When men in power target children, should bail even be an option?

Content warning: This story contains details of alleged child exploitation.

A senior bank executive stood accused of attempting to exploit two teenage girls.

The girls were just 14 and 15 years old when he allegedly made the arrangement.

Despite the disturbing allegations, he was granted bail.


Christopher James McCann, 50, appeared in Brisbane Arrest Court on 14 July 2025 after being extradited from New South Wales.

The former Commonwealth Bank executive was charged with using the internet to procure children under the age of 16.

Police alleged that McCann had contacted 18-year-old Brisbane sex worker Shauntelle Elizabeth Went and asked if she had younger friends.


image1.png
Former bank executive faces grooming charge. Image source: Pexels/Andrea Piacquadio
Disclaimer: This is a stock image used for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual person, item, or event described.


Magistrate Louise Shephard said McCann was accused of arranging to meet with Went and two underage girls at a luxury hotel in Brisbane.

‘You travelled interstate frequently. You formed some kind of connection with (Went). On May 14 police intercepted messages between you and she,’ Shephard said.

‘The allegation is you...queried her about whether she had younger friends that she worked with.’


Shephard said that on the night of the alleged offence, the two teenage girls arrived at the Brisbane CBD hotel with Went.

‘Later the evening Went and the girls attended (a Brisbane CBD five-star hotel),’ Shephard said.

‘The two girls went to the room and you contacted the front desk to ask them to leave. It is not alleged the girls entered the room.’

Police executed a search warrant at McCann’s home on 8 July after receiving a referral from New South Wales authorities.

The matter was taken up by Queensland Police’s Task Force Argos, a unit specialising in child exploitation cases.


The prosecution opposed bail, citing McCann’s financial means, interstate residence, and risk to the community.

‘He lives in NSW. He is a flight risk. He has financial capacity from his previous employment,’ the prosecutor said.

The court heard McCann had since been dismissed from his job.

His barrister, David Jones, claimed the police affidavit relied on speculation and said McCann had no prior criminal record.

‘They are unprofessional. They lack complete objectivity...they speculate when there is nothing there. It goes so far as fortune-telling,’ Jones said.

Jones also argued that even if his client were convicted, a custodial sentence might not be imposed.

McCann agreed to relocate to Queensland and follow strict bail conditions, including an overnight curfew and the use of only one mobile phone with no encrypted apps.

Magistrate Shephard said the case against McCann appeared strong, but the risks could be managed through bail conditions.

Went, who was also charged, was granted bail on the same day.

Both cases are expected to return to court on 4 August.


Shocking allegations like those involving Christopher James McCann often leave entire communities reeling, especially when the accused holds a position of trust.

The emotional toll these cases take can be seen not just in courtrooms but in the reactions of those trying to report the news.

One particularly powerful moment unfolded on live television when a well-known presenter struggled to keep it together.

Read more: TV host breaks down on air as shocking scandal rocks community

Key Takeaways

  • Christopher James McCann was charged with using the internet to procure children under 16.
  • Police alleged he arranged a meeting involving two underage girls and a sex worker at a Brisbane hotel.
  • He was granted bail with conditions including a curfew and restricted phone use.
  • The charges are scheduled to return to court on 4 August.

When trusted figures face such serious accusations, the damage reaches far beyond a courtroom. Do you believe people accused of serious child exploitation offences should ever be released on bail?

Read the update here: Charged over child sex case—found dead days later in eerie scene
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
People charged with child interference should receive a jail sentence, in my opinion Law should be made in each state should be if male they are also castrated. Knowing this would happen would make them think twice before interfering with children, to make it worse they should have to pay for the operation. Have I opened a can of worms with this article?
 
People charged with child interference should receive a jail sentence, in my opinion Law should be made in each state should be if male they are also castrated. Knowing this would happen would make them think twice before interfering with children, to make it worse they should have to pay for the operation. Have I opened a can of worms with this article?
I think it is a damn good idea and if it had been put in place many years ago may have saved many many children which would have been a blessing. That is what we need, deterrents.
 
Whilst I find his behaviour objectionable it seems to be at the lower end of offending.
He was not interfering with random girls but attempting to access young prostitutes.
Much like Donald Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CemisugO
People charged with child interference should receive a jail sentence, in my opinion Law should be made in each state should be if male they are also castrated. Knowing this would happen would make them think twice before interfering with children, to make it worse they should have to pay for the operation. Have I opened a can of worms with this article?
Totally agree, this should happen to anyone (women included)that interferes with children.
 
Whilst I find his behaviour objectionable it seems to be at the lower end of offending.
He was not interfering with random girls but attempting to access young prostitutes.
Much like Donald Trump.
That seems a very benign response since we are talking about (presumably) under-age girls. How would you feel if this was your daughter or granddaughter, whichever the case may be? Your response is either naive or callous, not sure which!
 
That seems a very benign response since we are talking about (presumably) under-age girls. How would you feel if this was your daughter or granddaughter, whichever the case may be? Your response is either naive or callous, not sure which!
My comment is based on the facts. Yours is based on emotion not facts and is also naive.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×