressure’ but did not indicate whether further changes were planned.

She pointed to other government measures, including an $11.5 billion investment in welfare support.

Shadow Social Services Minister Michael Sukkar said the opposition had no plans to change JobSeeker, arguing that employment was the best way to improve living standards.

‘Few countries provide the strong safety net available to Australians,’ he said.

He added that since JobSeeker was taxpayer-funded, any changes needed to be handled ‘responsibly’.


In a previous story, the government announced a separate Centrelink change aimed at providing relief for pensioners.

While some welcomed the update, others questioned whether it would make a real difference.

Read more about how this change could impact pensioners.

Key Takeaways
  • Welfare recipients said the latest Centrelink increase failed to keep up with the rising cost of living.
  • Many struggled to afford essentials, with some skipping meals or choosing between medications.
  • Experts called for a higher JobSeeker rate, warning that inadequate payments caused severe hardship.
  • The government defended its welfare measures, while the opposition said any changes must be handled responsibly.

With the cost of living continuing to rise, do you think current welfare payments are enough to support those in need? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
I wonderful how many struggling working Aussies got a $225.60 pay rise in the same time frame these jobseekers did? And those complaining about the increase in their social housing rent? Consider the increase private renters faced. Instead of minimal increases, the various governments should be concentrating on cutting red tape, getting rid of the excess and unnecessary public service jobs, put on actual employees instead of contracting everything out to private companies and stop relying on charities and volunteers to do their job for them. It's pretty hard for working families who pay $600 a week in rent, $1200 a quarter for electricity etc to sympathise with those in public housing.
 
One of the highlights of the recent USA election was the use of misinformation to bring down the Government. I will take one example from your article: " since 2022 the price of petrol has risen 22 percent ". Google the price of petrol in 2022. The answer " the highest recorded average price was 184.2 c/l".
Our local servos are selling at 169.7 c/l presently. A decease of 14.5c/l.

In Sydney this week we saw prices from 167.4c/l to 214 c/l, straight across the road from one another. This is about an 11% increase but given the price differential in such close proximity, it is a business gouging issue, not inflation.

Let's get thee facts correct please.
 
Maybe the Government needs to look at not hitting benefits when people take part time employment for a time period to encourage moving off benefits.

With the grocery price rises, I recall that when Woolworths announced a 5% increase on profits the reporter stated: "... due to inflation..."

Yes, it was due to inflation caused by big raising prices 5% above their cost increases, and you have to realise too, that the increase in executive bonuses would be included in those costs.

A lot of our price inflation is due to businesses acting as though they are separate to everyone else in the economy and taking higher profits than are justified


Everyone needs to work together to make an economy work properly.

When we have people on multi million dollar salaries critical of the pittance received by welfare recipients, the hypocrisy screams.
 
The upcoming increase in the pension:



Some reflections.



I realise that the upcoming increase in the age pension has some, particularly those in political circles salivating and celebrating the anticipated increase of $2.30 per week for a single pensioner and $3.50 per week for a couple.

I certainly realise that under a LNP government the even unbelievably modest increase would be unlikely and that the LNP still harbour the desire to control our money by introducing the ‘cashless debit card’ treating us like we are all financially incompetent nitwits incapable of managing our money.

However, not withstanding the above just how euphoric should one get?

The single person increase equates to about 4.5 cents per hour based on a 38 hour week and will buy about half a cup of coffee or slightly less.

As I understand it, this half yearly increase is meant to be in line with cost of living increases.

I wonder how this is calculated??

I mean, there are costs that have had a major impact before even considering daily food prices

Example: house and contents insurance on my place increased by $450 for the year despite no claims, not in flood prone area and ‘shopping around’

Council rates increased by about $200 per year in round figures, health insurance went up about $3 per week or $150 per annum.

Now, one does not have to be a genius to work out that even with just those three items, the $2.30 per week increase falls far short of these increases.

Perhaps I should do away with health insurance and house and contents insurance??

Or, perhaps a proper livable pension could be paid so that when indexed it actually more closely reflects the cost of living increases?

Yes, I’m lucky because I own most of my house; about 90% of it, even a bit more but things must be even more challenging for those who don’t own a home.

