Search results

Not a money grab but a way of stopping these morons from destroying the neighbourhood peace and quiet. It is definitely not a new rule. It was certainly around, and policed, in the 1950/60s. I was one who paid the penalty.

This is not a new rule. Being fined for operating as noisy vehicle in the 1950/60s was quite a regular occurrence. I copped a hefty fine in 1958 for a noisy motor bike. The fine was in excess of my average weekly pay. The noisy exhaust rule has always been there, just hasn't been policed.

Perhaps they only employ there fellow countrymen because there is a certain percentage of "Aussies" who have no interest in gainful employment. You are a disgrace for you racist remarks.

I would pay the amount shown on the invoice and nothing more. This reinforces my decision to have nothing to do with Telstra. And they said Ned Kelly was a thief!

This is not a little known rule. I was made aware of it when obtaining my license in 1956. The horn is a warning device not a social tool.

They deserve every bit of that fine. Not only is it illegal to wear a seat belt in that way but it would be bloody uncomfortable as well. Idiots.

Just what is this woman spending money on, alcohol and cigarettes? Although just 2 of us we manage quite well on less than $50,000 and are even able to travel overseas every 5/6 years.

The regulation states that no vehicles on wheels permitted. Wonder if that would still apply if the wheels were removed and the bus placed on blocks.

Just one question. If he did not intend to use the phone why was it on his lap?

Cochineal has been around for as long as I can remember and I am 83. Hasn't harmed me. Is it not better to consume this product than numerous other products that have been proven to be detrimental to our health.