Changes are coming for residential aged care. Here’s what to know

The way Australians pay for residential aged care, or nursing homes, is changing from November 1.

Payment arrangements will be grouped into four main areas:

There will be no changes for residents who are living in aged care homes on October 31.


1.PNG
adamkaz/Getty Images


In addition, new residents who are assessed as having low financial means will not be affected. These are typically full pensioners without major assets who have an income of less than A$34,762 (for a single pensioner, slightly less if one of a couple) and assets of less than $63,000. The government will cover the full costs of their care.

All low-means residents will continue to pay a basic daily fee to contribute to their everyday living expenses. This is calculated as 85% of the basic single age pension, which is $65.55 at the current pension rate. The government also pays providers an extra Hotelling Supplement to top up their funding.

Clinical care will be fully subsidised for all

tc2.PNG
Residents won’t have to pay for clinical care, such as physiotherapy, no matter their income or assets. Alvaro Gonzalez/Getty Images

The government will fully fund all clinical care costs for all residents in aged care homes from November 1.

Who will have to pay for non-clinical and everyday living?

New means tested fees will be payable as a contribution to the costs of non-clinical care and everyday living for new residents who have higher means.


The government has published the Schedule of Fees and Charges that will apply from November 1 as well as a Fee Estimator. The following provides a simplified guide to these fees:


TC3.PNG
The Conversation, CC BY-SA


For those who can afford to contribute, payments for help with non-clinical care will be means tested and capped at $105.30 per day, with a lifetime cap of $135,318.69 (or after four years, whichever is reached first). Fees paid under the Support at Home program will be counted toward the cap.

All residents receive a wide range of everyday living services and, as now, will continue to pay a basic daily fee to contribute to their cost.

However, the fee does not meet the full costs of these services. From November 1, new residents with significant means will contribute to some or all of the cost of the top-up Hotelling Supplement, up to a maximum of $22.15 per day.

Some providers also offer extra or higher quality services and can set their prices which will become Higher Everyday Living Fees from November 1. These services are optional and payment of this fee cannot be made a condition of entry to an aged care home.


How is accommodation funding changing and who is affected?

The government will continue to pay the accommodation costs of all current and future low means residents by way of an accommodation supplement. Currently about 19% of residents are fully supported in this way.

A further 19% of residents are partially supported through government funding and pay their contribution through a refundable lump sum or an ongoing rental payment, or a combination. The contributions are capped and can’t exceed the value of the government’s accommodation supplement.

The remaining approximately 62% of residents are non-supported. They pay a set room price agreed with the provider, again by refundable lump sum and/or paying rent.

From November 1, providers will be able to deduct 2% of the balance of a resident’s lump sum each year for the first five years of residence or until the resident leaves, if earlier than five years.

If a non-supported resident (not eligible for government funding) is making rental payments, this amount will be indexed twice each year.

The government has a description of these funding changes here.


Why is aged care changing again?

The aged care system faces several long-term challenges. The demand for aged care continues to rise as the population ages, and the standards of care need to keep improving.

At the same time, nearly half of aged care homes operate at a loss, particularly in their delivery of everyday living services and accommodation. Homes making ongoing losses are at greater risk of closing, meaning less places available for older people in need of care in their local area.

The government has responded to a range of recommendations in recent reports on how to raise the quality and financial viability of aged care by rewriting the Aged Care Act.

Starting on November 1, the new Act aims to strengthens the rights of older people to receive high quality care and recognises the need to increase the funding of everyday living and accommodation services.

Increased funding will help support quality providers to be viable, build more homes and attract more skilled workers through higher wages and better conditions.

This additional funding should be shared equitably between taxpayers and older people who have significant income and assets, while ensuring those with low means receive the services they need.

Will there be further changes?

The changes to accommodation funding will not solve all of its issues, with the government announcing a further pricing review.

The review is exploring how to ensure older people with low means have access to high-quality aged care homes, while enabling providers to invest in the additional supply of quality accommodation needed to meet rising demand.

The findings will be publicly reported by July 2026 and may prompt further changes to accommodation payments.

This article is originally posted in The Conversation. You may read the original article here.
 

Seniors Discount Club

Sponsored content

Info
Loading data . . .
I tried to read the article and realised, the residential aged care payment system is extremely complicated! )
 
Leave the elderly alone. They have worked and paid their taxes throughout and now there are more changes ahead. It seems we are penalised for growing older 🥺
 
It seems that current residents will not be affected by these changes and those on a low income will not be affected either. However if you have other assests or income the costs will go up to cover the costs of less wealthy residents.Thes costs are based on funding to private aged care facilities, which means that they will want to make a profit.
I cannot understand why aged care facitlties are not owned by our Government; Government run and supervised, surely it would be more cost effective and much more transparent.
By the way, I think this article is complicated and confusing, to navigate, the consumer would need an experienced advocate to advise and support potential clients.
 
Last edited:
I am totally confused. I assume others are smarter than myself and fully understand :)
 
It seems that current residents with not be affected by these changes and those on a low income will not be affected either. However if you have other assests or income the costs will go up to cover the costs of less wealthy residents.Thes costs are based on funding to private aged care facilities, which means that they will want to make a profit.
I cannot understand why aged care facitlties are not owned by our Government; Government run and supervised, surely it would be more cost effective and much more transparent.
By the way, I think this article is complicated and confusing, to navigate it, the consumer would need an experienced advocate to advise and support potential clients.
Of course it is complcated, it is from the government!!! Designed so that you thtow your arms up in the air in disguest and requext euthrnasia to save the government a load of money!!!!
 
