‘Call me stupid': Nat Barr's fiery retort on Sunrise
- Replies 34
Today, we're putting on our current affairs hats to bring you a scoop from the popular morning news program Sunrise.
If you spent yesterday morning away from the telly, let's fill you in on the recent heated debate that unfolded live on-air.
On Monday morning, what would have usually been a casual news day took a rather intense turn.
Nat Barr found herself in a verbal skirmish with Barnaby Joyce.
The point of contention? The controversial and highly criticised 'Robodebt' scheme. But first, let's provide some quick context for those who might not entirely recall the details of the infamous 'Robodebt' fiasco.
It was a governmental system that wrongfully claimed that thousands of Australians owed money to Centrelink, which led to unfair penalties, causing emotional distress and, tragically, even suicides.
As the scandal unfolded, it raised severe questions about governmental responsibility, leading to public outrage, protests, and demands for justice and adequate compensation.
Back to the Sunrise spat, Mr Joyce seemed to ruffle some feathers with his allegations regarding the previous government's handling of the scheme.
He claimed that the government discontinued the 'Robodebt' scheme the moment it was found illegal.
He said, ‘People have to know—as soon as we knew it was illegal, we stopped the scheme, the Coalition stopped the scheme. But that is not good enough.’
Ms Barr, pulling no punches, wasted no time challenging Mr Joyce's narrative head-on, quoting the royal commissioner's findings contradicting his claim.
‘Actually, not what the royal commissioner says. She said that you pressed on even though the legal advice was unlawful and doubled down.’ Barr said.
What followed was a heated exchange.
Barr continued her interrogation, digging into ex-Prime Minister Scott Morrison's role in the 'Robodebt' scandal. As Morrison was the social services minister who brought the proposal for the scheme to cabinet, his association and accountability came under harsh scrutiny.
‘We are hearing this morning that Liberal MPs want Scott Morrison out over his role in this. Do you?’ Barr asked.
Joyce, seemingly attempting to dodge the bullet, veered the conversation away from Morrison's political future.
But Barr rechallenged him, ‘But the question was, do you think Scott Morrison should go, Barnaby?’
Joyce went on to say, ‘Look, I don’t like telling other politicians to leave politics; that’s their decision. They will make that decision, and when they decide to make it, they make it.’
As the argument reached its peak, Barr, with an intense piece of candid rhetoric, challenged Joyce with, 'Amanda, call me stupid, but isn’t this a “der” moment before you put something in a budget? Shouldn’t it be lawful?'
In response, the minister acknowledged that the previous government made significant mistakes in their approach.
The dust may have settled since this live on-air spat, but it left the audience with quite a heated discussion. And it wasn't just the television viewers who were enthralled.
The incident sparked a flurry of comments on social media, from viewers praising Barr's direct approach and forthright questions to critics questioning Joyce's defensive stance.
Members, what are your thoughts on the fiery on-air exchange between Nat Barr and Barnaby Joyce regarding the 'Robodebt' scheme?
Do you believe debates on live television help shed light on important issues and hold politicians accountable? Share your opinions with us.
If you spent yesterday morning away from the telly, let's fill you in on the recent heated debate that unfolded live on-air.
On Monday morning, what would have usually been a casual news day took a rather intense turn.
Nat Barr found herself in a verbal skirmish with Barnaby Joyce.
Holding politicians accountable is crucial for ensuring transparency, maintaining trust in governance, and driving positive change for society. Source: Sunrise
The point of contention? The controversial and highly criticised 'Robodebt' scheme. But first, let's provide some quick context for those who might not entirely recall the details of the infamous 'Robodebt' fiasco.
It was a governmental system that wrongfully claimed that thousands of Australians owed money to Centrelink, which led to unfair penalties, causing emotional distress and, tragically, even suicides.
As the scandal unfolded, it raised severe questions about governmental responsibility, leading to public outrage, protests, and demands for justice and adequate compensation.
Back to the Sunrise spat, Mr Joyce seemed to ruffle some feathers with his allegations regarding the previous government's handling of the scheme.
He claimed that the government discontinued the 'Robodebt' scheme the moment it was found illegal.
He said, ‘People have to know—as soon as we knew it was illegal, we stopped the scheme, the Coalition stopped the scheme. But that is not good enough.’
Ms Barr, pulling no punches, wasted no time challenging Mr Joyce's narrative head-on, quoting the royal commissioner's findings contradicting his claim.
Nat Barr's direct approach and incisive questioning during the Sunrise interview demonstrate the importance of journalists asking the right questions to shed light on critical issues and hold public figures accountable. Source: Channel 7
‘Actually, not what the royal commissioner says. She said that you pressed on even though the legal advice was unlawful and doubled down.’ Barr said.
What followed was a heated exchange.
Barr continued her interrogation, digging into ex-Prime Minister Scott Morrison's role in the 'Robodebt' scandal. As Morrison was the social services minister who brought the proposal for the scheme to cabinet, his association and accountability came under harsh scrutiny.
‘We are hearing this morning that Liberal MPs want Scott Morrison out over his role in this. Do you?’ Barr asked.
Joyce, seemingly attempting to dodge the bullet, veered the conversation away from Morrison's political future.
But Barr rechallenged him, ‘But the question was, do you think Scott Morrison should go, Barnaby?’
Joyce went on to say, ‘Look, I don’t like telling other politicians to leave politics; that’s their decision. They will make that decision, and when they decide to make it, they make it.’
As the argument reached its peak, Barr, with an intense piece of candid rhetoric, challenged Joyce with, 'Amanda, call me stupid, but isn’t this a “der” moment before you put something in a budget? Shouldn’t it be lawful?'
In response, the minister acknowledged that the previous government made significant mistakes in their approach.
The dust may have settled since this live on-air spat, but it left the audience with quite a heated discussion. And it wasn't just the television viewers who were enthralled.
The incident sparked a flurry of comments on social media, from viewers praising Barr's direct approach and forthright questions to critics questioning Joyce's defensive stance.
Members, what are your thoughts on the fiery on-air exchange between Nat Barr and Barnaby Joyce regarding the 'Robodebt' scheme?
Do you believe debates on live television help shed light on important issues and hold politicians accountable? Share your opinions with us.
Last edited:
.png){kind=icon}
