Judge orders National Australia Bank to pay $2.1 million fine after overcharging customers

Financial institutions play an important role in our lives.

So, when we hear stories of banks allegedly taking unfair advantage of their customers, it's hard not to feel a bit betrayed—which is exactly what many had been feeling when they heard about the National Australia Bank (NAB) being fined $2.1 million for wrongfully overcharging its customers for over 18 months.


Between January 2017 and July 2018, NAB wrongfully charged $139,845 of periodic payment fees on 74,593 occasions to 2,888 personal and 513 business banking customers.

The amount of money that was actually overcharged dates back to 2007, but according to Federal Court Justice Roger Derrington, it was only in late 2016 that the bank became aware of the charges.


139808866_92e05831ee_c.jpg
National Australia Bank (NAB) was fined $2.1 million for wrongfully overcharging its customers over 18 months. Credit: Wil/Flickr


Justice Derrington noted that NAB ‘unjustifiably advanced its self-interest’ by still charging its ‘oblivious’ customers after the discovery.


Last Friday, he wrote in an order: ‘It deliberately and cynically took advantage of its customers’ unawareness and was prepared to allow the overcharging to continue whilst it searched, admittedly in good faith, but without any great diligence, for a solution.’

So why were the customers charged? The problem reportedly stemmed from human error when NAB staff set up automated payments.

Between July 20, 2007, and February 22, 2019, the bank’s terms and conditions stated that $1.80 would be charged for periodic payments to other accounts with NAB and $5.30 for periodic payments to accounts with another bank.

They also mentioned certain transactions were exempted from these charges.


However, the bank charged customers periodic payments entitled to exemptions; for some, the incorrect amount was charged (some customers paid $5.30 when the correct fee was $1.80).

Despite the bank setting up internal investigations into the issue, Justice Derrington noted that they did not ‘remedy the system’s dysfunctionality, short of shutting it down altogether’.

It was reported that NAB did so in July 2018 and stopped charging periodic payment fees altogether on February 22, 2019.

Justice Derrington believed that imposing a penalty of $2.1 million (the maximum possible) was ‘woefully inadequate’ for the bank’s ‘unconscionable conduct’ and doubted it would significantly impact their conduct in the future.


‘In a context where NAB has been a repeat offender against the financial services legislation in this country and, as this case and others reveal, it appears to place a low priority on respecting the legal rights of its customers, a penalty several times the statutory maximum would have been far more appropriate,’ he explained.

Apart from the penalty, NAB was required to publish a notice on its website and pay the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) legal costs.

The ASIC Chair, Sarah Court, said, ‘It took NAB over two years to stop charging these incorrect fees, which was clearly unacceptable.’

‘If systems have let customers down, we expect all financial institutions, especially our banks, to act quickly to reduce consumer harm,’ she added.


ASIC claimed that the bank was liable for each incorrect fee, and the maximum penalty could have reached $130 billion, but Justice Derrington found them only responsible for one violation.

It was understood that NAB had paid more than $8 million to affected customers who incurred incorrect payment fees.

They also apologised for the issue: ‘We have completed a remediation program to set things right and repaid more than $8.3 million of fees plus interest to affected customers.’

Key Takeaways
  • National Australia Bank (NAB) has been fined $2.1 million for 'unconscionable conduct' against its customers, involving wrongful overcharging on over 74,000 occasions.
  • The Federal Court found that the bank had wrongfully charged $139,845 of periodic payment fees between January 2017 and July 2018, affecting thousands of personal and business banking customers.
  • Despite internal investigations, NAB did not correct the issue until July 2018 and ceased charging all periodic payment fees in February 2019.
  • The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's Chair, Sarah Court, stressed that financial institutions must act quickly to reduce consumer harm and resolve issues promptly.

What do you think of this story, members? Have you, or anyone you know, been charged wrongfully by a bank? Share your experience in the comments below!
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Tipsy

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
I do not feel our governments are really that interested in resolving issues and passing laws to protect us. Big business comes first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leenie
Bankers are bastards; beware. First law of suurviving in the modern jungle. They used to be called money-lenders and usurers; not much has changed since those days except the scale of the rorts.
 
