Changes are coming for Australia’s aged care system. Here’s what we know so far


file-20240205-27-cpme8v.jpg

Centre for Ageing Better/Unsplash



Australia’s subsidised aged care services now help around 1.5 million older people to receive care and support. Taxpayers contributed A$28 billion to the various programs in 2022-23. And yet the system is governed by an act that was first passed in 1997.

A lot has changed over the past two and a half decades – more people are living longer with chronic conditions and impairments that necessitate care, more of that care helps people stay in their own home, older people have more choice and control, and quality and safety are subject to tighter regulation and improved enforcement.



These and many other reforms are welcome. But as a result, the 1997 Aged Care Act has become a patchwork of change upon change. So when is the new act due, and what does it aim to achieve?

What we know so far​


Following the report of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, the government is rewriting the act with a view to it commencing on July 1 2024 – less than five months from now.

Parts of an initial draft of the act have been released for public consultation. The proposed act adopts a rights-based approach to caring for older Australians, and consolidates and simplifies multiple pieces of existing legislation.



Some of the improvements will include:

  • establishing a complaints commissioner to increase the independence and transparency of investigating aged care complaints
  • increasing whistleblower protections so older people, their families and aged care workers feel comfortable about exposing unacceptable treatment from a provider
  • streamlining access to aged care through a single-assessment process, rather than older people having to be assessed by different organisations depending on their particular care needs.
But several significant issues have yet to be addressed. The partial draft of the act lacks any provision relating to the proposed fees, payments and subsidies, or about how people with different needs will be prioritised and how aged care places will be allocated to them.



The act also makes many references to the government making rules about how the aged care system will actually operate. As always, the devil is in the detail but the rules have not yet been made public.

The new act also attempts to address the fundamental concern that Australia’s Constitution doesn’t provide the federal government with powers to make laws specifically for “aged care”. This is unlike the government’s powers over banking, marriage, the age pension and many other matters.

Instead, the act attempts to patch together a range of other powers, such as for providing sickness and hospital benefits and making binding international treaties (including disability support) under its external affairs powers.

It is unclear whether this approach will make the system too complex, compared with seeking agreement from the states to refer their powers to the federal government, or to enact a common set of laws on which both levels of government agree.



Federal Parliament will have the final say on what the act will contain and when it is passed.

file-20240205-16-sbts2w.jpg
Some 1.5 million older Australians receive aged care, whether in their own home or in an aged care facility. Matteo Vistocco/Unsplash​

How does this fit with other recent changes?​


The new act aims to provide an enduring structure that brings the current aged care system, including recent reforms, into a single consistent regulatory regime.

The newly introduced residential care workforce standards, for instance, will be carried over to the new act. They include the requirement for 24/7 cover by registered nurses so nurses are always available to care for a resident when needed, at any time of the day or night.



The new levels of care minutes that nurses and other personal care workers must provide to residents will also be part of the new act.

The act will also include the Star Ratings for individual aged care homes. These help inform residents about the quality of the care their homes provide.

Will this be it for a while?​


The recent changes to aged care are not the end of the decade-long reform journey.

In the immediate future there will be changes to payment arrangements for care as the government responds to the – yet to be released – report of the Aged Care Task Force.



Following that, a new Support at Home program is being designed to consolidate and streamline the current home care packages, short-term restorative care and respite care. Having already been deferred twice in recent years, the current proposed start date is July 1 2025.

file-20240205-25-fvw0hy.jpg
Home support programs will be consolidated into one. Vladimir Soares/Unsplash​
The drafting of a modern, simplified act is an important opportunity to provide the best legislative regime for caring for older Australians.

But such an opportunity comes only once every decade or two. While the new legislation needs to put older people at its centre, it must also facilitate a system that is sustainable and sufficiently robust to support them to access subsidised care when they need it.

The broad framework is there, but there are less than five months to get the details right.



This article was first published on The Conversation, and was written by , Michael Woods, Professor of Health Economics, University of Technology Sydney, Eugenia Tsihlis, Senior Research Assistant Law Health Justice, University of Technology Sydney

 
Sponsored
I won't have that problem..... when I'm ready for an old age home I have made arrangements for voluntary euthanasia and my remains to be given to science.
The cost of a funeral is exorbitant.....haven't found a place that will get rid of the body for under $6,000... the cost of a Dr signing a mere death certificate alone is over $900.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gsr
There needs to be a standard in place that covers the cost of food. The amount given per resident should be the same in every facility. Contractors should not be allowed to take the amount given and then make a profit of it, thus denying the residents essential meal items.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gsr and IAN3005
There needs to be a standard in place that covers the cost of food. The amount given per resident should be the same in every facility. Contractors should not be allowed to take the amount given and then make a profit of it, thus denying the residents essential meal items.
EVERYONE IS IN IT FOR THE $$$$$$
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gsr
Well I recently heard that one of the aged care facilities near where I live, which has been a high care facility for as long as I have lived in this town, has now decided to re classify itself as low care. The reason being so they don’t need to employ a registered nurse on every shift. I don’t know how they have been allowed to do this, surely there must be a governing body who would have to approve it. A friend of mine had her mother in this facility and they told her they were no longer high care, this friends mother had high care needs, but most of the time there were only AINs working there, supervised by 1 EN. This is totally unacceptable and there should be laws preventing it. This also means the families of people in this facility have to pay for everything that the government usually pays for, for use of high care clients. Items like incontinence aids, soaps, shampoos, body creams, most personal care items. So much for the recommendations from the aged care inquiry.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Shane O'Neill
Well the investigation was over a while ago so why wasn't the Liberal government implemented change?probably looking after the private sector ,so it's up to the Labor government to do that well in time ⏲ watch the Liberal government dismantle the guts off this legislation like they always do hopefully the Labor government inact a lot off the commissions recommendations unlike the Liberals did with the banking Royal Commission recommendations and we see how the banks can run rampant
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAN3005
Well the investigation was over a while ago so why wasn't the Liberal government implemented change?probably looking after the private sector ,so it's up to the Labor government to do that well in time ⏲ watch the Liberal government dismantle the guts off this legislation like they always do hopefully the Labor government inact a lot off the commissions recommendations unlike the Liberals did with the banking Royal Commission recommendations and we see how the banks can run rampant
you do not leave anyone in doubt of your political stance. time for a change.
 
Having seen the additional money available to pensioners. EG subsidised home delivered food , sanitary products and cleaners. There should be support for self funded retirees who rely on their spouse to take care of them. No EN at every home
 
Well the investigation was over a while ago so why wasn't the Liberal government implemented change?probably looking after the private sector ,so it's up to the Labor government to do that well in time ⏲ watch the Liberal government dismantle the guts off this legislation like they always do hopefully the Labor government inact a lot off the commissions recommendations unlike the Liberals did with the banking Royal Commission recommendations and we see how the banks can run rampant
The government is culpable... Royal commissions are a waste of tax-payers money.... nothing gets done about it..... by the time they come up with the findings it has all been blown away and forgotten....
 
The government is culpable... Royal commissions are a waste of tax-payers money.... nothing gets done about it..... by the time they come up with the findings it has all been blown away and forgotten....
Totally agree with you. All the enquiries in the world will not change the fact that decent aged care costs money. Don't our older citizens deserve a good life where their care needs are provided without them being made to feel like they are a financial burden. Other countries and cultures respect and treasure their elders. Australia you can do better.
 

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×