Network Ten takes legal action against ex-Project host Peter van Onselen

News of legal action against popular Network Ten personality Peter van Onselen sent shockwaves through the media industry this week after the ex-Project host made some less-than-kind remarks about his former employer.

But what lay behind the frosty move? What had provoked Channel 10 to take out an injunction in the NSW Supreme Court against its former political editor?



It all began when Mr van Onselen wrote a scathing article for The Australian on May 29th, criticising Channel 10’s parent company, Paramount, for its falling share price and under-performing streaming service.

Mr van Onselen, who resigned from his role as Canberra-based political editor in March, branded his former employer as ‘the minnow of Australian commercial television’ and called the situation a ‘disaster’.


network1.jpg
Channel 10 has launched legal action against Mr van Onselen. Credit: John-Mark Smith/Pexels

In response, Channel 10 has launched legal action against van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract. The network is seeking an injunction from the NSW Supreme Court. It is also understood that Channel 10 will allege that Mr van Onselen's comments contravened a non-disparagement clause in his exit deal.

The case between the network and Mr van Onselen will be heard by Justice David Hammerschlag.



In the controversial article, Mr van Onselen primarily took aim at Paramount's falling share price, which plummeted from over $97 two years ago to less than $15 today.

He also criticised the company's diminishing market share in Australia, noting that its flagship 5 5 pm news program attracted a measly 6 per cent of the national TV audience this month.

One rival TV executive reportedly told van Onselen that it was the worst result he had seen in his ‘30 years in the business’.


network2.jpg
The former host wrote a scathing piece against his previous employer. Credit: brotiN biswaS/Pexels

Mr van Onselen, who was the former host of the show Sunday Project in 2020, stated: ‘When CBS (now Paramount) took the little Aussie battler, I assumed its future was bright. But the latest news coming out of the US is reason to doubt its long-term viability.’

Mr van Onselen went on to say his ex-employer had been ‘outgunned and outrated by channels 7 and 9 and had ‘squandered’ its chance to be a major network.

‘Supported by a massive US media player – now rebranded Paramount – was a distinct advantage the other Aussie networks don't have. It was one of the reasons I accepted the job as 10's Political Editor,’ he said.



To add insult to injury, several high-profile TV veterans have allegedly turned down offers to replace the outspoken ex-Project host.

It has been rumoured that Channel 10 is currently in talks with a newspaper reporter to take the job, but if those negotiations fall through, an internal appointment may be made instead.

Mr van Onselen also said the slump had ‘set in’ and deepened despite having Sandra ‘Australia’s number one female news anchor’ Sully, at the wheel.

‘The network's ratings have slowly ebbed lower and lower, elongating the divide between it and its more successful commercial rivals in Australia,’ he stated.

Meanwhile, Channel 10 has defended itself against Mr van Onselen's allegations, noting that it recorded a $324 million profit in the 2021 financial year.

A spokesperson also stated that the network had seen strong year-on-year growth across key demographics, ratings, and commercial share, demonstrating an ‘excellent’ trajectory toward the first half of 2023.



‘Our share is up 0.6 points in total people this year and 1.5 points in 25-54s.10 Play is also having its biggest year ever, with minutes viewed up 23 per cent year-on-year, and Paramount+ is Australia's fastest-growing streaming service,’ they claimed.

Network 10 is dominating the key advertising demographics this year with six of the top 10 programs in 25s to 54s and under 50s, and seven of the top 10 programs in 16 to 39s with our tentpole entertainment shows,’ they continued.
Key Takeaways
  • Network Ten is suing former political editor Peter van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract and for making disparaging comments about the company in a column.
  • Mr van Onselen criticised his former employer for its poor performance, including low ratings and share price woes.
  • Network Ten's parent company, Paramount, is facing falling share prices and financial struggles, with its flagship news show earning only 6 per cent of the TV audience this month.
  • Mr van Onselen's departure from 10 has left an empty political editor spot, with the network approaching several potential candidates with no success as yet.
What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you agree with Mr van Onselen? Share your opinions in the comments!
 
Sponsored
News of legal action against popular Network Ten personality Peter van Onselen sent shockwaves through the media industry this week after the ex-Project host made some less-than-kind remarks about his former employer.

