As Australia prepares to welcome King Charles for his inaugural visit as the head of state, the nation finds itself at a crossroads, with debates intensifying over its future relationship with the British monarchy.

The arrival of Charles and Queen Camilla, scheduled for the 18th of October with stops in Sydney and Canberra, has reignited discussions about republicanism and the monarchy's role in modern Australia.


The Australian Republic Movement (ARM), a group advocating for an Australian head of state, has been particularly vocal.

They made headlines this week when a letter from King Charles to the ARM was made public.

In this correspondence, the King expressed that he would not obstruct Australia's path to becoming a republic if the nation chose to do so.


This exchange began with a letter from the ARM in December 2023, which requested a meeting with King Charles during his visit to discuss Australia's future and asked for public support should Australians express a desire to transition to a republic.

In March, the King's assistant private secretary, Nathan Ross, responded on his behalf.

‘The King appreciated that you took the time to write and asked me to reply on his behalf,’ Ross wrote.

‘Please be assured that your views on this matter have been carefully noted.


His Majesty, as a constitutional Monarch, acts on the advice of his Ministers, and whether Australia becomes a republic is, therefore, a matter for the Australian public to decide.’

Australia's relationship with the monarchy has been debated for decades.

A referendum in 1999 saw a majority of Australians vote against becoming a republic, but the conversation has only partially dissipated.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has been a proponent of republicanism, even appointing an assistant minister for the republic upon taking office in 2022.

However, the urgency for a second referendum has waned, with the assistant ministry being abolished in July.

Nathan Hansford, co-chair of ARM, expressed the group's desire for a respectful dialogue about Australia's future as the King visits.

He cited research suggesting that while a small percentage of Australians are staunch monarchists, a significant majority would prefer an Australian head of state, and many are unaware that Charles is the current head of state.

Philip Benwell, national chair of the Australian Monarchist League, countered by praising the stability and security provided by the current constitutional arrangement.

‘Our constitution provides stability and security,’ he said.

‘There’s never been a major crisis with our constitution since 1901 [when Australia federated]…That’s what we are campaigning against, not for the sake of the King or, earlier, the Queen, but because we believe our constitution best protects our democracy in this country because it blocks politicians from total and absolute power.’


As the debate rages on, Australians are left to ponder their national identity and governance.

The ARM hopes that the royal visit will spark a broader conversation about whether the concept of a hereditary head of state aligns with Australia's values in 2024, considering its rich Indigenous history and diverse, multicultural society.

‘The King cannot officially meet with me, just as he cannot officially meet with the Republicans, because [the republic question] is an ongoing issue in this country.’ the ARM exclaimed.

‘He’s here to meet the people, not to become involved in political issues. He’s above that as king.’
Will his visit be a mere ceremonial affair, or will it become a catalyst for change? What are your thoughts on this royal visit and the republic debate? Feel free to share your thoughts and opinions in the comments below.