Outrage as beloved Aussie camping spot faces sudden closure

Local decisions can often spark heated debates, especially when they touch on long-standing traditions and cherished community practices.

What seemed like a routine council update has now become the centre of a growing controversy, leaving many residents feeling unheard and frustrated.

At the heart of the issue is a clash of priorities, raising questions about fairness, transparency, and the future of a beloved Australian pastime.


Families who’ve cherished decades of camping traditions on the picturesque waterfront at Brooms Head, 130 km south of Byron Bay, are set to lose their spots as Clarence Valley Council moves to prioritise day visitors.

The council is pushing forward with controversial plans to remove 34 campsites along the foreshore, citing overcrowding caused by large vehicles like 4WDs, RVs, and caravans.

They argue that the influx of modern camping equipment has eroded the 'simple camping experience' and created environmental concerns, particularly regarding wastewater management at the crown land site.


image1.png
Council's foreshore plans spark community backlash. Image source: Pexel/Mac DeStroir


In its proposal, the council aims to create open spaces to better serve the broader community, claiming the area needs a 'greater balance' to accommodate increasing visitor numbers.

Ken Shephard, who has camped at the site with his family for 38 years, has condemned the council's decision, describing the lack of consultation as unjust.

'We’ve had no input, no consultation… it’s just wrong. We can’t get an honest answer,' said Shephard, spokesperson for the Brooms Campers and Caravanners Association.

He emphasised that campers contribute thousands of dollars to the local economy each season.

'There’s plenty of community space in Brooms Head,' Shephard added.

'Over Christmas, my daughter photographed the community areas, and at no stage were they full. There’s plenty of room for more visitors any day of the week.'


A significant point of contention is a 1987 council motion that stated camping sites would be phased out once their usage rights expired.

In 2021, the council removed 16 sites and now plans to shut down an additional 34.

However, Shephard argues this decision misinterprets the motion and conflicts with an existing Plan of Management for the area.

Council insists the changes are lawful, with general manager Laura Black stating they align with the original intent of the 1987 motion and legislative requirements.

She also highlighted that the changes reflect community desires for more open spaces and picnic facilities.

Last year, families were informed that the sites were no longer suitable for caravans, prompting many to invest in camper trailers or tents.


Now, they’ve been told all bookings will cease entirely from May.

For some, the loss is deeply personal.

'Brooms Head is the sole reason I moved my family from the Southern Highlands to the North Coast,' said camper Jethro Rockett.

'It’s where my partner and I first met — so much of our history is embedded here.'


Despite the backlash, the council continues to defend its decision, noting that affected campers can apply for other sites in Brooms Head that will remain open.

While many oppose the move, some community members support it.

'We don’t need caravan parks on the beach. I say best decision made in a long time,' one local shared online.

The debate highlights the challenges of balancing tradition, environmental concerns, and the growing demand for public spaces in some of Australia’s most treasured destinations.

Key Takeaways
  • Clarence Valley Council plans to remove 34 camping sites at Brooms Head, citing overcrowding from modern vehicles, environmental concerns, and the need for more open spaces to accommodate day visitors.
  • Longtime campers, including families who have used the site for decades, argue the decision is unfair, poorly communicated, and detrimental to the local economy.
  • A 1987 council motion to phase out camping sites is at the centre of the dispute, with critics claiming the current interpretation conflicts with an existing management plan.
  • While some residents support the changes, many campers feel the move undermines a cherished tradition, sparking debates over fairness, transparency, and preserving Australian pastimes.

Should preserving a cherished pastime take precedence over creating more public space, or is this a necessary step to adapt to changing demands? Let us know your thoughts below!
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×