But what lay behind the frosty move? What had provoked Channel 10 to take out an injunction in the NSW Supreme Court against its former political editor?



It all began when Mr van Onselen wrote a scathing article for The Australian on May 29th, criticising Channel 10’s parent company, Paramount, for its falling share price and under-performing streaming service.

Mr van Onselen, who resigned from his role as Canberra-based political editor in March, branded his former employer as ‘the minnow of Australian commercial television’ and called the situation a ‘disaster’.


View attachment 21483
Channel 10 has launched legal action against Mr van Onselen. Credit: John-Mark Smith/Pexels

In response, Channel 10 has launched legal action against van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract. The network is seeking an injunction from the NSW Supreme Court. It is also understood that Channel 10 will allege that Mr van Onselen's comments contravened a non-disparagement clause in his exit deal.

The case between the network and Mr van Onselen will be heard by Justice David Hammerschlag.



In the controversial article, Mr van Onselen primarily took aim at Paramount's falling share price, which plummeted from over $97 two years ago to less than $15 today.

He also criticised the company's diminishing market share in Australia, noting that its flagship 5 5 pm news program attracted a measly 6 per cent of the national TV audience this month.

One rival TV executive reportedly told van Onselen that it was the worst result he had seen in his ‘30 years in the business’.


View attachment 21484
The former host wrote a scathing piece against his previous employer. Credit: brotiN biswaS/Pexels

Mr van Onselen, who was the former host of the show Sunday Project in 2020, stated: ‘When CBS (now Paramount) took the little Aussie battler, I assumed its future was bright. But the latest news coming out of the US is reason to doubt its long-term viability.’

Mr van Onselen went on to say his ex-employer had been ‘outgunned and outrated by channels 7 and 9 and had ‘squandered’ its chance to be a major network.

‘Supported by a massive US media player – now rebranded Paramount – was a distinct advantage the other Aussie networks don't have. It was one of the reasons I accepted the job as 10's Political Editor,’ he said.



To add insult to injury, several high-profile TV veterans have allegedly turned down offers to replace the outspoken ex-Project host.

It has been rumoured that Channel 10 is currently in talks with a newspaper reporter to take the job, but if those negotiations fall through, an internal appointment may be made instead.

Mr van Onselen also said the slump had ‘set in’ and deepened despite having Sandra ‘Australia’s number one female news anchor’ Sully, at the wheel.

‘The network's ratings have slowly ebbed lower and lower, elongating the divide between it and its more successful commercial rivals in Australia,’ he stated.

Meanwhile, Channel 10 has defended itself against Mr van Onselen's allegations, noting that it recorded a $324 million profit in the 2021 financial year.

A spokesperson also stated that the network had seen strong year-on-year growth across key demographics, ratings, and commercial share, demonstrating an ‘excellent’ trajectory toward the first half of 2023.



‘Our share is up 0.6 points in total people this year and 1.5 points in 25-54s.10 Play is also having its biggest year ever, with minutes viewed up 23 per cent year-on-year, and Paramount+ is Australia's fastest-growing streaming service,’ they claimed.

Network 10 is dominating the key advertising demographics this year with six of the top 10 programs in 25s to 54s and under 50s, and seven of the top 10 programs in 16 to 39s with our tentpole entertainment shows,’ they continued.
Key Takeaways

  • Network Ten is suing former political editor Peter van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract and for making disparaging comments about the company in a column.
  • Mr van Onselen criticised his former employer for its poor performance, including low ratings and share price woes.
  • Network Ten's parent company, Paramount, is facing falling share prices and financial struggles, with its flagship news show earning only 6 per cent of the TV audience this month.
  • Mr van Onselen's departure from 10 has left an empty political editor spot, with the network approaching several potential candidates with no success as yet.
What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you agree with Mr van Onselen? Share your opinions in the comments!
Channel 10, I thought thought that this excuse for a TV Channel had disappeared years ago. Just maybe if senior management got rid of some of their alleged stars and employed some real down to earth talent that might become relevant again.
 
News of legal action against popular Network Ten personality Peter van Onselen sent shockwaves through the media industry this week after the ex-Project host made some less-than-kind remarks about his former employer.

But what lay behind the frosty move? What had provoked Channel 10 to take out an injunction in the NSW Supreme Court against its former political editor?



