Parking fines spark debate: Are councils cash grabbing with outrageous penalties?

Navigating the maze of parking regulations can be a headache for any driver.

Still, it's enough to make anyone's blood boil when the fines for a minor miscalculation can be as steep as a week's worth of groceries.

Across Australia, drivers are voicing their frustration over what they perceive as excessive and unjust parking fines, leading to a growing outcry against what some call a 'legal scam' perpetrated by 'greedy councils'.


The issue of parking fines is contentious, with many Australians feeling the pinch of what they see as a revenue-raising tactic rather than a fair penalty system.

The recent move by the Minns government in New South Wales to ban ticketless parking fines is a step in the right direction for many.


1726718377356.png
Caleb Bond called hefty parking fines a ‘legal scam’ and criticised councils. Credit: Shutterstock


This practice, where drivers would only know they'd been fined once a letter arrived in the mail, often left them with no chance to contest the fine due to a lack of evidence from the scene.

Consider the scenario where parking your car just 15 minutes longer than a sign permits can result in a fine exceeding $100.

Many drivers, including Caleb Bond, have found themselves in this situation.


Bond's experience of being fined nearly $130 in Sydney for overstaying his welcome by a mere quarter of an hour has sparked a debate about the fairness of such penalties.

For Bond, a simple decision to enjoy another pint at the pub resulted in a fine that cost the equivalent of 13 more pints.

Moreover, using technology such as CCTV cameras to enforce parking regulations has added another layer of surveillance that some find intrusive.

In Adelaide, a man received a $116 fine for momentarily stopping on a yellow line—a penalty issued based on CCTV footage for an act that lasted 10 seconds.

There have been instances where entire streets have been caught off guard by sudden changes in parking regulations, such as Adelaide Street, which was turned into a 24-hour bike lane without residents' knowledge.


The result? A slew of $257 fines for unsuspecting locals who had been parking there for years.

Many of these fines were overturned when challenged.

With council rates already a significant expense for many households—some of which have seen increases of nearly 10 per cent per annum—the additional burden of hefty parking fines feels like a step too far for many Australians.


In other news, drivers in Australia, including those in NSW, can face fines for blocking driveways or footpaths with their vehicles, as a Newcastle woman recently discovered when it disrupted her birthday plans.

While this offence is not widely known, parking over a driveway or footpath can result in significant fines that vary by council area.
Key Takeaways
  • Caleb Bond criticised councils for issuing hefty parking fines, labelling them a 'legal scam'.
  • New South Wales has banned the practice of issuing ticketless parking fines, which adds difficulty for drivers in disputing fines.
  • Bond argued that parking fines are often disproportionately high compared to the perceived offence, suggesting penalties should be capped at $50.
  • Investigation into parking fines disputed in Adelaide revealed that half of the challenged fines were overturned, questioning the validity of many issued fines.
Have you been hit with a parking fine that felt more like a cash grab than a just punishment? Share your experiences in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
Quote: "a simple decision to enjoy another pint at the pub resulted in a fine that cost the equivalent of 13 more pints" unquote.

Maybe if he'd made the 'simple decision' to leave the car at home, he could have enjoyed quite a few more?

Seriously, SDC? You've scraped the barrel-bottom so hard that it's sprung a leak.
 
I love it when road rule enforcement is misused and the "authorities" get their arses handed on a platter.

How about the incident from the mid 2000s when NSW Police set up a speeding blitz at a school zone on the Princes Highway at North Nowra. Down to speed limit goes from 80 kmh to 40 kmh that extends the length of two high schools. Thousands of illegally issued infringement notices had to be refunded and demerit points reinstated.

The reason why? The dopey pricks set up their revenue raising rort on a PUPIL FREE DAY! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
I love it when road rule enforcement is misused and the "authorities" get their arses handed on a platter.

How about the incident from the mid 2000s when NSW Police set up a speeding blitz at a school zone on the Princes Highway at North Nowra. Down to speed limit goes from 80 kmh to 40 kmh that extends the length of two high schools. Thousands of illegally issued infringement notices had to be refunded and demerit points reinstated.

The reason why? The dopey pricks set up their revenue raising rort on a PUPIL FREE DAY! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
😂 Good one! 🤣
 
I love it when road rule enforcement is misused and the "authorities" get their arses handed on a platter.

How about the incident from the mid 2000s when NSW Police set up a speeding blitz at a school zone on the Princes Highway at North Nowra. Down to speed limit goes from 80 kmh to 40 kmh that extends the length of two high schools. Thousands of illegally issued infringement notices had to be refunded and demerit points reinstated.

The reason why? The dopey pricks set up their revenue raising rort on a PUPIL FREE DAY! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
NOT a Revenue Raising rort funds go to Road Trauma Trust Account.
 
NOT a Revenue Raising rort funds go to Road Trauma Trust Account.
Are you privy to their accounting systems to prove this?

In 2023-2024, Transport for NSW received $908 million in traffic fine revenue. For the same time period, Transport for NSW, with the assistance of the Federal Government, spent $518 million on road safety measures. This means a shortfall of nearly $400 million.

Do you know where this money went?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
Why are they blaming others when each one should have heeded the rules. That’s where our kids learn to ignore laws, parents/people always blame anything else but themselves
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jen77au
I love it when road rule enforcement is misused and the "authorities" get their arses handed on a platter.

How about the incident from the mid 2000s when NSW Police set up a speeding blitz at a school zone on the Princes Highway at North Nowra. Down to speed limit goes from 80 kmh to 40 kmh that extends the length of two high schools. Thousands of illegally issued infringement notices had to be refunded and demerit points reinstated.

The reason why? The dopey pricks set up their revenue raising rort on a PUPIL FREE DAY! :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
I'm not sure if I read it here earlier this year but I remember an article on the 40km speed limit in school zones and it noted that the 40km speed limit could be enforced on pupil free days.

I thought it was odd at the time 😳.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jen77au
I'm not sure if I read it here earlier this year but I remember an article on the 40km speed limit in school zones and it noted that the 40km speed limit could be enforced on pupil free days.

I thought it was odd at the time 😳.
In nsw the 40kph rule definitely is enforced on pupil free days. Sadly many get caught.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Veggiepatch
Are you privy to their accounting systems to prove this?

In 2023-2024, Transport for NSW received $908 million in traffic fine revenue. For the same time period, Transport for NSW, with the assistance of the Federal Government, spent $518 million on road safety measures. This means a shortfall of nearly $400 million.

Do you know where the money went.
Please allow Members to have an Opinion or pass Comment without snide remarks. The Road Safety Commissioner goes on to say " All this money is spent on making our Roads safer. It is illegal for any of this money to be used for purposes other than Road Safety"
 
Please allow Members to have an Opinion or pass Comment without snide remarks. The Road Safety Commissioner goes on to say " All this money is spent on making our Roads safer. It is illegal for any of this money to be used for purposes other than Road Safety"
Snide?

snide /snʌɪd/ : derogatory or mocking in an indirect way.

Buy an Oxford dictionary.

Oh wait! That's a snide remark....

FMD!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gordon1940

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×