Critics blast the Duke and Duchess of Sussex for their appearances amid ongoing crisis

In the world of celebrities and philanthropy, the line between genuine charity and public relations could sometimes become blurred.

One celebrity echoed this sentiment as she took to social media to voice her scepticism over Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's recent public appearance.


Amid the ongoing Los Angeles fires, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex visited the Pasadena Convention Centre and mingled with fellow wildfire evacuees.

The couple, along with other volunteers, offered support to victims and handed out food parcels to everyone affected.

Footage of the couple in the charitable act showed the pair in casual attire in the middle of the activities.

Additional footage also showed the couple talking with Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo.


compressed-Duke and Duchess of Sussex.jpeg
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were seen mingling with evacuees and local officials. Image Credit: YouTube/FOX 11 Los Angeles


In the midst of the crisis, Meghan Markle announced the postponement of her new Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, initially set to release on 15 January.

The Duchess stated that the focus should be on the needs of impacted residents.

The show, which reportedly includes tributes to Meghan's home state of California, has been rescheduled for 4 March.

While some saw these as signs of goodwill, others had a different perspective about the Duke and Duchess' actions.


Family Ties star Justine Bateman criticised the Sussexes for what she perceived as a calculated 'photo op'.

Bateman took to social media to air her concerns about their sudden appearance amid relief operations.

'Are they politicians now? They don't live here,' Bateman wrote in a post.

'They are tourists. Disaster Tourists,' she added, expressing her distaste for the couple's involvement.

Despite Bateman's harsh words, local officials praised Harry and Meghan for their contributions during the efforts.


Pasadena Mayor Victor Gordo described Harry and Meghan as 'great people' with 'great personalities' who genuinely wanted to be supportive.

'They really buoyed the spirits of the first responders. We visited the command post at the Rose Bowl, and people were very happy to see them,' Mayor Gordo shared.

Despite the possibility of being affected by the fires, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex offered more assistance beyond their public appearance.

They opened the doors of their Montecito mansion to friends and loved ones who were forced to evacuate.

Their efforts to provide aid and comfort received praise from community members, including World Central Kitchen Founder José Andrés.


However, there were still several controversies and speculations about the Sussexes’ actions.

A news anchor from FOX Los Angeles faced criticism for referring to Meghan as 'Princess Markle'.

Some also deemed the anchor's comments about Meghan 'hanging out with the commoners' insensitive.

The debate over the Sussexes' intentions highlighted the complexities of celebrity involvement in charitable causes.

While some view their actions as a heartfelt attempt to help those in need, others remain sceptical of the motivations behind public displays of support.

Always remember that the impact of charity should be measured by the aid and comfort it can provide to those in need rather than the publicity it could generate.

We send our sympathies and support to those affected by the Los Angeles wildfires.
Key Takeaways

  • Family Ties star Justine Bateman criticised Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for appearing at an evacuation centre and called them 'disaster tourists'.
  • Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were at the Pasadena Convention Centre, mingling with volunteers and the city mayor. They also offered support to the first respondents and victims of the Los Angeles wildfires.
  • Meghan Markle postponed the release of her new Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, in light of the ongoing crisis.
  • A FOX Los Angeles broadcaster also received criticism for calling Meghan Markle a different title during their visit.
What do you think of the Duke and Duchess' recent appearance? Do you believe that celebrities can engage in charity work without underlying motives, or is there always an element of self-promotion? We invite you to share your thoughts on this topic in the comments section below.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
Damned if they do and damned if they dont, they are contributing in the only way that they can, by being there to offer help and support, some people just cannot accept that they may mean well and it is not always about publicity for them.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×