It all began when Mr van Onselen wrote a scathing article for The Australian on May 29th, criticising Channel 10’s parent company, Paramount, for its falling share price and under-performing streaming service.

Mr van Onselen, who resigned from his role as Canberra-based political editor in March, branded his former employer as ‘the minnow of Australian commercial television’ and called the situation a ‘disaster’.


View attachment 21483
Channel 10 has launched legal action against Mr van Onselen. Credit: John-Mark Smith/Pexels

In response, Channel 10 has launched legal action against van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract. The network is seeking an injunction from the NSW Supreme Court. It is also understood that Channel 10 will allege that Mr van Onselen's comments contravened a non-disparagement clause in his exit deal.

The case between the network and Mr van Onselen will be heard by Justice David Hammerschlag.



In the controversial article, Mr van Onselen primarily took aim at Paramount's falling share price, which plummeted from over $97 two years ago to less than $15 today.

He also criticised the company's diminishing market share in Australia, noting that its flagship 5 5 pm news program attracted a measly 6 per cent of the national TV audience this month.

One rival TV executive reportedly told van Onselen that it was the worst result he had seen in his ‘30 years in the business’.


View attachment 21484
The former host wrote a scathing piece against his previous employer. Credit: brotiN biswaS/Pexels

Mr van Onselen, who was the former host of the show Sunday Project in 2020, stated: ‘When CBS (now Paramount) took the little Aussie battler, I assumed its future was bright. But the latest news coming out of the US is reason to doubt its long-term viability.’

Mr van Onselen went on to say his ex-employer had been ‘outgunned and outrated by channels 7 and 9 and had ‘squandered’ its chance to be a major network.

‘Supported by a massive US media player – now rebranded Paramount – was a distinct advantage the other Aussie networks don't have. It was one of the reasons I accepted the job as 10's Political Editor,’ he said.



To add insult to injury, several high-profile TV veterans have allegedly turned down offers to replace the outspoken ex-Project host.

It has been rumoured that Channel 10 is currently in talks with a newspaper reporter to take the job, but if those negotiations fall through, an internal appointment may be made instead.

Mr van Onselen also said the slump had ‘set in’ and deepened despite having Sandra ‘Australia’s number one female news anchor’ Sully, at the wheel.

‘The network's ratings have slowly ebbed lower and lower, elongating the divide between it and its more successful commercial rivals in Australia,’ he stated.

Meanwhile, Channel 10 has defended itself against Mr van Onselen's allegations, noting that it recorded a $324 million profit in the 2021 financial year.

A spokesperson also stated that the network had seen strong year-on-year growth across key demographics, ratings, and commercial share, demonstrating an ‘excellent’ trajectory toward the first half of 2023.



‘Our share is up 0.6 points in total people this year and 1.5 points in 25-54s.10 Play is also having its biggest year ever, with minutes viewed up 23 per cent year-on-year, and Paramount+ is Australia's fastest-growing streaming service,’ they claimed.

Network 10 is dominating the key advertising demographics this year with six of the top 10 programs in 25s to 54s and under 50s, and seven of the top 10 programs in 16 to 39s with our tentpole entertainment shows,’ they continued.
Key Takeaways

  • Network Ten is suing former political editor Peter van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract and for making disparaging comments about the company in a column.
  • Mr van Onselen criticised his former employer for its poor performance, including low ratings and share price woes.
  • Network Ten's parent company, Paramount, is facing falling share prices and financial struggles, with its flagship news show earning only 6 per cent of the TV audience this month.
  • Mr van Onselen's departure from 10 has left an empty political editor spot, with the network approaching several potential candidates with no success as yet.
What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you agree with Mr van Onselen? Share your opinions in the comments!
I have to say I have never gravated to this person. In other words I do not like him. The fallen on his own sword would be appropriate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricci and Bridgit
Almost everything on every free to air channel is a repeat, not just once but numerous times and every program is one third adds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melnugro
News of legal action against popular Network Ten personality Peter van Onselen sent shockwaves through the media industry this week after the ex-Project host made some less-than-kind remarks about his former employer.

But what lay behind the frosty move? What had provoked Channel 10 to take out an injunction in the NSW Supreme Court against its former political editor?