I am totally confused. I assume others are smarter than myself and fully understand :)
It is very confusing and written in way that is unclear, I must be dumb but it is certainly bamboozling , I think we would need somebody who understands it to explain in clear language.
 
I will continue to live on my isolated property by myself and totally ignore the entire system,
and enjoy the solitude, and the beautiful bush and wild life.
 
It is very confusing and written in way that is unclear, I must be dumb but it is certainly bamboozling , I think we would need somebody who understands it to explain in clear language.
You’re not dumb at all. The way it’s written has succeeded in having us feel we can’t understand. That’s often deliberate to conceal “loopholes”.
 
I will continue to live on my isolated property by myself and totally ignore the entire system,
and enjoy the solitude, and the beautiful bush and wild life.
Sounds idyllic, but the isolation could be a problem for many of us.
 
I will continue to live on my isolated property by myself and totally ignore the entire system,
and enjoy the solitude, and the beautiful bush and wild life.
I’m on my way pop the kettle on love 🤣
 
You’re not dumb at all. The way it’s written has succeeded in having us feel we can’t understand. That’s often deliberate to conceal “loopholes”.
Yes I agree, the language and the hidden information is raising red flags!!
 
If you can afford it, you pay a fair share; if you can’t, the government has you covered. That is my take-away, anyway.
"From 1 Nov 2025, a person entering aged care will have their care and accommodation contributions means-tested based on both income and assets.
The family home is either exempt or only counted up to a capped amount, so it doesn’t usually disqualify someone from low-means status.
Pensioners with little super or investment income are typically fully supported by government (other than the basic daily fee).
Those with higher super balances or investment income will pay more — particularly for non-clinical care and accommodation.
 
Received the new changes on friday fro my mums age care provider. I am brilliant with figures but find what they have stated very confusing. I am going to have to ask someone to go through what mum gets what she will be charged for etc. so I know she is not been ripped off. It is now done quarterly not monthly??
 
Yes Im not sure of the new system, but cant see it being any value in costs to the individual.

Does this mean no more bonds???

Government used to run nursing homes, eg Mt Henry and Sunset in Perth WA, but ran at a loss, so govertment privitised aged care.

Currently the pension pays for basic needs- electricity food, water and care staff.

The bond is invested and makes investment profit for the private company over the time the person is in care, less a fee on departure......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54 and Ezzy
If you can afford it, you pay a fair share; if you can’t, the government has you covered. That is my take-away, anyway.
"From 1 Nov 2025, a person entering aged care will have their care and accommodation contributions means-tested based on both income and assets.
The family home is either exempt or only counted up to a capped amount, so it doesn’t usually disqualify someone from low-means status.
Pensioners with little super or investment income are typically fully supported by government (other than the basic daily fee).
Those with higher super balances or investment income will pay more — particularly for non-clinical care and accommodation.
Well said!
 
If you can afford it, you pay a fair share; if you can’t, the government has you covered. That is my take-away, anyway.
"From 1 Nov 2025, a person entering aged care will have their care and accommodation contributions means-tested based on both income and assets.
The family home is either exempt or only counted up to a capped amount, so it doesn’t usually disqualify someone from low-means status.
Pensioners with little super or investment income are typically fully supported by government (other than the basic daily fee).
Those with higher super balances or investment income will pay more — particularly for non-clinical care and accommodation.
You make a lot more sense than whoever did the write-up from “The Conversation”.
Thanks Knell. 👍🏻
 
Was the whole notification from the Government written by a Solicitor to confuse us & would take a Solicitor to fully explain this to those of us who are not competent in this jargon?
 
It’s taken from health.gov.au if you press on the blue writing you’ll get more info. 🌞
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sherril54 and DLHM
It seems that current residents will not be affected by these changes and those on a low income will not be affected either. However if you have other assests or income the costs will go up to cover the costs of less wealthy residents.Thes costs are based on funding to private aged care facilities, which means that they will want to make a profit.
I cannot understand why aged care facitlties are not owned by our Government; Government run and supervised, surely it would be more cost effective and much more transparent.
By the way, I think this article is complicated and confusing, to navigate, the consumer would need an experienced advocate to advise and support potential clients.
unfortunately advocates are not that good (I tried 3 and got 3 different results) and they aren't cheap to consult
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sherril54 and DLHM

Join the conversation

News, deals, games, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.

Seniors Discount Club

The SDC searches for the best deals, discounts, and bargains for Aussies over 60. From everyday expenses like groceries and eating out, to electronics, fashion and travel, the club is all about helping you make your money go further.
  1. New members
  2. Jokes & fun
  3. Photography
  4. Nostalgia / Yesterday's Australia
  5. Food and Lifestyle
  6. Money Saving Hacks
  7. Offtopic / Everything else
  • We believe that retirement should be a time to relax and enjoy life, not worry about money. That's why we're here to help our members make the most of their retirement years. If you're over 60 and looking for ways to save money, connect with others, and have a laugh, we’d love to have you aboard.
  • Advertise with us

User Menu

Enjoyed Reading our Story?

  • Share this forum to your loved ones.
Change Weather Postcode×
Change Petrol Postcode×