I know people will race to defend the increase but, I’m sorry, I think it’s a paltry amount based on a miserly basis.

Should I be grateful anyway?

Perhaps. I was in the paid workforce for 52 years, never unemployed, paid taxes every year and hopefully, contributed positively to the community.

Is the expectation of a decent pension in old age unreasonable?

Not all of us were able to save and access a million dollar Super.

I don’t have the skill set to determine what is reasonable but the current rates don’t ‘feel’ anywhere near fair.

I note that many aged pensioners are having considerable trouble balancing the budget when unplanned contingencies arise such as serious dental work.
 
tell Damien, 62, to get off his lazy fat arse and get a real job and stop relying on the government for money. No reason whatsoever for him to have been on job seeker since 2019.
If I had my way I would reduce the job seeker allowance .
The amount they get makes it too easy for them to not work!
 
Last edited:
The upcoming increase in the pension:



Some reflections.



I realise that the upcoming increase in the age pension has some, particularly those in political circles salivating and celebrating the anticipated increase of $2.30 per week for a single pensioner and $3.50 per week for a couple.

I certainly realise that under a LNP government the even unbelievably modest increase would be unlikely and that the LNP still harbour the desire to control our money by introducing the ‘cashless debit card’ treating us like we are all financially incompetent nitwits incapable of managing our money.

However, not withstanding the above just how euphoric should one get?

The single person increase equates to about 4.5 cents per hour based on a 38 hour week and will buy about half a cup of coffee or slightly less.

As I understand it, this half yearly increase is meant to be in line with cost of living increases.

I wonder how this is calculated??

I mean, there are costs that have had a major impact before even considering daily food prices

Example: house and contents insurance on my place increased by $450 for the year despite no claims, not in flood prone area and ‘shopping around’

Council rates increased by about $200 per year in round figures, health insurance went up about $3 per week or $150 per annum.

Now, one does not have to be a genius to work out that even with just those three items, the $2.30 per week increase falls far short of these increases.

Perhaps I should do away with health insurance and house and contents insurance??

Or, perhaps a proper livable pension could be paid so that when indexed it actually more closely reflects the cost of living increases?

Yes, I’m lucky because I own most of my house; about 90% of it, even a bit more but things must be even more challenging for those who don’t own a home.

I know people will race to defend the increase but, I’m sorry, I think it’s a paltry amount based on a miserly basis.

Should I be grateful anyway?

Perhaps. I was in the paid workforce for 52 years, never unemployed, paid taxes every year and hopefully, contributed positively to the community.

Is the expectation of a decent pension in old age unreasonable?

Not all of us were able to save and access a million dollar Super.

I don’t have the skill set to determine what is reasonable but the current rates don’t ‘feel’ anywhere near fair.

I note that many aged pensioners are having considerable trouble balancing the budget when unplanned contingencies arise such as serious dental work.
Mate, you don’t need a million $ Super to live very comfortably.
I have $300,000 in super, worked hard for 50 years as did you, paid of my home and cars, raised 3 kids. Wife worked and I worked two jobs but we are living a very comfortable existence now and even doing overseas trips.
 
The increase is paltry, and so miniscule it may have been better to have no increase.
Just how and who calculates inflation? They must be with the fairies. The government says all is good, the reserve bank says things are bad!
The biggest problem is lack of government action on price gouging. Lack of action is expected from conservatives but this PM should hang his cowardly head in shame.
It would be better for the economy if handouts and price gouging were stopped, and instead large corporates paid a fair share of tax.
 
tell Damien, 62, to get off his lazy fat arse and get a real job and stop relying on the government for money. No reason whatsoever for him to have been on job seeker since 2019.
If I had my way I would reduce the job seeker allowance .
The amount they get makes it too easy for them to not work!
Do not be so personal and critical of another on this site - I doubt you know every aspect of why he is/has been on JobSeeker. Not everyone is in your boat. Some, through no fault of their own, could be in a boat that is sinking while you ‘appear’ to be floating well above the stormy seas. I see your comments as very vile, and extremely rude towards those who are the more unfortunate among us. Perhaps his ‘lazy fat arise’ as quoted by you, is a darned side smaller than yours.
 
