Unearthing Queensland's rental trap: Don't let this rule catch you off guard!
- Replies 5
Navigating the rental market can be a minefield of hidden clauses and unexpected costs, but for Queensland renters, a little-known rule has recently come to light that could leave them thousands of dollars out of pocket.
This just goes to show how crucial it is to really understand what you're signing up for in those rental contracts. They have a big impact on what you can and can't do as a tenant.
Erin and her partner, like many couples looking to find a new home in Queensland, were excited to discover a property that seemed perfect for their needs.
With a weekly rent of around $800, they anticipated the bond—a security deposit held against damages or unpaid rent—to be the standard four weeks' rent, which would amount to $3,200.
This is a common expectation, as renters across Australia are typically required to pay a bond equivalent to four weeks of rent.
However, their excitement quickly turned to disbelief when the couple was asked to fork out a staggering $6,500 to move in, a figure that left Erin particularly shocked and prompted her to share her experience on social media.
‘When we went to apply, there was an amount owing of $6,500,’ Erin said on her social media video post.
According to Residential Tenancies Authority regulations, if the weekly rent exceeds $700, landlords have the right to negotiate a higher bond price.
This is a huge contrast to the standard bond cap, and it's a rule that many renters may not be aware of until it's too late.
The Residential and Tenancies Accommodation Act (2008), which sets the framework for rental and tenancy agreements in Queensland, does not specify a maximum bond amount under these circumstances.
This legislative gap has left renters like Erin and her partner vulnerable to unexpectedly high upfront costs, igniting outrage and calls for change.
‘You wonder why we have a rental f*****g crisis, hun, woah!’ Erin said.
Erin's story resonated with many, as evidenced by the flood of social media users who shared their own tales of exorbitant bond demands.
‘We had a bond of $10,000 at the request of the landlord. Our property was $850 a week. It was insane,’ one person shared.
‘These prices are insane,’ one wrote.
‘So wrong that it should be illegal,’ another person added.
Some recommended that the couple should find a cheaper rental option until they manage to save up for a deposit.
‘You might [save enough for a deposit] if you move somewhere for $450 a week for a few years…you can't live in the now and prepare for the future; it's a sad reality,' someone commented.
Antonia Mercorella, CEO of the Real Estate Institute of Queensland, pointed out that these bond rules were put in place during a time when the property market was very different.
‘The $700 threshold was set many years ago at a time when weekly rent values were vastly different from those we are seeing in today's market,’ she explained.
In a move to address these issues, Queensland passed new tenancy laws last month that will limit the bond to no more than four weeks of rent.
Tenants who have paid bonds exceeding this amount prior to the new laws can request a refund.
However, these new laws are yet to be enforced, with an official start date still pending.
It's crucial to carefully review the details and stay updated on your rights as a renter to avoid becoming a victim of such legal pitfalls.
Have you faced similar challenges with rental bonds, or do you possess insights for navigating the rental landscape? Feel free to share your experiences in the comments section.
This just goes to show how crucial it is to really understand what you're signing up for in those rental contracts. They have a big impact on what you can and can't do as a tenant.
Erin and her partner, like many couples looking to find a new home in Queensland, were excited to discover a property that seemed perfect for their needs.
With a weekly rent of around $800, they anticipated the bond—a security deposit held against damages or unpaid rent—to be the standard four weeks' rent, which would amount to $3,200.
This is a common expectation, as renters across Australia are typically required to pay a bond equivalent to four weeks of rent.
Erin and her partner were looking for a place to rent in Queensland. Credit: @ez95e/TikTok
However, their excitement quickly turned to disbelief when the couple was asked to fork out a staggering $6,500 to move in, a figure that left Erin particularly shocked and prompted her to share her experience on social media.
‘When we went to apply, there was an amount owing of $6,500,’ Erin said on her social media video post.
According to Residential Tenancies Authority regulations, if the weekly rent exceeds $700, landlords have the right to negotiate a higher bond price.
This is a huge contrast to the standard bond cap, and it's a rule that many renters may not be aware of until it's too late.
The Residential and Tenancies Accommodation Act (2008), which sets the framework for rental and tenancy agreements in Queensland, does not specify a maximum bond amount under these circumstances.
This legislative gap has left renters like Erin and her partner vulnerable to unexpectedly high upfront costs, igniting outrage and calls for change.
‘You wonder why we have a rental f*****g crisis, hun, woah!’ Erin said.
Erin's story resonated with many, as evidenced by the flood of social media users who shared their own tales of exorbitant bond demands.
‘We had a bond of $10,000 at the request of the landlord. Our property was $850 a week. It was insane,’ one person shared.
‘These prices are insane,’ one wrote.
‘So wrong that it should be illegal,’ another person added.
Some recommended that the couple should find a cheaper rental option until they manage to save up for a deposit.
‘You might [save enough for a deposit] if you move somewhere for $450 a week for a few years…you can't live in the now and prepare for the future; it's a sad reality,' someone commented.
Antonia Mercorella, CEO of the Real Estate Institute of Queensland, pointed out that these bond rules were put in place during a time when the property market was very different.
‘The $700 threshold was set many years ago at a time when weekly rent values were vastly different from those we are seeing in today's market,’ she explained.
In a move to address these issues, Queensland passed new tenancy laws last month that will limit the bond to no more than four weeks of rent.
Tenants who have paid bonds exceeding this amount prior to the new laws can request a refund.
However, these new laws are yet to be enforced, with an official start date still pending.
It's crucial to carefully review the details and stay updated on your rights as a renter to avoid becoming a victim of such legal pitfalls.
Have you faced similar challenges with rental bonds, or do you possess insights for navigating the rental landscape? Feel free to share your experiences in the comments section.
Last edited:
.png){kind=icon}
