Driver slams 'outrageous' $385 fine for seatbelt issue

In a world where technology is increasingly relied upon to enforce the law, it's not uncommon for mistakes to be made.

This was the unfortunate reality for a Victorian driver who was slapped with a hefty $385 fine and three demerit points for what was claimed to be a seatbelt offence.

However, the driver is adamant that the camera's photos, which led to the fine, prove her passenger was wearing the seatbelt all along.



The incident occurred on January 5, when the woman was driving along the Princes Highway in Nar Nar Goon, in Victoria's Gippsland region.

Her mother was in the front passenger seat, and her daughter was in the back.


SDC 6.png
A woman was slapped with a hefty $385 fine for a seatbelt issue. Image source: rawpixel.com on Freepik.


They were on their way to Melbourne Airport for a holiday to Bali.

Upon returning from their trip, the driver was shocked to find she'd been fined for a seatbelt offence.



She believes the angle of the camera made it appear as though her mother wasn't wearing a seatbelt.

'We believe the images show that the seatbelt is being used,' she said.

'Mum is 73-years-old and always wears one. I'll be appealing the fine.'

In the photos taken by the seatbelt detection camera, the seatbelt is seen extended from its socket, above the passenger's left shoulder.

The driver argues that this could only mean her mother was indeed wearing the seatbelt, and it may have been obscured by her hands.



The front window's frame also blocked the view of her mother's left side when the photo was taken, making it difficult to see the seatbelt across her torso. Interestingly, her mother was not fined.

This isn't the first time a seatbelt-related fine has caused controversy.

Last September, a Gold Coast mother was fined $1,161 because her chest caused a twist in her seatbelt while driving.

The infringement notice stated she had been fined for not wearing a seatbelt properly adjusted or fastened while riding in the passenger seat.

'I had the belt on properly over the shoulder, across the chest and buckled in,' she explained.

'My boob got in the way and caused what looks like a slight twist. I really can't believe I received the fine for something I feel I have no control over.'



In similar news, a woman emerged victorious after an 18-month court battle over an 'unfair' $413 seatbelt fine.

The long-time Gold Coast resident found the penalty unfair and claimed it was impossible to constantly monitor her daughter’s seatbelt position while driving.

According to the infringement notice from the Queensland Department for Transport and Main Roads, the fine was issued for 'driving with unrestrained front seat passenger' as the seatbelt strap was placed under her daughter’s arm instead of over her shoulder as required, while she sat in the front passenger seat.

The woman admitted the seatbelt was placed in the wrong position, but called the fine as 'revenue raising'.

You can read more about the story here.
Key Takeaways
  • A Victorian driver was fined $385 and received three demerit points for allegedly not having her passenger properly restrained with a seatbelt, which she disputes.
  • The incident was captured by a seatbelt detection camera, but the driver insists the photographs show her 73-year-old mother was wearing a seatbelt.
  • The driver, who was photographed along the Princes Highway, plans to appeal the fine, arguing that the camera angle may have obscured the view of the seatbelt.
  • Another motorist, a Gold Coast mother, was also fined $413 and three demerit points for her daughter wearing her seatbelt incorrectly 18 months ago.
  • The mum found the penalty unfair and claimed it was impossible to constantly monitor the 14-year-old's seatbelt position while driving.
What are your thoughts on this issue, members? Have you ever experienced a similar situation? Share your stories in the comments below.
 
Sponsored
So sad, too bad! Make sure kiddo knows the importance of wearing the seatbelt correctly - it might save her life!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chrissyfs
All these cameras cannot accurately shoot a photo of every car as it passes so they will get bad photos which the police use to raise more revenue. The same applies when a policeman can say I saw you using your phone but has no proof of the offence. This is also revenue raising. And before you all have a go at me, I do understand the need to not use your phone & to wear your seatbelt at all times, the proof of the offence is very slim.
 
Cameras do get it wrong from time to time. I remember a few years back my husband got a fine for speeding from a speed camera. The thing was he had worked a night shift and at the time of the infringement he was tucked up in bed and the car was tucked up in the garage! Plus it was absolutely no where near home or his work. I rang up to sort it out and they said for a fee they could supply a photo. I said I don’t need a photo I was here at home while he was in bed at the time of the photo. They didn’t sound to convinced but canceled the fine.
 
All these cameras cannot accurately shoot a photo of every car as it passes so they will get bad photos which the police use to raise more revenue. The same applies when a policeman can say I saw you using your phone but has no proof of the offence. This is also revenue raising. And before you all have a go at me, I do understand the need to not use your phone & to wear your seatbelt at all times, the proof of the offence is very slim.
It is and was designed to catch those idiots using their phone whilst driving. The same applies to playing with your radio, reading the paper or book. People have even been caught having their breakfast whilst driving. Surely the roads are bad enough without added distractions? I agree that speeding tickets and tolls are revenue raising to a huge degree. The difference in the National Road toll today and 20 years ago is enormous. Our annual toll is probably equivalent to NSW alone 20+ years ago. Considering the population explosion everywhere and the increased numbers of shocking drivers I'd say it's pretty damn good.
 
Cameras do get it wrong from time to time. I remember a few years back my husband got a fine for speeding from a speed camera. The thing was he had worked a night shift and at the time of the infringement he was tucked up in bed and the car was tucked up in the garage! Plus it was absolutely no where near home or his work. I rang up to sort it out and they said for a fee they could supply a photo. I said I don’t need a photo I was here at home while he was in bed at the time of the photo. They didn’t sound to convinced but canceled the fine.
I received a fine once and like Colette, was nowhere near the event.
The fine was in Victoria and I live in Newcastle, and could prove where I was.
Crazy part of this story was that I had reported my front number plate stolen around a month before. Duuuuh.
Took ages to sort it out, but eventually, someone bothered to check on the report.
One department won't talk to another. Grrrr
 
Haven't all cars got a seatbelt light on the dashboard that only goes off when all seatbelts are done up?
 
I received a fine once and like Colette, was nowhere near the event.
The fine was in Victoria and I live in Newcastle, and could prove where I was.
Crazy part of this story was that I had reported my front number plate stolen around a month before. Duuuuh.
Took ages to sort it out, but eventually, someone bothered to check on the report.
One department won't talk to another. Grrrr
You’re quite right @MariaG that departments, even in the same building, don’t communicate with one another. Then they resort to finger pointing, or just ignore the issue altogether.
 
The fact I can remember when we had freedom of choice suggests I getting old but I do object to having cameras intruding on my privacy while in my car or any other place, the Authorities are acting as rulers not administrators
 
The fact I can remember when we had freedom of choice suggests I getting old but I do object to having cameras intruding on my privacy while in my car or any other place, the Authorities are acting as rulers not administrators
That's why we have a Police FORCE and a Roads and Traffic AUTHORITY. Coercion and control under the guise of a Government service.

YOU MUST COMPLY....
 
  • Like
Reactions: DLHM
One minute Police Force not doing enough, next minute they do too much. Freedom/anarchy does not work, because it requires all to think alike and have the same morals - and who is right/wrong?

If cameras save one person who chooses to not wear a seat belt, talk or text while driving, have children unrestrained in proper car seating, recklessly driving, how can this be a bad thing? Spare a thought for the humans (Police, Paramedics, Firies, Medical staff) who have to deal with the outcomes of personal choices.
Nobody cares about what you are doing - unless you are doing the wrong thing!
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else

Latest Articles

  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×