Rosse Eckl found guilty of laundering almost $2.4m for online scammers!
- Replies 2
Sharing information online can be risky. One, unfortunately, has to beware of shameless scammers.
These scam threats include email hackers who target innocent businesses and customers alike.
A legal case has recently come to light involving Rosse Eckl, a 67-year-old Brisbane local, who was found guilty of laundering almost $2.4 million for a band of scammers.
Eckl used her business accounts with National Australia Bank, Heritage Bank, and ANZ to receive an outrageous $2.36m from scammers running a devastating fake invoice operation.
Victims of this scam included a range of businesses across Australia, from mining waste disposal companies to animal feed suppliers.
The largest single transaction Eckl enabled was an astounding $1.164m.
The ill-gotten loot was transferred between different accounts multiple times before Eckl withdrew the funds in cash denominations between $2000 and $5000.
These sums were then handed over to a third party—in person, in Brisbane. It's unsettling stuff, isn't it?
Shockingly, Eckl herself had been a victim of scams in the past, having lost $600,000 in personal savings.
But her involvement in this crime was no simple twist of fate, as Paul Bolster, the public prosecutor, pointed out.
‘My learned friend points to Ms Eckl being taken advantage of in the past. Becoming involved with people involved in this type of activity, having been a victim yourself, as a means of recovering previous losses would suggest Ms Eckl was prepared to involve herself in criminal activity in a means of recovering those losses.’ Mr Bolster said.
He added, ‘That is unfortunate for her because it shows she was prepared to be involved with people who were prepared in scamming others.’
Mr Bolster acknowledged that there was no evidence to suggest that Eckl profited from the scam, except for receiving a few hundred dollars, which she used for dental surgery.
However, he pointed out that her willingness to keep laundering money demonstrated her understanding that her actions were illegal, particularly given her background in accounting.
‘She certainly didn’t know about the invoices and fake emails being sent… but she must have appreciated these funds were the proceeds of crime.’ Mr Bolster said.
‘Accepting one could have every sympathy in the world for (her being scammed), there’s no sympathy towards her getting involved with those people who were responsible for those losses.’
‘At the heart of this, Ms Eckl was prepared to be involved in this not once but five times.’ he added.
Eckl's defence barrister, Carl Tessmann, argued that his client should serve no more than 5.5 years in jail upon sentencing.
He emphasised that Eckl did not engage in this conduct for profit or to live an extravagant lifestyle.
The evidence showed only a few hundred dollars in gains, and she had no significant role in directing others, although the amounts involved were substantial.
According to Mr Tessmann, Eckl's involvement in the scam was driven by a desire and willingness to help others, as evidenced by the letters of support from her family describing her as a person of good character and always willing to assist the community.
Justice Paul Freeman noted that helping others seemed to be a part of her character, and he requested more details from a psychology report to better understand this aspect before making his decision.
During the investigation, Eckl freely provided her passwords to assist the police, although Mr Bolster clarified that she was legally required to do so.
Eckl's barrister mentioned that she would face deportation to Malaysia upon completing her sentence, as she was born there.
Justice Freeman reserved his decision for a later date; in the meantime, Eckl was granted bail.
We'd love our wise SDC community to take a moment right now and think about how cyber ploys are becoming increasingly complex.
Keep checking the correspondence you receive, the transactions you make, and any potentially suspicious activity.
Have you ever encountered suspicious emails or invoices in your business or personal inbox? How do you ensure that you are dealing with legitimate communications?
These scam threats include email hackers who target innocent businesses and customers alike.
A legal case has recently come to light involving Rosse Eckl, a 67-year-old Brisbane local, who was found guilty of laundering almost $2.4 million for a band of scammers.
Eckl used her business accounts with National Australia Bank, Heritage Bank, and ANZ to receive an outrageous $2.36m from scammers running a devastating fake invoice operation.
Earlier this year, Eckl was found guilty by a jury in the Brisbane Supreme Court for her involvement in money laundering. Image by tingeyinjurylawfirm from unsplash
Victims of this scam included a range of businesses across Australia, from mining waste disposal companies to animal feed suppliers.
The largest single transaction Eckl enabled was an astounding $1.164m.
The ill-gotten loot was transferred between different accounts multiple times before Eckl withdrew the funds in cash denominations between $2000 and $5000.
These sums were then handed over to a third party—in person, in Brisbane. It's unsettling stuff, isn't it?
Shockingly, Eckl herself had been a victim of scams in the past, having lost $600,000 in personal savings.
But her involvement in this crime was no simple twist of fate, as Paul Bolster, the public prosecutor, pointed out.
‘My learned friend points to Ms Eckl being taken advantage of in the past. Becoming involved with people involved in this type of activity, having been a victim yourself, as a means of recovering previous losses would suggest Ms Eckl was prepared to involve herself in criminal activity in a means of recovering those losses.’ Mr Bolster said.
He added, ‘That is unfortunate for her because it shows she was prepared to be involved with people who were prepared in scamming others.’
Mr Bolster acknowledged that there was no evidence to suggest that Eckl profited from the scam, except for receiving a few hundred dollars, which she used for dental surgery.
However, he pointed out that her willingness to keep laundering money demonstrated her understanding that her actions were illegal, particularly given her background in accounting.
‘She certainly didn’t know about the invoices and fake emails being sent… but she must have appreciated these funds were the proceeds of crime.’ Mr Bolster said.
‘Accepting one could have every sympathy in the world for (her being scammed), there’s no sympathy towards her getting involved with those people who were responsible for those losses.’
She is currently awaiting sentencing for the charges. Image by Sora Shimazaki from pexels
‘At the heart of this, Ms Eckl was prepared to be involved in this not once but five times.’ he added.
Eckl's defence barrister, Carl Tessmann, argued that his client should serve no more than 5.5 years in jail upon sentencing.
He emphasised that Eckl did not engage in this conduct for profit or to live an extravagant lifestyle.
The evidence showed only a few hundred dollars in gains, and she had no significant role in directing others, although the amounts involved were substantial.
According to Mr Tessmann, Eckl's involvement in the scam was driven by a desire and willingness to help others, as evidenced by the letters of support from her family describing her as a person of good character and always willing to assist the community.
Justice Paul Freeman noted that helping others seemed to be a part of her character, and he requested more details from a psychology report to better understand this aspect before making his decision.
During the investigation, Eckl freely provided her passwords to assist the police, although Mr Bolster clarified that she was legally required to do so.
Eckl's barrister mentioned that she would face deportation to Malaysia upon completing her sentence, as she was born there.
Justice Freeman reserved his decision for a later date; in the meantime, Eckl was granted bail.
We'd love our wise SDC community to take a moment right now and think about how cyber ploys are becoming increasingly complex.
Keep checking the correspondence you receive, the transactions you make, and any potentially suspicious activity.
Have you ever encountered suspicious emails or invoices in your business or personal inbox? How do you ensure that you are dealing with legitimate communications?
.png){kind=icon}
