The debate over appropriate swimwear has made waves at the Blue Mountains Leisure Centres (BMLC), where a recent reinforcement of a ban on G-string bikinis and thongs has left the community divided. The BMLC, operated by the Blue Mountains City Council, has caused quite the splash with its decision to clarify what it deems 'recognised swimwear' at its facilities, including Katoomba Sports and Aquatic Centre, Springwood Aquatic and Fitness Centre, Blackheath Pool, and Glenbrook Swim Centre.



The council's terms of entry clearly state that patrons must shower before entering the pool and that 'recognised swimwear must be worn'. However, the definition of 'recognised swimwear' has been the subject of heated debate. The terms explicitly exclude G-strings, stating, 'Recognised swimwear does not include G-strings.' This clarification came after confusion arose from a sign at the centres that prohibited 'revealing swimwear/thongs', prompting the council to take to social media to explain that the sign referred to G-string and thong bottoms, not bikini tops and bottoms, which remain acceptable attire.


The enforcement of this policy has stirred a range of reactions among locals. Some see the ban as an unnecessary imposition on personal freedom and fashion. They argue that individuals should focus on their own activities at the pool rather than policing the attire of others. 'Shouldn't people go to the pool to SWIM and not to worry about what other people are wearing,' one local questioned, reflecting a sentiment that swimwear choices should be a matter of personal preference.



Others have taken a more philosophical stance, suggesting that the responsibility should lie with those who take issue with the swimwear, not those who wear it. 'Young people will wear what's fashionable and these are what are fashionable. If you don't like it, don't look,' another local commented, highlighting the generational divide that often accompanies such debates.

However, there are those who support the council's stance, citing concerns about the presence of children and the need for a family-friendly environment. Some parents and guardians feel that certain styles of swimwear are not appropriate for a public setting where children are present. 'There are so many kids who innocently swim and enjoy, only to see many sets of butt cheeks walking by which I actually find ridiculous,' a supporter of the ban expressed, voicing a desire to maintain a certain level of modesty at public pools.

Despite the uproar, a spokesperson for the Blue Mountains City Council has stated that there has been 'no change' to the council's policy regarding swimwear, suggesting that the ban on G-strings has been a long-standing rule that is only now being strictly enforced.



The controversy raises broader questions about societal norms, body positivity, and the balance between individual rights and community standards. It also touches on the evolving nature of fashion and how public institutions respond to these changes.
As we dive into this topic, we invite our readers to reflect on their own experiences and opinions. Have you encountered similar swimwear regulations at your local pools? Do you believe that public swimming facilities have the right to enforce dress codes, or should individuals have the freedom to wear what they please? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below, and let's navigate these waters together.