It all began when Mr van Onselen wrote a scathing article for The Australian on May 29th, criticising Channel 10’s parent company, Paramount, for its falling share price and under-performing streaming service.

Mr van Onselen, who resigned from his role as Canberra-based political editor in March, branded his former employer as ‘the minnow of Australian commercial television’ and called the situation a ‘disaster’.


View attachment 21483
Channel 10 has launched legal action against Mr van Onselen. Credit: John-Mark Smith/Pexels

In response, Channel 10 has launched legal action against van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract. The network is seeking an injunction from the NSW Supreme Court. It is also understood that Channel 10 will allege that Mr van Onselen's comments contravened a non-disparagement clause in his exit deal.

The case between the network and Mr van Onselen will be heard by Justice David Hammerschlag.



In the controversial article, Mr van Onselen primarily took aim at Paramount's falling share price, which plummeted from over $97 two years ago to less than $15 today.

He also criticised the company's diminishing market share in Australia, noting that its flagship 5 5 pm news program attracted a measly 6 per cent of the national TV audience this month.

One rival TV executive reportedly told van Onselen that it was the worst result he had seen in his ‘30 years in the business’.


View attachment 21484
The former host wrote a scathing piece against his previous employer. Credit: brotiN biswaS/Pexels

Mr van Onselen, who was the former host of the show Sunday Project in 2020, stated: ‘When CBS (now Paramount) took the little Aussie battler, I assumed its future was bright. But the latest news coming out of the US is reason to doubt its long-term viability.’

Mr van Onselen went on to say his ex-employer had been ‘outgunned and outrated by channels 7 and 9 and had ‘squandered’ its chance to be a major network.

‘Supported by a massive US media player – now rebranded Paramount – was a distinct advantage the other Aussie networks don't have. It was one of the reasons I accepted the job as 10's Political Editor,’ he said.



To add insult to injury, several high-profile TV veterans have allegedly turned down offers to replace the outspoken ex-Project host.

It has been rumoured that Channel 10 is currently in talks with a newspaper reporter to take the job, but if those negotiations fall through, an internal appointment may be made instead.

Mr van Onselen also said the slump had ‘set in’ and deepened despite having Sandra ‘Australia’s number one female news anchor’ Sully, at the wheel.

‘The network's ratings have slowly ebbed lower and lower, elongating the divide between it and its more successful commercial rivals in Australia,’ he stated.

Meanwhile, Channel 10 has defended itself against Mr van Onselen's allegations, noting that it recorded a $324 million profit in the 2021 financial year.

A spokesperson also stated that the network had seen strong year-on-year growth across key demographics, ratings, and commercial share, demonstrating an ‘excellent’ trajectory toward the first half of 2023.



‘Our share is up 0.6 points in total people this year and 1.5 points in 25-54s.10 Play is also having its biggest year ever, with minutes viewed up 23 per cent year-on-year, and Paramount+ is Australia's fastest-growing streaming service,’ they claimed.

Network 10 is dominating the key advertising demographics this year with six of the top 10 programs in 25s to 54s and under 50s, and seven of the top 10 programs in 16 to 39s with our tentpole entertainment shows,’ they continued.
Key Takeaways

  • Network Ten is suing former political editor Peter van Onselen for an alleged breach of contract and for making disparaging comments about the company in a column.
  • Mr van Onselen criticised his former employer for its poor performance, including low ratings and share price woes.
  • Network Ten's parent company, Paramount, is facing falling share prices and financial struggles, with its flagship news show earning only 6 per cent of the TV audience this month.
  • Mr van Onselen's departure from 10 has left an empty political editor spot, with the network approaching several potential candidates with no success as yet.
What are your thoughts on this story, members? Do you agree with Mr van Onselen? Share your opinions in the comments!
Well I will gell you my thoughts about the falling of viewers in Channel 10.

As they say ""go WOKE go BROKE"", and channell 10 is another typical example of that.

CBS an American channell took it over and guess what .... what amount of audience does CBS have in the USA.??

When does medai outlets learn that indpendent views by it's reporters and news channel have to be Indpendent and not pushing their own personal ideologies onto their audience.??

I REST MY CASE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Macarj
We don't bother with the repeats, they are all the same. If just one of them had a good idea and stuck to it maybe people would bother to come back to watching TV.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×