This from an online search.

Grocery Price Increase Australia​

In the past six months, grocery prices in Australia have shown varying rates of change. According to the Consumer Price Index data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the overall grocery category experienced a 2.5% increase from September 2024 to December 2024.2 Specific categories like fruit saw a significant increase of 12.3% from January 2024 to January 2025, while others like beef and veal saw a decrease of -2.8%.12 These fluctuations reflect the diverse impacts of inflation and other economic factors on different food items.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
🌐
finder.com.au
What the average Aussie spends on groceries in 2025 | Finder

🌐
abs.gov.au
Consumer Price Index, Australia, December Quarter 2024

🌐
tradingeconomics.com
Australia Food Inflation

🌐
sbs.com.au
How much have grocery prices increased in Australia? | SBS News

🌐
9news.com.au
Grocery prices: The cost of this supermarket shop rose by a third in just three years

🌐
theguardian.com
How supermarkets are profiting from Aust
 
The increase is paltry, and so miniscule it may have been better to have no increase.
The biggest problem is lack of government action on price gouging. Lack of action is expected from conservatives but this PM should hang his cowardly head in shame.
It would be better for the economy if handouts and price gouging were stopped, and instead large corporates paid a fair share of tax.
tell Damien, 62, to get off his lazy fat arse and get a real job and stop relying on the government for money. No reason whatsoever for him to have been on job seeker since 2019.
If I had my way I would reduce the job seeker allowance .
The amount they get makes it too easy for them to not work!
You are an idiot. How do you know if the person is able bodied or ill or disabled. Where are all these wondrous jobs, as I don't see too many. How many jobs pay enough to live on? How much is needed these days to pay expenses?
The 'CPI' does not reflect the increased prices we all face
 
The increase in Job Seeker and the age pension is ludicrous. Almost couldn't believe it when I read the amount. Why are we funding an Olympics when so many people are struggling? $800,000 for Aucus to a country that is about to slap us with tarrifs and is lead by a dictator. The supermarkets should hang their heads in shame for their price gouging. It appears worldwide that the rich get richer and the poor struggle. I am in my 80's and I fear for kids going forward.
 
tell Damien, 62, to get off his lazy fat arse and get a real job and stop relying on the government for money. No reason whatsoever for him to have been on job seeker since 2019.
If I had my way I would reduce the job seeker allowance .
The amount they get makes it too easy for them to not work!
What a cruel comment. Not everyone is able to work. Your lack of empathy is staggering. The amount they get hardly keeps them in food and rent. Many would work if they were able. Do you know this man's circumstances? Don't make such a vile comment until you know tha facts.
 
"Strong social safety net" and increases "need to be handled responsibly"? Who is the minister kidding? Absolutely out of touch. Everyone in Canberra should be made to live on the pension or jobseeker payment for six months. Without any assistance of any kind.
 
The increase is paltry, and so miniscule it may have been better to have no increase.
Just how and who calculates inflation? They must be with the fairies. The government says all is good, the reserve bank says things are bad!
The biggest problem is lack of government action on price gouging. Lack of action is expected from conservatives but this PM should hang his cowardly head in shame.
It would be better for the economy if handouts and price gouging were stopped, and instead large corporates paid a fair share of tax.
And the ACCC or whatever they are called has just announced there is no evidence of price gouging by the Big 2 supermarkets . Are they dumb, stupid, blind and death. Talk about giving them carte blanche to keep at their dirty tactics and no end in sight of rising prices.
 
Welfare recipients get this paltry amount twice every year, and pensioners especially feel insulted by this small amount that does absolutely nothing, nothing to help the rise in prices !
I recently had to move as my rented Two bedroom duplex’s rent went up to $600 a week the very cheapest I was lucky to get is $450 a week $900 a fortnight for 2 rooms and a bathroom ! And because my pension doesn’t meet the affordable amount to pay the rent I had to have a guarantor ! Another bloody insult as I’ve always had such a good record in rental history. In my opinion the government who ever is in should give this paltry amount to charity and give pensioners a living wage we all paid heaps in taxes for a very long time ! Instead they seem to wish all us older generation would curl up and die to save them paying pensions !
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×