Financial institutions play an important role in our lives.

So, when we hear stories of banks allegedly taking unfair advantage of their customers, it's hard not to feel a bit betrayed—which is exactly what many had been feeling when they heard about the National Australia Bank (NAB) being fined $2.1 million for wrongfully overcharging its customers for over 18 months.


Between January 2017 and July 2018, NAB wrongfully charged $139,845 of periodic payment fees on 74,593 occasions to 2,888 personal and 513 business banking customers.

The amount of money that was actually overcharged dates back to 2007, but according to Federal Court Justice Roger Derrington, it was only in late 2016 that the bank became aware of the charges.


View attachment 30708
National Australia Bank (NAB) was fined $2.1 million for wrongfully overcharging its customers over 18 months. Credit: Wil/Flickr


Justice Derrington noted that NAB ‘unjustifiably advanced its self-interest’ by still charging its ‘oblivious’ customers after the discovery.


Last Friday, he wrote in an order: ‘It deliberately and cynically took advantage of its customers’ unawareness and was prepared to allow the overcharging to continue whilst it searched, admittedly in good faith, but without any great diligence, for a solution.’

So why were the customers charged? The problem reportedly stemmed from human error when NAB staff set up automated payments.

Between July 20, 2007, and February 22, 2019, the bank’s terms and conditions stated that $1.80 would be charged for periodic payments to other accounts with NAB and $5.30 for periodic payments to accounts with another bank.

They also mentioned certain transactions were exempted from these charges.


However, the bank charged customers periodic payments entitled to exemptions; for some, the incorrect amount was charged (some customers paid $5.30 when the correct fee was $1.80).

Despite the bank setting up internal investigations into the issue, Justice Derrington noted that they did not ‘remedy the system’s dysfunctionality, short of shutting it down altogether’.

It was reported that NAB did so in July 2018 and stopped charging periodic payment fees altogether on February 22, 2019.

Justice Derrington believed that imposing a penalty of $2.1 million (the maximum possible) was ‘woefully inadequate’ for the bank’s ‘unconscionable conduct’ and doubted it would significantly impact their conduct in the future.


‘In a context where NAB has been a repeat offender against the financial services legislation in this country and, as this case and others reveal, it appears to place a low priority on respecting the legal rights of its customers, a penalty several times the statutory maximum would have been far more appropriate,’ he explained.

Apart from the penalty, NAB was required to publish a notice on its website and pay the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) legal costs.

The ASIC Chair, Sarah Court, said, ‘It took NAB over two years to stop charging these incorrect fees, which was clearly unacceptable.’

‘If systems have let customers down, we expect all financial institutions, especially our banks, to act quickly to reduce consumer harm,’ she added.


ASIC claimed that the bank was liable for each incorrect fee, and the maximum penalty could have reached $130 billion, but Justice Derrington found them only responsible for one violation.

It was understood that NAB had paid more than $8 million to affected customers who incurred incorrect payment fees.

They also apologised for the issue: ‘We have completed a remediation program to set things right and repaid more than $8.3 million of fees plus interest to affected customers.’

Key Takeaways

  • National Australia Bank (NAB) has been fined $2.1 million for 'unconscionable conduct' against its customers, involving wrongful overcharging on over 74,000 occasions.
  • The Federal Court found that the bank had wrongfully charged $139,845 of periodic payment fees between January 2017 and July 2018, affecting thousands of personal and business banking customers.
  • Despite internal investigations, NAB did not correct the issue until July 2018 and ceased charging all periodic payment fees in February 2019.
  • The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's Chair, Sarah Court, stressed that financial institutions must act quickly to reduce consumer harm and resolve issues promptly.

What do you think of this story, members? Have you, or anyone you know, been charged wrongfully by a bank? Share your experience in the comments below!
They are Banks are they not.? They are all tarred with the same brush.
Greedy as and they will never stop and will soon come up with aother idea to fleece some more customers.
 
