What would a vehicle efficiency standard for new cars cost – or save – Australian drivers?


file-20240213-24-i1xgc2.png

Mazda CX30. Shutterstock



Opposition leader Peter Dutton says Labor’s proposed fuel efficiency standard for new cars would push up the price of a Mazda CX30 “by about $19,000”.

Given that right now the Mazda CX30 costs A$33,140, that’d be one hell of an increase.



So what should we really expect if Australia finally introduces fuel efficiency standards here – decades after the US and Europe? What could it cost us upfront for buying new cars? And how much could we save later in lower fuel bills?

Here’s what we do know, based on decades of international experience, new federal government analysis – and even cost estimates from a previous Coalition government.

Car efficiency standards are common overseas​


Labor is proposing a so-called new vehicle efficiency standard of the kind proposed by the Coalition in 2016, championed by the Coalition in 2022, and common in the rest of the world.



Here’s how it works in Europe, the United States and Japan, and just about every advanced economy other than Russia and Australia.

Every car manufacturer has to meet an average efficiency standard for the new vehicles it sells each year, whether expressed in miles per gallon (the US) or carbon dioxide emitted per kilometre (Europe).



Europe has been doing it since 2009. When it tightened its standards in 2020, average CO2 emissions of new passenger cars sold fell 12% and a further 12.5% the following year.

In the US, fuel efficiency has doubled​


The United States has been doing it since 1975.

In that time, the average efficiency of its new cars has doubled, and it is about to tighten standards further.

After decades of being the odd one out, Australian passenger cars on average use 20% more fuel than passenger cars in the US.



And that isn’t only because Australians like SUVs and utes. In both Australia and the US, SUVs and utes account for four out of every five new light vehicles sold.

But the new SUVs and utes sold in Australia produce on average 24% more emissions than those sold in the United States. The new smaller cars sold in Australia produce 31% more.

Standards change the mix of what’s sold​


Efficiency standards don’t prevent carmakers from selling inefficient vehicles. What they do is ensure they make those vehicles more efficient, or balance their sales with sales of more efficient ones.

At the moment, it means the vehicles sold in the US and elsewhere get advanced emissions technologies not generally offered in Australia.

file-20240213-26-y4161g.png
Volkswagen says Australia is a dumping ground for older and less efficient cars. Shutterstock​
It’s easy to understand why. With efficient vehicles prized in the US, Europe, and other places, because they are needed to balance up the sales of less efficient vehicles, they get diverted to those places – rather than Australia.

In the words of Volkswagen Group Australia chief Michael Bartsch, it makes Australia a “dumping ground” for older and less efficient vehicles.



Labor has put forward three options for targets: a slow start, a fast start, and its preferred option: “fast but flexible”.

Its preferred option would require carmakers selling in Australia to catch up with the standards of countries including the United States by 2028.

For motorists, the biggest benefit is fuel savings – calculated at A$107 billion between now and 2050. Against that sit vehicle technology, electricity and battery replacement costs of half as much, leaving motorists a long way ahead.

But would it push up the price of cars, as Dutton suggests?



‘No systemic, statistically significant increase’​


The government’s consultation paper says the evidence consistently shows no price impact or a negligible price impact.

But common sense suggests it’ll make the price of gas guzzlers somewhat more expensive, and lean, fuel-efficient machines less expensive, as carmakers adjust the mix of what they trying to sell.

When the Coalition looked at this back in 2016, it found the standard it proposed would increase the price of an average-performing petrol passenger vehicle by between $800 and $2,000, and the price of an average-performing diesel light commercial vehicle by between $750 and $2,000.

At the petrol price at the time, $1.30 per litre – far less than we’re paying now – motorists would have been ahead after four years.



Maybe Labor’s plan will push up car prices more than the Coalition’s 2016 plan, because it is more ambitious, as Dutton suggests. Or maybe it will push up prices by less because vehicle technology has improved.

In the US, a statistical analysis of prices from 2003 to 2021 found “no systemic, statistically significant increase in inflation-adjusted vehicle prices” during two decades in which standards were tightened and fuel economy improved 30%.

And standards will need to tighten. Cars and other light vehicles account for 13% of Australia’s carbon emissions. Both this government – and its Coalition predecessor – committed to cutting Australia’s net emissions to zero by 2050.

Without vehicles pulling their weight, along with heavy industry and electricity, we won’t get there.



This article was first published on The Conversation, and was written by , Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ezzy
Sponsored
How about Australia's cities getting ahead with good public transport and getting commuters travelling by bus, bike or on foot?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mika and janj
I agree with the previous comment. In my last job it took 20 - 30 minutes to drive, depending on traffic. To go by public transport?. Well I couldn’t. There was no public transport anywhere near where I worked and very few buses where we lived. (A well populated residential area and a huge business area Each about 20 minutes from Perth)
 
They aren't doing this to help the environment, they want everyone in Electric Vehicles so they have more control over you. Once everything is electric and the smart meters are everywhere, they can limit you in whatever they want.
 
Like the new red meat tax this pathetic government wants to throw at us, this is just another money grabbing scheme by them.

It has already been proved that electric cars are not the way to go, the wind turbines are a dead loss as is some of the solar powered electricity.

Hydro-electric would be a lot better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gbaerken
If they don't want to use newer clean coal techniques why don't they use gas instead of selling it to the Chinese? Even Nuclear which has been made safer over the years.
 
Like the new red meat tax this pathetic government wants to throw at us, this is just another money grabbing scheme by them.

It has already been proved that electric cars are not the way to go, the wind turbines are a dead loss as is some of the solar powered electricity.

Hydro-electric would be a lot better.
Unfortunately most of Australia looks a bit too flat and dry for hydro-power though we could build a circular dam round Ayers Rock to catch the run-off when it rains; windy places such as Denmark seem to do OK with wind turbines; and solar-powered electricity is being developed and can hit a 22%% efficiency . That we can already power homes by solar panels for 12 of 24 hours is well-established and if our privatised power utilities actually paid us as much for the solar power we generate as they charge us for their power then a lot more would use it. On top of which our power is generated by one company with a CEO and shareholders and Board of Director, the transmission lines are run by another privatised company with shareholders and CEO and Board of Directors and the people that sell the power to we punters consists of yet another company. That is plain stupid and expensive.

As for nuclear; how long does it take to build a nuclear power station? At what cost? It is cheaper to turn off the lights when you leave the room.

As for a red-meat tax; well, y'all wants cuts to your income taxes and yet public health, roads and education still have to be paid for. You can't have that for nothing.
 
Last edited:
As usual the Australian consumer who has been ripped off gets no support from the LNP. All they care about is the mining industry which lines their pockets today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob44
I am disabled with limited mobility. I need a car. extending public transport won’t work for me. I am a competent driver and enjoy driving, fortunately I can generally avoid peak times as I am retired. The needs of the whole community need to be considered. I think it is a good idea to improve fuel efficiency in cars in Australia, however you can still buy cars with excellent fuel efficiency, I purchased my new small Škoda SUV because of the quality of the car, the safety features provided with the car, the comfort and because it has excellent fuel efficiency. My husband has a Skoda Octavia, a largish car, and we got a brilliant 5.1 litres/100km on a trip from Melbourne to Adelaide. It’s up to you to purchase a fuel efficient car, which can be done now if you shop around.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×