Financial institutions play an important role in our lives.

So, when we hear stories of banks allegedly taking unfair advantage of their customers, it's hard not to feel a bit betrayed—which is exactly what many had been feeling when they heard about the National Australia Bank (NAB) being fined $2.1 million for wrongfully overcharging its customers for over 18 months.


Between January 2017 and July 2018, NAB wrongfully charged $139,845 of periodic payment fees on 74,593 occasions to 2,888 personal and 513 business banking customers.

The amount of money that was actually overcharged dates back to 2007, but according to Federal Court Justice Roger Derrington, it was only in late 2016 that the bank became aware of the charges.


View attachment 30708
National Australia Bank (NAB) was fined $2.1 million for wrongfully overcharging its customers over 18 months. Credit: Wil/Flickr


Justice Derrington noted that NAB ‘unjustifiably advanced its self-interest’ by still charging its ‘oblivious’ customers after the discovery.


Last Friday, he wrote in an order: ‘It deliberately and cynically took advantage of its customers’ unawareness and was prepared to allow the overcharging to continue whilst it searched, admittedly in good faith, but without any great diligence, for a solution.’

So why were the customers charged? The problem reportedly stemmed from human error when NAB staff set up automated payments.

Between July 20, 2007, and February 22, 2019, the bank’s terms and conditions stated that $1.80 would be charged for periodic payments to other accounts with NAB and $5.30 for periodic payments to accounts with another bank.

They also mentioned certain transactions were exempted from these charges.


However, the bank charged customers periodic payments entitled to exemptions; for some, the incorrect amount was charged (some customers paid $5.30 when the correct fee was $1.80).

Despite the bank setting up internal investigations into the issue, Justice Derrington noted that they did not ‘remedy the system’s dysfunctionality, short of shutting it down altogether’.

It was reported that NAB did so in July 2018 and stopped charging periodic payment fees altogether on February 22, 2019.

Justice Derrington believed that imposing a penalty of $2.1 million (the maximum possible) was ‘woefully inadequate’ for the bank’s ‘unconscionable conduct’ and doubted it would significantly impact their conduct in the future.


‘In a context where NAB has been a repeat offender against the financial services legislation in this country and, as this case and others reveal, it appears to place a low priority on respecting the legal rights of its customers, a penalty several times the statutory maximum would have been far more appropriate,’ he explained.

Apart from the penalty, NAB was required to publish a notice on its website and pay the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) legal costs.

The ASIC Chair, Sarah Court, said, ‘It took NAB over two years to stop charging these incorrect fees, which was clearly unacceptable.’

‘If systems have let customers down, we expect all financial institutions, especially our banks, to act quickly to reduce consumer harm,’ she added.


ASIC claimed that the bank was liable for each incorrect fee, and the maximum penalty could have reached $130 billion, but Justice Derrington found them only responsible for one violation.

It was understood that NAB had paid more than $8 million to affected customers who incurred incorrect payment fees.

They also apologised for the issue: ‘We have completed a remediation program to set things right and repaid more than $8.3 million of fees plus interest to affected customers.’

Key Takeaways

  • National Australia Bank (NAB) has been fined $2.1 million for 'unconscionable conduct' against its customers, involving wrongful overcharging on over 74,000 occasions.
  • The Federal Court found that the bank had wrongfully charged $139,845 of periodic payment fees between January 2017 and July 2018, affecting thousands of personal and business banking customers.
  • Despite internal investigations, NAB did not correct the issue until July 2018 and ceased charging all periodic payment fees in February 2019.
  • The Australian Securities and Investments Commission's Chair, Sarah Court, stressed that financial institutions must act quickly to reduce consumer harm and resolve issues promptly.

What do you think of this story, members? Have you, or anyone you know, been charged wrongfully by a bank? Share your experience in the comments below!
I will never ever trust the big 4 bunch of thieving money laundering criminals... They have been doing this sort of things for decades and they also bribe the politicians all the bloody time
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×